Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Some sources, documents or advisories need attention: 274/275 feeds/APIs · 469/469 docs · 8/9 advisories · checked 01:18 UTC Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

Malicious code in fabric-loader-core (npm)

Collected exploitation and prediction evidence

Risk source coverage

CISA KEV is observed exploitation evidence. FIRST EPSS is a dated prediction of exploitation in the next 30 days. Missing scores are unknown. This collector requests predictions only for explicit CVE aliases in the public NuGet archive; Microsoft release views retain their existing prediction scope.

No collected risk observation for these identifiers. This does not establish absence of exploitation or a zero probability.

osv · MAL-2026-17306

Published

--- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: amazon-inspector (a11b2ce0f9b1a7b7587acd21c631a72069bab0216c8bf010f4fb04f8b0ae543f) The package's postinstall hook runs index.js, which performs an HTTPS GET to the hardcoded host https://fabric-npm.gm-service.xyz/p and passes the response body directly to vm.runInContext with a context exposing require, process, Buffer, timers, and console. Whatever bytes that server returns execute at npm install time with full Node privileges on the installer's machine. The advertised purpose ("Native asset loader bridge for Fabric mod environments") does not match the code: lib/renderer.js is an inert stub with no-op exports, and index.js contains only the remote fetch-and-eval loader. The package name evokes the unrelated Fabric Minecraft mod ecosystem, which is a cover story. The remote host controls the payload and can change it at any time, so installer impact is unbounded and can include credential theft, persistence, or lateral movement. ## Source: ossf-package-analysis (d5abc604e8b7408e3be8d65f587522024ce65b390cb7746706e1032b13995cb1) The OpenSSF Package Analysis project identified 'fabric-loader-core' @ 1.0.0 (npm) as malicious. It is considered malicious because: - The package communicates with a domain associated with malicious activity.

Source published
29 Sep 2026 17:42:53 UTC
Source modified
1 Oct 2026 06:00:04 UTC
Observed here
24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
Source terms
OSV · upstream source license applies

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · OSV · upstream source license applies. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 12 Nov 01:18 UTC · 274 of 275 readable · 272 fully read · documentation 469/469 current