deepstream: PATCH_MULTI action bypasses Valve permission system allowing unauthorized record writes
Collected exploitation and prediction evidence
Risk source coverageCISA KEV is observed exploitation evidence. FIRST EPSS is a dated prediction of exploitation in the next 30 days. Missing scores are unknown. This collector requests predictions only for explicit CVE aliases in the public NuGet archive; Microsoft release views retain their existing prediction scope.
No collected risk observation for these identifiers. This does not establish absence of exploitation or a zero probability.
cve-program · CVE-2026-63116
Publisheddeepstream is a server that allows clients and backend services to sync data, send messages and make rpcs at scale. From 10.1.0 until 10.1.1, src/services/permission/valve/rules-map.ts omits RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI from RULES_MAP. When an authenticated user sends a PATCH_MULTI record operation while permission.type is config, getRulesForMessage returns a null rule specification and ConfigPermission.canPerformAction treats the missing specification as an unconditional allow instead of applying RULE_TYPES.WRITE. Any authenticated user can therefore modify arbitrary protected records, corrupt application state, or cause service disruption; deployments using the default permission type none already allow all operations and are not additionally affected. This issue is fixed in version 10.1.1.
- Source published
- 21 Sep 2026 16:59:22 UTC
- Source modified
- 21 Sep 2026 17:59:34 UTC
- Observed here
- 23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
- Source terms
- CVE Program Terms of Use
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.
CVSS 3.1 · 8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
euvd · EUVD-2026-84001
Publisheddeepstream is a server that allows clients and backend services to sync data, send messages and make rpcs at scale. From 10.1.0 until 10.1.1, src/services/permission/valve/rules-map.ts omits RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI from RULES_MAP. When an authenticated user sends a PATCH_MULTI record operation while permission.type is config, getRulesForMessage returns a null rule specification and ConfigPermission.canPerformAction treats the missing specification as an unconditional allow instead of applying RULE_TYPES.WRITE. Any authenticated user can therefore modify arbitrary protected records, corrupt application state, or cause service disruption; deployments using the default permission type none already allow all operations and are not additionally affected. This issue is fixed in version 10.1.1.
EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.
Original publisher date fields
datePublished: Sep 21, 2026, 4:59:22 PM
dateUpdated: Sep 21, 2026, 5:59:34 PM
- Source published
- Sep 21, 2026, 4:59:22 PM (timezone not stated)
- Source modified
- Sep 21, 2026, 5:59:34 PM (timezone not stated)
- Observed here
- 11 Nov 2026 15:05:34 UTC
- Source terms
- ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.
EUVD CVSS 3.1 · 8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
nvd · CVE-2026-63116
Publisheddeepstream is a server that allows clients and backend services to sync data, send messages and make rpcs at scale. From 10.1.0 until 10.1.1, src/services/permission/valve/rules-map.ts omits RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI from RULES_MAP. When an authenticated user sends a PATCH_MULTI record operation while permission.type is config, getRulesForMessage returns a null rule specification and ConfigPermission.canPerformAction treats the missing specification as an unconditional allow instead of applying RULE_TYPES.WRITE. Any authenticated user can therefore modify arbitrary protected records, corrupt application state, or cause service disruption; deployments using the default permission type none already allow all operations and are not additionally affected. This issue is fixed in version 10.1.1.
NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.
Source analysis status: Deferred
Weakness classifications: CWE-862
Original publisher date fields
published: 2026-09-21T17:17:38.510
lastModified: 2026-09-24T21:25:27.050
- Source published
- 21 Sep 2026 17:17:38 UTC
- Source modified
- 24 Sep 2026 21:25:27 UTC
- Observed here
- 25 Oct 2026 14:19:28 UTC
- Source terms
- NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.
CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Secondary · 8.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
osv · GHSA-89vx-jh4q-vg3w
Published## Summary The `RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI` action is not registered in the Valve permission system's `RULES_MAP` (`src/services/permission/valve/rules-map.ts`). When `ConfigPermission.canPerformAction()` is called for a PATCH_MULTI message, `getRulesForMessage()` returns `null` because the action is missing from the map. This triggers an unconditional allow (`callback(..., null, true)`), completely bypassing all configured Valve permission rules. Any authenticated user — regardless of their configured permissions — can write arbitrary data to any record using the PATCH_MULTI action. ## Root Cause In `src/services/permission/valve/rules-map.ts` lines 38-54, the `RULES_MAP[TOPIC.RECORD].actions` dictionary maps record actions to permission rule types. The actions registered include: SUBSCRIBE, SUBSCRIBEANDHEAD, SUBSCRIBEANDREAD, READ, HEAD, LISTEN, CREATE, UPDATE, PATCH, NOTIFY, DELETE, ERASE. However, `RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI` is **absent** from this map. When `getRulesForMessage()` at line 86-99 encounters an action not in the map, it returns `null`. In `config-permission.ts` at line 88-93, when `ruleSpecification === null`, the callback is invoked with `true` (allow) unconditionally. ## Attack Chain 1. Attacker authenticates with any valid credentials (even a minimal-privilege user) 2. Attacker sends a WebSocket message: `{topic: RECORD, action: PATCH_MULTI, name: "admin/secret-record", parsedData: [{path: "role", data: "admin"}]}` 3. `message-processor.ts:68` invokes permission check 4. `config-permission.ts:89` → `getRulesForMessage()` returns `null` for PATCH_MULTI 5. `config-permission.ts:92` → unconditional ALLOW 6. Record transition applies the operations — arbitrary record is modified ## Impact - **Complete Valve permission bypass for record writes** — all configured permission rules are irrelevant - Any authenticated user can overwrite any record, including admin-only records - Mass record overwrites can destroy application state, corrupt sessions, cause service outage - Only exploitable when `permission.type` is set to `config` (Valve) — the recommended production configuration per deepstream documentation - Default permission type `none` (OpenPermission) allows everything already, so default deployments are unaffected <details><summary>Proof of Concept</summary> ```javascript // Connect as a minimal-privilege user const { DeepstreamClient } = require('@deepstream/client'); const client = new DeepstreamClient('localhost:6020'); await client.login({ username: 'restricted-user', password: 'password' }); // This should be blocked by Valve permissions but isn't: // Send raw PATCH_MULTI message to bypass all permission rules const connection = client.getConnection(); connection.sendMessage({ topic: 0x52, // TOPIC.RECORD action: 0x50, // RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI (check actual enum value) name: 'admin/protected-record', parsedData: [ { path: 'permissions', data: 'admin' }, { path: 'secret', data: 'overwritten' } ] }); ``` </details> ## Suggested Fix Add `PATCH_MULTI` to the RULES_MAP in `src/services/permission/valve/rules-map.ts`: ```typescript [RECORD_ACTION.PATCH_MULTI]: RULE_TYPES.WRITE, ``` This maps PATCH_MULTI operations to the same WRITE permission rule that governs UPDATE and PATCH. ## Affected Versions All versions that include PATCH_MULTI support with the Valve (ConfigPermission) permission system. The PATCH_MULTI action was added in commit `82ffa8119d8f4a8242ac5c3507469a22de746b65` but was never registered in RULES_MAP. ## Credit Vulnerability discovered by Zhixi "Jace" Sun of ASM/VI at TikTok.
- Source published
- 22 Sep 2026 19:56:34 UTC
- Source modified
- 22 Sep 2026 20:15:05 UTC
- Observed here
- 24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
- Source terms
- GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
This view projects the publisher's source fields for reading; the original JSON retains additional fields and CVE enrichment containers. Attribution: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. Source text is retained; field grouping and change labels are provided by ChangeIntel.
CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Publisher rating · HIGH