better-auth 1.3.8-beta.3 before 1.7.0-rc.3 Device Authorization Phishing via /device

CISA KEV is observed exploitation evidence. FIRST EPSS is a dated prediction of exploitation in the next 30 days. Missing scores are unknown. This collector requests predictions only for explicit CVE aliases in the public NuGet archive; Microsoft release views retain their existing prediction scope.

No collected risk observation for these identifiers. This does not establish absence of exploitation or a zero probability.

better-auth from 1.3.8-beta.3 before 1.7.0-rc.3 contains a UI misrepresentation vulnerability in the deviceAuthorization plugin because GET /device omits the requesting client_id and scope. Attackers can start a device request via /device/code, trick signed-in users into approving the code, then redeem it at /device/token for a live session token.

Source published

12 Oct 2026 16:05:30 UTC

Source modified

26 Oct 2026 16:46:48 UTC

Observed here

26 Oct 2026 17:35:31 UTC

Source terms

CVE Program Terms of Use

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS 4.0 · 8.5 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

CVSS 3.1 · 8.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

better-auth from 1.3.8-beta.3 before 1.7.0-rc.3 contains a UI misrepresentation vulnerability in the deviceAuthorization plugin because GET /device omits the requesting client_id and scope. Attackers can start a device request via /device/code, trick signed-in users into approving the code, then redeem it at /device/token for a live session token.

Source published

Oct 12, 2026, 4:05:30 PM (timezone not stated)

Source modified

Oct 26, 2026, 4:46:48 PM (timezone not stated)

Observed here

30 Oct 2026 01:55:34 UTC

Source terms

ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

EUVD CVSS 4.0 · 8.5 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

better-auth from 1.3.8-beta.3 before 1.7.0-rc.3 contains a UI misrepresentation vulnerability in the deviceAuthorization plugin because GET /device omits the requesting client_id and scope. Attackers can start a device request via /device/code, trick signed-in users into approving the code, then redeem it at /device/token for a live session token.

Source published

12 Oct 2026 17:17:31 UTC

Source modified

26 Oct 2026 17:17:13 UTC

Observed here

27 Oct 2026 15:15:14 UTC

Source terms

NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS 4.0 · [email protected] · Secondary · 8.5 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Secondary · 8.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

## Am I affected? You may be affected if you use `better-auth` from `1.3.8-beta.3` up to, but not including, `1.7.0-rc.3`, and you enable the `deviceAuthorization()` plugin. This range includes all 1.6 releases. You are affected only if all of these are also true: - An attacker can start a device request: `validateClient` is not configured, or the attacker can use a valid public client. - Before allowing approval, your approval page does not show, from server-checked data, which client is asking and the exact permissions it requests. - Users may approve a code or complete verification link they did not start and cannot compare with a device they have. - Your application accepts the session token that the device flow returns, for example through the bearer plugin. You are not affected if you do not enable the opt-in `deviceAuthorization()` plugin. ## Summary The device authorization plugin lets a user sign in on one device by approving a short code on another. In affected versions, the approval information given to the user leaves out which client asked for access and which permissions it wants. The official approval examples therefore show only a generic request and a code, so users cannot tell their own device from an attacker's request. ## Impact An attacker who convinces a signed-in user to approve the attacker's code receives a live Better Auth session token for that user. The attacker can then read or change any data the user's account can access. The attack needs the opt-in device flow, a request the attacker creates, and a user who actively approves it; it is not a sign-in bypass without user action. ## Patches The fix first shipped in `1.7.0-rc.3`. Upgrade to `[email protected]` or later. No 1.6 release contains the fix. After upgrading, `GET /device` returns the requesting `client_id` and `scope` to the signed-in account that owns the request. If you built your own approval page, update it to show that client and those permissions, and keep approval disabled until they load. ## Workarounds If you cannot upgrade yet, do the following: - Disable `deviceAuthorization()`, or block untrusted access to `/device/code`. - Configure a strict `validateClient` allowlist. Do not rely on the allowlist alone: it limits who can start the flow, but it does not give users the missing approval information. - Build your own approval endpoint. It should read the pending request from trusted server-side storage and map the checked client identifier to a trusted display name. Show the exact requested permissions and the user code. Keep approval disabled until this information loads. - Tell users to reject device requests they did not expect. They should approve only when the same code is visible right now on a device they have. ## Technical details A device starts the flow by calling `/device/code`. The plugin stores the client identifier and any requested scope with the pending request. Before approval, `GET /device` returns only the user code and its status. This is true even for a signed-in session of the user account that owns the request. An approval page built from that response cannot show which client asked for access or which permissions it wants. After approval, the original device code can be redeemed at `/device/token` for a Better Auth session token. RFC 8628 describes this remote phishing scenario. It recommends that the server tell users they are authorizing a device and ask them to confirm that the device is in their possession. It also recommends showing device information that helps users detect impersonation. Client allowlisting reduces who can start the flow, but it does not give users the missing approval information. A valid public client can therefore still be affected when its identifier and requested permissions are not shown.

Source published

27 Oct 2026 14:49:53 UTC

Source modified

27 Oct 2026 15:00:04 UTC

Observed here

27 Oct 2026 15:09:44 UTC

Source terms

GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Publisher rating · HIGH