Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Some sources, documents or advisories need attention: 275/275 feeds/APIs · 469/469 docs · 8/9 advisories · checked 23:10 UTC Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

OpenBao vulnerable to denial of service via malicious JSON request processing

Collected exploitation and prediction evidence

Risk source coverage

CISA KEV is observed exploitation evidence. FIRST EPSS is a dated prediction of exploitation in the next 30 days. Missing scores are unknown. This collector requests predictions only for explicit CVE aliases in the public NuGet archive; Microsoft release views retain their existing prediction scope.

No collected risk observation for these identifiers. This does not establish absence of exploitation or a zero probability.

cve-program · CVE-2025-59043

Published

OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. In OpenBao versions prior to 2.4.1, JSON objects after decoding may use significantly more memory than their serialized version. It is possible to craft a JSON payload to maximize the factor between serialized memory usage and deserialized memory usage, similar to a zip bomb, with factors reaching approximately 35. This can be used to circumvent the max_request_size configuration parameter which is intended to protect against denial of service attacks. The request body is parsed into a map very early in the request handling chain before authentication, which means an unauthenticated attacker can send a specifically crafted JSON object and cause an out-of-memory crash. Additionally, for requests with large numbers of strings, the audit subsystem can consume large quantities of CPU. The vulnerability is fixed in version 2.4.1.

Source published
17 Oct 2025 16:03:23 UTC
Source modified
17 Oct 2025 17:22:52 UTC
Observed here
23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
Source terms
CVE Program Terms of Use

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS 3.1 · 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

euvd · EUVD-2025-34895

Published

OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. In OpenBao versions prior to 2.4.1, JSON objects after decoding may use significantly more memory than their serialized version. It is possible to craft a JSON payload to maximize the factor between serialized memory usage and deserialized memory usage, similar to a zip bomb, with factors reaching approximately 35. This can be used to circumvent the max_request_size configuration parameter which is intended to protect against denial of service attacks. The request body is parsed into a map very early in the request handling chain before authentication, which means an unauthenticated attacker can send a specifically crafted JSON object and cause an out-of-memory crash. Additionally, for requests with large numbers of strings, the audit subsystem can consume large quantities of CPU. The vulnerability is fixed in version 2.4.1.

EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.

Original publisher date fields

datePublished: Oct 17, 2025, 4:03:23 PM

dateUpdated: Oct 17, 2025, 5:22:52 PM

2 related source bulletins · separate from aliases

openSUSE-SU-2025:15710-1: govulncheck-vulndb-0.0.20251105T184115-1.1 on GA media

CVE-2016-11063 · CVE-2016-11066 · CVE-2016-11067 · CVE-2016-11068 · CVE-2016-11069 · CVE-2016-11070 · CVE-2016-11071 · CVE-2016-11072 · CVE-2016-11073 · CVE-2016-11074 · CVE-2016-11075 · CVE-2016-11076 · CVE-2016-11077 · CVE-2016-11078 · CVE-2016-11079 · CVE-2016-11080 · CVE-2016-11081 · CVE-2016-11082 · CVE-2016-11083 · CVE-2016-11084 · CVE-2017-18872 · CVE-2023-32199 · CVE-2024-58269 · CVE-2025-10545 · CVE-2025-10678 · CVE-2025-10954 · CVE-2025-11374 · CVE-2025-11375 · CVE-2025-11579 · CVE-2025-11621 · CVE-2025-12044 · CVE-2025-26625 · CVE-2025-27093 · CVE-2025-41410 · CVE-2025-41443 · CVE-2025-54286 · CVE-2025-54287 · CVE-2025-54288 · CVE-2025-54289 · CVE-2025-54290 · CVE-2025-54291 · CVE-2025-54293 · CVE-2025-54469 · CVE-2025-54470 · CVE-2025-54471 · CVE-2025-54499 · CVE-2025-58073 · CVE-2025-58075 · CVE-2025-58356 · CVE-2025-59043 · CVE-2025-59048 · CVE-2025-59530 · CVE-2025-59836 · CVE-2025-59937 · CVE-2025-61141 · CVE-2025-61524 · CVE-2025-61581 · CVE-2025-61688 · CVE-2025-62156 · CVE-2025-62157 · CVE-2025-62375 · CVE-2025-62506 · CVE-2025-62513 · CVE-2025-62705 · CVE-2025-62714 · CVE-2025-62725 · CVE-2025-62820 · CVE-2025-64101 · CVE-2025-64102 · CVE-2025-64103

