{"id":"CVE-2026-52735","revision":null,"records":[{"revision":"7e64c357b1d848f5838e6fda090bd408","observedAt":"2026-10-23T15:48:27.903+00:00","statement":{"source":"cve-program","id":"CVE-2026-52735","aliases":[],"title":"ZEBRA: Consensus divergence via P2SH sigop undercount in pure-Rust disabled-opcode parser","description":"ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to 4.5.0, Zebra can accept a block that zcashd rejects because the P2SH signature-operation counter undercounts redeem scripts containing a disabled opcode followed by signature opcodes. In zebra-script/src/lib.rs, p2sh_input_sigop_count used the pure-Rust script::Code::sig_op_count path, whose try_fold parser stops at disabled opcodes such as OP_CODESEPARATOR and returns only the partial count accumulated before the error. The zcashd reference implementation continues static signature-operation counting through disabled opcodes, so an attacker can broadcast P2SH spends that Zebra counts below MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS while zcashd counts above the 20,000-operation limit. If a Zebra miner includes those transactions, Zebra validators accept the block while zcashd validators reject it, creating a consensus chain split that affects network integrity and availability without requiring the attacker to produce a block. This issue is fixed in version 4.5.0.","state":0,"publishedAt":"2026-08-18T19:23:10.705+00:00","modifiedAt":"2026-08-18T19:48:45.15+00:00","affected":[{"ecosystem":"Vendor product","name":"zebra","ranges":[],"versions":[],"rawVersionEvidence":"{\n                    \"vendor\": \"ZcashFoundation\",\n                    \"product\": \"zebra\",\n                    \"versions\": [\n                        {\n                            \"version\": \"< 4.5.0\",\n                            \"status\": \"affected\"\n                        }\n                    ]\n                }"}],"metrics":[{"system":"CVSS 4.0","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H","score":9.3,"severity":"CRITICAL"}],"references":["https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/security/advisories/GHSA-gf9r-m956-97qx","https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/commit/1440b43ca7df59aca948090d45117557b217a6cd","https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/releases/tag/v4.5.0"],"sourceUrl":"https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-52735","license":"CVE Program Terms of Use","key":"cve-program:CVE-2026-52735","identifiers":["CVE-2026-52735"]},"retained":false,"historicalAffected":[]},{"revision":"20eee05a12504069a4b988de78461d44","observedAt":"2026-11-07T11:35:37.425+00:00","statement":{"source":"euvd","id":"EUVD-2026-61166","aliases":["CVE-2026-52735","GHSA-gf9r-m956-97qx"],"title":"ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to 4.5.0, Zebra can accept a block that zcashd rejects because the P2SH signature-operation counter undercounts redeem scripts containing a disabled opcode followed by signature opcodes.…","description":"ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to 4.5.0, Zebra can accept a block that zcashd rejects because the P2SH signature-operation counter undercounts redeem scripts containing a disabled opcode followed by signature opcodes. In zebra-script/src/lib.rs, p2sh_input_sigop_count used the pure-Rust script::Code::sig_op_count path, whose try_fold parser stops at disabled opcodes such as OP_CODESEPARATOR and returns only the partial count accumulated before the error. The zcashd reference implementation continues static signature-operation counting through disabled opcodes, so an attacker can broadcast P2SH spends that Zebra counts below MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS while zcashd counts above the 20,000-operation limit. If a Zebra miner includes those transactions, Zebra validators accept the block while zcashd validators reject it, creating a consensus chain split that affects network integrity and availability without requiring the attacker to produce a block. This issue is fixed in version 4.5.0.","state":0,"publishedAt":null,"modifiedAt":null,"affected":[],"metrics":[{"system":"EUVD CVSS 4.0","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H","score":9.3,"severity":null}],"references":["https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/security/advisories/GHSA-gf9r-m956-97qx","https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/commit/1440b43ca7df59aca948090d45117557b217a6cd","https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/releases/tag/v4.5.0"],"sourceUrl":"https://euvd.enisa.europa.eu/vulnerability/EUVD-2026-61166","license":"ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply","enrichment":{"sourceStatus":null,"weaknesses":[],"productCriteria":[],"sourceDates":{"datePublished":"Aug 18, 2026, 7:23:10 PM","dateUpdated":"Aug 18, 2026, 7:48:45 PM"},"relatedAdvisories":[],"note":"EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON."