23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
Langflow is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution due to multiple incomplete code security controls and missing execution guards
cve-program · CVE-2026-76059 · Published
CVE-2026-76059
Langflow OSS · Vulnerability
CVSS 3.1 8.8 HIGHCheck source for fixed versionsKEV status unknown
cve-program · CVE-2026-76059
PublishedIBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 An attacker who could submit custom component source code could bypass the static security scanner by crafting an annotated class-body assignment that resolved to a dangerous callable through alias tracking; the resolved value was never checked against the dangerous callable blocklist due to the logic error. If the crafted component reached the runtime execution path, the attacker could cause arbitrary operating system commands to execute on the server in-process, with the privileges of the running service.
Read the publisher's advisoryAffected versions, risk and source history
Exploitation and risk
Source statusCISA KEV lists vulnerabilities known to be exploited. FIRST EPSS estimates the likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unavailable score does not mean zero risk.
Which CVEs have scores here?
This view includes predictions for CVE identifiers explicitly listed in public NuGet advisories. Microsoft release pages have their own prediction coverage. Check source status for the scope and latest checks.
No exploitation or prediction data is available here for these CVEs. This does not mean they are safe or unlikely to be exploited.
Risk history
Compare earlier KEV listings and daily EPSS scores. Advisory wording and affected versions have a separate history.
When does an EPSS score appear as a change?
A prediction change is reported when EPSS rises from below 10% to 10% or higher. Other daily score changes remain in this history.
Advisory history
1 saved versionsSee how the publisher's advisory changed over time. Each link opens the version saved at that time. The publisher's update date can differ from the date shown here.
How advisory history works
Each link identifies one complete publisher record. History can include advisories that previously shared an identifier; an identifier removed by a publisher no longer establishes a current relationship. A historical link shows only that record and earlier saved versions. Failed checks and unchanged reads do not create new versions.