Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Sources need attention Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

axios before 1.18.0 Prototype Pollution via auth subfields

Exploitation and risk

Source status

CISA KEV lists vulnerabilities known to be exploited. FIRST EPSS estimates the likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unavailable score does not mean zero risk.

Which CVEs have scores here?

This view includes predictions for CVE identifiers explicitly listed in public NuGet advisories. Microsoft release pages have their own prediction coverage. Check source status for the scope and latest checks.

No exploitation or prediction data is available here for these CVEs. This does not mean they are safe or unlikely to be exploited.

cve-program · CVE-2026-67314

Published

axios versions >=1.15.2 and <1.18.0 contain prototype-pollution read-side gadgets in Basic auth subfield handling (lib/adapters/http.js and lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js). When an application is already affected by a separate prototype-pollution primitive and makes an axios request with an own auth object that omits the username and/or password properties, axios reads the inherited Object.prototype.username and Object.prototype.password values and uses them to construct an outbound 'Authorization: Basic ...' header. axios itself does not pollute prototypes. The practical impact is outbound request tampering: an attacker who controls the polluted prototype values can inject attacker-chosen Basic auth credentials or replace an existing Authorization header. Credential disclosure is only possible under additional application-specific conditions.

Source published
1 Aug 2026 12:22:16 UTC
Source modified
3 Aug 2026 18:06:09 UTC
Saved here
23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
Source terms
CVE Program Terms of Use

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS 4.0 · 6.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

euvd · EUVD-2026-51864

Published

axios versions >=1.15.2 and <1.18.0 contain prototype-pollution read-side gadgets in Basic auth subfield handling (lib/adapters/http.js and lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js). When an application is already affected by a separate prototype-pollution primitive and makes an axios request with an own auth object that omits the username and/or password properties, axios reads the inherited Object.prototype.username and Object.prototype.password values and uses them to construct an outbound 'Authorization: Basic ...' header. axios itself does not pollute prototypes. The practical impact is outbound request tampering: an attacker who controls the polluted prototype values can inject attacker-chosen Basic auth credentials or replace an existing Authorization header. Credential disclosure is only possible under additional application-specific conditions.

Additional publisher context

EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.

Original publisher date fields

datePublished: Aug 1, 2026, 12:22:16 PM

dateUpdated: Aug 3, 2026, 6:06:09 PM

26 related source bulletins · separate from aliases

RHSA-2026:69255: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.16.6

CVE-2026-13149 · CVE-2026-15792 · CVE-2026-15927 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-32283 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-39822 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-54058 · CVE-2026-54060 · CVE-2026-54770 · CVE-2026-55379 · CVE-2026-55380 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-57231 · CVE-2026-59197 · CVE-2026-59199 · CVE-2026-59200 · CVE-2026-59204 · CVE-2026-59205 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-59879 · CVE-2026-59885 · CVE-2026-59886 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-75593 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-84375

RHSA-2026:59566: Red Hat Security Advisory: Kiali 2.22.9 for Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3

CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-45149 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-54272 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:49714: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs Security Update

CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67315 · CVE-2026-67316 · CVE-2026-67317 · CVE-2026-67318

RHSA-2026:68765: Red Hat Security Advisory: Technical preview of the satellite/iop-vulnerability-frontend-rhel9 container image

CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-45819 · CVE-2026-59879 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76172

RHSA-2026:92510: Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.4.6 - Red Hat OpenShift AI

