Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Sources need attention Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

qs's arrayLimit bypass in comma parsing allows denial of service

CVSS 4.0 6.3 MEDIUMCVSS 3.1 3.7 LOWEUVD CVSS 4.0 6.3 CVSS 4.0 · 7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158 · Secondary 6.3 MEDIUMCVSS 3.1 · 7ffcee3d-2c14-4c3e-b844-86c6a321a158 · Secondary 3.7 LOWCVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Primary 7.5 HIGHCVSS_V3 Publisher rating LOWFixed by qs 6.14.2KEV status unknown

cve-program · CVE-2026-2391

Published

### Summary The `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when `comma: true` is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284). ### Details When the `comma` option is set to `true` (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., `?param=a,b,c` becomes `['a', 'b', 'c']`). However, the limit check for `arrayLimit` (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in `parseArrayValue`, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation. **Vulnerable code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50): ```js if (val && typeof val === 'string' && options.comma && val.indexOf(',') > -1) {     return val.split(','); } if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded && currentArrayLength >= options.arrayLimit) {     throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } return val; ``` The `split(',')` returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via `utils.combine` does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of `arrayLimit`, which is enforced correctly for indexed (`a[0]=`) and bracket (`a[]=`) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p). ### PoC **Test 1 - Basic bypass:** ``` npm install qs ``` ```js const qs = require('qs'); const payload = 'a=' + ','.repeat(25); // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5) const options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true }; try {   const result = qs.parse(payload, options);   console.log(result.a.length); // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful) } catch (e) {   console.log('Limit enforced:', e.message); // Not thrown } ``` **Configuration:** - `comma: true` - `arrayLimit: 5` - `throwOnLimitExceeded: true` Expected: Throws "Array limit exceeded" error. Actual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26. ### Impact Denial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion.

Read the publisher's advisory

euvd · EUVD-2026-6720

Published

### Summary The `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when `comma: true` is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284). ### Details When the `comma` option is set to `true` (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., `?param=a,b,c` becomes `['a', 'b', 'c']`). However, the limit check for `arrayLimit` (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in `parseArrayValue`, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation. **Vulnerable code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50): ```js if (val && typeof val === 'string' && options.comma && val.indexOf(',') > -1) {     return val.split(','); } if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded && currentArrayLength >= options.arrayLimit) {     throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } return val; ``` The `split(',')` returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via `utils.combine` does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of `arrayLimit`, which is enforced correctly for indexed (`a[0]=`) and bracket (`a[]=`) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p). ### PoC **Test 1 - Basic bypass:** ``` npm install qs ``` ```js const qs = require('qs'); const payload = 'a=' + ','.repeat(25); // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5) const options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true }; try {   const result = qs.parse(payload, options);   console.log(result.a.length); // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful) } catch (e) {   console.log('Limit enforced:', e.message); // Not thrown } ``` **Configuration:** - `comma: true` - `arrayLimit: 5` - `throwOnLimitExceeded: true` Expected: Throws "Array limit exceeded" error. Actual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26. ### Impact Denial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion.

Read the publisher's advisory

nvd · CVE-2026-2391

Published

### Summary The `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when `comma: true` is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284). ### Details When the `comma` option is set to `true` (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., `?param=a,b,c` becomes `['a', 'b', 'c']`). However, the limit check for `arrayLimit` (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in `parseArrayValue`, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation. **Vulnerable code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50): ```js if (val && typeof val === 'string' && options.comma && val.indexOf(',') > -1) {     return val.split(','); } if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded && currentArrayLength >= options.arrayLimit) {     throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } return val; ``` The `split(',')` returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via `utils.combine` does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of `arrayLimit`, which is enforced correctly for indexed (`a[0]=`) and bracket (`a[]=`) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p). ### PoC **Test 1 - Basic bypass:** ``` npm install qs ``` ```js const qs = require('qs'); const payload = 'a=' + ','.repeat(25); // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5) const options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true }; try {   const result = qs.parse(payload, options);   console.log(result.a.length); // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful) } catch (e) {   console.log('Limit enforced:', e.message); // Not thrown } ``` **Configuration:** - `comma: true` - `arrayLimit: 5` - `throwOnLimitExceeded: true` Expected: Throws "Array limit exceeded" error. Actual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26. ### Impact Denial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion.

