Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Sources need attention Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

node-tar has Arbitrary File Read/Write via Hardlink Target Escape Through Symlink Chain in Extraction

CVSS 3.1 7.1 HIGHEUVD CVSS 3.1 7.1 CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Secondary 7.1 HIGHCVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Primary 7.1 HIGHCVSS_V3 Publisher rating HIGHFixed by tar 7.5.8KEV status unknown

cve-program · CVE-2026-26960

Published

node-tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js. When using default options in versions 7.5.7 and below, an attacker-controlled archive can create a hardlink inside the extraction directory that points to a file outside the extraction root, enabling arbitrary file read and write as the extracting user. Severity is high because the primitive bypasses path protections and turns archive extraction into a direct filesystem access primitive. This issue has been fixed in version 7.5.8.

Read the publisher's advisory

euvd · EUVD-2026-8399

Published

node-tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js. When using default options in versions 7.5.7 and below, an attacker-controlled archive can create a hardlink inside the extraction directory that points to a file outside the extraction root, enabling arbitrary file read and write as the extracting user. Severity is high because the primitive bypasses path protections and turns archive extraction into a direct filesystem access primitive. This issue has been fixed in version 7.5.8.

Read the publisher's advisory

nvd · CVE-2026-26960

Published

node-tar is a full-featured Tar for Node.js. When using default options in versions 7.5.7 and below, an attacker-controlled archive can create a hardlink inside the extraction directory that points to a file outside the extraction root, enabling arbitrary file read and write as the extracting user. Severity is high because the primitive bypasses path protections and turns archive extraction into a direct filesystem access primitive. This issue has been fixed in version 7.5.8.

Read the publisher's advisory

osv · GHSA-83g3-92jg-28cx

Published

### Summary `tar.extract()` in Node `tar` allows an attacker-controlled archive to create a hardlink inside the extraction directory that points to a file outside the extraction root, using default options. This enables **arbitrary file read and write** as the extracting user (no root, no chmod, no `preservePaths`). Severity is high because the primitive bypasses path protections and turns archive extraction into a direct filesystem access primitive. ### Details The bypass chain uses two symlinks plus one hardlink: 1. `a/b/c/up -> ../..` 2. `a/b/escape -> c/up/../..` 3. `exfil` (hardlink) -> `a/b/escape/<target-relative-to-parent-of-extract>` Why this works: - Linkpath checks are string-based and do not resolve symlinks on disk for hardlink target safety. - See `STRIPABSOLUTEPATH` logic in: - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:255` - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:268` - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:281` - Hardlink extraction resolves target as `path.resolve(cwd, entry.linkpath)` and then calls `fs.link(target, destination)`. - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:566` - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:567` - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:703` - Parent directory safety checks (`mkdir` + symlink detection) are applied to the destination path of the extracted entry, not to the resolved hardlink target path. - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:617` - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/unpack.js:619` - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/mkdir.js:27` - `../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar/dist/commonjs/mkdir.js:101` As a result, `exfil` is created inside extraction root but linked to an external file. The PoC confirms shared inode and successful read+write via `exfil`. ### PoC [hardlink.js](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/25240082/hardlink.js) Environment used for validation: - Node: `v25.4.0` - tar: `7.5.7` - OS: macOS Darwin 25.2.0 - Extract options: defaults (`tar.extract({ file, cwd })`) Steps: 1. Prepare/locate a `tar` module. If `require('tar')` is not available locally, set `TAR_MODULE` to an absolute path to a tar package directory. 2. Run: ```bash TAR_MODULE="$(cd '../tar-audit-setuid - CVE/node_modules/tar' && pwd)" node hardlink.js ``` 3. Expected vulnerable output (key lines): ```text same_inode=true read_ok=true write_ok=true result=VULNERABLE ``` Interpretation: - `same_inode=true`: extracted `exfil` and external secret are the same file object. - `read_ok=true`: reading `exfil` leaks external content. - `write_ok=true`: writing `exfil` modifies external file. ### Impact Vulnerability type: - Arbitrary file read/write via archive extraction path confusion and link resolution. Who is impacted: - Any application/service that extracts attacker-controlled tar archives with Node `tar` defaults. - Impact scope is the privileges of the extracting process user. Potential outcomes: - Read sensitive files reachable by the process user. - Overwrite writable files outside extraction root. - Escalate impact depending on deployment context (keys, configs, scripts, app data).

Read the publisher's advisory

Affected versions, risk and source history

Related advisories and sources

Related changes

Linked by CVE identifier
ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 15 Nov 12:11 UTC · 256 of 275 readable · 252 fully read · documentation 469/469 current