fastify vulnerable to request validation bypass via skipped boolean false schemas
Exploitation and risk
Source statusCISA KEV lists vulnerabilities known to be exploited. FIRST EPSS estimates the likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unavailable score does not mean zero risk.
Which CVEs have scores here?
This view includes predictions for CVE identifiers explicitly listed in public NuGet advisories. Microsoft release pages have their own prediction coverage. Check source status for the scope and latest checks.
No exploitation or prediction data is available here for these CVEs. This does not mean they are safe or unlikely to be exploited.
cve-program · CVE-2026-84469
Publishedfastify versions before 5.12.2 decide whether to compile a request schema based on JavaScript truthiness, but JSON Schema Draft 7 defines the boolean false as a valid schema that rejects every instance. When an application assigns false to a route's body, querystring, params, or headers schema to deny all input, fastify treats it as a missing schema, compiles no validator, and runs the route handler on any request. An unauthenticated remote client can therefore reach a handler that a valid deny-all schema was intended to make unreachable, a complete validation bypass that can lead to unauthorized state changes or execution of disabled operations. Users should upgrade to fastify 5.12.2 or later.
- Source published
- 4 Sep 2026 09:59:36 UTC
- Source modified
- 4 Sep 2026 19:34:13 UTC
- Saved here
- 23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
- Source terms
- CVE Program Terms of Use
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
Source: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.
CVSS 3.1 · 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
euvd · EUVD-2026-70989
Publishedfastify versions before 5.12.2 decide whether to compile a request schema based on JavaScript truthiness, but JSON Schema Draft 7 defines the boolean false as a valid schema that rejects every instance. When an application assigns false to a route's body, querystring, params, or headers schema to deny all input, fastify treats it as a missing schema, compiles no validator, and runs the route handler on any request. An unauthenticated remote client can therefore reach a handler that a valid deny-all schema was intended to make unreachable, a complete validation bypass that can lead to unauthorized state changes or execution of disabled operations. Users should upgrade to fastify 5.12.2 or later.
Additional publisher context
EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.
Original publisher date fields
datePublished: Sep 4, 2026, 9:59:36 AM
dateUpdated: Sep 4, 2026, 7:34:13 PM
3 related source bulletins · separate from aliases
RHSA-2026:90321: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.31.0 Release.
CVE-2023-54404 · CVE-2025-62718 · CVE-2026-8643 · CVE-2026-9496 · CVE-2026-12185 · CVE-2026-13697 · CVE-2026-14682 · CVE-2026-15076 · CVE-2026-16308 · CVE-2026-17106 · CVE-2026-18427 · CVE-2026-19203 · CVE-2026-19534 · CVE-2026-39820 · CVE-2026-41178 · CVE-2026-41707 · CVE-2026-42499 · CVE-2026-42502 · CVE-2026-45416 · CVE-2026-47884 · CVE-2026-47886 · CVE-2026-47888 · CVE-2026-47890 · CVE-2026-47892 · CVE-2026-50010 · CVE-2026-55831 · CVE-2026-55833 · CVE-2026-55851 · CVE-2026-56745 · CVE-2026-56746 · CVE-2026-56819 · CVE-2026-56852 · CVE-2026-56854 · CVE-2026-58062 · CVE-2026-59280 · CVE-2026-59282 · CVE-2026-59283 · CVE-2026-59296 · CVE-2026-59313 · CVE-2026-59323 · CVE-2026-59651 · CVE-2026-59887 · CVE-2026-59899 · CVE-2026-59901 · CVE-2026-62243 · CVE-2026-64607 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67312 · CVE-2026-67313 · CVE-2026-67314 · CVE-2026-67320 · CVE-2026-67321 · CVE-2026-68494 · CVE-2026-68497 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-71290 · CVE-2026-71324 · CVE-2026-71325 · CVE-2026-71327 · CVE-2026-73500 · CVE-2026-73508 · CVE-2026-74835 · CVE-2026-75838 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-76169 · CVE-2026-81521 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-82562 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84394 · CVE-2026-84428 · CVE-2026-84445 · CVE-2026-84469 · CVE-2026-84504 · CVE-2026-84961 · CVE-2026-85062 · CVE-2026-85124 · CVE-2026-85152 · CVE-2026-85595 · CVE-2026-85597 · CVE-2026-86063 · CVE-2026-87743 · CVE-2026-88004 · CVE-2026-88007 · CVE-2026-88008 · CVE-2026-88009 · CVE-2026-88011 · CVE-2026-88012 · CVE-2026-88031 · CVE-2026-88878 · CVE-2026-88879 · CVE-2026-90711 · CVE-2026-93749 · CVE-2026-100655 · CVE-2026-100656 · CVE-2026-100666 · CVE-2026-101916 · CVE-2026-102925 · CVE-2026-102930 · CVE-2026-103435 · CVE-2026-109618 · CVE-2026-109619