Read the publisher's advisory

osv · GHSA-w7fw-mjwx-w883

Published

### Summary The `arrayLimit` option in qs does not enforce limits for comma-separated values when `comma: true` is enabled, allowing attackers to cause denial-of-service via memory exhaustion. This is a bypass of the array limit enforcement, similar to the bracket notation bypass addressed in GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p (CVE-2025-15284). ### Details When the `comma` option is set to `true` (not the default, but configurable in applications), qs allows parsing comma-separated strings as arrays (e.g., `?param=a,b,c` becomes `['a', 'b', 'c']`). However, the limit check for `arrayLimit` (default: 20) and the optional throwOnLimitExceeded occur after the comma-handling logic in `parseArrayValue`, enabling a bypass. This permits creation of arbitrarily large arrays from a single parameter, leading to excessive memory allocation. **Vulnerable code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50): ```js if (val && typeof val === 'string' && options.comma && val.indexOf(',') > -1) { return val.split(','); } if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded && currentArrayLength >= options.arrayLimit) { throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } return val; ``` The `split(',')` returns the array immediately, skipping the subsequent limit check. Downstream merging via `utils.combine` does not prevent allocation, even if it marks overflows for sparse arrays.This discrepancy allows attackers to send a single parameter with millions of commas (e.g., `?param=,,,,,,,,...`), allocating massive arrays in memory without triggering limits. It bypasses the intent of `arrayLimit`, which is enforced correctly for indexed (`a[0]=`) and bracket (`a[]=`) notations (the latter fixed in v6.14.1 per GHSA-6rw7-vpxm-498p). ### PoC **Test 1 - Basic bypass:** ``` npm install qs ``` ```js const qs = require('qs'); const payload = 'a=' + ','.repeat(25); // 26 elements after split (bypasses arrayLimit: 5) const options = { comma: true, arrayLimit: 5, throwOnLimitExceeded: true }; try { const result = qs.parse(payload, options); console.log(result.a.length); // Outputs: 26 (bypass successful) } catch (e) { console.log('Limit enforced:', e.message); // Not thrown } ``` **Configuration:** - `comma: true` - `arrayLimit: 5` - `throwOnLimitExceeded: true` Expected: Throws "Array limit exceeded" error. Actual: Parses successfully, creating an array of length 26. ### Impact Denial of Service (DoS) via memory exhaustion. ### Suggested Fix Move the `arrayLimit` check before the comma split in `parseArrayValue`, and enforce it on the resulting array length. Use `currentArrayLength` (already calculated upstream) for consistency with bracket notation fixes. **Current code** (lib/parse.js: lines ~40-50): ```js if (val && typeof val === 'string' && options.comma && val.indexOf(',') > -1) { return val.split(','); } if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded && currentArrayLength >= options.arrayLimit) { throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } return val; ``` **Fixed code:** ```js if (val && typeof val === 'string' && options.comma && val.indexOf(',') > -1) { const splitArray = val.split(','); if (splitArray.length > options.arrayLimit - currentArrayLength) { // Check against remaining limit if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded) { throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } else { // Optionally convert to object or truncate, per README return splitArray.slice(0, options.arrayLimit - currentArrayLength); } } return splitArray; } if (options.throwOnLimitExceeded && currentArrayLength >= options.arrayLimit) { throw new RangeError('Array limit exceeded. Only ' + options.arrayLimit + ' element' + (options.arrayLimit === 1 ? '' : 's') + ' allowed in an array.'); } return val; ``` This aligns behavior with indexed and bracket notations, reuses `currentArrayLength`, and respects `throwOnLimitExceeded`. Update README to note the consistent enforcement.

Read the publisher's advisory

Affected versions, risk and source history

cve-program · CVE-2026-2391

Published

qs

https://npmjs.com/qs

Publisher's version information

Shown as published. These rules are not interpreted as NuGet package version ranges.

