Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Some sources or documents need attention: 275/275 feeds/APIs · 469/469 docs · 9/9 advisories · checked 10:47 UTC Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

MessagePack: Nested arrays can blow past buffer length limits

Collected exploitation and prediction evidence

Risk source coverage

CISA KEV is observed exploitation evidence. FIRST EPSS is a dated prediction of exploitation in the next 30 days. Missing scores are unknown. This collector requests predictions only for explicit CVE aliases in the public NuGet archive; Microsoft release views retain their existing prediction scope.

CVE-2026-92707

Exact risk observation. Current source statements above are a separate evidence layer. Latest risk evidence.

No KEV entry is attached to this observation; this is not evidence that exploitation is absent.

FIRST EPSS: 0.68 % · percentile 52.37 % · scored 3 Nov 2026. Retained older prediction.

Observed 03 Nov 2026 16:59:18 UTC · Complete immutable risk JSON

cve-program · CVE-2026-92707

Published

MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.303 and 3.1.9, deserializing attacker-controlled MessagePack data as System.Object through PrimitiveObjectFormatter can cause excessive memory allocation. The formatter allocates an object[] from each declared array length before the configured object-graph depth limit rejects the input, while nested array headers can reuse the same trailing unread bytes to satisfy per-header length validation. A comparatively small payload can therefore keep many large arrays alive at once. When an attacker can submit such data repeatedly, the allocations can cause severe managed-heap pressure, excessive garbage collection, process termination, or loss of service. Exposure requires an application to deserialize untrusted data through the affected formatter path and permit repeated attacker-controlled submissions, such as a reachable ASP.NET Core SignalR hub method with an object parameter and AddMessagePackProtocol() enabled. This issue is fixed in versions 2.5.303 and 3.1.9.

Source published
15 Oct 2026 18:35:49 UTC
Source modified
15 Oct 2026 20:12:15 UTC
Observed here
23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
Source terms
CVE Program Terms of Use

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS 3.1 · 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

euvd · EUVD-2026-102315

Published

MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.303 and 3.1.9, deserializing attacker-controlled MessagePack data as System.Object through PrimitiveObjectFormatter can cause excessive memory allocation. The formatter allocates an object[] from each declared array length before the configured object-graph depth limit rejects the input, while nested array headers can reuse the same trailing unread bytes to satisfy per-header length validation. A comparatively small payload can therefore keep many large arrays alive at once. When an attacker can submit such data repeatedly, the allocations can cause severe managed-heap pressure, excessive garbage collection, process termination, or loss of service. Exposure requires an application to deserialize untrusted data through the affected formatter path and permit repeated attacker-controlled submissions, such as a reachable ASP.NET Core SignalR hub method with an object parameter and AddMessagePackProtocol() enabled. This issue is fixed in versions 2.5.303 and 3.1.9.

EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.

Original publisher date fields

datePublished: Oct 15, 2026, 6:35:49 PM

dateUpdated: Oct 15, 2026, 8:12:15 PM

15 related source bulletins · separate from aliases

RHSA-2026:89735: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 9.0 security update

CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-58649 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-69806 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960

RHSA-2026:88422: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 8.0 security update

CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-58649 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96222 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960

RHSA-2026:86171: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 9.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update

CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960

RHSA-2026:88474: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 8.0 security update

CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-58649 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96222 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960

RHSA-2026:88425: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 8.0 security update

CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-58649 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96222 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960

RHSA-2026:86594: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 8.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update

CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96222 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960

RHSA-2026:86168: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 8.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update

CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96222 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960

RHSA-2026:86172: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 9.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update

CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960

WID-SEC-W-2026-3893: Microsoft Entwicklerwerkzeuge: Mehrere Schwachstellen

CVE-2026-100205 · CVE-2026-102229 · CVE-2026-102231 · CVE-2026-102232 · CVE-2026-102233 · CVE-2026-102234 · CVE-2026-102235 · CVE-2026-102238 · CVE-2026-102851 · CVE-2026-102869 · CVE-2026-102870 · CVE-2026-103572 · CVE-2026-105016 · CVE-2026-105729 · CVE-2026-105732 · CVE-2026-108398 · CVE-2026-109468 · CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69370 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70007 · CVE-2026-70035 · CVE-2026-70098 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70161 · CVE-2026-70162 · CVE-2026-70165 · CVE-2026-70174 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70190 · CVE-2026-70194 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-70197 · CVE-2026-83520 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-85363 · CVE-2026-85790 · CVE-2026-87697 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96222 · CVE-2026-96224 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96229 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96232 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96234 · CVE-2026-96235 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96251 · CVE-2026-96303 · CVE-2026-96957 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960 · CVE-2026-97788 · CVE-2026-97801

RHSA-2026:86170: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 9.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update

CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960

RHSA-2026:86193: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 10.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update

CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96957 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960 · CVE-2026-102870

RHSA-2026:88424: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 9.0 security update

CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-58649 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-69806 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960

RHSA-2026:86195: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 10.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update

CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96957 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960 · CVE-2026-102870

RHSA-2026:86169: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 8.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update

CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96222 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960

RHSA-2026:86192: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 10.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update

CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96957 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960 · CVE-2026-102870

Source published
Oct 15, 2026, 6:35:49 PM (timezone not stated)
Source modified
Oct 15, 2026, 8:12:15 PM (timezone not stated)
Observed here
7 Nov 2026 15:25:30 UTC
Source terms
ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

EUVD CVSS 3.1 · 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

nvd · CVE-2026-92707

Published

MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.303 and 3.1.9, deserializing attacker-controlled MessagePack data as System.Object through PrimitiveObjectFormatter can cause excessive memory allocation. The formatter allocates an object[] from each declared array length before the configured object-graph depth limit rejects the input, while nested array headers can reuse the same trailing unread bytes to satisfy per-header length validation. A comparatively small payload can therefore keep many large arrays alive at once. When an attacker can submit such data repeatedly, the allocations can cause severe managed-heap pressure, excessive garbage collection, process termination, or loss of service. Exposure requires an application to deserialize untrusted data through the affected formatter path and permit repeated attacker-controlled submissions, such as a reachable ASP.NET Core SignalR hub method with an object parameter and AddMessagePackProtocol() enabled. This issue is fixed in versions 2.5.303 and 3.1.9.

NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.

Source analysis status: Awaiting Analysis

Weakness classifications: CWE-1325

Original publisher date fields

published: 2026-10-15T19:17:48.703

lastModified: 2026-10-16T16:00:33.533

Source published
15 Oct 2026 19:17:48 UTC
Source modified
16 Oct 2026 16:00:33 UTC
Observed here
25 Oct 2026 16:19:22 UTC
Source terms
NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Secondary · 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

osv · GHSA-qhrr-8q5h-9q3h

Published

### Impact MessagePack-CSharp is vulnerable to denial of service through excessive memory allocation when deserializing attacker-controlled data into `System.Object`. When `PrimitiveObjectFormatter` encounters an array, it allocates an `object[]` using the declared array length **before** enforcing the configured maximum object-graph depth. A specially crafted payload containing deeply nested arrays can therefore keep many large arrays live simultaneously before deserialization is rejected for exceeding the depth limit. Because the array-header validation uses the total unread byte count as evidence that the declared elements may be present, nested array headers can reuse the same trailing bytes for this validation. This permits a relatively small payload to cause disproportionately large managed-heap allocations. The reported example uses an approximately 31.5 KiB payload to allocate roughly 114.7 MiB of reference storage on x64—an amplification factor of approximately 3,800—before the depth exception is raised. Repeated requests may cause severe memory pressure, excessive garbage collection, process termination, or loss of service availability. Applications are affected when they: - Deserialize untrusted MessagePack data as `object`, or otherwise use a resolver path that selects `PrimitiveObjectFormatter`; and - Permit an attacker to submit such data repeatedly. ASP.NET Core SignalR is one known way to expose the vulnerability remotely: an application that enables `AddMessagePackProtocol()` and has a reachable hub method with an `object` parameter may pass attacker-controlled arguments to the vulnerable MessagePack-CSharp formatter. However, the underlying vulnerability is in MessagePack-CSharp, not SignalR, and other applications that deserialize untrusted data through the same formatter may also be affected. MessagePack-CSharp 2.5.302 is confirmed to contain the vulnerable code. Other releases containing the same allocate-before-depth-check behavior may also be affected. Authentication requirements depend on the application exposing the deserialization endpoint: exploitation requires no privileges for a publicly reachable endpoint, while protected endpoints retain their configured authorization requirements. ### Workarounds Where possible, avoid deserializing untrusted data into `System.Object`, including `object`-typed members of otherwise strongly typed models. Use concrete, narrowly defined DTO types instead. For ASP.NET Core SignalR applications, any of the following can prevent or reduce exposure: - Replace `object` parameters in reachable hub methods with concrete types. - Disable the MessagePack hub protocol and use another protocol until a patched MessagePack-CSharp release is available. - Restrict affected hub methods to trusted and authenticated callers. - Apply rate limits and connection limits to reduce the ability to repeat malicious requests. Reducing the maximum deserialization depth or transport message size may reduce the worst-case allocation, but should be treated only as defense in depth. It does not correct the allocate-before-depth-check behavior and is not a complete remediation. Applications with advanced resolver configurations may use a custom formatter for `object` that enforces the depth limit before allocating arrays. Such a formatter should be carefully reviewed and tested against untrusted input.

Source published
15 Oct 2026 18:35:46 UTC
Source modified
15 Oct 2026 18:45:11 UTC
Observed here
23 Oct 2026 16:01:25 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Publisher rating · MODERATE

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 9 Nov 10:47 UTC · 275 of 275 readable · 273 fully read · documentation 469/469 current