Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Sources need attention Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

path-to-regexp outputs backtracking regular expressions

CVSS 3.1 7.5 HIGHCVSS 3.1 7.5 HIGHEUVD CVSS 3.1 7.5 EUVD CVSS 3.1 7.5 CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Secondary 7.5 HIGHCVSS 3.1 · ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb · Secondary 7.5 HIGHCVSS_V3 Publisher rating HIGHFixed by path-to-regexp 0.1.13CVSS_V3 CVSS_V4 Publisher rating HIGHFixed by path-to-regexp 1.9.0Fixed by path-to-regexp 0.1.10Fixed by path-to-regexp 8.0.0Fixed by path-to-regexp 3.3.0KEV status unknown

cve-program · CVE-2024-45296

Published

path-to-regexp turns path strings into a regular expressions. In certain cases, path-to-regexp will output a regular expression that can be exploited to cause poor performance. Because JavaScript is single threaded and regex matching runs on the main thread, poor performance will block the event loop and lead to a DoS. The bad regular expression is generated any time you have two parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (.). For users of 0.1, upgrade to 0.1.10. All other users should upgrade to 8.0.0.

Read the publisher's advisory

cve-program · CVE-2026-4867

Published

Impact: A bad regular expression is generated any time you have three or more parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (.). For example, /:a-:b-:c or /:a-:b-:c-:d. The backtrack protection added in [email protected] only prevents ambiguity for two parameters. With three or more, the generated lookahead does not block single separator characters, so capture groups overlap and cause catastrophic backtracking. Patches: Upgrade to [email protected] Custom regex patterns in route definitions (e.g., /:a-:b([^-/]+)-:c([^-/]+)) are not affected because they override the default capture group. Workarounds: All versions can be patched by providing a custom regular expression for parameters after the first in a single segment. As long as the custom regular expression does not match the text before the parameter, you will be safe. For example, change /:a-:b-:c to /:a-:b([^-/]+)-:c([^-/]+). If paths cannot be rewritten and versions cannot be upgraded, another alternative is to limit the URL length.

Read the publisher's advisory

euvd · EUVD-2024-2764

Published

path-to-regexp turns path strings into a regular expressions. In certain cases, path-to-regexp will output a regular expression that can be exploited to cause poor performance. Because JavaScript is single threaded and regex matching runs on the main thread, poor performance will block the event loop and lead to a DoS. The bad regular expression is generated any time you have two parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (.). For users of 0.1, upgrade to 0.1.10. All other users should upgrade to 8.0.0.

Read the publisher's advisory

euvd · EUVD-2026-16273

Published

Impact: A bad regular expression is generated any time you have three or more parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (.). For example, /:a-:b-:c or /:a-:b-:c-:d. The backtrack protection added in [email protected] only prevents ambiguity for two parameters. With three or more, the generated lookahead does not block single separator characters, so capture groups overlap and cause catastrophic backtracking. Patches: Upgrade to [email protected] Custom regex patterns in route definitions (e.g., /:a-:b([^-/]+)-:c([^-/]+)) are not affected because they override the default capture group. Workarounds: All versions can be patched by providing a custom regular expression for parameters after the first in a single segment. As long as the custom regular expression does not match the text before the parameter, you will be safe. For example, change /:a-:b-:c to /:a-:b([^-/]+)-:c([^-/]+). If paths cannot be rewritten and versions cannot be upgraded, another alternative is to limit the URL length.

Read the publisher's advisory

nvd · CVE-2024-45296

Published

path-to-regexp turns path strings into a regular expressions. In certain cases, path-to-regexp will output a regular expression that can be exploited to cause poor performance. Because JavaScript is single threaded and regex matching runs on the main thread, poor performance will block the event loop and lead to a DoS. The bad regular expression is generated any time you have two parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (.). For users of 0.1, upgrade to 0.1.10. All other users should upgrade to 8.0.0.

Read the publisher's advisory

nvd · CVE-2026-4867

Published

Impact: A bad regular expression is generated any time you have three or more parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (.). For example, /:a-:b-:c or /:a-:b-:c-:d. The backtrack protection added in [email protected] only prevents ambiguity for two parameters. With three or more, the generated lookahead does not block single separator characters, so capture groups overlap and cause catastrophic backtracking. Patches: Upgrade to [email protected] Custom regex patterns in route definitions (e.g., /:a-:b([^-/]+)-:c([^-/]+)) are not affected because they override the default capture group. Workarounds: All versions can be patched by providing a custom regular expression for parameters after the first in a single segment. As long as the custom regular expression does not match the text before the parameter, you will be safe. For example, change /:a-:b-:c to /:a-:b([^-/]+)-:c([^-/]+). If paths cannot be rewritten and versions cannot be upgraded, another alternative is to limit the URL length.

