Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Sources need attention Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

Picomatch has a ReDoS vulnerability via extglob quantifiers

Exploitation and risk

Source status

CISA KEV lists vulnerabilities known to be exploited. FIRST EPSS estimates the likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unavailable score does not mean zero risk.

Which CVEs have scores here?

This view includes predictions for CVE identifiers explicitly listed in public NuGet advisories. Microsoft release pages have their own prediction coverage. Check source status for the scope and latest checks.

No exploitation or prediction data is available here for these CVEs. This does not mean they are safe or unlikely to be exploited.

cve-program · CVE-2026-33671

Published

Picomatch is a glob matcher written JavaScript. Versions prior to 4.0.4, 3.0.2, and 2.3.2 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when processing crafted extglob patterns. Certain patterns using extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, especially when combined with overlapping alternatives or nested extglobs, are compiled into regular expressions that can exhibit catastrophic backtracking on non-matching input. Applications are impacted when they allow untrusted users to supply glob patterns that are passed to `picomatch` for compilation or matching. In those cases, an attacker can cause excessive CPU consumption and block the Node.js event loop, resulting in a denial of service. Applications that only use trusted, developer-controlled glob patterns are much less likely to be exposed in a security-relevant way. This issue is fixed in picomatch 4.0.4, 3.0.2 and 2.3.2. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later, depending on their supported release line. If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted glob patterns to `picomatch`. Possible mitigations include disabling extglob support for untrusted patterns by using `noextglob: true`, rejecting or sanitizing patterns containing nested extglobs or extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, enforcing strict allowlists for accepted pattern syntax, running matching in an isolated worker or separate process with time and resource limits, and applying application-level request throttling and input validation for any endpoint that accepts glob patterns.

Source published
26 Mar 2026 21:20:48 UTC
Source modified
27 Mar 2026 20:00:45 UTC
Saved here
23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
Source terms
CVE Program Terms of Use

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS 3.1 · 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

euvd · EUVD-2026-16436

Published

Picomatch is a glob matcher written JavaScript. Versions prior to 4.0.4, 3.0.2, and 2.3.2 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when processing crafted extglob patterns. Certain patterns using extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, especially when combined with overlapping alternatives or nested extglobs, are compiled into regular expressions that can exhibit catastrophic backtracking on non-matching input. Applications are impacted when they allow untrusted users to supply glob patterns that are passed to `picomatch` for compilation or matching. In those cases, an attacker can cause excessive CPU consumption and block the Node.js event loop, resulting in a denial of service. Applications that only use trusted, developer-controlled glob patterns are much less likely to be exposed in a security-relevant way. This issue is fixed in picomatch 4.0.4, 3.0.2 and 2.3.2. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later, depending on their supported release line. If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted glob patterns to `picomatch`. Possible mitigations include disabling extglob support for untrusted patterns by using `noextglob: true`, rejecting or sanitizing patterns containing nested extglobs or extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, enforcing strict allowlists for accepted pattern syntax, running matching in an isolated worker or separate process with time and resource limits, and applying application-level request throttling and input validation for any endpoint that accepts glob patterns.

Additional publisher context

EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.

Original publisher date fields

datePublished: Mar 26, 2026, 9:20:48 PM

dateUpdated: Mar 27, 2026, 8:00:45 PM

7 related source bulletins · separate from aliases

RHSA-2026:34342: Red Hat Security Advisory: Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0

CVE-2020-7753 · CVE-2021-33623 · CVE-2024-4068 · CVE-2024-45338 · CVE-2024-52011 · CVE-2025-22868 · CVE-2025-22870 · CVE-2025-22872 · CVE-2025-47911 · CVE-2025-58190 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-4867 · CVE-2026-6321 · CVE-2026-6322 · CVE-2026-6734 · CVE-2026-9277 · CVE-2026-9697 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-12151 · CVE-2026-25680 · CVE-2026-25681 · CVE-2026-29063 · CVE-2026-32141 · CVE-2026-33228 · CVE-2026-33671 · CVE-2026-33814 · CVE-2026-33891 · CVE-2026-33894 · CVE-2026-33895 · CVE-2026-33896 · CVE-2026-33937 · CVE-2026-33938 · CVE-2026-33939 · CVE-2026-33940 · CVE-2026-33941 · CVE-2026-39821 · CVE-2026-42506 · CVE-2026-48779

