Vikunja's Scoped API tokens with projects.background permission can delete project backgrounds

CISA KEV is observed exploitation evidence. FIRST EPSS is a dated prediction of exploitation in the next 30 days. Missing scores are unknown. This collector requests predictions only for explicit CVE aliases in the public NuGet archive; Microsoft release views retain their existing prediction scope.

No collected risk observation for these identifiers. This does not establish absence of exploitation or a zero probability.

Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to 2.3.0, Vikunja's scoped API token enforcement for custom project background routes is method-confused. A token with only projects.background can successfully delete a project background, while a token with only projects.background_delete is rejected. This is a scoped-token authorization bypass. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.0.

Source published

10 Apr 2026 16:12:27 UTC

Source modified

15 Apr 2026 14:45:18 UTC

Observed here

23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC

Source terms

CVE Program Terms of Use

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS 3.1 · 4.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to 2.3.0, Vikunja's scoped API token enforcement for custom project background routes is method-confused. A token with only projects.background can successfully delete a project background, while a token with only projects.background_delete is rejected. This is a scoped-token authorization bypass. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.0.

Source published

Apr 10, 2026, 4:12:27 PM (timezone not stated)

Source modified

Apr 15, 2026, 2:45:18 PM (timezone not stated)

Observed here

28 Oct 2026 05:00:54 UTC

Source terms

ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

EUVD CVSS 3.1 · 4.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Vikunja is an open-source self-hosted task management platform. Prior to 2.3.0, Vikunja's scoped API token enforcement for custom project background routes is method-confused. A token with only projects.background can successfully delete a project background, while a token with only projects.background_delete is rejected. This is a scoped-token authorization bypass. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.0.

Source published

10 Apr 2026 17:17:13 UTC

Source modified

26 Oct 2026 21:10:00 UTC

Observed here

27 Oct 2026 10:09:56 UTC

Source terms

NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Secondary · 4.3 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Primary · 5.4 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

### Summary Vikunja's scoped API token enforcement for custom project background routes is method-confused. A token with only `projects.background` can successfully delete a project background, while a token with only `projects.background_delete` is rejected. This is a scoped-token authorization bypass. ### Details I verified this locally on commit `c5450fb55f5192508638cbb3a6956438452a712e`. Relevant code paths: * `pkg/models/api_routes.go` * `pkg/routes/routes.go` * `pkg/modules/background/handler/background.go` Route registration exposes separate permissions for the same path: * `GET /api/v1/projects/:project/background` -> `projects.background` * `DELETE /api/v1/projects/:project/background` -> `projects.background_delete` At enforcement time, `CanDoAPIRoute()` falls back to the parent group and reconstructs the child permission from the path segments only. For the DELETE request, that becomes `background`, so the matcher accepts any token containing `projects.background` without re-checking the HTTP method or matching the stored route detail. This matters because `RemoveProjectBackground()` is a real destructive operation: * It checks project update rights. * It deletes the background file if present. * It clears the project's `BackgroundFileID`. ### PoC 1. Log in as a user who can update a project that already has a background. 2. Create an API token with only: `{"projects":["background"]}` 3. Send: `DELETE /api/v1/projects/<project_id>/background` `Authorization: Bearer <token>` 4. Observe that the request succeeds and the project background is removed. **For comparison:** 1. Create an API token with only: `{"projects":["background_delete"]}` 2. Repeat the same DELETE request. 3. Observe that the request is rejected with `401 Unauthorized`. I confirmed this locally with three validations: 1. `/api/v1/routes` advertises both `background` and `background_delete`. 2. The matcher unit test proves `CanDoAPIRoute()` accepts DELETE for `background`. 3. The webtest proves a real API token with only `background` successfully deletes the background. ### Impact Scoped API tokens can exceed their intended capability. A token intended for project background access can delete project backgrounds, which weakens the trust model for automation and third-party integrations that rely on narrowly scoped tokens. The attacker needs a valid API token created by a user who has update rights on the target project, but the token itself only needs the weaker `projects.background` permission.

Source published

10 Apr 2026 15:36:47 UTC

Source modified

25 Jun 2026 23:11:19 UTC

Observed here

24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC

Source terms

GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Publisher rating · MODERATE

Vikunja: Scoped API tokens with projects.background permission can delete project backgrounds in code.vikunja.io/api. NOTE: The source advisory for this report contains additional versions that could not be automatically mapped to standard Go module versions. (If this is causing false-positive reports from vulnerability scanners, please suggest an edit to the report.) The additional affected modules and versions are: code.vikunja.io/api before v2.3.0.

Source published

25 Jun 2026 22:34:38 UTC

Source modified

25 Jun 2026 23:01:37 UTC

Observed here

24 Oct 2026 13:19:41 UTC

Source terms

OSV · upstream source license applies

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · OSV · upstream source license applies. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.