Undici Uses Insufficiently Random Values
cve-program · CVE-2025-22150
PublishedUndici is an HTTP/1.1 client. Starting in version 4.5.0 and prior to versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3, undici uses `Math.random()` to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of `Math.random()` can be predicted if several of its generated values are known. If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, an attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met. This is fixed in versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3. As a workaround, do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers.
Read the publisher's advisoryeuvd · EUVD-2025-0154
PublishedUndici is an HTTP/1.1 client. Starting in version 4.5.0 and prior to versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3, undici uses `Math.random()` to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of `Math.random()` can be predicted if several of its generated values are known. If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, an attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met. This is fixed in versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3. As a workaround, do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers.
Read the publisher's advisorynvd · CVE-2025-22150
PublishedUndici is an HTTP/1.1 client. Starting in version 4.5.0 and prior to versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3, undici uses `Math.random()` to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of `Math.random()` can be predicted if several of its generated values are known. If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, an attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met. This is fixed in versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3. As a workaround, do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers.
Read the publisher's advisoryosv · GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975
Published### Impact [Undici `fetch()` uses Math.random()](https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113) to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of Math.random() can be predicted if several of its generated values are known. If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, An attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met. ### Patches This is fixed in 5.28.5; 6.21.1; 7.2.3. ### Workarounds Do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers. ### References * https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312 * https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f
Read the publisher's advisoryAffected versions, risk and source history
Related advisories and sources
Publishers link these advisories through the identifiers shown below. A shared identifier or date alone does not tell you whether your software is affected or whether the advisories describe the same cause.
CVE-2025-22150 · CVE overview and exploitation status
cve-program · CVE-2025-22150
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385
- https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312
- https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113
euvd · EUVD-2025-0154
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385
- https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312
- https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113
nvd · CVE-2025-22150
- https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975
- https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312
osv · GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/security/advisories/GHSA-c76h-2ccp-4975
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-22150
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/711e20772764c29f6622ddc937c63b6eefdf07d0
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c2d78cd19fe4f4c621424491e26ce299e65e934a
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/commit/c3acc6050b781b827d80c86cbbab34f14458d385
- https://hackerone.com/reports/2913312
- https://blog.securityevaluators.com/hacking-the-javascript-lottery-80cc437e3b7f
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici
- https://github.com/nodejs/undici/blob/8b06b8250907d92fead664b3368f1d2aa27c1f35/lib/web/fetch/body.js#L113
Related changes
Linked by CVE identifierNo related changes are available here.