{
                    "collectionURL": "https://npmjs.com/qs",
                    "defaultStatus": "unaffected",
                    "packageName": "qs",
                    "repo": "https://github.com/ljharb/qs",
                    "versions": [
                        {
                            "lessThanOrEqual": "6.14.1",
                            "status": "affected",
                            "version": "6.7.0",
                            "versionType": "semver"
                        }
                    ]
                }

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

euvd · EUVD-2026-6720

Published

EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.

Original publisher date fields

datePublished: Feb 12, 2026, 4:39:42 AM

dateUpdated: Feb 12, 2026, 5:32:05 PM

5 related source bulletins · separate from aliases

WID-SEC-W-2026-3596: IBM App Connect Enterprise: Mehrere Schwachstellen

CVE-2022-35948 · CVE-2026-13149 · CVE-2026-14257 · CVE-2026-15157 · CVE-2026-1527 · CVE-2026-16728 · CVE-2026-16729 · CVE-2026-18149 · CVE-2026-18540 · CVE-2026-19534 · CVE-2026-2391 · CVE-2026-45820 · CVE-2026-54272 · CVE-2026-63670 · CVE-2026-67213 · CVE-2026-67214 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-69198 · CVE-2026-73566 · CVE-2026-73646 · CVE-2026-77037 · CVE-2026-77063 · CVE-2026-77078 · CVE-2026-82333 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-82562 · CVE-2026-83605 · CVE-2026-83606 · CVE-2026-83607 · CVE-2026-83608 · CVE-2026-83609 · CVE-2026-83610 · CVE-2026-83611 · CVE-2026-83612 · CVE-2026-83613 · CVE-2026-83614 · CVE-2026-83615 · CVE-2026-83616 · CVE-2026-83618 · CVE-2026-83619 · CVE-2026-84292 · CVE-2026-84371 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84890 · CVE-2026-84933 · CVE-2026-84947 · CVE-2026-84961 · CVE-2026-85008 · CVE-2026-85014 · CVE-2026-85024 · CVE-2026-85152

