CVE-2026-92707
No KEV entry is attached to this observation; this is not evidence that exploitation is absent.
FIRST EPSS: 0.68 % · percentile 52.58 % · scored 8 Nov 2026.
Observed 08 Nov 2026 15:12:21 UTC · Complete immutable risk JSON
No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means
CISA KEV is observed exploitation evidence. FIRST EPSS is a dated prediction of exploitation in the next 30 days. Missing scores are unknown. This collector requests predictions only for explicit CVE aliases in the public NuGet archive; Microsoft release views retain their existing prediction scope.
No KEV entry is attached to this observation; this is not evidence that exploitation is absent.
FIRST EPSS: 0.68 % · percentile 52.58 % · scored 8 Nov 2026.
Observed 08 Nov 2026 15:12:21 UTC · Complete immutable risk JSON
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.303 and 3.1.9, deserializing attacker-controlled MessagePack data as System.Object through PrimitiveObjectFormatter can cause excessive memory allocation. The formatter allocates an object[] from each declared array length before the configured object-graph depth limit rejects the input, while nested array headers can reuse the same trailing unread bytes to satisfy per-header length validation. A comparatively small payload can therefore keep many large arrays alive at once. When an attacker can submit such data repeatedly, the allocations can cause severe managed-heap pressure, excessive garbage collection, process termination, or loss of service. Exposure requires an application to deserialize untrusted data through the affected formatter path and permit repeated attacker-controlled submissions, such as a reachable ASP.NET Core SignalR hub method with an object parameter and AddMessagePackProtocol() enabled. This issue is fixed in versions 2.5.303 and 3.1.9.
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.
CVSS 3.1 · 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.303 and 3.1.9, deserializing attacker-controlled MessagePack data as System.Object through PrimitiveObjectFormatter can cause excessive memory allocation. The formatter allocates an object[] from each declared array length before the configured object-graph depth limit rejects the input, while nested array headers can reuse the same trailing unread bytes to satisfy per-header length validation. A comparatively small payload can therefore keep many large arrays alive at once. When an attacker can submit such data repeatedly, the allocations can cause severe managed-heap pressure, excessive garbage collection, process termination, or loss of service. Exposure requires an application to deserialize untrusted data through the affected formatter path and permit repeated attacker-controlled submissions, such as a reachable ASP.NET Core SignalR hub method with an object parameter and AddMessagePackProtocol() enabled. This issue is fixed in versions 2.5.303 and 3.1.9.
EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.
datePublished: Oct 15, 2026, 6:35:49 PM
dateUpdated: Oct 15, 2026, 8:12:15 PM
RHSA-2026:89735: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 9.0 security update
CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-58649 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-69806 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960
RHSA-2026:88422: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 8.0 security update
CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-58649 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96222 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960
RHSA-2026:86171: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 9.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update
CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960
RHSA-2026:88474: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 8.0 security update
CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-58649 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96222 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960
RHSA-2026:88425: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 8.0 security update
CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-58649 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96222 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960
RHSA-2026:86594: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 8.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update
CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96222 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960
RHSA-2026:86168: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 8.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update
CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96222 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960
RHSA-2026:86172: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 9.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update
CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960
WID-SEC-W-2026-3893: Microsoft Entwicklerwerkzeuge: Mehrere Schwachstellen
CVE-2026-100205 · CVE-2026-102229 · CVE-2026-102231 · CVE-2026-102232 · CVE-2026-102233 · CVE-2026-102234 · CVE-2026-102235 · CVE-2026-102238 · CVE-2026-102851 · CVE-2026-102869 · CVE-2026-102870 · CVE-2026-103572 · CVE-2026-105016 · CVE-2026-105729 · CVE-2026-105732 · CVE-2026-108398 · CVE-2026-109468 · CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69370 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70007 · CVE-2026-70035 · CVE-2026-70098 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70161 · CVE-2026-70162 · CVE-2026-70165 · CVE-2026-70174 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70190 · CVE-2026-70194 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-70197 · CVE-2026-83520 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-85363 · CVE-2026-85790 · CVE-2026-87697 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96222 · CVE-2026-96224 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96229 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96232 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96234 · CVE-2026-96235 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96251 · CVE-2026-96303 · CVE-2026-96957 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960 · CVE-2026-97788 · CVE-2026-97801
RHSA-2026:86170: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 9.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update
CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960
RHSA-2026:86193: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 10.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update
CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96957 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960 · CVE-2026-102870
RHSA-2026:88424: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 9.0 security update
CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-58649 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-69806 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960
RHSA-2026:86195: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 10.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update
CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96957 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960 · CVE-2026-102870
RHSA-2026:86169: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 8.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update
CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96222 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960
RHSA-2026:86192: Red Hat Security Advisory: .NET 10.0 security, bug fix, and enhancement update
CVE-2026-58280 · CVE-2026-66822 · CVE-2026-69651 · CVE-2026-70159 · CVE-2026-70175 · CVE-2026-70179 · CVE-2026-70181 · CVE-2026-70183 · CVE-2026-70186 · CVE-2026-70188 · CVE-2026-70196 · CVE-2026-84008 · CVE-2026-88092 · CVE-2026-92707 · CVE-2026-96225 · CVE-2026-96230 · CVE-2026-96231 · CVE-2026-96233 · CVE-2026-96236 · CVE-2026-96237 · CVE-2026-96238 · CVE-2026-96957 · CVE-2026-96958 · CVE-2026-96959 · CVE-2026-96960 · CVE-2026-102870
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.
