{"id":"CVE-2024-3596","revision":"a1e49b4673a540dd8d1fcabb9abbf51d","records":[{"revision":"a1e49b4673a540dd8d1fcabb9abbf51d","observedAt":"2026-10-23T15:48:27.903+00:00","statement":{"source":"cve-program","id":"CVE-2024-3596","aliases":[],"title":"RADIUS Protocol under RFC2865 is vulnerable to forgery attacks.","description":"RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature.","state":0,"publishedAt":"2024-07-09T12:02:53.001+00:00","modifiedAt":"2026-10-15T00:25:35.013+00:00","affected":[{"ecosystem":"Vendor product","name":"RFC","ranges":[],"versions":[],"rawVersionEvidence":"{\n                    \"vendor\": \"IETF\",\n                    \"product\": \"RFC\",\n                    \"versions\": [\n                        {\n                            \"status\": \"affected\",\n                            \"version\": \"2865\"\n                        }\n                    ]\n                }"}],"metrics":[],"references":["https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc2865","https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-radext-deprecating-radius/","https://networkradius.com/assets/pdf/radius_and_md5_collisions.pdf","https://www.blastradius.fail/","http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/09/4","https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2024-0014","https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-794185.html","https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-723487.html"],"sourceUrl":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-3596","license":"CVE Program Terms of Use","key":"cve-program:CVE-2024-3596","identifiers":["CVE-2024-3596"]},"retained":false,"historicalAffected":[]}],"coverage":[]}