WID-SEC-W-2026-3623: IBM DataPower Gateway: Mehrere Schwachstellen

CVE-2023-53781 · CVE-2025-14087 · CVE-2025-14512 · CVE-2025-21858 · CVE-2025-22105 · CVE-2025-37980 · CVE-2025-38015 · CVE-2025-38097 · CVE-2025-38180 · CVE-2025-38400 · CVE-2025-38405 · CVE-2025-38441 · CVE-2025-38470 · CVE-2025-38653 · CVE-2025-39766 · CVE-2025-39797 · CVE-2025-39866 · CVE-2025-40134 · CVE-2025-48431 · CVE-2025-5278 · CVE-2025-68183 · CVE-2025-68211 · CVE-2025-68214 · CVE-2025-68347 · CVE-2025-68366 · CVE-2025-68724 · CVE-2025-71066 · CVE-2025-71089 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-13257 · CVE-2026-13258 · CVE-2026-13757 · CVE-2026-14269 · CVE-2026-14273 · CVE-2026-14496 · CVE-2026-14497 · CVE-2026-14502 · CVE-2026-14507 · CVE-2026-14508 · CVE-2026-14509 · CVE-2026-14888 · CVE-2026-14905 · CVE-2026-14988 · CVE-2026-14990 · CVE-2026-14991 · CVE-2026-14992 · CVE-2026-14999 · CVE-2026-15588 · CVE-2026-15762 · CVE-2026-15781 · CVE-2026-15784 · CVE-2026-15819 · CVE-2026-15822 · CVE-2026-15824 · CVE-2026-16111 · CVE-2026-16159 · CVE-2026-16161 · CVE-2026-16163 · CVE-2026-16164 · CVE-2026-16165 · CVE-2026-16167 · CVE-2026-16169 · CVE-2026-16170 · CVE-2026-16176 · CVE-2026-16177 · CVE-2026-16178 · CVE-2026-16179 · CVE-2026-16181 · CVE-2026-16182 · CVE-2026-16340 · CVE-2026-16439 · CVE-2026-16440 · CVE-2026-16441 · CVE-2026-2100 · CVE-2026-22979 · CVE-2026-22984 · CVE-2026-22990 · CVE-2026-23002 · CVE-2026-23060 · CVE-2026-23110 · CVE-2026-23204 · CVE-2026-23209 · CVE-2026-23216 · CVE-2026-23243 · CVE-2026-23270 · CVE-2026-23392 · CVE-2026-23455 · CVE-2026-2391 · CVE-2026-31411 · CVE-2026-31419 · CVE-2026-31488 · CVE-2026-31508 · CVE-2026-31532 · CVE-2026-31581 · CVE-2026-31607 · CVE-2026-31613 · CVE-2026-31669 · CVE-2026-31677 · CVE-2026-31684 · CVE-2026-31685 · CVE-2026-33845 · CVE-2026-33846 · CVE-2026-3832 · CVE-2026-3833 · CVE-2026-4046 · CVE-2026-41254 · CVE-2026-41602 · CVE-2026-41606 · CVE-2026-41607 · CVE-2026-42009 · CVE-2026-42010 · CVE-2026-42011 · CVE-2026-42012 · CVE-2026-42013 · CVE-2026-42014 · CVE-2026-42015 · CVE-2026-43027 · CVE-2026-43037 · CVE-2026-43038 · CVE-2026-43056 · CVE-2026-43074 · CVE-2026-43116 · CVE-2026-43125 · CVE-2026-43163 · CVE-2026-43190 · CVE-2026-43198 · CVE-2026-43260 · CVE-2026-43284 · CVE-2026-43303 · CVE-2026-43329 · CVE-2026-43499 · CVE-2026-43501 · CVE-2026-43868 · CVE-2026-43870 · CVE-2026-4437 · CVE-2026-4438 · CVE-2026-45852 · CVE-2026-46054 · CVE-2026-46086 · CVE-2026-46116 · CVE-2026-46173 · CVE-2026-46181 · CVE-2026-46242 · CVE-2026-46259 · CVE-2026-46300 · CVE-2026-46331 · CVE-2026-46333 · CVE-2026-46917 · CVE-2026-46968 · CVE-2026-47010 · CVE-2026-47021 · CVE-2026-47027 · CVE-2026-47059 · CVE-2026-47063 · CVE-2026-48144 · CVE-2026-48145 · CVE-2026-5260 · CVE-2026-52923 · CVE-2026-52991 · CVE-2026-53006 · CVE-2026-53009 · CVE-2026-53131 · CVE-2026-53189 · CVE-2026-53264 · CVE-2026-53266 · CVE-2026-5419 · CVE-2026-5450 · CVE-2026-55602 · CVE-2026-55603 · CVE-2026-55968 · CVE-2026-55970 · CVE-2026-58010 · CVE-2026-58011 · CVE-2026-58012 · CVE-2026-58013 · CVE-2026-58014 · CVE-2026-58015 · CVE-2026-58016 · CVE-2026-58662 · CVE-2026-59879 · CVE-2026-59880 · CVE-2026-60147 · CVE-2026-60589 · CVE-2026-61308 · CVE-2026-63913 · CVE-2026-63952 · CVE-2026-64017 · CVE-2026-64530 · CVE-2026-64560 · CVE-2026-70906 · CVE-2026-70907 · CVE-2026-74581 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-82562 · CVE-2026-83605 · CVE-2026-83607 · CVE-2026-83608 · CVE-2026-83613 · CVE-2026-83614 · CVE-2026-83615 · CVE-2026-83616 · CVE-2026-83619