CVE-2023-54404 · CVE-2026-11822 · CVE-2026-11824 · CVE-2026-13717 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-17106 · CVE-2026-18446 · CVE-2026-25681 · CVE-2026-26007 · CVE-2026-27136 · CVE-2026-33814 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-39821 · CVE-2026-39834 · CVE-2026-41178 · CVE-2026-42502 · CVE-2026-45819 · CVE-2026-45820 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-57516 · CVE-2026-59951 · CVE-2026-63209 · CVE-2026-63374 · CVE-2026-65898 · CVE-2026-67312 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69097 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73643 · CVE-2026-75838 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76172 · CVE-2026-76844 · CVE-2026-77301 · CVE-2026-78679 · CVE-2026-82397 · CVE-2026-83663 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84445 · CVE-2026-85393 · CVE-2026-85525 · CVE-2026-87018 · CVE-2026-90711 · CVE-2026-91990 · CVE-2026-92599 · CVE-2026-93690 · CVE-2026-93749 · CVE-2026-94637 · CVE-2026-96640 · CVE-2026-96643 · CVE-2026-96644 · CVE-2026-96778 · CVE-2026-96804 · CVE-2026-97687 · CVE-2026-97689 · CVE-2026-102267 · CVE-2026-102271 · CVE-2026-102272 · CVE-2026-102276 · CVE-2026-102278 · CVE-2026-102282 · CVE-2026-104150 · CVE-2026-104851 · CVE-2026-105922 · CVE-2026-106445 · CVE-2026-106446 · CVE-2026-109156 · CVE-2026-109383 · CVE-2026-109527 · CVE-2026-109829 · CVE-2026-109869 · CVE-2026-109956 · CVE-2026-110856 · CVE-2026-110857 · CVE-2026-110858 · CVE-2026-110859 · CVE-2026-111064 · CVE-2026-111066 · CVE-2026-111497 · CVE-2026-112390 · CVE-2026-112391 · CVE-2026-112392 · CVE-2026-112397 · CVE-2026-112399 · CVE-2026-112400 · CVE-2026-112402 · CVE-2026-112404 · CVE-2026-112405 · CVE-2026-112893 · CVE-2026-112894 · CVE-2026-112895 · CVE-2026-112896 · CVE-2026-112897 · CVE-2026-112940 · CVE-2026-114145

RHSA-2026:90321: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.31.0 Release.

CVE-2023-54404 · CVE-2025-62718 · CVE-2026-8643 · CVE-2026-9496 · CVE-2026-12185 · CVE-2026-13697 · CVE-2026-14682 · CVE-2026-15076 · CVE-2026-16308 · CVE-2026-17106 · CVE-2026-18427 · CVE-2026-19203 · CVE-2026-19534 · CVE-2026-39820 · CVE-2026-41178 · CVE-2026-41707 · CVE-2026-42499 · CVE-2026-42502 · CVE-2026-45416 · CVE-2026-47884 · CVE-2026-47886 · CVE-2026-47888 · CVE-2026-47890 · CVE-2026-47892 · CVE-2026-50010 · CVE-2026-55831 · CVE-2026-55833 · CVE-2026-55851 · CVE-2026-56745 · CVE-2026-56746 · CVE-2026-56819 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56854 · CVE-2026-58062 · CVE-2026-59280 · CVE-2026-59282 · CVE-2026-59283 · CVE-2026-59296 · CVE-2026-59313 · CVE-2026-59323 · CVE-2026-59651 · CVE-2026-59887 · CVE-2026-59899 · CVE-2026-59901 · CVE-2026-62243 · CVE-2026-64607 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67312 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-68494 · CVE-2026-68497 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-71290 · CVE-2026-71324 · CVE-2026-71325 · CVE-2026-71327 · CVE-2026-73500 · CVE-2026-73508 · CVE-2026-74835 · CVE-2026-75838 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-76169 · CVE-2026-81521 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-82562 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84394 · CVE-2026-84428 · CVE-2026-84445 · CVE-2026-84469 · CVE-2026-84504 · CVE-2026-84961 · CVE-2026-85062 · CVE-2026-85124 · CVE-2026-85152 · CVE-2026-85595 · CVE-2026-85597 · CVE-2026-86063 · CVE-2026-87743 · CVE-2026-88004 · CVE-2026-88007 · CVE-2026-88008 · CVE-2026-88009 · CVE-2026-88011 · CVE-2026-88012 · CVE-2026-88031 · CVE-2026-88878 · CVE-2026-88879 · CVE-2026-90711 · CVE-2026-93749 · CVE-2026-100655 · CVE-2026-100656 · CVE-2026-100666 · CVE-2026-101916 · CVE-2026-102925 · CVE-2026-102930 · CVE-2026-103435 · CVE-2026-109618 · CVE-2026-109619