EUVD CVSS 3.1 · 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
MessagePack for C# is a MessagePack serializer for C#. Prior to 2.5.303 and 3.1.9, deserializing attacker-controlled MessagePack data as System.Object through PrimitiveObjectFormatter can cause excessive memory allocation. The formatter allocates an object[] from each declared array length before the configured object-graph depth limit rejects the input, while nested array headers can reuse the same trailing unread bytes to satisfy per-header length validation. A comparatively small payload can therefore keep many large arrays alive at once. When an attacker can submit such data repeatedly, the allocations can cause severe managed-heap pressure, excessive garbage collection, process termination, or loss of service. Exposure requires an application to deserialize untrusted data through the affected formatter path and permit repeated attacker-controlled submissions, such as a reachable ASP.NET Core SignalR hub method with an object parameter and AddMessagePackProtocol() enabled. This issue is fixed in versions 2.5.303 and 3.1.9.
NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.
Source analysis status: Awaiting Analysis
Weakness classifications: CWE-1325
published: 2026-10-15T19:17:48.703
lastModified: 2026-10-16T16:00:33.533
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.
CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Secondary · 5.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
### Impact MessagePack-CSharp is vulnerable to denial of service through excessive memory allocation when deserializing attacker-controlled data into `System.Object`. When `PrimitiveObjectFormatter` encounters an array, it allocates an `object[]` using the declared array length **before** enforcing the configured maximum object-graph depth. A specially crafted payload containing deeply nested arrays can therefore keep many large arrays live simultaneously before deserialization is rejected for exceeding the depth limit. Because the array-header validation uses the total unread byte count as evidence that the declared elements may be present, nested array headers can reuse the same trailing bytes for this validation. This permits a relatively small payload to cause disproportionately large managed-heap allocations. The reported example uses an approximately 31.5 KiB payload to allocate roughly 114.7 MiB of reference storage on x64—an amplification factor of approximately 3,800—before the depth exception is raised. Repeated requests may cause severe memory pressure, excessive garbage collection, process termination, or loss of service availability. Applications are affected when they: - Deserialize untrusted MessagePack data as `object`, or otherwise use a resolver path that selects `PrimitiveObjectFormatter`; and - Permit an attacker to submit such data repeatedly. ASP.NET Core SignalR is one known way to expose the vulnerability remotely: an application that enables `AddMessagePackProtocol()` and has a reachable hub method with an `object` parameter may pass attacker-controlled arguments to the vulnerable MessagePack-CSharp formatter. However, the underlying vulnerability is in MessagePack-CSharp, not SignalR, and other applications that deserialize untrusted data through the same formatter may also be affected. MessagePack-CSharp 2.5.302 is confirmed to contain the vulnerable code. Other releases containing the same allocate-before-depth-check behavior may also be affected. Authentication requirements depend on the application exposing the deserialization endpoint: exploitation requires no privileges for a publicly reachable endpoint, while protected endpoints retain their configured authorization requirements. ### Workarounds Where possible, avoid deserializing untrusted data into `System.Object`, including `object`-typed members of otherwise strongly typed models. Use concrete, narrowly defined DTO types instead. For ASP.NET Core SignalR applications, any of the following can prevent or reduce exposure: - Replace `object` parameters in reachable hub methods with concrete types. - Disable the MessagePack hub protocol and use another protocol until a patched MessagePack-CSharp release is available. - Restrict affected hub methods to trusted and authenticated callers. - Apply rate limits and connection limits to reduce the ability to repeat malicious requests. Reducing the maximum deserialization depth or transport message size may reduce the worst-case allocation, but should be treated only as defense in depth. It does not correct the allocate-before-depth-check behavior and is not a complete remediation. Applications with advanced resolver configurations may use a custom formatter for `object` that enforces the depth limit before allocating arrays. Such a formatter should be carefully reviewed and tested against untrusted input.
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.
CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Publisher rating · MODERATE