WID-SEC-W-2026-3046: IBM Concert: Mehrere Schwachstellen

CVE-2019-19921 · CVE-2021-23337 · CVE-2024-3651 · CVE-2024-39338 · CVE-2024-45590 · CVE-2025-13465 · CVE-2025-15284 · CVE-2025-15599 · CVE-2025-22874 · CVE-2025-47273 · CVE-2025-47907 · CVE-2025-52881 · CVE-2025-53643 · CVE-2025-55184 · CVE-2025-58056 · CVE-2025-58188 · CVE-2025-58189 · CVE-2025-61723 · CVE-2025-61730 · CVE-2025-64649 · CVE-2025-64756 · CVE-2025-67221 · CVE-2025-68121 · CVE-2025-68146 · CVE-2026-0540 · CVE-2026-2327 · CVE-2026-23490 · CVE-2026-23897 · CVE-2026-2391 · CVE-2026-23949 · CVE-2026-24486 · CVE-2026-25528 · CVE-2026-25547 · CVE-2026-25639 · CVE-2026-25990 · CVE-2026-26007 · CVE-2026-26019 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27142 · CVE-2026-27212 · CVE-2026-27699 · CVE-2026-27903 · CVE-2026-27904 · CVE-2026-28684 · CVE-2026-29063 · CVE-2026-29181 · CVE-2026-2950 · CVE-2026-31808 · CVE-2026-31900 · CVE-2026-32274 · CVE-2026-32288 · CVE-2026-32597 · CVE-2026-32630 · CVE-2026-32887 · CVE-2026-32952 · CVE-2026-33186 · CVE-2026-33532 · CVE-2026-33750 · CVE-2026-33814 · CVE-2026-33816 · CVE-2026-33916 · CVE-2026-34043 · CVE-2026-34073 · CVE-2026-34077 · CVE-2026-3520 · CVE-2026-35469 · CVE-2026-35515 · CVE-2026-3627 · CVE-2026-39823 · CVE-2026-39825 · CVE-2026-39826 · CVE-2026-39892 · CVE-2026-39984 · CVE-2026-40175 · CVE-2026-40179 · CVE-2026-40181 · CVE-2026-40190 · CVE-2026-40347 · CVE-2026-41066 · CVE-2026-41182 · CVE-2026-41238 · CVE-2026-41239 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-41305 · CVE-2026-41324 · CVE-2026-41425 · CVE-2026-41481 · CVE-2026-41488 · CVE-2026-41602 · CVE-2026-41636 · CVE-2026-42151 · CVE-2026-42154 · CVE-2026-42198 · CVE-2026-42211 · CVE-2026-42338 · CVE-2026-42342 · CVE-2026-42561 · CVE-2026-42577 · CVE-2026-43870 · CVE-2026-44405 · CVE-2026-44431 · CVE-2026-44432 · CVE-2026-44486 · CVE-2026-44487 · CVE-2026-44488 · CVE-2026-44492 · CVE-2026-44494 · CVE-2026-44496 · CVE-2026-44728 · CVE-2026-4539 · CVE-2026-45409 · CVE-2026-45736 · CVE-2026-46625 · CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-4923 · CVE-2026-4926 · CVE-2026-7246 · CVE-2026-8723

NCSC-2026-0431: Kwetsbaarheden verholpen in IBM DataPower Gateway en onderliggende componenten

