Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Some sources, documents or advisories need attention: 275/275 feeds/APIs · 469/469 docs · 7/9 advisories · checked 05:32 UTC Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

hpke-js reuses AEAD nonces

Collected exploitation and prediction evidence

Risk source coverage

CISA KEV is observed exploitation evidence. FIRST EPSS is a dated prediction of exploitation in the next 30 days. Missing scores are unknown. This collector requests predictions only for explicit CVE aliases in the public NuGet archive; Microsoft release views retain their existing prediction scope.

No collected risk observation for these identifiers. This does not establish absence of exploitation or a zero probability.

cve-program · CVE-2025-64767

Published

hpke-js is a Hybrid Public Key Encryption (HPKE) module built on top of Web Cryptography API. Prior to version 1.7.5, the public SenderContext Seal() API has a race condition which allows for the same AEAD nonce to be re-used for multiple Seal() calls. This can lead to complete loss of Confidentiality and Integrity of the produced messages. This issue has been patched in version 1.7.5.

Source published
21 Nov 2025 18:47:19 UTC
Source modified
21 Nov 2025 19:01:11 UTC
Observed here
23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
Source terms
CVE Program Terms of Use

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS 3.1 · 9.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

euvd · EUVD-2025-198319

Published

hpke-js is a Hybrid Public Key Encryption (HPKE) module built on top of Web Cryptography API. Prior to version 1.7.5, the public SenderContext Seal() API has a race condition which allows for the same AEAD nonce to be re-used for multiple Seal() calls. This can lead to complete loss of Confidentiality and Integrity of the produced messages. This issue has been patched in version 1.7.5.

EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.

Original publisher date fields

datePublished: Nov 21, 2025, 6:47:19 PM

dateUpdated: Nov 21, 2025, 7:01:11 PM

Source published
Nov 21, 2025, 6:47:19 PM (timezone not stated)
Source modified
Nov 21, 2025, 7:01:11 PM (timezone not stated)
Observed here
9 Nov 2026 04:07:52 UTC
Source terms
ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

EUVD CVSS 3.1 · 9.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

nvd · CVE-2025-64767

Published

hpke-js is a Hybrid Public Key Encryption (HPKE) module built on top of Web Cryptography API. Prior to version 1.7.5, the public SenderContext Seal() API has a race condition which allows for the same AEAD nonce to be re-used for multiple Seal() calls. This can lead to complete loss of Confidentiality and Integrity of the produced messages. This issue has been patched in version 1.7.5.

NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.

Source analysis status: Deferred

Weakness classifications: CWE-323

Original publisher date fields

published: 2025-11-21T19:16:03.497

lastModified: 2026-10-18T20:10:00.110

Source published
21 Nov 2025 19:16:03 UTC
Source modified
18 Oct 2026 20:10:00 UTC
Observed here
25 Oct 2026 03:17:36 UTC
Source terms
NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Secondary · 9.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

osv · GHSA-73g8-5h73-26h4

Published

### Summary The public SenderContext Seal() API has a race condition which allows for the same AEAD nonce to be re-used for multiple Seal() calls. This can lead to complete loss of Confidentiality and Integrity of the produced messages. ### Details The SenderContext Seal() [implementation](https://github.com/dajiaji/hpke-js/blob/b7fd3592c7c08660c98289d67c6bb7f891af75c4/packages/core/src/senderContext.ts#L22-L34) allows for concurrent executions to trigger `computeNonce()` with the same sequence number. This results in the same nonce being used in the suite's AEAD. ### PoC This code reproduces the issue (and also checks for more things that could be wrong with the implementation). ```js import { CipherSuite, KdfId, AeadId, KemId } from "hpke-js"; const suite = new CipherSuite({ kem: KemId.DhkemP256HkdfSha256, kdf: KdfId.HkdfSha256, aead: AeadId.Aes128Gcm, }); const keypair = await suite.kem.generateKeyPair(); const skR = keypair.privateKey; const pkR = keypair.publicKey; const sender = await suite.createSenderContext({ recipientPublicKey: pkR, }); const [message0, message1] = await Promise.all([ sender.seal( new TextEncoder().encode("Secret message 1: Attack at dawn").buffer ), sender.seal( new TextEncoder().encode("Secret message 2: Withdraw troops").buffer ), ]); const recipient = await suite.createRecipientContext({ recipientKey: skR, enc: sender.enc, }); const plaintext0 = await recipient.open(message0); console.log("✓ Decrypted message seq=0", new TextDecoder().decode(plaintext0)); try { console.log( "✓ Decrypted message seq=1", new TextDecoder().decode(await recipient.open(message1)) ); console.log("\n✓ nonce-reuse reproduction completed, code is NOT vulnerable"); } catch (error) { // re-sequence the recipient to verify same nonce was used for two messages recipient._ctx.seq = 0; console.log( "❌ Decrypted a different message with seq=0", new TextDecoder().decode(await recipient.open(message1)) ); console.log( "\n✓ nonce-reuse reproduction completed, code is vulnerable, nonces are reused when concurrent calls to .seal() are used" ); } // Test that failed Open() doesn't increment sequence const recipient2 = await suite.createRecipientContext({ recipientKey: skR, enc: sender.enc, }); const invalidMessage = new Uint8Array(message0.byteLength); invalidMessage.set(new Uint8Array(message0)); invalidMessage[0] ^= 0xff; // Corrupt the first byte try { await recipient2.open(invalidMessage.buffer); } catch {} // Now try to open the first valid message - should still work with seq=0 try { await recipient2.open(message0); console.log("✓ Successfully decrypted message with seq=0 after failed open()"); console.log("✓ Failed open() did NOT increment sequence"); } catch (error) { console.log("❌ Failed to decrypt message - sequence was incorrectly incremented"); } // Test that same message produces same ciphertext due to nonce reuse const sender2 = await suite.createSenderContext({ recipientPublicKey: pkR, }); const sameMessage = new TextEncoder().encode("Identical message").buffer; const [cipher0, cipher1] = await Promise.all([ sender2.seal(sameMessage), sender2.seal(sameMessage), ]); const cipher0Array = new Uint8Array(cipher0); const cipher1Array = new Uint8Array(cipher1); let identical = true; if (cipher0Array.length !== cipher1Array.length) { identical = false; } else { for (let i = 0; i < cipher0Array.length; i++) { if (cipher0Array[i] !== cipher1Array[i]) { identical = false; break; } } } if (identical) { console.log("\n❌ Same message produced IDENTICAL ciphertext (nonce reuse confirmed)"); } else { console.log("\n✓ Same message produced different ciphertext (nonces are unique)"); } ``` ### Recommendation Implement a synchronization mechanism such that only one seal()/open() per context can be executed at a time. ### Notes Refs: https://github.com/hpkewg/hpke/issues/38 > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9180.html#section-9.7.5 > The AEADs specified in this document are not secure in case of nonce reuse. > https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9180.html#section-5-6 > A context is an implementation-specific structure that encodes the AEAD algorithm and key in use, and manages the nonces used so that the same nonce is not used with multiple plaintexts. The context implementation in @hpke/core is not correct given its AEAD Seal() is awaited/asynchronous.

Source published
20 Nov 2025 17:36:13 UTC
Source modified
21 Nov 2025 22:18:25 UTC
Observed here
24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Publisher rating · CRITICAL

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 9 Nov 05:32 UTC · 275 of 275 readable · 273 fully read · documentation 469/469 current