WID-SEC-W-2025-2391: OpenBao: Mehrere Schwachstellen

CVE-2025-62513 · CVE-2025-62705 · CVE-2025-59043

Source published
Oct 17, 2025, 4:03:23 PM (timezone not stated)
Source modified
Oct 17, 2025, 5:22:52 PM (timezone not stated)
Observed here
7 Nov 2026 02:43:11 UTC
Source terms
ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

EUVD CVSS 3.1 · 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd · CVE-2025-59043

Published

OpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. In OpenBao versions prior to 2.4.1, JSON objects after decoding may use significantly more memory than their serialized version. It is possible to craft a JSON payload to maximize the factor between serialized memory usage and deserialized memory usage, similar to a zip bomb, with factors reaching approximately 35. This can be used to circumvent the max_request_size configuration parameter which is intended to protect against denial of service attacks. The request body is parsed into a map very early in the request handling chain before authentication, which means an unauthenticated attacker can send a specifically crafted JSON object and cause an out-of-memory crash. Additionally, for requests with large numbers of strings, the audit subsystem can consume large quantities of CPU. The vulnerability is fixed in version 2.4.1.

NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.

Source analysis status: Analyzed

Weakness classifications: CWE-400

Original publisher date fields

published: 2025-10-17T16:15:38.763

lastModified: 2026-10-19T16:10:00.260

1 source CPE criteria · context only
  • cpe:2.3:a:openbao:openbao:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

The original JSON retains the logical configuration operators, exclusions and version bounds.

Source published
17 Oct 2025 16:15:38 UTC
Source modified
19 Oct 2026 16:10:00 UTC
Observed here
25 Oct 2026 03:17:18 UTC
Source terms
NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Secondary · 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

osv · GHSA-g46h-2rq9-gw5m

Published

### Summary JSON objects after decoding might use more memory than their serialized version. It is possible to tune a JSON to maximize the factor between serialized memory usage and deserialized memory usage (similar to a zip bomb). While reproducing the issue, we could reach a factor of about 35. This can be used to circumvent the [`max_request_size` (https://openbao.org/docs/configuration/listener/tcp/) configuration parameter, which is meant to protect against Denial of Service attacks, and also makes Denial of Service attacks easier in general, as the attacker needs much less resources. ### Details The request body is parsed into a `map[string]interface{}` https://github.com/openbao/openbao/blob/788536bd3e10818a7b4fb00aac6affc23388e5a9/http/logical.go#L50 very early in the request handling chain (before authentication), which means an attacker can send a specifically crafted JSON object and cause an OOM crash. Additionally, for simpler requests with large numbers of strings, the audit subsystem can consume large quantities of CPU. To remediate, set `max_request_json_memory` and `max_request_json_strings`. ### Impact - Unauthenticated Denial of Service ### Resources This issue was disclosed directly to HashiCorp and is the OpenBao equivalent of the following tickets: - https://discuss.hashicorp.com/t/hcsec-2025-24-vault-denial-of-service-though-complex-json-payloads/76393 - https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-6203 HashiCorp attributes the problem to the audit subsystem. For OpenBao, it was noted the problem was additionally in the requests handling logic.

Source published
17 Oct 2025 17:08:11 UTC
Source modified
27 Jul 2026 09:11:37 UTC
Observed here
24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Publisher rating · HIGH

osv · GO-2025-4039

Published

OpenBao has potential Denial of Service vulnerability when processing malicious unauthenticated JSON requests in github.com/openbao/openbao. NOTE: The source advisory for this report contains additional versions that could not be automatically mapped to standard Go module versions. (If this is causing false-positive reports from vulnerability scanners, please suggest an edit to the report.) The additional affected modules and versions are: github.com/openbao/openbao before v2.4.1.

Source published
30 Oct 2025 15:02:33 UTC
Source modified
27 Jul 2026 09:11:37 UTC
Observed here
24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC
Source terms
OSV · upstream source license applies

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · OSV · upstream source license applies. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 8 Nov 23:10 UTC · 275 of 275 readable · 273 fully read · documentation 469/469 current