No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means
Hickory DNS 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.25.2 contains a query amplification vulnerability in its recursive resolver, which mishandles cyclic sibling name server referrals that lack glue records. Attackers controlling two zones whose name servers reference each other without glue records can make the recursor loop, sending many upstream queries, amplified further by zero-TTL NS records.
Read the publisher's advisoryHickory DNS 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.25.2 contains a query amplification vulnerability in its recursive resolver, which mishandles cyclic sibling name server referrals that lack glue records. Attackers controlling two zones whose name servers reference each other without glue records can make the recursor loop, sending many upstream queries, amplified further by zero-TTL NS records.
Read the publisher's advisoryHickory DNS 0.25.0-alpha.3 through 0.25.2 contains a query amplification vulnerability in its recursive resolver, which mishandles cyclic sibling name server referrals that lack glue records. Attackers controlling two zones whose name servers reference each other without glue records can make the recursor loop, sending many upstream queries, amplified further by zero-TTL NS records.
Read the publisher's advisoryTwo zones can each delegate to name servers named only inside the other zone, with no glue records (the cyclic sibling case in RFC 9471 section 2.3). Such delegations can never be resolved, but the recursor did not stop when it came back to a zone it was already resolving. It kept sending queries until the per-request limits ran out, and zero TTLs on the referral NS records made this worse. Someone who controls two such zones can make a recursor send many upstream queries for each client query. This affects the recursive resolver, which is in hickory-resolver behind the opt-in `recursor` feature from 0.26.0-beta.1. Earlier releases shipped it as the separate hickory-recursor crate. From 0.26.2 each client request tracks the zones on its resolution stack and refuses to enter a zone that is already on it.
Read the publisher's advisoryTwo zones can each delegate to name servers named only inside the other zone, with no glue records (RFC 9471 section 2.3). The recursor did not stop when it came back to a zone it was already resolving, so someone who controls two such zones can make it send many upstream queries for each client query. The recursor code moved into hickory-resolver (opt-in `recursor` feature) in 0.26.0-beta.1, and the fix is in hickory-resolver 0.26.2. No hickory-recursor release contains a fix, so users should move to hickory-resolver 0.26.2 or later with the `recursor` feature.
Read the publisher's advisoryCISA KEV lists vulnerabilities known to be exploited. FIRST EPSS estimates the likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unavailable score does not mean zero risk.
This view includes predictions for CVE identifiers explicitly listed in public NuGet advisories. Microsoft release pages have their own prediction coverage. Check source status for the scope and latest checks.
No exploitation or prediction data is available here for these CVEs. This does not mean they are safe or unlikely to be exploited.
Compare earlier KEV listings and daily EPSS scores. Advisory wording and affected versions have a separate history.
A prediction change is reported when EPSS rises from below 10% to 10% or higher. Other daily score changes remain in this history.
See how the publisher's advisory changed over time. Each link opens the version saved at that time. The publisher's update date can differ from the date shown here.
Each link identifies one complete publisher record. History can include advisories that previously shared an identifier; an identifier removed by a publisher no longer establishes a current relationship. A historical link shows only that record and earlier saved versions. Failed checks and unchanged reads do not create new versions.
euvd · EUVD-2026-119345 · Published
nvd · CVE-2026-123586 · Published
osv · RUSTSEC-2026-0516 · Published
osv · RUSTSEC-2026-0522 · Published
cve-program · CVE-2026-123586 · Published
cve-program · CVE-2026-123586 · Published