Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Sources need attention Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

xmldom: XML node injection through unvalidated processing instruction serialization

CVSS 4.0 8.7 HIGHEUVD CVSS 4.0 8.7 CVSS 4.0 · [email protected] · Secondary 8.7 HIGHCVSS 3.1 · 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c · Secondary 7.5 HIGHCVSS_V4 Publisher rating HIGHFixed by @xmldom/xmldom 0.8.13Fixed by @xmldom/xmldom 0.9.10KEV status unknown

cve-program · CVE-2026-41675

Published

xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) `DOMParser` and `XMLSerializer` module. In @xmldom/xmldom prior to versions 0.9.10 and 0.8.13 and xmldom version 0.6.0 and prior, the package allows attacker-controlled processing instruction data to be serialized into XML without validating or neutralizing the PI-closing sequence ?>. As a result, an attacker can terminate the processing instruction early and inject arbitrary XML nodes into the serialized output. This issue has been patched in versions @xmldom/xmldom versions 0.9.10 and 0.8.13.

Read the publisher's advisory

euvd · EUVD-2026-28290

Published

xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) `DOMParser` and `XMLSerializer` module. In @xmldom/xmldom prior to versions 0.9.10 and 0.8.13 and xmldom version 0.6.0 and prior, the package allows attacker-controlled processing instruction data to be serialized into XML without validating or neutralizing the PI-closing sequence ?>. As a result, an attacker can terminate the processing instruction early and inject arbitrary XML nodes into the serialized output. This issue has been patched in versions @xmldom/xmldom versions 0.9.10 and 0.8.13.

Read the publisher's advisory

nvd · CVE-2026-41675

Published

xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) `DOMParser` and `XMLSerializer` module. In @xmldom/xmldom prior to versions 0.9.10 and 0.8.13 and xmldom version 0.6.0 and prior, the package allows attacker-controlled processing instruction data to be serialized into XML without validating or neutralizing the PI-closing sequence ?>. As a result, an attacker can terminate the processing instruction early and inject arbitrary XML nodes into the serialized output. This issue has been patched in versions @xmldom/xmldom versions 0.9.10 and 0.8.13.