Read the publisher's advisory

osv · GHSA-37ch-88jc-xwx2

Published

### Impact A bad regular expression is generated any time you have three or more parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (`.`). For example, `/:a-:b-:c` or `/:a-:b-:c-:d`. The backtrack protection added in `[email protected]` only prevents ambiguity for two parameters. With three or more, the generated lookahead does not block single separator characters, so capture groups overlap and cause catastrophic backtracking. ### Patches Upgrade to [[email protected]](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v.0.1.13) Custom regex patterns in route definitions (e.g., `/:a-:b([^-/]+)-:c([^-/]+)`) are not affected because they override the default capture group. ### Workarounds All versions can be patched by providing a custom regular expression for parameters after the first in a single segment. As long as the custom regular expression does not match the text before the parameter, you will be safe. For example, change `/:a-:b-:c` to `/:a-:b([^-/]+)-:c([^-/]+)`. If paths cannot be rewritten and versions cannot be upgraded, another alternative is to limit the URL length. ### References - [GHSA-9wv6-86v2-598j](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-9wv6-86v2-598j) - [Detailed blog post: ReDoS the web](https://blakeembrey.com/posts/2024-09-web-redos/)

Read the publisher's advisory

osv · GHSA-9wv6-86v2-598j

Published

### Impact A bad regular expression is generated any time you have two parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (`.`). For example, `/:a-:b`. ### Patches For users of 0.1, upgrade to `0.1.10`. All other users should upgrade to `8.0.0`. These versions add backtrack protection when a custom regex pattern is not provided: - [0.1.10](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v0.1.10) - [1.9.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v1.9.0) - [3.3.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v3.3.0) - [6.3.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v6.3.0) They do not protect against vulnerable user supplied capture groups. Protecting against explicit user patterns is out of scope for old versions and not considered a vulnerability. Version [7.1.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v7.1.0) can enable `strict: true` and get an error when the regular expression might be bad. Version [8.0.0](https://github.com/pillarjs/path-to-regexp/releases/tag/v8.0.0) removes the features that can cause a ReDoS. ### Workarounds All versions can be patched by providing a custom regular expression for parameters after the first in a single segment. As long as the custom regular expression does not match the text before the parameter, you will be safe. For example, change `/:a-:b` to `/:a-:b([^-/]+)`. If paths cannot be rewritten and versions cannot be upgraded, another alternative is to limit the URL length. For example, halving the attack string improves performance by 4x faster. ### Details Using `/:a-:b` will produce the regular expression `/^\/([^\/]+?)-([^\/]+?)\/?$/`. This can be exploited by a path such as `/a${'-a'.repeat(8_000)}/a`. [OWASP](https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Regular_expression_Denial_of_Service_-_ReDoS) has a good example of why this occurs, but the TL;DR is the `/a` at the end ensures this route would never match but due to naive backtracking it will still attempt every combination of the `:a-:b` on the repeated 8,000 `-a`. Because JavaScript is single threaded and regex matching runs on the main thread, poor performance will block the event loop and can lead to a DoS. In local benchmarks, exploiting the unsafe regex will result in performance that is over 1000x worse than the safe regex. In a more realistic environment using Express v4 and 10 concurrent connections, this translated to average latency of ~600ms vs 1ms. ### References * [OWASP](https://owasp.org/www-community/attacks/Regular_expression_Denial_of_Service_-_ReDoS) * [Detailed blog post](https://blakeembrey.com/posts/2024-09-web-redos/)

Read the publisher's advisory

Affected versions, risk and source history

Related advisories and sources

Publishers link these advisories through the identifiers shown below. A shared identifier or date alone does not tell you whether your software is affected or whether the advisories describe the same cause.

CVE-2024-45296 · CVE overview and exploitation status

CVE-2026-4867 · CVE overview and exploitation status

EUVD-2024-2764

GHSA-9wv6-86v2-598j

EUVD-2026-16273

GHSA-37ch-88jc-xwx2

cve-program · CVE-2024-45296

cve-program · CVE-2026-4867

euvd · EUVD-2024-2764

euvd · EUVD-2026-16273

nvd · CVE-2024-45296

nvd · CVE-2026-4867

osv · GHSA-37ch-88jc-xwx2

osv · GHSA-9wv6-86v2-598j

Related changes

Linked by CVE identifier

No related changes are available here.

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 15 Nov 23:13 UTC · 274 of 275 readable · 250 fully read · 18 waiting for GitHub's hourly limit · documentation 461/469 current