Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Some sources, documents or advisories need attention: 275/275 feeds/APIs · 469/469 docs · 8/9 advisories · checked 15:09 UTC Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

Flux notification-controller GCR Receiver missing email validation allows unauthorized reconciliation triggering

Exact source revision recorded 24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC. It does not establish the source's current position. Latest evidence.

osv · GHSA-h9cx-xjg6-5v2w

Published

### Impact The `gcr` Receiver type in Flux notification-controller does not validate the `email` claim of Google OIDC tokens used for Pub/Sub push authentication. This allows any valid Google-issued token, to authenticate against the Receiver webhook endpoint, triggering unauthorized Flux reconciliations. Exploitation requires the attacker to know the Receiver's webhook URL. The webhook path is generated as `/hook/sha256sum(token+name+namespace)`, where the token is a random string stored in a Kubernetes Secret. There is no API or endpoint that enumerates webhook URLs. An attacker cannot discover the path without either having access to the cluster and permissions to read the Receiver's `.status.webhookPath` in the target namespace, or obtaining the URL through other means (e.g. leaked secrets or access to Pub/Sub config). Upon successful authentication, the controller triggers a reconciliation for all resources listed in the Receiver's `.spec.resources`. However, the practical impact is limited: Flux reconciliation is idempotent, so if the desired state in the configured sources (Git, OCI, Helm) has not changed, the reconciliation results in a no-op with no effect on cluster state. Additionally, Flux controllers deduplicate reconciliation requests, sending many requests in a short period results in only a single reconciliation being processed. ### Patches The fix in notification-controller v1.8.3 refactors the GCR Receiver authentication to allow users to extend the verification to `email` and `audience` claims in the JWT. This enables operators to configure their Receiver's secret with the expected GCP Service Account email and audience, which the controller will validate against the token's claims before accepting the request. Email validation example: ```yaml apiVersion: v1 kind: Secret metadata: name: gcr-webhook-token namespace: apps type: Opaque stringData: token: <random token> email: <service-account>@<project>.iam.gserviceaccount.com audience: https://<hostname>/hook/<sha256(token+name+namespace)> ``` For more information, please see the GCR Receiver documentation: https://fluxcd.io/flux/components/notification/receivers/#gcr ### Credits Thanks to Saroj Khadka for reporting this issue to the Flux Security Team.

Source published
10 Apr 2026 20:18:16 UTC
Source modified
25 Jun 2026 23:11:28 UTC
Observed here
24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Publisher rating · LOW

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 1 Nov 15:09 UTC · 275 of 275 readable · 272 fully read · documentation 469/469 current