Remark42: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) on /api/v1/img via content-type spoofing
Collected exploitation and prediction evidence
Risk source coverageCISA KEV is observed exploitation evidence. FIRST EPSS is a dated prediction of exploitation in the next 30 days. Missing scores are unknown. This collector requests predictions only for explicit CVE aliases in the public NuGet archive; Microsoft release views retain their existing prediction scope.
No collected risk observation for these identifiers. This does not establish absence of exploitation or a zero probability.
cve-program · CVE-2026-48788
PublishedRemark42 is a self-hosted comment engine for blogs, articles, or any other place where readers can add comments. Versions 1.6.0 through 1.15.0 contain a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable through content-type spoofing. The Remark42 image proxy fetches an arbitrary remote URL and re-serves the response from Remark42's own origin. During the download phase, the proxy determines whether the resource is an image by inspecting only the Content-Type header advertised by the remote server, never examining the actual bytes; during the serving phase, it instead derives the response Content-Type by sniffing those bytes with http.DetectContentType. An attacker can exploit this inconsistency by hosting a URL that advertises Content-Type: image/png while returning an HTML/JavaScript body: the download check accepts it as an image, the serving path sniffs the body and emits Content-Type: text/html, and the browser renders the attacker-controlled HTML/JavaScript as a document within Remark42's origin. Exploitation requires no Remark42 account on the target instance; the attacker only needs to host the malicious upstream URL and deliver the proxy link to a victim by any means, such as email, direct message, or a link on another website. This issue has been fixed in version 1.16.0.
- Source published
- 16 Jun 2026 22:29:38 UTC
- Source modified
- 17 Jun 2026 13:20:11 UTC
- Observed here
- 23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
- Source terms
- CVE Program Terms of Use
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.
CVSS 3.0 · 8.2 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
euvd · EUVD-2026-37511
PublishedRemark42 is a self-hosted comment engine for blogs, articles, or any other place where readers can add comments. Versions 1.6.0 through 1.15.0 contain a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable through content-type spoofing. The Remark42 image proxy fetches an arbitrary remote URL and re-serves the response from Remark42's own origin. During the download phase, the proxy determines whether the resource is an image by inspecting only the Content-Type header advertised by the remote server, never examining the actual bytes; during the serving phase, it instead derives the response Content-Type by sniffing those bytes with http.DetectContentType. An attacker can exploit this inconsistency by hosting a URL that advertises Content-Type: image/png while returning an HTML/JavaScript body: the download check accepts it as an image, the serving path sniffs the body and emits Content-Type: text/html, and the browser renders the attacker-controlled HTML/JavaScript as a document within Remark42's origin. Exploitation requires no Remark42 account on the target instance; the attacker only needs to host the malicious upstream URL and deliver the proxy link to a victim by any means, such as email, direct message, or a link on another website. This issue has been fixed in version 1.16.0.
EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.
Original publisher date fields
datePublished: Jun 16, 2026, 10:29:38 PM
dateUpdated: Jun 17, 2026, 1:20:11 PM
- Source published
- Jun 16, 2026, 10:29:38 PM (timezone not stated)
- Source modified
- Jun 17, 2026, 1:20:11 PM (timezone not stated)
- Observed here
- 7 Nov 2026 11:30:42 UTC
- Source terms
- ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.
EUVD CVSS 3.0 · 8.2 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
nvd · CVE-2026-48788
PublishedRemark42 is a self-hosted comment engine for blogs, articles, or any other place where readers can add comments. Versions 1.6.0 through 1.15.0 contain a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exploitable through content-type spoofing. The Remark42 image proxy fetches an arbitrary remote URL and re-serves the response from Remark42's own origin. During the download phase, the proxy determines whether the resource is an image by inspecting only the Content-Type header advertised by the remote server, never examining the actual bytes; during the serving phase, it instead derives the response Content-Type by sniffing those bytes with http.DetectContentType. An attacker can exploit this inconsistency by hosting a URL that advertises Content-Type: image/png while returning an HTML/JavaScript body: the download check accepts it as an image, the serving path sniffs the body and emits Content-Type: text/html, and the browser renders the attacker-controlled HTML/JavaScript as a document within Remark42's origin. Exploitation requires no Remark42 account on the target instance; the attacker only needs to host the malicious upstream URL and deliver the proxy link to a victim by any means, such as email, direct message, or a link on another website. This issue has been fixed in version 1.16.0.
NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.
Source analysis status: Deferred
Weakness classifications: CWE-79 · CWE-436
Original publisher date fields
published: 2026-06-17T13:20:43.490
lastModified: 2026-10-25T23:10:00.167
- Source published
- 17 Jun 2026 13:20:43 UTC
- Source modified
- 25 Oct 2026 23:10:00 UTC
- Observed here
- 27 Oct 2026 13:11:53 UTC
- Source terms
- NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.