RHSA-2026:87410: Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 2.25.12 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
CVE-2024-12224 · CVE-2025-14920 · CVE-2025-14921 · CVE-2025-14924 · CVE-2025-14925 · CVE-2025-14926 · CVE-2025-14927 · CVE-2025-14928 · CVE-2025-14929 · CVE-2025-14930 · CVE-2025-61726 · CVE-2025-61729 · CVE-2026-5241 · CVE-2026-5497 · CVE-2026-6734 · CVE-2026-8643 · CVE-2026-9697 · CVE-2026-11822 · CVE-2026-11824 · CVE-2026-12151 · CVE-2026-12860 · CVE-2026-15143 · CVE-2026-15574 · CVE-2026-15679 · CVE-2026-15925 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-18427 · CVE-2026-18446 · CVE-2026-18949 · CVE-2026-19481 · CVE-2026-19484 · CVE-2026-19534 · CVE-2026-25681 · CVE-2026-25960 · CVE-2026-27136 · CVE-2026-28390 · CVE-2026-28684 · CVE-2026-31812 · CVE-2026-32283 · CVE-2026-33186 · CVE-2026-33805 · CVE-2026-33811 · CVE-2026-33814 · CVE-2026-34993 · CVE-2026-39821 · CVE-2026-39852 · CVE-2026-39892 · CVE-2026-40682 · CVE-2026-41178 · CVE-2026-42502 · CVE-2026-42561 · CVE-2026-44431 · CVE-2026-44432 · CVE-2026-44660 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-45820 · CVE-2026-47219 · CVE-2026-48526 · CVE-2026-48710 · CVE-2026-48746 · CVE-2026-49114 · CVE-2026-49825 · CVE-2026-49855 · CVE-2026-50559 · CVE-2026-54283 · CVE-2026-54399 · CVE-2026-54428 · CVE-2026-55831 · CVE-2026-55833 · CVE-2026-56121 · CVE-2026-56746 · CVE-2026-56819 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-58059 · CVE-2026-59296 · CVE-2026-59879 · CVE-2026-59884 · CVE-2026-59885 · CVE-2026-59886 · CVE-2026-59899 · CVE-2026-62243 · CVE-2026-62384 · CVE-2026-63209 · CVE-2026-63374 · CVE-2026-65898 · CVE-2026-65918 · CVE-2026-66007 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-67312 · CVE-2026-68494 · CVE-2026-68497 · CVE-2026-68770 · CVE-2026-69097 · CVE-2026-69112 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69153 · CVE-2026-69243 · CVE-2026-69244 · CVE-2026-71281 · CVE-2026-73086 · CVE-2026-73088 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73415 · CVE-2026-73417 · CVE-2026-73502 · CVE-2026-73508 · CVE-2026-73620 · CVE-2026-73622 · CVE-2026-73623 · CVE-2026-73624 · CVE-2026-73625 · CVE-2026-73627 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-75838 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76098 · CVE-2026-76169 · CVE-2026-76172 · CVE-2026-76222 · CVE-2026-76905 · CVE-2026-77354 · CVE-2026-77874 · CVE-2026-78676 · CVE-2026-78677 · CVE-2026-78679 · CVE-2026-78682 · CVE-2026-79674 · CVE-2026-79675 · CVE-2026-80205 · CVE-2026-81722 · CVE-2026-81724 · CVE-2026-81727 · CVE-2026-82397 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84394 · CVE-2026-84428 · CVE-2026-84445 · CVE-2026-84469 · CVE-2026-84504 · CVE-2026-84782 · CVE-2026-84961 · CVE-2026-85124 · CVE-2026-85152 · CVE-2026-85525 · CVE-2026-86049 · CVE-2026-86332 · CVE-2026-87776 · CVE-2026-87817 · CVE-2026-87819 · CVE-2026-88029 · CVE-2026-88031 · CVE-2026-89418 · CVE-2026-89425 · CVE-2026-91777 · CVE-2026-91990 · CVE-2026-92599 · CVE-2026-93599 · CVE-2026-93657 · CVE-2026-93749 · CVE-2026-96749 · CVE-2026-102831 · CVE-2026-102925 · CVE-2026-102930 · CVE-2026-102937 · CVE-2026-102938 · CVE-2026-103262 · CVE-2026-104851 · CVE-2026-105744
RHSA-2026:86891: Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.5.2 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
CVE-2024-14029 · CVE-2026-13697 · CVE-2026-15679 · CVE-2026-15789 · CVE-2026-18427 · CVE-2026-19534 · CVE-2026-37237 · CVE-2026-49825 · CVE-2026-49855 · CVE-2026-54284 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-59296 · CVE-2026-59893 · CVE-2026-62243 · CVE-2026-62384 · CVE-2026-63209 · CVE-2026-63374 · CVE-2026-66007 · CVE-2026-68494 · CVE-2026-68497 · CVE-2026-69097 · CVE-2026-69112 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69243 · CVE-2026-69244 · CVE-2026-71281 · CVE-2026-71491 · CVE-2026-73417 · CVE-2026-73502 · CVE-2026-73508 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-75838 · CVE-2026-75899 · CVE-2026-75931 · CVE-2026-75975 · CVE-2026-76098 · CVE-2026-76169 · CVE-2026-76172 · CVE-2026-76222 · CVE-2026-76905 · CVE-2026-77354 · CVE-2026-77874 · CVE-2026-78676 · CVE-2026-78677 · CVE-2026-78679 · CVE-2026-78682 · CVE-2026-79674 · CVE-2026-79675 · CVE-2026-80205 · CVE-2026-81722 · CVE-2026-81724 · CVE-2026-81725 · CVE-2026-81726 · CVE-2026-81727 · CVE-2026-82397 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84381 · CVE-2026-84382 · CVE-2026-84394 · CVE-2026-84428 · CVE-2026-84445 · CVE-2026-84469 · CVE-2026-84504 · CVE-2026-84782 · CVE-2026-84961 · CVE-2026-85124 · CVE-2026-85152 · CVE-2026-85525 · CVE-2026-86332 · CVE-2026-87776 · CVE-2026-87817 · CVE-2026-87819 · CVE-2026-88029 · CVE-2026-88031 · CVE-2026-89425 · CVE-2026-91990 · CVE-2026-93348 · CVE-2026-93599 · CVE-2026-93657 · CVE-2026-93749 · CVE-2026-96749 · CVE-2026-96775 · CVE-2026-102925 · CVE-2026-102930 · CVE-2026-102937 · CVE-2026-102938 · CVE-2026-102990 · CVE-2026-104851 · CVE-2026-104852 · CVE-2026-104861 · CVE-2026-104873
- Source published
- Sep 4, 2026, 9:59:36 AM (timezone not stated)
- Source modified
- Sep 4, 2026, 7:34:13 PM (timezone not stated)
- Saved here
- 11 Nov 2026 17:01:27 UTC
- Source terms
- ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
Source: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.
EUVD CVSS 3.1 · 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
nvd · CVE-2026-84469
Publishedfastify versions before 5.12.2 decide whether to compile a request schema based on JavaScript truthiness, but JSON Schema Draft 7 defines the boolean false as a valid schema that rejects every instance. When an application assigns false to a route's body, querystring, params, or headers schema to deny all input, fastify treats it as a missing schema, compiles no validator, and runs the route handler on any request. An unauthenticated remote client can therefore reach a handler that a valid deny-all schema was intended to make unreachable, a complete validation bypass that can lead to unauthorized state changes or execution of disabled operations. Users should upgrade to fastify 5.12.2 or later.
Additional publisher context
NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.
Source analysis status: Analyzed
Weakness classifications: CWE-20
Original publisher date fields
published: 2026-09-04T10:17:13.677
lastModified: 2026-09-15T20:06:50.543
1 source CPE criteria · context only
- cpe:2.3:a:fastify:fastify:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
The original JSON retains the logical configuration operators, exclusions and version bounds.
- Source published
- 4 Sep 2026 10:17:13 UTC
- Source modified
- 15 Sep 2026 20:06:50 UTC
- Saved here
- 25 Oct 2026 16:19:16 UTC
- Source terms
- NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
Source: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.
CVSS 3.1 · ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb · Secondary · 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
osv · GHSA-hwr6-493r-vm6h
Published### Impact Fastify decided whether to validate a request part by checking its schema for JavaScript truthiness. JSON Schema Draft 7 defines the boolean `false` as a valid schema that rejects every instance, but because `false` is falsy, a route that set `body`, `querystring`, `params`, or `headers` to `false` had that part left uncompiled: no validator was attached and the request reached the handler. An application that used `false` as a deny-all schema to make a route unreachable was therefore fully bypassed, and an unauthenticated remote client could reach the handler with any input. The same applied to the documented `query` alias for `querystring`. This is a complete bypass rather than a weak-schema issue, since `false` is the strongest JSON Schema assertion and must always fail. ### Patches Request-part schemas are now selected by an explicit presence check rather than truthiness, so a boolean `false` (or `true`) schema is compiled and enforced, including through the `query` alias. Patched in fastify `5.12.2`. The fix is also included in the `6.0.0` release. ### Workarounds If upgrading is not immediately possible, express a deny-all request schema with an always-failing object schema instead of the boolean `false` (for example `{ "not": {} }`), or reject the request in an `onRequest` hook.
- Source published
- 30 Sep 2026 23:44:58 UTC
- Source modified
- 1 Oct 2026 00:00:04 UTC
- Saved here
- 24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
- Source terms
- GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
Source: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.
CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Publisher rating · HIGH