RHSA-2026:81110: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.18.1

CVE-2026-15792 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-49825 · CVE-2026-54058 · CVE-2026-54770 · CVE-2026-55379 · CVE-2026-55380 · CVE-2026-59197 · CVE-2026-59199 · CVE-2026-59200 · CVE-2026-59204 · CVE-2026-59205 · CVE-2026-59886 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321

RHSA-2026:74511: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.17.5

CVE-2026-15792 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-39820 · CVE-2026-39822 · CVE-2026-42151 · CVE-2026-42154 · CVE-2026-42499 · CVE-2026-42504 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-49825 · CVE-2026-54770 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84394

RHSA-2026:63373: Red Hat Security Advisory: General availability of the satellite/iop-host-inventory-frontend-rhel9 container image

CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:68681: Red Hat Security Advisory: Migration Toolkit for Containers (MTC) 1.8.17 update

CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-27145 · CVE-2026-33186 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-42504 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-59873 · CVE-2026-59874 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73566 · CVE-2026-73643 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76172 · CVE-2026-76844 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84394

RHSA-2026:65514: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.9.26

CVE-2026-15792 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-32283 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:63355: Red Hat Security Advisory: General availability of the satellite/iop-host-inventory-frontend-rhel9 container image

CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:50826: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs Security Update

CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67315 · CVE-2026-67316 · CVE-2026-67317 · CVE-2026-67318 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-69198

RHSA-2026:59583: Red Hat Security Advisory: Kiali 2.27.3 for Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.4

CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-41178 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-54272 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:48758: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs Security Update

CVE-2026-27459 · CVE-2026-62995 · CVE-2026-67312 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-73086

RHSA-2026:68755: Red Hat Security Advisory: Technical preview of the satellite/iop-vulnerability-frontend-rhel9 container image

CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-45819 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76172

RHSA-2026:67714: Red Hat Security Advisory: RHACS 4.11.4 security and bug fix update

CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-46600 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-56864 · CVE-2026-56865 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-75838 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-84375

RHSA-2026:67711: Red Hat Security Advisory: RHACS 4.10.8 security and bug fix update

CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-75838 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-84375

RHSA-2026:63307: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.15.8

CVE-2026-15927 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-57231 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:70267: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.14.9

CVE-2026-4427 · CVE-2026-6322 · CVE-2026-9277 · CVE-2026-10143 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-13149 · CVE-2026-13676 · CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-15792 · CVE-2026-15927 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-32591 · CVE-2026-33747 · CVE-2026-33748 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-39820 · CVE-2026-39821 · CVE-2026-39822 · CVE-2026-39828 · CVE-2026-39829 · CVE-2026-39830 · CVE-2026-39831 · CVE-2026-39832 · CVE-2026-39835 · CVE-2026-42151 · CVE-2026-42154 · CVE-2026-42499 · CVE-2026-42504 · CVE-2026-42508 · CVE-2026-44432 · CVE-2026-44486 · CVE-2026-44487 · CVE-2026-44488 · CVE-2026-44492 · CVE-2026-44494 · CVE-2026-44495 · CVE-2026-44496 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-44990 · CVE-2026-46595 · CVE-2026-46597 · CVE-2026-48526 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-54058 · CVE-2026-54060 · CVE-2026-55379 · CVE-2026-55380 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-57231 · CVE-2026-59197 · CVE-2026-59199 · CVE-2026-59200 · CVE-2026-59204 · CVE-2026-59205 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-59885 · CVE-2026-59886 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-84375

RHSA-2026:66084: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.10.26

CVE-2026-15792 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-32283 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-84375

RHSA-2026:66523: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.12.22

CVE-2026-15792 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-32283 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:68754: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.30.1 Release.

CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-45819 · CVE-2026-47219 · CVE-2026-48801 · CVE-2026-54272 · CVE-2026-55831 · CVE-2026-55833 · CVE-2026-56745 · CVE-2026-56746 · CVE-2026-56819 · CVE-2026-59887 · CVE-2026-59899 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67312 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-71436 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73508 · CVE-2026-73566 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76172 · CVE-2026-82562 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84394

RHSA-2026:68748: Red Hat Security Advisory: General availability of the satellite/iop-advisor-frontend-rhel9 container image

CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76172 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84394

RHSA-2026:65118: Red Hat Security Advisory: Ansible plug-ins for Red Hat Developer Hub Product Release Update

CVE-2026-5079 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-73563 · CVE-2026-73566 · CVE-2026-75838 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76172 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84394

openSUSE-SU-2026:12070-1: velociraptor-0.76.7.0.git145.b60ef1146-1.1 on GA media

CVE-2025-0914 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-17535 · CVE-2026-18348 · CVE-2026-18636 · CVE-2026-18638 · CVE-2026-18639 · CVE-2026-18860 · CVE-2026-27601 · CVE-2026-29074 · CVE-2026-41650 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-49356 · CVE-2026-5329 · CVE-2026-53550 · CVE-2026-55602 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-6290 · CVE-2026-64951 · CVE-2026-64952 · CVE-2026-64954 · CVE-2026-65903 · CVE-2026-65912 · CVE-2026-65913 · CVE-2026-65914 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-6863 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-6948 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-73650 · CVE-2026-7572 · CVE-2026-7573 · CVE-2026-84369 · CVE-2026-84370

Source published
Aug 1, 2026, 12:22:16 PM (timezone not stated)
Source modified
Aug 3, 2026, 6:06:09 PM (timezone not stated)
Saved here
13 Nov 2026 16:08:06 UTC
Source terms
ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

EUVD CVSS 4.0 · 6.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

nvd · CVE-2026-67314

Published

axios versions >=1.15.2 and <1.18.0 contain prototype-pollution read-side gadgets in Basic auth subfield handling (lib/adapters/http.js and lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js). When an application is already affected by a separate prototype-pollution primitive and makes an axios request with an own auth object that omits the username and/or password properties, axios reads the inherited Object.prototype.username and Object.prototype.password values and uses them to construct an outbound 'Authorization: Basic ...' header. axios itself does not pollute prototypes. The practical impact is outbound request tampering: an attacker who controls the polluted prototype values can inject attacker-chosen Basic auth credentials or replace an existing Authorization header. Credential disclosure is only possible under additional application-specific conditions.

Additional publisher context

NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.

Source analysis status: Analyzed

Weakness classifications: CWE-1321

Original publisher date fields

published: 2026-08-01T13:17:01.407

lastModified: 2026-09-01T15:40:20.437

1 source CPE criteria · context only
  • cpe:2.3:a:axios:axios:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*

The original JSON retains the logical configuration operators, exclusions and version bounds.

Source published
1 Aug 2026 13:17:01 UTC
Source modified
1 Sep 2026 15:40:20 UTC
Saved here
25 Oct 2026 15:18:51 UTC
Source terms
NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS 4.0 · [email protected] · Secondary · 6.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Primary · 6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

osv · GHSA-38gx-cfqf-f652

Withdrawn

## Duplicate Advisory This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-xj6q-8x83-jv6g. This link is maintained to preserve external references. ## Original Description axios versions >=1.15.2 and <1.18.0 contain prototype-pollution read-side gadgets in Basic auth subfield handling (lib/adapters/http.js and lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js). When an application is already affected by a separate prototype-pollution primitive and makes an axios request with an own auth object that omits the username and/or password properties, axios reads the inherited Object.prototype.username and Object.prototype.password values and uses them to construct an outbound 'Authorization: Basic ...' header. axios itself does not pollute prototypes. The practical impact is outbound request tampering: an attacker who controls the polluted prototype values can inject attacker-chosen Basic auth credentials or replace an existing Authorization header. Credential disclosure is only possible under additional application-specific conditions.

