OpenBao's Certificate Authentication Allows Token Renewal With Different Certificate
cve-program · CVE-2026-39388
PublishedOpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.5.3, OpenBao's Certificate authentication method, when a token renewal is requested and `disable_binding=true` is set, attempts to verify the current request's presented mTLS certificate matches the original. Token renewals for other authentication methods do not require any supplied login information. Due to incorrect matching, the certificate authentication method would allow renewal of tokens for which the attacker had a sibling certificate+key signed by the same CA, but which did not necessarily match the original role or the originally supplied certificate. This implies an attacker could still authenticate to OpenBao in a similar scope, however, token renewal implies that an attacker may be able to extend the lifetime of dynamic leases held by the original token. This attack requires knowledge of either the original token or its accessor. This vulnerability is original from HashiCorp Vault. This is addressed in v2.5.3. As a workaround, ensure privileged roles are tightly scoped to single certificates.
Read the publisher's advisoryeuvd · EUVD-2026-24029
PublishedOpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.5.3, OpenBao's Certificate authentication method, when a token renewal is requested and `disable_binding=true` is set, attempts to verify the current request's presented mTLS certificate matches the original. Token renewals for other authentication methods do not require any supplied login information. Due to incorrect matching, the certificate authentication method would allow renewal of tokens for which the attacker had a sibling certificate+key signed by the same CA, but which did not necessarily match the original role or the originally supplied certificate. This implies an attacker could still authenticate to OpenBao in a similar scope, however, token renewal implies that an attacker may be able to extend the lifetime of dynamic leases held by the original token. This attack requires knowledge of either the original token or its accessor. This vulnerability is original from HashiCorp Vault. This is addressed in v2.5.3. As a workaround, ensure privileged roles are tightly scoped to single certificates.
Read the publisher's advisorynvd · CVE-2026-39388
PublishedOpenBao is an open source identity-based secrets management system. Prior to version 2.5.3, OpenBao's Certificate authentication method, when a token renewal is requested and `disable_binding=true` is set, attempts to verify the current request's presented mTLS certificate matches the original. Token renewals for other authentication methods do not require any supplied login information. Due to incorrect matching, the certificate authentication method would allow renewal of tokens for which the attacker had a sibling certificate+key signed by the same CA, but which did not necessarily match the original role or the originally supplied certificate. This implies an attacker could still authenticate to OpenBao in a similar scope, however, token renewal implies that an attacker may be able to extend the lifetime of dynamic leases held by the original token. This attack requires knowledge of either the original token or its accessor. This vulnerability is original from HashiCorp Vault. This is addressed in v2.5.3. As a workaround, ensure privileged roles are tightly scoped to single certificates.
Read the publisher's advisoryosv · GHSA-7ccv-rp6m-rffr
Published### Background OpenBao's Certificate authentication method, when a token renewal is requested and `disable_binding=true` is set, attempts to verify the current request's presented mTLS certificate matches the original. Token renewals for other authentication methods do not require any supplied login information. ### Impact Due to incorrect matching, the certificate authentication method would allow renewal of tokens for which the attacker had a sibling certificate+key signed by the same CA, but which did not necessarily match the original role or the originally supplied certificate. This implies an attacker could still authenticate to OpenBao in a similar scope, however, token renewal implies that an attacker may be able to extend the lifetime of dynamic leases held by the original token. This attack requires knowledge of either the original token or its accessor. This vulnerability is originally from HashiCorp Vault. ### Patches This has been addressed in v2.5.3. ### Workarounds Ensure privileged roles are tightly scoped to single certificates.
Read the publisher's advisoryosv · GO-2026-5213
PublishedOpenBao's Certificate Authentication Allows Token Renewal With Different Certificate in github.com/openbao/openbao
Read the publisher's advisoryAffected versions, risk and source history
Related advisories and sources
Publishers link these advisories through the identifiers shown below. A shared identifier or date alone does not tell you whether your software is affected or whether the advisories describe the same cause.
CVE-2026-39388 · CVE overview and exploitation status
cve-program · CVE-2026-39388
euvd · EUVD-2026-24029
nvd · CVE-2026-39388
osv · GHSA-7ccv-rp6m-rffr
- https://github.com/openbao/openbao/security/advisories/GHSA-7ccv-rp6m-rffr
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39388
- https://github.com/openbao/openbao/pull/2932
- https://github.com/openbao/openbao/commit/9ab7a066826cc544c30e8b203f8f472076f366e1
- https://github.com/openbao/openbao
- https://github.com/openbao/openbao/releases/tag/v2.5.3
osv · GO-2026-5213
- https://github.com/openbao/openbao/security/advisories/GHSA-7ccv-rp6m-rffr
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-39388
- https://github.com/openbao/openbao/commit/9ab7a066826cc544c30e8b203f8f472076f366e1
- https://github.com/openbao/openbao/pull/2932
- https://github.com/openbao/openbao/releases/tag/v2.5.3