},"key":"euvd:EUVD-2026-61166","identifiers":["EUVD-2026-61166","CVE-2026-52735","GHSA-gf9r-m956-97qx"]},"retained":false,"historicalAffected":[]},{"revision":"166c52f60f4c4b7ea7ee25accc011612","observedAt":"2026-10-25T13:17:10.707+00:00","statement":{"source":"nvd","id":"CVE-2026-52735","aliases":[],"title":"ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to 4.5.0, Zebra can accept a block that zcashd rejects because the P2SH signature-operation counter undercounts redeem scripts containing a disabled opcode followed by signature opcodes.…","description":"ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to 4.5.0, Zebra can accept a block that zcashd rejects because the P2SH signature-operation counter undercounts redeem scripts containing a disabled opcode followed by signature opcodes. In zebra-script/src/lib.rs, p2sh_input_sigop_count used the pure-Rust script::Code::sig_op_count path, whose try_fold parser stops at disabled opcodes such as OP_CODESEPARATOR and returns only the partial count accumulated before the error. The zcashd reference implementation continues static signature-operation counting through disabled opcodes, so an attacker can broadcast P2SH spends that Zebra counts below MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS while zcashd counts above the 20,000-operation limit. If a Zebra miner includes those transactions, Zebra validators accept the block while zcashd validators reject it, creating a consensus chain split that affects network integrity and availability without requiring the attacker to produce a block. This issue is fixed in version 4.5.0.","state":0,"publishedAt":"2026-08-18T20:17:17.227+00:00","modifiedAt":"2026-10-22T22:10:00.25+00:00","affected":[],"metrics":[{"system":"CVSS 4.0 · security-advisories@github.com · Secondary","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X","score":9.3,"severity":"CRITICAL"}],"references":["https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/commit/1440b43ca7df59aca948090d45117557b217a6cd","https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/releases/tag/v4.5.0","https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/security/advisories/GHSA-gf9r-m956-97qx"],"sourceUrl":"https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-52735","license":"NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained","enrichment":{"sourceStatus":"Deferred","weaknesses":["CWE-684"],"productCriteria":[],"sourceDates":{"published":"2026-08-18T20:17:17.227","lastModified":"2026-10-22T22:10:00.250"},"relatedAdvisories":[],"note":"NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON."},"key":"nvd:CVE-2026-52735","identifiers":["CVE-2026-52735"]},"retained":false,"historicalAffected":[]},{"revision":"23742768def540aa999006b5c8e9ded7","observedAt":"2026-10-24T13:19:54.901+00:00","statement":{"source":"osv","id":"GHSA-gf9r-m956-97qx","aliases":["CVE-2026-52735"],"title":"zebrad has consensus divergence via P2SH sigop undercount in pure-Rust disabled-opcode parser","description":"### Am I affected\n\nYou are affected if:\n\n1. You run any version of `zebrad` up to and including `v4.4.1`.\n2. Your node validates blocks on mainnet, testnet, or any network where both Zebra and zcashd nodes participate.\n\nAll default configurations are affected. No feature flags, non-default settings, or special build options are required.\n\n### Summary\n\nZebra's P2SH sigop counter uses a pure-Rust code path that short-circuits on disabled opcodes (such as `OP_CODESEPARATOR`), returning a partial count of zero for any sigops following the disabled opcode. The reference implementation (zcashd) correctly counts through disabled opcodes in its static sigop analysis. This produces a consensus divergence: Zebra accepts blocks that zcashd rejects when the block-wide `MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS = 20,000` threshold is crossed on one side but not the other.\n\nAn attacker can exploit this without mining capability. Broadcasting transactions that spend P2SH outputs with malicious redeem scripts is sufficient; any Zebra miner who includes those transactions in a block triggers a chain split between Zebra and zcashd validators.\n\n### Details\n\nThe P2SH sigop counter at `zebra-script/src/lib.rs:399` calls `script::Code(redeemed_bytes).sig_op_count(true)`, which is a pure-Rust path through `zcash_script-0.4.4`. The legacy (non-P2SH) sigop counter at `lib.rs:282-289` correctly uses the C++ FFI via `interpreter.legacy_sigop_count_script()`. Only the P2SH path bypasses the FFI.\n\nThe Rust parser in `zcash_script-0.4.4/src/opcode/mod.rs:1247-1260` treats 16 disabled opcodes (0x7e through 0xab, including `OP_CAT`, `OP_SUBSTR`, `OP_AND`, `OP_OR`, `OP_XOR`, `OP_2MUL`, `OP_2DIV`, `OP_MUL`, `OP_DIV`, `OP_MOD`, `OP_LSHIFT`, `OP_RSHIFT`, and `OP_CODESEPARATOR`) as `Err(Error::Disabled(...))