Source published
1 Aug 2026 15:30:27 UTC
Source modified
10 Sep 2026 03:51:12 UTC
Saved here
24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS_V4 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Publisher rating · MODERATE

osv · GHSA-xj6q-8x83-jv6g

Published

## Summary Axios versions after the `GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj` fix still contain prototype-pollution read-side gadgets in Basic auth subfield handling. If a host application is already affected by prototype pollution and then makes an axios request with an own `auth` object that omits `username` or `password`, axios reads inherited `Object.prototype.username` and `Object.prototype.password` values and uses them to construct an outbound `Authorization: Basic ...` header. This does not mean axios itself pollutes prototypes. Exploitation requires a separate prototype-pollution primitive in the host process, plus an axios call pattern such as `auth: opts.auth || {}`. ## Impact An attacker who can pollute `Object.prototype.username` and/or `Object.prototype.password` can influence the Basic auth header on affected axios requests that pass an empty or partial own `auth` object. The practical impact is outbound request tampering. The attacker can inject attacker-chosen Basic auth credentials, replace an existing `Authorization` header because axios removes it when `auth` is used, or cause downstream authorization failures. This should not be described as automatic credential exfiltration. In the minimal reproduced case, the Basic auth values are attacker-controlled values, not secrets read from axios. Credential disclosure requires an additional application-specific condition, such as a request destination observable by the attacker and a partial real auth object with a missing polluted subfield. ## Affected Functionality Affected functionality: - Node HTTP adapter Basic auth handling in `lib/adapters/http.js`. - Browser, web worker, React Native, and fetch shared resolver Basic auth handling in `lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js`. - Requests where `config.auth` is an own object but `username` and/or `password` are absent own properties. Unaffected or not accepted as core impact: - Requests with no own `auth` object after `mergeConfig()`. - Requests with own `auth.username` and `auth.password` values. - Normal axios request flow for inherited top-level `params` / `paramsSerializer` after the null-prototype `mergeConfig()` hardening. - Attacker-controlled `paramsSerializer` functions from JSON-only prototype pollution, because JSON pollution cannot create functions. If attacker-controlled code can install functions in the process, that is outside axios’ runtime boundary. ## Technical Details `mergeConfig()` returns a null-prototype top-level config object, which prevents top-level reads such as `config.auth` from inheriting polluted values. However, nested plain objects returned by `utils.merge()` still have `Object.prototype`. In `lib/adapters/http.js`, axios correctly reads the top-level `auth` value through `own('auth')`, but then reads subfields directly: ```js const configAuth = own('auth'); if (configAuth) { const username = configAuth.username || ''; const password = configAuth.password || ''; auth = username + ':' + password; } ``` If the caller passes auth: {} and Object.prototype.username/password are polluted, those direct subfield reads walk the prototype chain. The same pattern exists in `lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js`: ```js if (auth) { headers.set( 'Authorization', 'Basic ' + btoa((auth.username || '') + ':' + (auth.password ? encodeUTF8(auth.password) : '')) ); } ``` The fix should guard `username` and `password` with `utils.hasOwnProp`, matching the proxy-auth pattern already used elsewhere. ## Proof of Concept of Attack Safe local PoC against published `[email protected]`: ```js const http = require('node:http'); const axios = require('axios'); Object.prototype.username = 'victim-user'; Object.prototype.password = 'victim-password-leaked'; const server = http.createServer((req, res) => { console.log({ url: req.url, authorization: req.headers.authorization || null }); res.end('{}'); server.close(() => { delete Object.prototype.username; delete Object.prototype.password; }); }); server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', async () => { await axios.get(`http://127.0.0.1:${server.address().port}/api`, { auth: {} }); }); ``` Expected output: ```json { "url": "/api", "authorization": "Basic dmljdGltLXVzZXI6dmljdGltLXBhc3N3b3JkLWxlYWtlZA==" } ``` The base64 value decodes to `victim-user:victim-password-leaked`. ## Workarounds Avoid passing empty or partial `auth` objects. Only set `auth` when the application has own username and password values. Applications that merge untrusted input should filter `__proto__`, `constructor`, and `prototype`, and should read optional user options with own-property checks rather than `opts.auth || {}`. Where a wrapper must materialize optional auth, use a null-prototype object or explicitly copy only own fields. <details> <summary>Original Report</summary> ### Summary After [GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj](https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj) / [PR #10779](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10779) (shipped in `v1.15.2`) and the further proxy-side hardening in [PR #10833](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10833) (merged 2026-05-02), the **top-level** `config.auth` and the **proxy auth**sub-fields are correctly read via `utils.hasOwnProp`. The **regular request auth sub-fields** (`config.auth.username` and `config.auth.password`) and the **`config.params` / `config.paramsSerializer`** reads inside `resolveConfig.js` are still unguarded against a polluted `Object.prototype`. When a polluted host process makes an axios call with the common "optional override" pattern (`auth: opts.auth || {}` — an empty own `{}`), the sub-field reads `configAuth.username` and `configAuth.password` walk the prototype chain and return the attacker-controlled values. Same for `params` and `paramsSerializer`. The outbound HTTP request then carries an attacker-chosen `Authorization: Basic <base64>` header and an attacker-chosen querystring, leaking credentials and exfiltrating data to whichever host the request goes to (often attacker-influenced too — i.e. the amplifier is wired into many credential-stuffing chains). Reproduces against `axios` `main` HEAD (`34723be`, dated 2026-05-24) as well as the released `v1.16.1`. ### Details **Three still-unguarded read sites** on `main` HEAD: **(1) `lib/adapters/http.js` lines 737–740** (Node http adapter): ```js const configAuth = own('auth'); // ← top-level guard OK if (configAuth) { const username = configAuth.username || ''; // ← reads .username on the inherited chain const password = configAuth.password || ''; // ← reads .password on the inherited chain auth = username + ':' + password; } ``` `own('auth')` correctly applies `hasOwnProp` to the top-level `auth` key. But once `configAuth` is the empty object the caller passed (`auth: {}`), `configAuth.username` walks the prototype chain and picks up `Object.prototype.username`. Contrast with the proxy-auth path that PR #10833 fixed (lines 322–324): ```js const authUsername = authIsObject && utils.hasOwnProp(proxyAuth, 'username') ? proxyAuth.username : undefined; const authPassword = authIsObject && utils.hasOwnProp(proxyAuth, 'password') ? proxyAuth.password : undefined; ``` This is the exact pattern needed at lines 739–740 too. **(2) `lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js` lines 50 + 68** (xhr/fetch adapter shared resolver): ```js const auth = own('auth'); // ← top-level guard OK ... btoa((auth.username || '') + ':' + (auth.password ? encodeUTF8(auth.password) : '')) // ^ .username and .password read directly on `auth`, no hasOwnProp guard ``` Same shape — top-level guarded, sub-fields walk prototype. **(3) `lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js` lines 58–59** (params + paramsSerializer): ```js newConfig.url = buildURL( buildFullPath(baseURL, url, allowAbsoluteUrls), config.params, // ← direct read, not through own() config.paramsSerializer // ← direct read, not through own() ); ``` This