CISA lists this Cisco Multiple Products vulnerability as known exploited. Check the cited references and original publisher guidance for affected products and remediation.
Cisco Secure Email Gateway, Secure Email, AsyncOS Software, and Web Manager appliances contains an improper input validation vulnerability that allows threat actors to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system of an affected appliance.
Product
Multiple Products
Added to KEV
17 Dec 2025
Federal remediation due
24 Dec 2025
Known ransomware use
Not reported
Page history
Changes are dated when recorded; day views use the last saved version from that UTC day, and citations stay fixed.
Up to 100 recent field edits are shown; older edits may be outside retention.
29 Oct 2026 · 20:19:26 UTCLink: Vendor advisoryhttps://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-sma-attack-N9bf4 → No longer listed in this observation
29 Oct 2026 · 20:19:26 UTCLink: CISA-cited referencehttps://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-sma-attack-N9bf4
CISA KEV is observed exploitation evidence. FIRST EPSS is a dated prediction of exploitation in the next 30 days. Missing scores are unknown. This collector requests predictions only for explicit CVE aliases in the public NuGet archive; Microsoft release views retain their existing prediction scope.
Cisco Secure Email Gateway, Secure Email, AsyncOS Software, and Web Manager appliances contains an improper input validation vulnerability that allows threat actors to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system of an affected appliance.
Risk history is separate from CNA/OSV content history. Daily score drift is retained but only an upward crossing of 10% triggers the prediction change event.
Each citation identifies one complete source statement. Source modification dates and the time this installation observed them are distinct. Latest history includes records historically associated by source identifiers; a removed alias is not a current equivalence claim. Exact citations show that source record's own earlier observations. Failed reads and unchanged polls do not rewrite history.