RHSA-2026:56431: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.18.27 security, enhancement & bug fix update

CVE-2025-61726 · CVE-2025-61729 · CVE-2025-64718 · CVE-2025-68470 · CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1527 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-6321 · CVE-2026-6322 · CVE-2026-6733 · CVE-2026-6734 · CVE-2026-9358 · CVE-2026-9679 · CVE-2026-9697 · CVE-2026-11525 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-12151 · CVE-2026-13149 · CVE-2026-13676 · CVE-2026-22036 · CVE-2026-25645 · CVE-2026-33186 · CVE-2026-33349 · CVE-2026-33671 · CVE-2026-33672 · CVE-2026-33750 · CVE-2026-34043 · CVE-2026-34986 · CVE-2026-35469 · CVE-2026-39821 · CVE-2026-40181 · CVE-2026-41305 · CVE-2026-41650 · CVE-2026-41907 · CVE-2026-42342 · CVE-2026-45409 · CVE-2026-45736 · CVE-2026-48779 · CVE-2026-48801 · CVE-2026-53550 · CVE-2026-59869

WID-SEC-W-2026-2460: Atlassian Bamboo, Bitbucket, Confluence, Fisheye, Crucible, Jira und Jira Service Management: Mehrere Schwachstellen

CVE-2016-10540 · CVE-2020-28282 · CVE-2020-7729 · CVE-2021-22569 · CVE-2021-23358 · CVE-2022-1537 · CVE-2022-3509 · CVE-2022-3510 · CVE-2022-37599 · CVE-2022-37601 · CVE-2022-37603 · CVE-2024-7254 · CVE-2025-11226 · CVE-2025-14813 · CVE-2025-62718 · CVE-2025-69873 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-21575 · CVE-2026-21577 · CVE-2026-21579 · CVE-2026-22731 · CVE-2026-2332 · CVE-2026-27830 · CVE-2026-29063 · CVE-2026-29145 · CVE-2026-29146 · CVE-2026-31802 · CVE-2026-33671 · CVE-2026-33870 · CVE-2026-33871 · CVE-2026-34043 · CVE-2026-35554 · CVE-2026-40175 · CVE-2026-42033 · CVE-2026-42035 · CVE-2026-42041 · CVE-2026-42043 · CVE-2026-42044 · CVE-2026-42198 · CVE-2026-42264 · CVE-2026-42581 · CVE-2026-42583 · CVE-2026-42585 · CVE-2026-42587 · CVE-2026-42588 · CVE-2026-44249 · CVE-2026-44486 · CVE-2026-44487 · CVE-2026-44488 · CVE-2026-44490 · CVE-2026-44492 · CVE-2026-44494 · CVE-2026-44495 · CVE-2026-44496 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-45416 · CVE-2026-45505 · CVE-2026-45736 · CVE-2026-46625 · CVE-2026-47838 · CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-48043 · CVE-2026-48779 · CVE-2026-50010 · CVE-2026-5598 · CVE-2026-6321 · CVE-2026-6322