third site is already proposed for fix in **open** [PR #10922](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10922) by @Mohammad-Faiz-Cloud-Engineer (status: open, currently mergeable: false). That PR's `own('params')` / `own('paramsSerializer')` change is exactly correct; this report flags the auth sub-field sites that PR #10922 does **not** cover. ### PoC This PoC contains zero direct `Object.prototype.x = y` writes. The pollution flows entirely from attacker-shaped JSON through a real deep-merge utility (`[email protected]`, ~50k weekly downloads, still walks `constructor.prototype`). A hand-rolled deep merge — the canonical insecure backend pattern — exhibits the same pollution via `__proto__` and is more common in real codebases than any named utility. ```js #!/usr/bin/env node 'use strict'; const http = require('node:http'); const axios = require('axios'); const defaultsDeep = require('defaults-deep'); // Defensive: scrub any prior pollution const PROTO_KEYS = ['username', 'password', 'params', 'paramsSerializer']; function scrub() { for (const k of PROTO_KEYS) { try { delete Object.prototype[k]; } catch (_) {} } } scrub(); // 1) Attacker input — what JSON.parse(req.body) would yield from an HTTP POST const attackerBody = JSON.parse(`{ "constructor": { "prototype": { "username": "victim-user", "password": "victim-password-leaked", "params": {"leak": "ATTACKER_QUERY_TOKEN"} } } }`); // 2) Realistic application pattern: merge user options into defaults const appDefaults = { timeout: 5000 }; defaultsDeep(appDefaults, attackerBody); // After this line: // Object.prototype.username === "victim-user" // Object.prototype.password === "victim-password-leaked" // Object.prototype.params === { leak: "ATTACKER_QUERY_TOKEN" } // 3) Capture outbound request on a local listener const server = http.createServer((req, res) => { console.log('=== captured outbound request ==='); console.log(JSON.stringify({ method: req.method, url: req.url, authorization: req.headers.authorization || null, }, null, 2)); res.end('{}'); server.close(); scrub(); }); server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', () => { const port = server.address().port; // 4) Realistic application wrapper: optional per-call overrides. // `auth: opts.auth || {}` is the common pattern — empty own object, // but inherited values walk the prototype chain. function makeRequest(targetUrl, opts = {}) { return axios.get(targetUrl, { timeout: 5000, auth: opts.auth || {}, params: opts.params || {}, }); } makeRequest(`http://127.0.0.1:${port}/api/widget`).catch((e) => { console.error('axios error:', e.message); scrub(); process.exit(1); }); }); ``` Reproduction: ```bash mkdir /tmp/axios-poc && cd /tmp/axios-poc npm init -y npm install [email protected] [email protected] node /path/to/poc.cjs ``` Captured output (verified against released `1.16.1` AND against `main` at `34723be`, 2026-05-24): ```json { "method": "GET", "url": "/api/widget?leak=ATTACKER_QUERY_TOKEN", "authorization": "Basic dmljdGltLXVzZXI6dmljdGltLXBhc3N3b3JkLWxlYWtlZA==" } ``` `dmljdGltLXVzZXI6dmljdGltLXBhc3N3b3JkLWxlYWtlZA==` base64-decodes to `victim-user:victim-password-leaked`. The querystring carries `?leak=ATTACKER_QUERY_TOKEN`, which can be a full data-exfil channel in real chains (CSRF token, session cookie via `req.headers`, etc.). ### Impact - **Credential exfiltration** via Basic auth header on the outbound request. If the request URL is attacker-influenced too (common in webhook/oauth-callback patterns), the credentials flow directly to the attacker. If not, they flow to the legitimate destination but expose victim credentials in any logs / proxies along the path. - **Outbound request-shape control** via inherited `params` / `paramsSerializer`. With `paramsSerializer` polluted to an attacker function, axios will execute that function with each `params` invocation — same-process code execution from a pollution primitive. - **Amplifier framing** is still correct. The application-side precondition is "deep-merges attacker JSON into a config object without `__proto__`/`constructor` filtering, then uses the empty- fallback wrapper `auth: opts.auth || {}` / `params: opts.params || {}`." Both halves are very common in real codebases (we tested `defaults-deep`, hand-rolled merges, and several lodash-family utilities; many still pollute). - **CWE-1321** (Improperly Controlled Modification of Object Prototype Attributes — amplifier sink). ### Proposed fix Two-line change in `http.js`, matching the proxy-auth pattern PR #10833 already established: ```diff --- a/lib/adapters/http.js +++ b/lib/adapters/http.js @@ -737,8 +737,10 @@ const configAuth = own('auth'); if (configAuth) { - const username = configAuth.username || ''; - const password = configAuth.password || ''; + const username = utils.hasOwnProp(configAuth, 'username') ? (configAuth.username || '') : ''; + const password = utils.hasOwnProp(configAuth, 'password') ? (configAuth.password || '') : ''; auth = username + ':' + password; } ``` Same pattern in `resolveConfig.js`: ```diff --- a/lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js +++ b/lib/helpers/resolveConfig.js @@ -64,7 +64,11 @@ // HTTP basic authentication if (auth) { + const authUsername = utils.hasOwnProp(auth, 'username') ? (auth.username || '') : ''; + const authPassword = utils.hasOwnProp(auth, 'password') ? auth.password : ''; headers.set( 'Authorization', 'Basic ' + - btoa((auth.username || '') + ':' + (auth.password ? encodeUTF8(auth.password) : '')) + btoa(authUsername + ':' + (authPassword ? encodeUTF8(authPassword) : '')) ); } ``` The **`params` / `paramsSerializer`** half is already handled by open PR #10922's `own('params')` / `own('paramsSerializer')` change — that PR should be rebased / merged. ### Relationship to recent prototype-pollution work Same vulnerability class as the existing public hardening, just at sub-field granularity: - [GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj](https://github.com/axios/axios/security/advisories/GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj) / [PR #10779](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10779) — `mergeConfig` direct-key reads. **Fixed in v1.15.2.** - [PR #10761](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10761) — `mergeDirectKeys` `in` → `hasOwnProp`. **Fixed in v1.15.x.** - [PR #10833](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10833) — proxy `auth.username/password` sub-fields. **Fixed post-1.16.1.** - [PR #7413](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/7413) — `formDataToJSON` defense-in-depth. **Fixed post-1.16.1.** - [PR #10901](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10901) — `socketPath` guard. **Merged 2026-05-24.** - [PR #10922 (OPEN)](https://github.com/axios/axios/pull/10922) — `params` / `paramsSerializer` `own()` guard. **Proposed; not merged.** This report adds: regular-request `auth.username` / `auth.password` sub-field reads in both the http adapter (lines 737–740) and resolveConfig.js (line 68). ### Reporter notes - Reported as part of a small peer-review bundle of runtime security findings. The bundle's public tracking entry (without the working exploit chain) is at [`georgian-io/package-runtime-security-findings/advisories/AXIOS-002-prototype-pollution-config-fields.md`](https://github.com/georgian-io/package-runtime-security-findings/blob/main/advisories/AXIOS-002-prototype-pollution-config-fields.md). - I'm happy to submit the patch as a PR if that helps. Or, if you'd prefer to fold this into open PR #10922 (whose author is actively responding to comments), please let me know and I'll coordinate. - Threat model honesty: this is **amplifier framing** — exploitation requires a separate prototype-pollution primitive elsewhere in the host process. That's how the existing GHSA-q8qp-cvcw-x6jj and PR #10833 were framed too, so the precedent for "in-scope as a hardening fix" is established. </details>

Source published
20 Jul 2026 17:51:17 UTC
Source modified
10 Sep 2026 03:51:12 UTC
Saved here
24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS_V4 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Publisher rating · MODERATE

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 15 Nov 06:00 UTC · 254 of 275 readable · 250 fully read · documentation 469/469 current