CVSS 3.0 · [email protected] · Secondary · 8.2 CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
osv · GHSA-4c8j-mgm4-qqvp
Published### Summary The remark42 image proxy fetches an arbitrary remote URL and re-serves the response from remark42's own origin. The download path decides whether the fetched resource is an image by looking only at the `Content-Type` header the remote server claims — it never inspects the actual bytes. The serving path then derives the response `Content-Type` by sniffing those bytes with `http.DetectContentType`. An attacker hosts a URL that sets `Content-Type` to `image/png` but returns an HTML/JavaScript body: * the download check sees `image/png` → accepts it; * the serve path sniffs the body → emits `Content-Type: text/html`; * the browser renders attacker HTML/JS as a document in remark42's origin. ### Details #### Downloader `backend/app/rest/proxy/image.go` — `downloadImage()`, lines 189-206: ```go contentType := resp.Header.Get("Content-Type") if !strings.HasPrefix(contentType, "image/") { return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid content type %s", contentType) } maxSize := 5 * 1024 * 1024 // 5MB default if p.ImageService != nil && p.ImageService.MaxSize > 0 { maxSize = p.ImageService.MaxSize } lr := io.LimitReader(resp.Body, int64(maxSize)+1) imgData, err := io.ReadAll(lr) if err != nil { return nil, fmt.Errorf("unable to read image body: %w", err) } if len(imgData) > maxSize { return nil, fmt.Errorf("image is too large") } return imgData, nil // <-- bytes never validated, returned as-is ``` Send `Content-Type: image/png` and the check passes regardless of what the body actually contains. #### Server `backend/app/rest/proxy/image.go` — `Handler()`, line 131: ```go w.Header().Add("Content-Type", p.ImageService.ImgContentType(img)) _, err = io.Copy(w, bytes.NewReader(img)) ``` `backend/app/store/image/image.go` — `ImgContentType()`, lines 242-249: ```go func (s *Service) ImgContentType(img []byte) string { contentType := http.DetectContentType(img) if contentType == "application/octet-stream" { return "image/*" } return contentType // <-- returns text/html for an HTML body } ``` ### PoC ```python self.send_response(200) self.send_header("Content-Type", "image/png") self.send_header("Content-Length", str(len(body))) self.end_headers() self.wfile.write(body) # body = <!DOCTYPE html><script>...</script> ``` Then have the victim open `https://<remark42-host>/api/v1/img?src=<base64(attacker-host)>` top-level. ### Impact * The script can issue authenticated, same-origin API calls with `credentials: 'include'` — the JWT cookie is sent automatically. * The script can read the `XSRF-TOKEN` cookie and re-send it as the `X-XSRF-TOKEN` header, defeating CSRF protection. The attacker acts as the victim: delete/edit their comments, change their settings, and — if the victim is admin — perform admin actions. Triggering requires no remark42 account on the target instance; the attacker only needs to host the malicious upstream URL and deliver the proxy link to a victim by any means (email, DM, link on another site, etc.). ### Fix `v1.16.0` adds layered defense to `/api/v1/img` and `/api/v1/picture/{user}/{id}`: * `rest.SafeImgContentType` validates sniffed body bytes against a strict allowlist (`image/png`, `image/jpeg`, `image/gif`, `image/webp`, `image/bmp`, `image/x-icon`). Non-image content returns `415` with no body echo. SVG is implicitly excluded. * Every response carries `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'none'; sandbox; frame-ancestors 'none'`, `X-Content-Type Options: nosniff`, and `Content-Disposition: inline; filename="image"`. * The ETag is bumped to `"v2:<base64(src)>"`. Browsers that revalidate cached pre-fix responses get a fresh validated `200` instead of a `304` against the poisoned cached entry. * The strict `default-src 'none'; sandbox` CSP also applies to all `/api/v1/*` routes as defense-in-depth. #### Residual exposure Browser-local caches that already hold a pre-fix `text/html` response with `Cache-Control: max-age=2592000` keep serving it from local store until the TTL expires or the cache is evicted under memory pressure. The ETag bump only reaches clients that revalidate during the cached lifetime. Operators running a CDN/edge cache in front of remark42 should purge `/api/v1/img` after deploying `v1.16.0`.
- Source published
- 26 Jun 2026 19:26:43 UTC
- Source modified
- 7 Jul 2026 16:11:13 UTC
- Observed here
- 24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC
- Source terms
- GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.
CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Publisher rating · HIGH
osv · GO-2026-5804
PublishedRemark42: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) on /api/v1/img via content-type spoofing in github.com/umputun/remark42
- Source published
- 7 Jul 2026 15:26:32 UTC
- Source modified
- 7 Jul 2026 16:01:34 UTC
- Observed here
- 24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC
- Source terms
- OSV · upstream source license applies
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · OSV · upstream source license applies. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.