msrc_CVE-2026-33671: Picomatch has a ReDoS vulnerability via extglob quantifiers

CVE-2026-33671

WID-SEC-W-2026-2933: Splunk SOAR: Mehrere Schwachstellen

CVE-2025-13465 · CVE-2025-13473 · CVE-2025-14550 · CVE-2025-15599 · CVE-2025-53859 · CVE-2025-6545 · CVE-2025-6547 · CVE-2025-66221 · CVE-2025-67724 · CVE-2025-67725 · CVE-2025-67726 · CVE-2025-68428 · CVE-2025-69873 · CVE-2026-0540 · CVE-2026-1207 · CVE-2026-1285 · CVE-2026-1287 · CVE-2026-1312 · CVE-2026-1642 · CVE-2026-2004 · CVE-2026-2005 · CVE-2026-2006 · CVE-2026-21226 · CVE-2026-21860 · CVE-2026-22702 · CVE-2026-22815 · CVE-2026-2391 · CVE-2026-24001 · CVE-2026-24040 · CVE-2026-24043 · CVE-2026-24133 · CVE-2026-24737 · CVE-2026-25535 · CVE-2026-25673 · CVE-2026-25674 · CVE-2026-25755 · CVE-2026-25940 · CVE-2026-26007 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27199 · CVE-2026-2739 · CVE-2026-27651 · CVE-2026-27654 · CVE-2026-27784 · CVE-2026-27959 · CVE-2026-28277 · CVE-2026-28684 · CVE-2026-28753 · CVE-2026-28755 · CVE-2026-29063 · CVE-2026-2950 · CVE-2026-30922 · CVE-2026-31898 · CVE-2026-31938 · CVE-2026-31958 · CVE-2026-32141 · CVE-2026-32597 · CVE-2026-32647 · CVE-2026-33228 · CVE-2026-33532 · CVE-2026-33671 · CVE-2026-33672 · CVE-2026-33750 · CVE-2026-34513 · CVE-2026-34514 · CVE-2026-34515 · CVE-2026-34516 · CVE-2026-34517 · CVE-2026-34518 · CVE-2026-34519 · CVE-2026-34520 · CVE-2026-34525 · CVE-2026-34601 · CVE-2026-35536 · CVE-2026-40087 · CVE-2026-40460 · CVE-2026-40701 · CVE-2026-41066 · CVE-2026-42215 · CVE-2026-42284 · CVE-2026-42934 · CVE-2026-42945 · CVE-2026-42946 · CVE-2026-44243 · CVE-2026-44244 · CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-76356 · CVE-2026-76357 · CVE-2026-76358 · CVE-2026-76359 · CVE-2026-76360 · CVE-2026-76361 · CVE-2026-76362 · CVE-2026-76363 · CVE-2026-76364 · CVE-2026-76365 · CVE-2026-76366 · CVE-2026-76367 · CVE-2026-76368 · CVE-2026-76369 · CVE-2026-76370 · CVE-2026-9256

RHSA-2026:86618: Red Hat Security Advisory: New container image: rhceph-9.2

CVE-2023-46159 · CVE-2024-47866 · CVE-2024-48916 · CVE-2024-55565 · CVE-2025-12816 · CVE-2025-15599 · CVE-2025-26791 · CVE-2025-30156 · CVE-2025-50181 · CVE-2025-50182 · CVE-2025-58754 · CVE-2025-59343 · CVE-2025-62718 · CVE-2025-66030 · CVE-2025-66035 · CVE-2025-66412 · CVE-2025-69873 · CVE-2026-0540 · CVE-2026-21441 · CVE-2026-22610 · CVE-2026-25639 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27903 · CVE-2026-27904 · CVE-2026-27970 · CVE-2026-32141 · CVE-2026-33228 · CVE-2026-33671 · CVE-2026-33672 · CVE-2026-33891 · CVE-2026-33894 · CVE-2026-33895 · CVE-2026-33896 · CVE-2026-39865 · CVE-2026-40175 · CVE-2026-40895 · CVE-2026-41238 · CVE-2026-41239 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-41305 · CVE-2026-42033 · CVE-2026-42034 · CVE-2026-42035 · CVE-2026-42036 · CVE-2026-42037 · CVE-2026-42038 · CVE-2026-42039 · CVE-2026-42040 · CVE-2026-42041 · CVE-2026-42042 · CVE-2026-42043 · CVE-2026-42044 · CVE-2026-50152 · CVE-2026-58224

RHSA-2026:56928: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.22.2 security, enhancement & bug fix update

CVE-2026-6321 · CVE-2026-6322 · CVE-2026-9358 · CVE-2026-33671 · CVE-2026-33672 · CVE-2026-33750 · CVE-2026-40181 · CVE-2026-41305 · CVE-2026-41650 · CVE-2026-41907 · CVE-2026-42338 · CVE-2026-44665 · CVE-2026-45149 · CVE-2026-45736