`. The `sig_op_count` function at `iter.rs:104-115` uses `try_fold`, which terminates on the first `Err` and returns the partial sum accumulated so far.\n\nzcashd's `GetOp2` (`script.h:514-562`) returns `true` for all non-push opcodes including the disabled range. Its `GetSigOpCount(true)` (`script.cpp:152-174`) continues counting through disabled opcodes. zcashd rejects disabled opcodes at execution time in the interpreter, not during static sigop analysis.\n\nA redeem script of `[0xab, OP_CHECKMULTISIG x 50]` produces: Zebra = 0 sigops, zcashd = 1,000 sigops. Across 21 inputs in a block, Zebra computes 0 while zcashd computes 21,000, crossing the `MAX_BLOCK_SIGOPS = 20,000` threshold on one side only.\n\n### Patches\n\nPatched in Zebra 4.4.2. The fix routes the P2SH sigop counter through the same C++ FFI already used by the legacy sigop counter.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nThere is no configuration-level workaround. All Zebra nodes validating blocks on a network shared with zcashd are affected. Upgrade as soon as the patched version is available.\n\n### Impact\n\nA chain split between Zebra and zcashd validators. The attacker broadcasts spending transactions referencing P2SH outputs whose redeem scripts contain a disabled opcode followed by `OP_CHECKSIG` or `OP_CHECKMULTISIG` opcodes. When a Zebra miner (estimated ~30% of current network hashrate) includes these transactions in a block, Zebra validators accept the block while zcashd validators reject it with `bad-blk-sigops`. The two halves of the network diverge and every subsequent block extending the Zebra-side tip inherits the divergence.\n\nThe attacker does not need mining capability, RPC access, or any special privileges. The cost is the transaction fees for the funding and spending transactions.\n\n### Credit\n\nReported by `@samsulselfut` via a private GitHub Security Advisory submission.","state":0,"publishedAt":"2026-07-02T19:43:36+00:00","modifiedAt":"2026-07-02T20:11:29.482145+00:00","affected":[{"ecosystem":"crates.io","name":"zebra-script","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"kind":"introduced","version":"0"},{"kind":"fixed","version":"7.0.0"}]}],"versions":[],"rawVersionEvidence":null},{"ecosystem":"crates.io","name":"zebrad","ranges":[{"type":"SEMVER","events":[{"kind":"introduced","version":"0"},{"kind":"fixed","version":"4.5.0"}]}],"versions":[],"rawVersionEvidence":null}],"metrics":[{"system":"CVSS_V4","vector":"CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H","score":null,"severity":null},{"system":"Publisher rating","vector":null,"score":null,"severity":"CRITICAL"}],"references":["https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/security/advisories/GHSA-gf9r-m956-97qx","https://github.com/AlfredoG87/zcash_script/blob/v0.4.4/src/script/iter.rs#L104-L115","https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra","https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/blob/d4cd662c716382f6397d2a730148025a1ca79fec/zebra-consensus/src/block.rs#L140","https://github.com/ZcashFoundation/zebra/blob/d4cd662c716382f6397d2a730148025a1ca79fec/zebra-script/src/lib.rs#L383-L400"],"sourceUrl":"https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-gf9r-m956-97qx","license":"GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0","key":"osv:GHSA-gf9r-m956-97qx","identifiers":["GHSA-gf9r-m956-97qx","CVE-2026-52735"]},"retained":false,"historicalAffected":[]}],"coverage":[{"source":"cisa-kev:global","scope":"Complete CISA KEV catalog; all vendors. Missing entries do not establish absence of exploitation.","generation":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.8743578+00:00","complete":true,"records":1769,"lastAttemptAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.8743578+00:00","lastSuccessAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:41.0239033+00:00","error":null,"lastVerifiedAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:41.0239043+00:00","snapshotPublishedAt":null,"importing":false,"stagedRecords":0,"checkedIdentifiers":null,"expectedIdentifiers":null,"failedIdentifiers":null},{"source":"cve-program","scope":"Official CVE Program baseline and cumulative hourly delta; all vendors, published and rejected records","generation":"cve-eaa64dac63caa79c8d4905619258c41c51b39e461b996124e1a21b5e85e7e738-83dbcd705162368a7389ef21c7d5877b90bc9ecd8679671f4b5e02683a8e1d4f","complete":true,"records":421074,"lastAttemptAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.5628876+00:00","lastSuccessAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.5495855+00:00","error":null,"lastVerifiedAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.5628876+00:00","snapshotPublishedAt":"2026-11-08T05:23:47+00:00","importing":false,"stagedRecords":0,"checkedIdentifiers":null,"expectedIdentifiers":null,"failedIdentifiers":null},{"source":"euvd","scope":"Rolling