Nitro has a proxy scope bypass via percent-encoded path traversal in `routeRules`

A proxy route rule like: ```ts routeRules: { "/api/orders/**": { proxy: { to: "http://upstream/orders/**" } } } ``` is intended to limit the proxy to URLs under `/api/orders/`. Before the patch, an attacker could bypass that scope by sending percent-encoded path traversal (`..%2f`) in the URL, causing Nitro to forward a request that the upstream resolved outside the configured scope. Example exploit: ``` GET /api/orders/..%2fadmin%2fconfig.json ``` Nitro sees `..%2f` as opaque characters at match time, the `/api/orders/**` rule matched, and the raw path was forwarded to the upstream as `/orders/..%2fadmin/config.json`. An upstream that decodes `%2F` to `/` then resolved `..` and can serve `/admin/config.json` outside the intended scope. ### Are you affected? Users may be affected if **ALL** of the following are true: 1. Their project uses Nitro's `routeRules` with a `proxy` entry (`{ proxy: { to: "..." } }`). 2. The proxy `to` value uses a `/**` wildcard suffix to forward sub-paths. 3. The **upstream** behind the proxy decodes `%2F` as `/` before routing or filesystem lookup. 4. Proxy route rules are _not_ handled natively at CDN (nitro v3 and vercel) Whether the bypass actually leaks data depends on the upstream. Modern JS frameworks keep `%2F` opaque per RFC 3986 and are safe by construction. - **Safe examples:** H3 v2, Express v5, Hono v4 — modern JS frameworks keep `%2F` opaque per RFC 3986. - **Vulnerable examples:** naive imlementations that decodes the URL, static file servers, CGI dispatchers, Python `os.path`-based routing, anything sitting behind another layer that decodes `%2F` (common in microservice meshes). ## Impact Any HTTP path reachable from the Nitro server to the upstream could be requested, regardless of the configured `/**` scope. In typical deployments (API gateway, BFF, microservice proxy) this could expose internal admin endpoints, secrets endpoints, or other services the developer believed the scope rule fenced off. ## Patched versions Upgrade to one of: - [2.13.4](https://github.com/nitrojs/nitro/releases/tag/v2.13.4) or later (https://github.com/nitrojs/nitro/pull/4223) - [3.0.260429-beta](https://github.com/nitrojs/nitro/releases/tag/v3.0.260429-beta) or later (https://github.com/nitrojs/nitro/pull/4222) The fix canonicalizes the incoming pathname before building the upstream URL and rejects requests with `400 Bad Request` if the resolved path would escape the rule's base. The bytes forwarded upstream are unchanged when the request is allowed. > Note: the fix assumes the upstream does not double-decode percent-encoding. If your upstream decodes twice (`%252F → %2F → /`), it remains your responsibility to harden it. **Single-decode is standard**. ## Credits Reported by [@mHe4am](https://github.com/mHe4am) ([@he4am on HackerOne](https://hackerone.com/he4am)) via the [Vercel Open Source](https://hackerone.com/vercel-open-source?type=team) program.

Source published

6 May 2026 23:01:27 UTC

Source modified

14 May 2026 20:48:31 UTC

Observed here

24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC

Source terms

GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Publisher rating · MODERATE