Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Some sources or documents need attention: 275/275 feeds/APIs · 469/469 docs · 9/9 advisories · checked 05:48 UTC Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

Cedar: JSON template is in scope missing slot-id validation allows link panic and decision divergence

Exact source revision recorded 29 Oct 2026 17:12:42 UTC. It does not establish the source's current position. Latest evidence.

osv · GHSA-c33x-vcv4-vg3g

Published

Cedar users must be using all of the following features to be affected by this advisory: JSON format policies, policy templates, and the `is in` scope condition. This advisory only affects JSON-formatted Cedar policy templates containing `is in` scope conditions that are **malformed** according to the Cedar syntax. It does **not** affect syntactically well-formed policies. Users of Cedar who author policies in the JSON format were able to write Cedar policies using the `is in` condition with an incorrect slot identifier in the principal and resource scope constraints (e.g., `?principal` in the resource scope constraint) even though this is not allowed when parsing policies from the Cedar policy syntax. Internally, the slot identifiers were silently corrected (e.g. `?resource` is placed in the resource scope constraint). If the policy contains *exactly one slot* in either the principal or resource position, then any attempt to create a linked policy from the template results in an error: the internal representation of the template does not contain the slot identifier as written in the malformed JSON policy (it has been corrected silently), so attempting to fill that slot is an error. If instead the template is linked using slot identifier expected internally (i.e., not what is written in the JSON template), the linking will initially succeed, but a subsequent invariant violation will cause a panic. When the template contains *slots in both the principal and resource* position, then both slots will be present in the internal representation: linking succeeds, but with each slot bound to the value intended for the other (the silent correction). The linked policy is then semantically different from the malformed policy the user intended, and any subsequent authorization decision made against that policy may lead to accesses being unintentionally allowed or denied. Concretely, consider the following JSON format policy template intended to deny users in a particular project from accessing documents with a particular classification. ``` { "effect": "forbid", "principal": { "op": "is", "entity_type": "User", "in": { "slot": "?resource" } }, "action": { "op": "All" }, "resource": { "op": "is", "entity_type": "Doc", "in": { "slot": "?principal" } }, "conditions": [] } ``` Linked with `?principal = Classification::"topsecret"` and `?resource = Project::"alpha"`, the author expects to create the policy: ``` forbid(principal is User in Project::"alpha", action, resource is Doc in Classification::"topsecret"); ``` But because Cedar internally links slots by scope position (not by name), the actual policy evaluated by the engine is: ``` forbid(principal is User in Classification::"topsecret", action, resource is Doc in Project::"alpha"); ``` If a user is in `Project::"alpha"` but not `Classification::"topsecret"`, the `forbid` policy does not apply, and access is unintentionally allowed. ## Patches This advisory is patched in version 4.11.1 and 3.4.3, both available on Crates.io and NPM. ## Workarounds If you cannot update to a patched version, you can determine if you are affected by checking your JSON format policy templates for the following two patterns. ``` "principal": { "op": "is", "entity_type": "User", "in": { "slot": "?resource" } } ``` and ``` "resource": { "op": "is", "entity_type": "Doc", "in": { "slot": "?principal" } } ``` ## References * [Cedar Policy Language Reference Guide - Cedar Policy Templates](https://docs.cedarpolicy.com/policies/templates.html) * [Cedar Policy Language Reference Guide - JSON Policy Format](https://docs.cedarpolicy.com/policies/json-format.html)

Source published
29 Oct 2026 16:35:04 UTC
Source modified
29 Oct 2026 16:45:05 UTC
Observed here
29 Oct 2026 17:12:42 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V4 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L

Publisher rating · LOW

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 7 Nov 05:48 UTC · 275 of 275 readable · 274 fully read · documentation 469/469 current