CVE-2023-53781 · CVE-2025-14087 · CVE-2025-14512 · CVE-2025-21858 · CVE-2025-22105 · CVE-2025-37980 · CVE-2025-38015 · CVE-2025-38097 · CVE-2025-38180 · CVE-2025-38400 · CVE-2025-38405 · CVE-2025-38441 · CVE-2025-38470 · CVE-2025-38653 · CVE-2025-39766 · CVE-2025-39797 · CVE-2025-39866 · CVE-2025-40134 · CVE-2025-48431 · CVE-2025-5278 · CVE-2025-68183 · CVE-2025-68211 · CVE-2025-68214 · CVE-2025-68347 · CVE-2025-68366 · CVE-2025-68724 · CVE-2025-71066 · CVE-2025-71089 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-13257 · CVE-2026-13258 · CVE-2026-13757 · CVE-2026-14269 · CVE-2026-14273 · CVE-2026-14496 · CVE-2026-14497 · CVE-2026-14502 · CVE-2026-14507 · CVE-2026-14508 · CVE-2026-14509 · CVE-2026-14888 · CVE-2026-14905 · CVE-2026-14988 · CVE-2026-14990 · CVE-2026-14991 · CVE-2026-14992 · CVE-2026-14999 · CVE-2026-15588 · CVE-2026-15762 · CVE-2026-15781 · CVE-2026-15784 · CVE-2026-15819 · CVE-2026-15822 · CVE-2026-15824 · CVE-2026-16111 · CVE-2026-16159 · CVE-2026-16161 · CVE-2026-16163 · CVE-2026-16164 · CVE-2026-16165 · CVE-2026-16167 · CVE-2026-16169 · CVE-2026-16170 · CVE-2026-16176 · CVE-2026-16177 · CVE-2026-16178 · CVE-2026-16179 · CVE-2026-16181 · CVE-2026-16182 · CVE-2026-16340 · CVE-2026-16439 · CVE-2026-16440 · CVE-2026-16441 · CVE-2026-2100 · CVE-2026-22979 · CVE-2026-22984 · CVE-2026-22990 · CVE-2026-23002 · CVE-2026-23060 · CVE-2026-23110 · CVE-2026-23204 · CVE-2026-23209 · CVE-2026-23216 · CVE-2026-23243 · CVE-2026-23270 · CVE-2026-23392 · CVE-2026-23455 · CVE-2026-2391 · CVE-2026-31411 · CVE-2026-31419 · CVE-2026-31488 · CVE-2026-31508 · CVE-2026-31532 · CVE-2026-31581 · CVE-2026-31607 · CVE-2026-31613 · CVE-2026-31669 · CVE-2026-31677 · CVE-2026-31684 · CVE-2026-31685 · CVE-2026-33845 · CVE-2026-33846 · CVE-2026-3832 · CVE-2026-3833 · CVE-2026-4046 · CVE-2026-41254 · CVE-2026-41602 · CVE-2026-41606 · CVE-2026-41607 · CVE-2026-42009 · CVE-2026-42010 · CVE-2026-42011 · CVE-2026-42012 · CVE-2026-42013 · CVE-2026-42014 · CVE-2026-42015 · CVE-2026-43027 · CVE-2026-43037 · CVE-2026-43038 · CVE-2026-43056 · CVE-2026-43074 · CVE-2026-43116 · CVE-2026-43125 · CVE-2026-43163 · CVE-2026-43190 · CVE-2026-43198 · CVE-2026-43260 · CVE-2026-43284 · CVE-2026-43303 · CVE-2026-43329 · CVE-2026-43499 · CVE-2026-43501 · CVE-2026-43868 · CVE-2026-43870 · CVE-2026-4437 · CVE-2026-4438 · CVE-2026-45852 · CVE-2026-46054 · CVE-2026-46086 · CVE-2026-46116 · CVE-2026-46173 · CVE-2026-46181 · CVE-2026-46242 · CVE-2026-46259 · CVE-2026-46300 · CVE-2026-46331 · CVE-2026-46333 · CVE-2026-46917 · CVE-2026-46968 · CVE-2026-47010 · CVE-2026-47021 · CVE-2026-47027 · CVE-2026-47059 · CVE-2026-47063 · CVE-2026-48144 · CVE-2026-48145 · CVE-2026-5260 · CVE-2026-52923 · CVE-2026-52991 · CVE-2026-53006 · CVE-2026-53009 · CVE-2026-53131 · CVE-2026-53189 · CVE-2026-53264 · CVE-2026-53266 · CVE-2026-5419 · CVE-2026-5450 · CVE-2026-55602 · CVE-2026-55603 · CVE-2026-55968 · CVE-2026-55970 · CVE-2026-58010 · CVE-2026-58011 · CVE-2026-58012 · CVE-2026-58013 · CVE-2026-58014 · CVE-2026-58015 · CVE-2026-58016 · CVE-2026-58662 · CVE-2026-59879 · CVE-2026-59880 · CVE-2026-60147 · CVE-2026-60589 · CVE-2026-61308 · CVE-2026-63913 · CVE-2026-63952 · CVE-2026-64017 · CVE-2026-64530 · CVE-2026-64560 · CVE-2026-70906 · CVE-2026-70907 · CVE-2026-74581 · CVE-2026-82417 · CVE-2026-82562 · CVE-2026-83605 · CVE-2026-83607 · CVE-2026-83608 · CVE-2026-83613 · CVE-2026-83614 · CVE-2026-83615 · CVE-2026-83616 · CVE-2026-83619