Read the publisher's advisory

osv · GHSA-x6wf-f3px-wcqx

Published

## Summary The package allows attacker-controlled processing instruction data to be serialized into XML without validating or neutralizing the PI-closing sequence `?>`. As a result, an attacker can terminate the processing instruction early and inject arbitrary XML nodes into the serialized output. --- ## Details The issue is in the DOM construction and serialization flow for processing instruction nodes. When `createProcessingInstruction(target, data)` is called, the supplied `data` string is stored directly on the node without validation. Later, when the document is serialized, the serializer writes PI nodes by concatenating `<?`, the target, a space, `node.data`, and `?>` directly. That behavior is unsafe because processing instructions are a syntax-sensitive context. The closing delimiter `?>` terminates the PI. If attacker-controlled input contains `?>`, the serializer does not preserve it as literal PI content. Instead, it emits output where the remainder of the payload is treated as live XML markup. The same class of vulnerability was previously addressed for CDATA sections (GHSA-wh4c-j3r5-mjhp / CVE-2026-34601), where `]]>` in CDATA data was handled by splitting. The serializer applies no equivalent protection to processing instruction data. --- ## Affected code **`lib/dom.js` — `createProcessingInstruction` (lines 2240–2246):** ```js createProcessingInstruction: function (target, data) { var node = new ProcessingInstruction(PDC); node.ownerDocument = this; node.childNodes = new NodeList(); node.nodeName = node.target = target; node.nodeValue = node.data = data; return node; }, ``` No validation is performed on `data`. Any string including `?>` is stored as-is. **`lib/dom.js` — serializer PI case (line 2966):** ```js case PROCESSING_INSTRUCTION_NODE: return buf.push('<?', node.target, ' ', node.data, '?>'); ``` `node.data` is emitted verbatim. If it contains `?>`, that sequence terminates the PI in the output stream and the remainder appears as active XML markup. **Contrast — CDATA (line 2945, patched):** ```js case CDATA_SECTION_NODE: return buf.push(g.CDATA_START, node.data.replace(/]]>/g, ']]]]><![CDATA[>'), g.CDATA_END); ``` --- ## PoC ### Minimal (from @tlsbollei report, 2026-04-01) ```js const { DOMImplementation, XMLSerializer } = require('@xmldom/xmldom'); const doc = new DOMImplementation().createDocument(null, 'r', null); doc.documentElement.appendChild( doc.createProcessingInstruction('a', '?><z/><?q ') ); console.log(new XMLSerializer().serializeToString(doc)); // <r><?a ?><z/><?q ?></r> // ^^^^ injected <z/> element is active markup ``` ### With re-parse verification (from @tlsbollei report) ```js const assert = require('assert'); const { DOMParser, XMLSerializer } = require('@xmldom/xmldom'); const doc = new DOMParser().parseFromString('<r/>', 'application/xml'); doc.documentElement.appendChild(doc.createProcessingInstruction('a', '?><z/><?q ')); const xml = new XMLSerializer().serializeToString(doc); assert.strictEqual(new DOMParser().parseFromString(xml, 'application/xml') .getElementsByTagName('z').length, 1); // passes — z is a real element ``` --- ## Impact An application that uses the package to build XML from untrusted input can be made to emit attacker-controlled elements outside the intended PI boundary. That allows the attacker to alter the meaning and structure of generated XML documents. In practice, this can affect any workflow that generates XML and then stores it, forwards it, signs it, or hands it to another parser. Realistic targets include XML-based configuration, policy documents, and message formats where downstream consumers trust the serialized structure. As noted by @tlsbollei: this is the same delimiter-driven XML injection bug class previously addressed by GHSA-wh4c-j3r5-mjhp for `createCDATASection()`. Fixing CDATA while leaving PI creation and PI serialization unguarded leaves the same standards-constrained issue open for another node type. --- ## Disclosure This vulnerability was publicly disclosed at 2026-04-06T11:25:07Z via [xmldom/xmldom#987](https://github.com/xmldom/xmldom/pull/987), which was subsequently closed without being merged. --- ## Fix Applied > **⚠ Opt-in required.** Protection is not automatic. Existing serialization calls remain > vulnerable unless `{ requireWellFormed: true }` is explicitly passed. Applications that pass > untrusted data to `createProcessingInstruction()` or mutate PI nodes with untrusted input > (via `.data =` or `CharacterData` mutation methods) should audit all `serializeToString()` > call sites and add the option. `XMLSerializer.serializeToString()` now accepts an options object as a second argument. When `{ requireWellFormed: true }` is passed, the serializer throws `InvalidStateError` before emitting any ProcessingInstruction node whose `.data` contains `?>`. This check applies regardless of how `?>` entered the node — whether via `createProcessingInstruction` directly or a subsequent mutation (`.data =`, `CharacterData` methods). On `@xmldom/xmldom` ≥ 0.9.10, the serializer additionally applies the full W3C DOM Parsing §3.2.1.7 checks when `requireWellFormed: true`: 1. **Target check**: throws `InvalidStateError` if the PI target contains a `:` character or is an ASCII case-insensitive match for `"xml"`. 2. **Data Char check**: throws `InvalidStateError` if the PI data contains characters outside the XML Char production. 3. **Data sequence check**: throws `InvalidStateError` if the PI data contains `?>`. On `@xmldom/xmldom` ≥ 0.8.13 (LTS), only the `?>` data check (check 3) is applied. The target and XML Char checks are not included in the LTS fix. ### PoC — fixed path ```js const { DOMImplementation, XMLSerializer } = require('@xmldom/xmldom'); const doc = new DOMImplementation().createDocument(null, 'r', null); doc.documentElement.appendChild(doc.createProcessingInstruction('a', '?><z/><?q ')); // Default (unchanged): verbatim — injection present const unsafe = new XMLSerializer().serializeToString(doc); console.log(unsafe); // <r><?a ?><z/><?q ?></r> // Opt-in guard: throws InvalidStateError before serializing try { new XMLSerializer().serializeToString(doc, { requireWellFormed: true }); } catch (e) { console.log(e.name, e.message); // InvalidStateError: The ProcessingInstruction data contains "?>" } ``` The guard catches `?>` regardless of when it was introduced: ```js // Post-creation mutation: also caught at serialization time const pi = doc.createProcessingInstruction('target', 'safe data'); doc.documentElement.appendChild(pi); pi.data = 'safe?><injected/>'; new XMLSerializer().serializeToString(doc, { requireWellFormed: true }); // InvalidStateError: The ProcessingInstruction data contains "?>" ``` ### Why the default stays verbatim The W3C DOM Parsing and Serialization spec §3.2.1.3 defines a `require well-formed` flag whose **default value is `false`**. With the flag unset, the spec explicitly permits serializing PI data verbatim. This matches browser behavior: Chrome, Firefox, and Safari all emit `?>` in PI data verbatim by default without error. Unconditionally throwing would be a behavioral breaking change with no spec justification. The opt-in `requireWellFormed: true` flag allows applications that require injection safety to enable strict mode without breaking existing code. ### Residual limitation `createProcessingInstruction(target, data)` does not validate `data` at creation time. The WHATWG DOM spec (§4.5 step 2) mandates an `InvalidCharacterError` when `data` contains `?>`; enforcing this check unconditionally at creation time is a breaking change and is deferred to a future breaking release. When the default serialization path is used (without `requireWellFormed: true`), PI data containing `?>` is still emitted verbatim. Applications that do not pass `requireWellFormed: true` remain exposed.