Source published
Mar 26, 2026, 9:20:48 PM (timezone not stated)
Source modified
Mar 27, 2026, 8:00:45 PM (timezone not stated)
Saved here
15 Nov 2026 10:04:18 UTC
Source terms
ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

EUVD CVSS 3.1 · 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

nvd · CVE-2026-33671

Published

Picomatch is a glob matcher written JavaScript. Versions prior to 4.0.4, 3.0.2, and 2.3.2 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when processing crafted extglob patterns. Certain patterns using extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, especially when combined with overlapping alternatives or nested extglobs, are compiled into regular expressions that can exhibit catastrophic backtracking on non-matching input. Applications are impacted when they allow untrusted users to supply glob patterns that are passed to `picomatch` for compilation or matching. In those cases, an attacker can cause excessive CPU consumption and block the Node.js event loop, resulting in a denial of service. Applications that only use trusted, developer-controlled glob patterns are much less likely to be exposed in a security-relevant way. This issue is fixed in picomatch 4.0.4, 3.0.2 and 2.3.2. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later, depending on their supported release line. If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted glob patterns to `picomatch`. Possible mitigations include disabling extglob support for untrusted patterns by using `noextglob: true`, rejecting or sanitizing patterns containing nested extglobs or extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, enforcing strict allowlists for accepted pattern syntax, running matching in an isolated worker or separate process with time and resource limits, and applying application-level request throttling and input validation for any endpoint that accepts glob patterns.

Additional publisher context

NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.

Source analysis status: Analyzed

Weakness classifications: CWE-1333

Original publisher date fields

published: 2026-03-26T22:16:30.210

lastModified: 2026-06-17T10:37:54.007

1 source CPE criteria · context only
  • cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*

The original JSON retains the logical configuration operators, exclusions and version bounds.

Source published
26 Mar 2026 22:16:30 UTC
Source modified
17 Jun 2026 10:37:54 UTC
Saved here
25 Oct 2026 08:17:24 UTC
Source terms
NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Secondary · 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

osv · GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj

Published

### Impact `picomatch` is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when processing crafted extglob patterns. Certain patterns using extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, especially when combined with overlapping alternatives or nested extglobs, are compiled into regular expressions that can exhibit catastrophic backtracking on non-matching input. Examples of problematic patterns include `+(a|aa)`, `+(*|?)`, `+(+(a))`, `*(+(a))`, and `+(+(+(a)))`. In local reproduction, these patterns caused multi-second event-loop blocking with relatively short inputs. For example, `+(a|aa)` compiled to `^(?:(?=.)(?:a|aa)+)$` and took about 2 seconds to reject a 41-character non-matching input, while nested patterns such as `+(+(a))` and `*(+(a))` took around 29 seconds to reject a 33-character input on a modern M1 MacBook. Applications are impacted when they allow untrusted users to supply glob patterns that are passed to `picomatch` for compilation or matching. In those cases, an attacker can cause excessive CPU consumption and block the Node.js event loop, resulting in a denial of service. Applications that only use trusted, developer-controlled glob patterns are much less likely to be exposed in a security-relevant way. ### Patches This issue is fixed in picomatch 4.0.4, 3.0.2 and 2.3.2. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later, depending on their supported release line. ### Workarounds If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted glob patterns to `picomatch`. Possible mitigations include: - disable extglob support for untrusted patterns by using `noextglob: true` - reject or sanitize patterns containing nested extglobs or extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()` - enforce strict allowlists for accepted pattern syntax - run matching in an isolated worker or separate process with time and resource limits - apply application-level request throttling and input validation for any endpoint that accepts glob patterns ### Resources - Picomatch repository: https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch - `lib/parse.js` and `lib/constants.js` are involved in generating the vulnerable regex forms - Comparable ReDoS precedent: CVE-2024-4067 (`micromatch`) - Comparable generated-regex precedent: CVE-2024-45296 (`path-to-regexp`)

Source published
25 Mar 2026 21:12:07 UTC
Source modified
10 Sep 2026 03:51:00 UTC
Saved here
24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Publisher rating · HIGH

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 15 Nov 12:11 UTC · 256 of 275 readable · 252 fully read · documentation 469/469 current