Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Sources need attention Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

Hono has incorrect IP matching in ipRestriction() for IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses

CVSS 4.0 6.3 MEDIUMEUVD CVSS 4.0 6.3 CVSS 4.0 · [email protected] · Secondary 6.3 MEDIUMCVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Primary 5.3 MEDIUMCVSS_V3 CVSS_V4 Publisher rating MODERATEFixed by hono 4.12.12KEV status unknown

cve-program · CVE-2026-39409

Published

Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.12, ipRestriction() does not canonicalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 client addresses (e.g. ::ffff:127.0.0.1) before applying IPv4 allow or deny rules. In environments such as Node.js dual-stack, this can cause IPv4 rules to fail to match, leading to unintended authorization behavior. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.12.

Read the publisher's advisory

euvd · EUVD-2026-20497

Published

Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.12, ipRestriction() does not canonicalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 client addresses (e.g. ::ffff:127.0.0.1) before applying IPv4 allow or deny rules. In environments such as Node.js dual-stack, this can cause IPv4 rules to fail to match, leading to unintended authorization behavior. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.12.

Read the publisher's advisory

nvd · CVE-2026-39409

Published

Hono is a Web application framework that provides support for any JavaScript runtime. Prior to 4.12.12, ipRestriction() does not canonicalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 client addresses (e.g. ::ffff:127.0.0.1) before applying IPv4 allow or deny rules. In environments such as Node.js dual-stack, this can cause IPv4 rules to fail to match, leading to unintended authorization behavior. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.12.12.

Read the publisher's advisory

osv · GHSA-xpcf-pg52-r92g

Published

## Summary `ipRestriction()` does not canonicalize IPv4-mapped IPv6 client addresses (e.g. `::ffff:127.0.0.1`) before applying IPv4 allow or deny rules. In environments such as Node.js dual-stack, this can cause IPv4 rules to fail to match, leading to unintended authorization behavior. ## Details The middleware classifies client addresses based on their textual form. Addresses containing "`:`" are treated as IPv6, including IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses such as `::ffff:127.0.0.1`. These addresses are not normalized to IPv4 before matching. As a result: * IPv4 static rules (e.g. `127.0.0.1`) do not match because the raw string differs * IPv4 CIDR rules (e.g. `127.0.0.0/8`, `10.0.0.0/8`) are skipped because the address is treated as IPv6 For example, with: `denyList: ['127.0.0.1']` a request from `127.0.0.1` may be represented as `::ffff:127.0.0.1` and bypass the deny rule. This behavior commonly occurs in Node.js environments where IPv4 clients are exposed as IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses. ## Impact Applications that rely on IPv4-based `ipRestriction()` rules may incorrectly allow or deny requests. In affected deployments, a denied IPv4 client may bypass access restrictions. Conversely, legitimate clients may be rejected when using IPv4 allow lists.

Read the publisher's advisory

Affected versions, risk and source history

Related advisories and sources

Related changes

Linked by CVE identifier

No related changes are available here.

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 15 Nov 12:11 UTC · 256 of 275 readable · 252 fully read · documentation 469/469 current