Read the publisher's advisory

Affected versions, risk and source history

Exploitation and risk

Source status

CISA KEV lists vulnerabilities known to be exploited. FIRST EPSS estimates the likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unavailable score does not mean zero risk.

Which CVEs have scores here?

This view includes predictions for CVE identifiers explicitly listed in public NuGet advisories. Microsoft release pages have their own prediction coverage. Check source status for the scope and latest checks.

No exploitation or prediction data is available here for these CVEs. This does not mean they are safe or unlikely to be exploited.

cve-program · CVE-2026-41675

Published

xmldom: XML node injection through unvalidated processing instruction serialization

xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) `DOMParser` and `XMLSerializer` module. In @xmldom/xmldom prior to versions 0.9.10 and 0.8.13 and xmldom version 0.6.0 and prior, the package allows attacker-controlled processing instruction data to be serialized into XML without validating or neutralizing the PI-closing sequence ?>. As a result, an attacker can terminate the processing instruction early and inject arbitrary XML nodes into the serialized output. This issue has been patched in versions @xmldom/xmldom versions 0.9.10 and 0.8.13.

Source published
7 May 2026 03:49:34 UTC
Source modified
28 Aug 2026 12:04:19 UTC
Saved here
23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
Source terms
CVE Program Terms of Use

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS 4.0 · 8.7 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

euvd · EUVD-2026-28290

Published

xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) `DOMParser` and `XMLSerializer` module. In @xmldom/xmldom prior to versions 0.9.10 and 0.8.13 and xmldom version 0.6.0 and prior, the package allows attacker-controlled p…

xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) `DOMParser` and `XMLSerializer` module. In @xmldom/xmldom prior to versions 0.9.10 and 0.8.13 and xmldom version 0.6.0 and prior, the package allows attacker-controlled processing instruction data to be serialized into XML without validating or neutralizing the PI-closing sequence ?>. As a result, an attacker can terminate the processing instruction early and inject arbitrary XML nodes into the serialized output. This issue has been patched in versions @xmldom/xmldom versions 0.9.10 and 0.8.13.

Additional publisher context

EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.

Original publisher date fields

datePublished: May 7, 2026, 3:49:34 AM

dateUpdated: Aug 28, 2026, 12:04:19 PM

4 related source bulletins · separate from aliases

WID-SEC-W-2026-1833: IBM App Connect Enterprise (basic-ftp, xmldom): Mehrere Schwachstellen

CVE-2026-39983 · CVE-2026-41324 · CVE-2026-41672 · CVE-2026-41673 · CVE-2026-41674 · CVE-2026-41675

RHSA-2026:26234: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9.5 release.

CVE-2026-6321 · CVE-2026-6322 · CVE-2026-24781 · CVE-2026-32281 · CVE-2026-41242 · CVE-2026-41672 · CVE-2026-41673 · CVE-2026-41674 · CVE-2026-41675 · CVE-2026-44293

msrc_CVE-2026-41675: xmldom: XML node injection through unvalidated processing instruction serialization

CVE-2026-41675

RHSA-2026:60520: Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.4.4 - Red Hat OpenShift AI