EUVD lookups of CVE aliases in current public OSV archives; 500 identifiers per refresh, rechecked after 48 hours. Not a global EUVD catalog. Successful not-found lookups count as checked; they do not imply withdrawal or safety. No reader inventory is sent.","generation":"enrichment-ce0df89a405747cda5b7c61ae0b48fb2","complete":true,"records":13633,"lastAttemptAt":"2026-11-08T06:07:06.8623217+00:00","lastSuccessAt":"2026-11-08T05:08:40.263+00:00","error":null,"lastVerifiedAt":"2026-11-08T05:08:40.263+00:00","snapshotPublishedAt":null,"importing":false,"stagedRecords":0,"checkedIdentifiers":13685,"expectedIdentifiers":13685,"failedIdentifiers":0},{"source":"first-epss:nuget","scope":"FIRST EPSS for explicit CVE aliases in the collected public NuGet archive. Not a global EPSS backfill.","generation":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.8743578+00:00","complete":true,"records":1096,"lastAttemptAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.8743578+00:00","lastSuccessAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:41.0246874+00:00","error":null,"lastVerifiedAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:41.0246876+00:00","snapshotPublishedAt":null,"importing":false,"stagedRecords":0,"checkedIdentifiers":null,"expectedIdentifiers":null,"failedIdentifiers":null},{"source":"nvd","scope":"Rolling NVD lookups of CVE aliases in current public OSV archives; 500 identifiers per refresh, rechecked after 48 hours. Not a global NVD catalog. Successful not-found lookups count as checked; they do not imply withdrawal or safety. No reader inventory is sent.","generation":"enrichment-f61a222d691b4992bb1403f1a88575db","complete":true,"records":13645,"lastAttemptAt":"2026-11-08T06:07:06.2347163+00:00","lastSuccessAt":"2026-11-08T06:07:06.231+00:00","error":null,"lastVerifiedAt":"2026-11-08T06:07:06.231+00:00","snapshotPublishedAt":null,"importing":false,"stagedRecords":0,"checkedIdentifiers":13685,"expectedIdentifiers":13685,"failedIdentifiers":0},{"source":"osv:Go","scope":"Complete OSV Go ecosystem archive, including withdrawn and malicious-package source records; statement counts are not unique CVE counts","generation":"go-0eb4d6dde62dffacd040ad992d4fd5a65cd7d0dc5f5f4cfa8b41967fc6f9ca5f","complete":true,"records":9914,"lastAttemptAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.830411+00:00","lastSuccessAt":"2026-11-06T20:10:36.6450506+00:00","error":null,"lastVerifiedAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.830411+00:00","snapshotPublishedAt":"2026-11-06T20:02:57+00:00","importing":false,"stagedRecords":0,"checkedIdentifiers":null,"expectedIdentifiers":null,"failedIdentifiers":null},{"source":"osv:NuGet","scope":"Complete OSV NuGet ecosystem archive, including GitHub Advisory Database records; NuGet version matching only","generation":"nuget-fde804134ecdda0ddd5ff5c26ee1fff5a6fa659311f7ef2e51c6ad54964db0e2","complete":true,"records":1971,"lastAttemptAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.6194681+00:00","lastSuccessAt":"2026-11-06T19:03:17.0399903+00:00","error":null,"lastVerifiedAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.6194681+00:00","snapshotPublishedAt":"2026-11-06T18:17:57+00:00","importing":false,"stagedRecords":0,"checkedIdentifiers":null,"expectedIdentifiers":null,"failedIdentifiers":null},{"source":"osv:crates.io","scope":"Complete OSV crates.io ecosystem archive, including withdrawn and malicious-package source records; statement counts are not unique CVE counts","generation":"crates.io-335633e78a15c9cde10a6025895b5617717087fb945489ae7e15d377bacf34a9","complete":true,"records":3055,"lastAttemptAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.8424247+00:00","lastSuccessAt":"2026-11-06T16:03:00.7615789+00:00","error":null,"lastVerifiedAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.8424247+00:00","snapshotPublishedAt":"2026-11-06T16:02:48+00:00","importing":false,"stagedRecords":0,"checkedIdentifiers":null,"expectedIdentifiers":null,"failedIdentifiers":null},{"source":"osv:npm","scope":"Complete OSV npm ecosystem archive, including withdrawn and malicious-package source records; statement counts are not unique CVE counts","generation":"npm-40ad6183a951565ace1520a9b4d631e1d0bfb1d4bf7c5574c375032559f3ff53","complete":true,"records":231292,"lastAttemptAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.7260451+00:00","lastSuccessAt":"2026-11-07T10:29:00.4821259+00:00","error":null,"lastVerifiedAt":"2026-11-08T06:06:40.7260451+00:00","snapshotPublishedAt":"2026-11-07T09:32:47+00:00","importing":false,"stagedRecords":0,"checkedIdentifiers":null,"expectedIdentifiers":null,"failedIdentifiers":null}]}