Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Sources need attention Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

js-toml has silent type confusion via falsy-primitive duplicate-key bypass

CVSS 3.1 5.3 MEDIUMEUVD CVSS 3.1 5.3 CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Secondary 5.3 MEDIUMCVSS_V3 Publisher rating MODERATEFixed by js-toml 1.1.2KEV status unknown

cve-program · CVE-2026-50029

Published

js-toml is a TOML parser for JavaScript, Prior to version 1.1.2, the interpreter checks whether a key already exists in a parser-built container with `if (object[key])` instead of `if (key in object)`. When the prior value is a falsy primitive — `false`, `0`, `0n`, `0.0`, `-0`, or `""` — the duplicate-key branch is skipped and the value is silently overwritten by a later sub-table, dotted-key sub-table, or array-of-tables sharing the same name. Per the TOML 1.0.0 spec ("Defining a key multiple times is invalid"; "You cannot define any key or table more than once"), this should be a parse error. The result is structural type confusion of attacker-named keys in the value returned by `load()`. A boolean-typed `false` (or numeric `0`) becomes a truthy object. Host applications that gate behavior on `if (config.flag)`, `if (!user.banned)`, `if (config.allowDelete)`, or `if (config.publicMode)` will silently take the truthy branch. This is distinct from GHSA-65fc-cr5f-v7r2 (the 1.0.2 prototype-pollution fix). `Object.prototype` is not polluted. The `Object.create(null)` mitigation from 1.0.2 is intact; the bug here is in the duplicate-key state machine, not in container construction. Version 1.1.2 patches the incorrect comparison.

Read the publisher's advisory

euvd · EUVD-2026-58791

Published

js-toml is a TOML parser for JavaScript, Prior to version 1.1.2, the interpreter checks whether a key already exists in a parser-built container with `if (object[key])` instead of `if (key in object)`. When the prior value is a falsy primitive — `false`, `0`, `0n`, `0.0`, `-0`, or `""` — the duplicate-key branch is skipped and the value is silently overwritten by a later sub-table, dotted-key sub-table, or array-of-tables sharing the same name. Per the TOML 1.0.0 spec ("Defining a key multiple times is invalid"; "You cannot define any key or table more than once"), this should be a parse error. The result is structural type confusion of attacker-named keys in the value returned by `load()`. A boolean-typed `false` (or numeric `0`) becomes a truthy object. Host applications that gate behavior on `if (config.flag)`, `if (!user.banned)`, `if (config.allowDelete)`, or `if (config.publicMode)` will silently take the truthy branch. This is distinct from GHSA-65fc-cr5f-v7r2 (the 1.0.2 prototype-pollution fix). `Object.prototype` is not polluted. The `Object.create(null)` mitigation from 1.0.2 is intact; the bug here is in the duplicate-key state machine, not in container construction. Version 1.1.2 patches the incorrect comparison.

Read the publisher's advisory

nvd · CVE-2026-50029

Published

js-toml is a TOML parser for JavaScript, Prior to version 1.1.2, the interpreter checks whether a key already exists in a parser-built container with `if (object[key])` instead of `if (key in object)`. When the prior value is a falsy primitive — `false`, `0`, `0n`, `0.0`, `-0`, or `""` — the duplicate-key branch is skipped and the value is silently overwritten by a later sub-table, dotted-key sub-table, or array-of-tables sharing the same name. Per the TOML 1.0.0 spec ("Defining a key multiple times is invalid"; "You cannot define any key or table more than once"), this should be a parse error. The result is structural type confusion of attacker-named keys in the value returned by `load()`. A boolean-typed `false` (or numeric `0`) becomes a truthy object. Host applications that gate behavior on `if (config.flag)`, `if (!user.banned)`, `if (config.allowDelete)`, or `if (config.publicMode)` will silently take the truthy branch. This is distinct from GHSA-65fc-cr5f-v7r2 (the 1.0.2 prototype-pollution fix). `Object.prototype` is not polluted. The `Object.create(null)` mitigation from 1.0.2 is intact; the bug here is in the duplicate-key state machine, not in container construction. Version 1.1.2 patches the incorrect comparison.

Read the publisher's advisory

osv · GHSA-m34p-749j-x6m6

Published

### Summary `js-toml`'s interpreter checks whether a key already exists in a parser-built container with `if (object[key])` instead of `if (key in object)`. When the prior value is a falsy primitive — `false`, `0`, `0n`, `0.0`, `-0`, or `""` — the duplicate-key branch is skipped and the value is silently overwritten by a later sub-table, dotted-key sub-table, or array-of-tables sharing the same name. Per the TOML 1.0.0 spec ("Defining a key multiple times is invalid"; "You cannot define any key or table more than once"), this should be a parse error. The result is **structural type confusion of attacker-named keys** in the value returned by `load()`. A boolean-typed `false` (or numeric `0`) becomes a truthy object. Host applications that gate behavior on `if (config.flag)`, `if (!user.banned)`, `if (config.allowDelete)`, or `if (config.publicMode)` will silently take the truthy branch. This is **distinct** from [GHSA-65fc-cr5f-v7r2](https://github.com/sunnyadn/js-toml/security/advisories/GHSA-65fc-cr5f-v7r2) (the 1.0.2 prototype-pollution fix). `Object.prototype` is **not** polluted. The `Object.create(null)` mitigation from 1.0.2 is intact; the bug here is in the duplicate-key state machine, not in container construction. ### Details Two truthy checks are wrong: `src/load/interpreter.ts:214` — `Interpreter.tryCreatingObject` ```js if (object[key]) { // falsy primitives slip through // duplicate-key logic } else { object[key] = createSafeObject(); // silently overwrites the prior falsy value ... } ``` `src/load/interpreter.ts:278` — `Interpreter.getOrCreateArray` ```js if (object[first] && !Array.isArray(object[first])) { // same flaw throw new DuplicateKeyError(); } object[first] = object[first] || []; // overwrites the prior falsy value ``` Both should use the `in` operator. Containers are created via `Object.create(null)`, so `in` is unambiguous (no inherited keys to worry about). The bug is reachable through every parent-walking interpreter path: - `assignValue` — dotted keys in `key = value` - `createTable` — `[stdTable]` headers - `getOrCreateArray` — `[[arrayOfTables]]` headers ### PoC ```toml isAdmin = false [isAdmin] forced = "yes" ``` ```js import { load } from 'js-toml'; const config = load(` isAdmin = false [isAdmin] forced = "yes" `); console.log(JSON.stringify(config)); // {"isAdmin":{"forced":"yes"}} console.log(config.isAdmin ? 'BYPASS' : 'safe'); // BYPASS if (config.isAdmin) { // attacker reaches admin-only code } ``` ### Impact Spec-violating input acceptance leading to structural type confusion. (CWE-697) ### Suggested fix in `src/load/interpreter.ts` ```diff export class Interpreter extends BaseCstVisitor { ignoreImplicitDeclared, ignoreExplicitDeclared ) { - if (object[key]) { + if (key in object) { if ( !isPlainObject(object[key]) || (!ignoreExplicitDeclared && ``` ```diff export class Interpreter extends BaseCstVisitor { return this.getOrCreateArray(keys, object[first], idx + 1); } - if (object[first] && !Array.isArray(object[first])) { + if (first in object && !Array.isArray(object[first])) { throw new DuplicateKeyError(); } object[first] = object[first] || []; ```

Read the publisher's advisory

Affected versions, risk and source history

Related advisories and sources

Related changes

Linked by CVE identifier

No related changes are available here.

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 13 Nov 03:01 UTC · 274 of 275 readable · 272 fully read · documentation 469/469 current