CVE-2025-66471 · CVE-2025-66626 · CVE-2025-71329 · CVE-2025-71330 · CVE-2026-0545 · CVE-2026-2614 · CVE-2026-5241 · CVE-2026-5422 · CVE-2026-6322 · CVE-2026-6734 · CVE-2026-8643 · CVE-2026-9697 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-12151 · CVE-2026-12243 · CVE-2026-12481 · CVE-2026-13149 · CVE-2026-13311 · CVE-2026-13676 · CVE-2026-13717 · CVE-2026-14450 · CVE-2026-15154 · CVE-2026-15218 · CVE-2026-15378 · CVE-2026-15467 · CVE-2026-15581 · CVE-2026-16745 · CVE-2026-18608 · CVE-2026-18611 · CVE-2026-18617 · CVE-2026-18620 · CVE-2026-18621 · CVE-2026-18948 · CVE-2026-18951 · CVE-2026-18982 · CVE-2026-25681 · CVE-2026-27136 · CVE-2026-32280 · CVE-2026-32283 · CVE-2026-33079 · CVE-2026-33245 · CVE-2026-33811 · CVE-2026-33814 · CVE-2026-34993 · CVE-2026-35397 · CVE-2026-39820 · CVE-2026-39821 · CVE-2026-39828 · CVE-2026-39829 · CVE-2026-39830 · CVE-2026-39831 · CVE-2026-39835 · CVE-2026-40171 · CVE-2026-41672 · CVE-2026-41673 · CVE-2026-41675 · CVE-2026-42211 · CVE-2026-42215 · CVE-2026-42264 · CVE-2026-42266 · CVE-2026-42284 · CVE-2026-42305 · CVE-2026-42311 · CVE-2026-42338 · CVE-2026-42342 · CVE-2026-42499 · CVE-2026-42502 · CVE-2026-42508 · CVE-2026-42557 · CVE-2026-44017 · CVE-2026-44018 · CVE-2026-44020 · CVE-2026-44240 · CVE-2026-44244 · CVE-2026-44289 · CVE-2026-44290 · CVE-2026-44291 · CVE-2026-44292 · CVE-2026-44293 · CVE-2026-44486 · CVE-2026-44487 · CVE-2026-44488 · CVE-2026-44492 · CVE-2026-44494 · CVE-2026-44495 · CVE-2026-44496 · CVE-2026-44513 · CVE-2026-44660 · CVE-2026-44705 · CVE-2026-44724 · CVE-2026-44727 · CVE-2026-44827 · CVE-2026-44843 · CVE-2026-45292 · CVE-2026-45623 · CVE-2026-45736 · CVE-2026-45740 · CVE-2026-45804 · CVE-2026-46595 · CVE-2026-46597 · CVE-2026-46625 · CVE-2026-47214 · CVE-2026-48526 · CVE-2026-48710 · CVE-2026-48712 · CVE-2026-48779 · CVE-2026-48801 · CVE-2026-49476 · CVE-2026-49477 · CVE-2026-49851 · CVE-2026-49978 · CVE-2026-50193 · CVE-2026-53550 · CVE-2026-54058 · CVE-2026-54060 · CVE-2026-54283 · CVE-2026-54293 · CVE-2026-55379 · CVE-2026-55380 · CVE-2026-55685 · CVE-2026-56121 · CVE-2026-56208 · CVE-2026-56209 · CVE-2026-56210 · CVE-2026-56211 · CVE-2026-58049 · CVE-2026-59197 · CVE-2026-59199 · CVE-2026-59200 · CVE-2026-59204 · CVE-2026-59205 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-59873 · CVE-2026-59874 · CVE-2026-59884 · CVE-2026-59885 · CVE-2026-59886 · CVE-2026-64835 · CVE-2026-64849 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-69243 · CVE-2026-69244

Source published
May 7, 2026, 3:49:34 AM (timezone not stated)
Source modified
Aug 28, 2026, 12:04:19 PM (timezone not stated)
Saved here
15 Nov 2026 14:05:44 UTC
Source terms
ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

EUVD CVSS 4.0 · 8.7 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

nvd · CVE-2026-41675

Published

xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) `DOMParser` and `XMLSerializer` module. In @xmldom/xmldom prior to versions 0.9.10 and 0.8.13 and xmldom version 0.6.0 and prior, the package allows attacker-controlled p…

xmldom is a pure JavaScript W3C standard-based (XML DOM Level 2 Core) `DOMParser` and `XMLSerializer` module. In @xmldom/xmldom prior to versions 0.9.10 and 0.8.13 and xmldom version 0.6.0 and prior, the package allows attacker-controlled processing instruction data to be serialized into XML without validating or neutralizing the PI-closing sequence ?>. As a result, an attacker can terminate the processing instruction early and inject arbitrary XML nodes into the serialized output. This issue has been patched in versions @xmldom/xmldom versions 0.9.10 and 0.8.13.