WID-SEC-W-2026-2933: Splunk SOAR: Mehrere Schwachstellen

CVE-2025-13465 · CVE-2025-13473 · CVE-2025-14550 · CVE-2025-15599 · CVE-2025-53859 · CVE-2025-6545 · CVE-2025-6547 · CVE-2025-66221 · CVE-2025-67724 · CVE-2025-67725 · CVE-2025-67726 · CVE-2025-68428 · CVE-2025-69873 · CVE-2026-0540 · CVE-2026-1207 · CVE-2026-1285 · CVE-2026-1287 · CVE-2026-1312 · CVE-2026-1642 · CVE-2026-2004 · CVE-2026-2005 · CVE-2026-2006 · CVE-2026-21226 · CVE-2026-21860 · CVE-2026-22702 · CVE-2026-22815 · CVE-2026-2391 · CVE-2026-24001 · CVE-2026-24040 · CVE-2026-24043 · CVE-2026-24133 · CVE-2026-24737 · CVE-2026-25535 · CVE-2026-25673 · CVE-2026-25674 · CVE-2026-25755 · CVE-2026-25940 · CVE-2026-26007 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27199 · CVE-2026-2739 · CVE-2026-27651 · CVE-2026-27654 · CVE-2026-27784 · CVE-2026-27959 · CVE-2026-28277 · CVE-2026-28684 · CVE-2026-28753 · CVE-2026-28755 · CVE-2026-29063 · CVE-2026-2950 · CVE-2026-30922 · CVE-2026-31898 · CVE-2026-31938 · CVE-2026-31958 · CVE-2026-32141 · CVE-2026-32597 · CVE-2026-32647 · CVE-2026-33228 · CVE-2026-33532 · CVE-2026-33671 · CVE-2026-33672 · CVE-2026-33750 · CVE-2026-34513 · CVE-2026-34514 · CVE-2026-34515 · CVE-2026-34516 · CVE-2026-34517 · CVE-2026-34518 · CVE-2026-34519 · CVE-2026-34520 · CVE-2026-34525 · CVE-2026-34601 · CVE-2026-35536 · CVE-2026-40087 · CVE-2026-40460 · CVE-2026-40701 · CVE-2026-41066 · CVE-2026-42215 · CVE-2026-42284 · CVE-2026-42934 · CVE-2026-42945 · CVE-2026-42946 · CVE-2026-44243 · CVE-2026-44244 · CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-76356 · CVE-2026-76357 · CVE-2026-76358 · CVE-2026-76359 · CVE-2026-76360 · CVE-2026-76361 · CVE-2026-76362 · CVE-2026-76363 · CVE-2026-76364 · CVE-2026-76365 · CVE-2026-76366 · CVE-2026-76367 · CVE-2026-76368 · CVE-2026-76369 · CVE-2026-76370 · CVE-2026-9256

No normalized affected-package data is projected for this source revision. The original publisher record may contain additional product and version evidence; this does not establish that a package is unaffected.

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

nvd · CVE-2026-2391

Published

NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.

Source analysis status: Analyzed

Weakness classifications: CWE-20 · NVD-CWE-noinfo

Original publisher date fields

published: 2026-02-12T05:17:11.187

lastModified: 2026-06-17T10:30:53.183

1 source CPE criteria · context only
  • cpe:2.3:a:qs_project:qs:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*

The original JSON retains the logical configuration operators, exclusions and version bounds.

No normalized affected-package data is projected for this source revision. The original publisher record may contain additional product and version evidence; this does not establish that a package is unaffected.

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

osv · GHSA-w7fw-mjwx-w883

Published

qs

npm

SEMVER · introduced 6.7.0 → fixed 6.14.2

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 15 Nov 12:11 UTC · 256 of 275 readable · 252 fully read · documentation 469/469 current