Observable timing discrepancy in AES-CCM decryption in AWS-LC allows an unauthenticated user to potentially determine authentication tag validity via timing analysis.
euvd · EUVD-2026-9265 · Published
No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means
Observable timing discrepancy in AES-CCM decryption in AWS-LC allows an unauthenticated user to potentially determine authentication tag validity via timing analysis. The impacted implementations are through the EVP CIPHER API: EVP_aes_128_ccm, EVP_aes_192_ccm, and EVP_aes_256_ccm. Customers of AWS services do not need to take action. Applications using AWS-LC should upgrade to AWS-LC version 1.69.0.
Read the publisher's advisoryObservable timing discrepancy in AES-CCM decryption in AWS-LC allows an unauthenticated user to potentially determine authentication tag validity via timing analysis. The impacted implementations are through the EVP CIPHER API: EVP_aes_128_ccm, EVP_aes_192_ccm, and EVP_aes_256_ccm. Customers of AWS services do not need to take action. Applications using AWS-LC should upgrade to AWS-LC version 1.69.0.
Read the publisher's advisoryObservable timing discrepancy in AES-CCM decryption in AWS-LC allows an unauthenticated user to potentially determine authentication tag validity via timing analysis. The impacted implementations are through the EVP CIPHER API: EVP_aes_128_ccm, EVP_aes_192_ccm, and EVP_aes_256_ccm. Customers of AWS services do not need to take action. Applications using AWS-LC should upgrade to AWS-LC version 1.69.0.
Read the publisher's advisory### Summary AWS-LC is an open-source, general-purpose cryptographic library. ### Impact Observable timing discrepancy in AES-CCM decryption in AWS-LC allows an unauthenticated user to potentially determine authentication tag validity via timing analysis. The impacted implementations are through the EVP CIPHER API: EVP_aes_128_ccm, EVP_aes_192_ccm, and EVP_aes_256_ccm. Customers of AWS services do not need to take action. aws-lc-sys and aws-lc-fips-sys contain code from AWS-LC. Applications using aws-lc-sys or aws-lc-fips-sys should upgrade to the most recent releases of aws-lc-sys or aws-lc-fips-sys. ### Impacted versions: - aws-lc-sys versions: >= 0.14.0, < 0.38.0 - aws-lc-fips-sys versions: >= v0.13.0, < 0.13.12. ### Patches The patch is included in aws-lc-sys v.0.38.0 and aws-lc-fips-sys v0.13.12. ### Workarounds In the special cases of using AES-CCM with (M=4, L=2), (M=8, L=2), or (M=16, L=2), applications can workaround this issue by using AES-CCM through the EVP AEAD API using implementations EVP_aead_aes_128_ccm_bluetooth, EVP_aead_aes_128_ccm_bluetooth_8, and, EVP_aead_aes_128_ccm_matter respectively. Otherwise, there is no workaround and applications using aws-lc-sys or aws-lc-fips-sys should upgrade to the most recent releases of aws-lc-sys or aws-lc-fips-sys. ### Resources If there are any questions or comments about this advisory, contact [AWS/Amazon] Security via the[vulnerability reporting page](https://aws.amazon.com/security/vulnerability-reporting) or directly via email to [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]). Please do not create a public GitHub issue. ### Acknowledgement AWS-LC would like to thank Joshua Rogers (https://joshua.hu/) for collaborating on this issue through the coordinated vulnerability disclosure process.
Read the publisher's advisoryObservable timing discrepancy in AES-CCM decryption in AWS-LC allows an unauthenticated user to potentially determine authentication tag validity via timing analysis. The impacted implementations are through the EVP CIPHER API: `EVP_aes_128_ccm`, `EVP_aes_192_ccm`, and `EVP_aes_256_ccm`. Customers of AWS services do not need to take action. `aws-lc-fips-sys` contains code from AWS-LC. Applications using `aws-lc-fips-sys` should upgrade to the most recent release of `aws-lc-fips-sys`. ## Workarounds In the special cases of using AES-CCM with (M=4, L=2), (M=8, L=2), or (M=16, L=2), applications can workaround this issue by using AES-CCM through the EVP AEAD API using implementations `EVP_aead_aes_128_ccm_bluetooth`, `EVP_aead_aes_128_ccm_bluetooth_8`, and `EVP_aead_aes_128_ccm_matter` respectively. Otherwise, there is no workaround and applications using `aws-lc-fips-sys` should upgrade to the most recent release of `aws-lc-fips-sys`.
Read the publisher's advisoryObservable timing discrepancy in AES-CCM decryption in AWS-LC allows an unauthenticated user to potentially determine authentication tag validity via timing analysis. The impacted implementations are through the EVP CIPHER API: `EVP_aes_128_ccm`, `EVP_aes_192_ccm`, and `EVP_aes_256_ccm`. Customers of AWS services do not need to take action. `aws-lc-sys` contains code from AWS-LC. Applications using `aws-lc-sys` should upgrade to the most recent release of `aws-lc-sys`. ## Workarounds In the special cases of using AES-CCM with (M=4, L=2), (M=8, L=2), or (M=16, L=2), applications can workaround this issue by using AES-CCM through the EVP AEAD API using implementations `EVP_aead_aes_128_ccm_bluetooth`, `EVP_aead_aes_128_ccm_bluetooth_8`, and `EVP_aead_aes_128_ccm_matter` respectively. Otherwise, there is no workaround and applications using `aws-lc-sys` should upgrade to the most recent release.
Read the publisher's advisoryCISA KEV lists vulnerabilities known to be exploited. FIRST EPSS estimates the likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unavailable score does not mean zero risk.
This view includes predictions for CVE identifiers explicitly listed in public NuGet advisories. Microsoft release pages have their own prediction coverage. Check source status for the scope and latest checks.
No exploitation or prediction data is available here for these CVEs. This does not mean they are safe or unlikely to be exploited.
Compare earlier KEV listings and daily EPSS scores. Advisory wording and affected versions have a separate history.
A prediction change is reported when EPSS rises from below 10% to 10% or higher. Other daily score changes remain in this history.
See how the publisher's advisory changed over time. Each link opens the version saved at that time. The publisher's update date can differ from the date shown here.
Each link identifies one complete publisher record. History can include advisories that previously shared an identifier; an identifier removed by a publisher no longer establishes a current relationship. A historical link shows only that record and earlier saved versions. Failed checks and unchanged reads do not create new versions.
euvd · EUVD-2026-9265 · Published
euvd · EUVD-2026-9265 · Published
osv · RUSTSEC-2026-0043 · Published
osv · RUSTSEC-2026-0045 · Published
euvd · EUVD-2026-9265 · Published
euvd · EUVD-2026-9265 · Published
euvd · EUVD-2026-9265 · Published
euvd · EUVD-2026-9265 · Published
euvd · EUVD-2026-9265 · Published
euvd · EUVD-2026-9265 · Published
euvd · EUVD-2026-9265 · Published
nvd · CVE-2026-3337 · Published
osv · GHSA-65p9-r9h6-22vj · Published
osv · RUSTSEC-2026-0043 · Published
osv · RUSTSEC-2026-0045 · Published
cve-program · CVE-2026-3337 · Published