Additional publisher context

NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.

Source analysis status: Deferred

Weakness classifications: CWE-91

Original publisher date fields

published: 2026-05-07T04:16:33.580

lastModified: 2026-08-28T16:17:58.217

Source published
7 May 2026 04:16:33 UTC
Source modified
28 Aug 2026 16:17:58 UTC
Saved here
25 Oct 2026 09:17:41 UTC
Source terms
NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS 4.0 · [email protected] · Secondary · 8.7 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

CVSS 3.1 · 0b0ca135-0b70-47e7-9f44-1890c2a1c46c · Secondary · 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

osv · GHSA-x6wf-f3px-wcqx

Published

xmldom has XML node injection through unvalidated processing instruction serialization

## Summary The package allows attacker-controlled processing instruction data to be serialized into XML without validating or neutralizing the PI-closing sequence `?>`. As a result, an attacker can terminate the processing instruction early and inject arbitrary XML nodes into the serialized output. --- ## Details The issue is in the DOM construction and serialization flow for processing instruction nodes. When `createProcessingInstruction(target, data)` is called, the supplied `data` string is stored directly on the node without validation. Later, when the document is serialized, the serializer writes PI nodes by concatenating `<?`, the target, a space, `node.data`, and `?>` directly. That behavior is unsafe because processing instructions are a syntax-sensitive context. The closing delimiter `?>` terminates the PI. If attacker-controlled input contains `?>`, the serializer does not preserve it as literal PI content. Instead, it emits output where the remainder of the payload is treated as live XML markup. The same class of vulnerability was previously addressed for CDATA sections (GHSA-wh4c-j3r5-mjhp / CVE-2026-34601), where `]]>` in CDATA data was handled by splitting. The serializer applies no equivalent protection to processing instruction data. --- ## Affected code **`lib/dom.js` — `createProcessingInstruction` (lines 2240–2246):** ```js createProcessingInstruction: function (target, data) { var node = new ProcessingInstruction(PDC); node.ownerDocument = this; node.childNodes = new NodeList(); node.nodeName = node.target = target; node.nodeValue = node.data = data; return node; }, ``` No validation is performed on `data`. Any string including `?>` is stored as-is. **`lib/dom.js` — serializer PI case (line 2966):** ```js case PROCESSING_INSTRUCTION_NODE: return buf.push('<?', node.target, ' ', node.data, '?>'); ``` `node.data` is emitted verbatim. If it contains `?>`, that sequence terminates the PI in the output stream and the remainder appears as active XML markup. **Contrast — CDATA (line 2945, patched):** ```js case CDATA_SECTION_NODE: return buf.push(g.CDATA_START, node.data.replace(/]]>/g, ']]]]><![CDATA[>'), g.CDATA_END); ``` --- ## PoC ### Minimal (from @tlsbollei report, 2026-04-01) ```js const { DOMImplementation, XMLSerializer } = require('@xmldom/xmldom'); const doc = new DOMImplementation().createDocument(null, 'r', null); doc.documentElement.appendChild( doc.createProcessingInstruction('a', '?><z/><?q ') ); console.log(new XMLSerializer().serializeToString(doc)); // <r><?a ?><z/><?q ?></r> // ^^^^ injected <z/> element is active markup ``` ### With re-parse verification (from @tlsbollei report) ```js const assert = require('assert'); const { DOMParser, XMLSerializer } = require('@xmldom/xmldom'); const doc = new DOMParser().parseFromString('<r/>', 'application/xml'); doc.documentElement.appendChild(doc.createProcessingInstruction('a', '?><z/><?q ')); const xml = new XMLSerializer().serializeToString(doc); assert.strictEqual(new DOMParser().parseFromString(xml, 'application/xml') .getElementsByTagName('z').length, 1); // passes — z is a real element ``` --- ## Impact An application that uses the package to build XML from untrusted input can be made to emit attacker-controlled elements outside the intended PI boundary. That allows the attacker to alter the meaning and structure of generated XML documents. In practice, this can affect any workflow that generates XML and then stores it, forwards it, signs it, or hands it to another parser. Realistic targets include XML-based configuration, policy documents, and message formats where downstream consumers trust the serialized structure. As noted by @tlsbollei: this is the same delimiter-driven XML injection bug class previously addressed by GHSA-wh4c-j3r5-mjhp for `createCDATASection()`. Fixing CDATA while leaving PI creation and PI serialization unguarded leaves the same standards-constrained issue open for another node type. --- ## Disclosure This vulnerability was publicly disclosed at 2026-04-06T11:25:07Z via [xmldom/xmldom#987](https://github.com/xmldom/xmldom/pull/987), which was subsequently closed without being merged. --- ## Fix Applied > **⚠ Opt-in required.** Protection is not automatic. Existing serialization calls remain > vulnerable unless `{ requireWellFormed: true }` is explicitly passed. Applications that pass > untrusted data to `createProcessingInstruction()` or mutate PI nodes with untrusted input > (via `.data =` or `CharacterData` mutation methods) should audit all `serializeToString()` > call sites and add the option. `XMLSerializer.serializeToString()` now accepts an options object as a second argument. When `{ requireWellFormed: true }` is passed, the serializer throws `InvalidStateError` before emitting any ProcessingInstruction node whose `.data` contains `?>`. This check applies regardless of how `?>` entered the node — whether via `createProcessingInstruction` directly or a subsequent mutation (`.data =`, `CharacterData` methods). On `@xmldom/xmldom` ≥ 0.9.10, the serializer additionally applies the full W3C DOM Parsing §3.2.1.7 checks when `requireWellFormed: true`: 1. **Target check**: throws `InvalidStateError` if the PI target contains a `:` character or is an ASCII case-insensitive match for `"xml"`. 2. **Data Char check**: throws `InvalidStateError` if the PI data contains characters outside the XML Char production. 3. **Data sequence check**: throws `InvalidStateError` if the PI data contains `?>`. On `@xmldom/xmldom` ≥ 0.8.13 (LTS), only the `?>` data check (check 3) is applied. The target and XML Char checks are not included in the LTS fix. ### PoC — fixed path ```js const { DOMImplementation, XMLSerializer } = require('@xmldom/xmldom'); const doc = new DOMImplementation().createDocument(null, 'r', null); doc.documentElement.appendChild(doc.createProcessingInstruction('a', '?><z/><?q ')); // Default (unchanged): verbatim — injection present const unsafe = new XMLSerializer().serializeToString(doc); console.log(unsafe); // <r><?a ?><z/><?q ?></r> // Opt-in guard: throws InvalidStateError before serializing try { new XMLSerializer().serializeToString(doc, { requireWellFormed: true }); } catch (e) { console.log(e.name, e.message); // InvalidStateError: The ProcessingInstruction data contains "?>" } ``` The guard catches `?>` regardless of when it was introduced: ```js // Post-creation mutation: also caught at serialization time const pi = doc.createProcessingInstruction('target', 'safe data'); doc.documentElement.appendChild(pi); pi.data = 'safe?><injected/>'; new XMLSerializer().serializeToString(doc, { requireWellFormed: true }); // InvalidStateError: The ProcessingInstruction data contains "?>" ``` ### Why the default stays verbatim The W3C DOM Parsing and Serialization spec §3.2.1.3 defines a `require well-formed` flag whose **default value is `false`**. With the flag unset, the spec explicitly permits serializing PI data verbatim. This matches browser behavior: Chrome, Firefox, and Safari all emit `?>` in PI data verbatim by default without error. Unconditionally throwing would be a behavioral breaking change with no spec justification. The opt-in `requireWellFormed: true` flag allows applications that require injection safety to enable strict mode without breaking existing code. ### Residual limitation `createProcessingInstruction(target, data)` does not validate `data` at creation time. The WHATWG DOM spec (§4.5 step 2) mandates an `InvalidCharacterError` when `data` contains `?>`; enforcing this check unconditionally at creation time is a breaking change and is deferred to a future breaking release. When the default serialization path is used (without `requireWellFormed: true`), PI data containing `?>` is still emitted verbatim. Applications that do not pass `requireWellFormed: true` remain exposed.

Source published
22 Apr 2026 20:17:58 UTC
Source modified
10 Sep 2026 03:50:44 UTC
Saved here
24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
Source terms
GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS_V4 · CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Publisher rating · HIGH

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 15 Nov 16:58 UTC · 254 of 275 readable · 250 fully read · documentation 469/469 current