undici is vulnerable to Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')
Exploitation and risk
Source statusCISA KEV lists vulnerabilities known to be exploited. FIRST EPSS estimates the likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unavailable score does not mean zero risk.
Which CVEs have scores here?
This view includes predictions for CVE identifiers explicitly listed in public NuGet advisories. Microsoft release pages have their own prediction coverage. Check source status for the scope and latest checks.
No exploitation or prediction data is available here for these CVEs. This does not mean they are safe or unlikely to be exploited.
cve-program · CVE-2026-1525
PublishedUndici allows duplicate HTTP Content-Length headers when they are provided in an array with case-variant names (e.g., Content-Length and content-length). This produces malformed HTTP/1.1 requests with multiple conflicting Content-Length values on the wire. Who is impacted: * Applications using undici.request(), undici.Client, or similar low-level APIs with headers passed as flat arrays * Applications that accept user-controlled header names without case-normalization Potential consequences: * Denial of Service: Strict HTTP parsers (proxies, servers) will reject requests with duplicate Content-Length headers (400 Bad Request) * HTTP Request Smuggling: In deployments where an intermediary and backend interpret duplicate headers inconsistently (e.g., one uses the first value, the other uses the last), this can enable request smuggling attacks leading to ACL bypass, cache poisoning, or credential hijacking
- Source published
- 12 Mar 2026 19:56:55 UTC
- Source modified
- 12 Mar 2026 20:46:13 UTC
- Saved here
- 23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
- Source terms
- CVE Program Terms of Use
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
Source: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.
CVSS 3.1 · 6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
euvd · EUVD-2026-11685
PublishedUndici allows duplicate HTTP Content-Length headers when they are provided in an array with case-variant names (e.g., Content-Length and content-length). This produces malformed HTTP/1.1 requests with multiple conflicting Content-Length values on the wire. Who is impacted: * Applications using undici.request(), undici.Client, or similar low-level APIs with headers passed as flat arrays * Applications that accept user-controlled header names without case-normalization Potential consequences: * Denial of Service: Strict HTTP parsers (proxies, servers) will reject requests with duplicate Content-Length headers (400 Bad Request) * HTTP Request Smuggling: In deployments where an intermediary and backend interpret duplicate headers inconsistently (e.g., one uses the first value, the other uses the last), this can enable request smuggling attacks leading to ACL bypass, cache poisoning, or credential hijacking
Additional publisher context
EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.
Original publisher date fields
datePublished: Mar 12, 2026, 7:56:55 PM
dateUpdated: Mar 12, 2026, 8:46:13 PM
15 related source bulletins · separate from aliases
RHSA-2026:7350: Red Hat Security Advisory: nodejs:24 security update
CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1527 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-2581 · CVE-2026-21637 · CVE-2026-21710 · CVE-2026-21711 · CVE-2026-21712 · CVE-2026-21713 · CVE-2026-21714 · CVE-2026-21715 · CVE-2026-21716 · CVE-2026-21717 · CVE-2026-25547 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27135
RHSA-2026:7983: Red Hat Security Advisory: nodejs:22 security update
CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-21710 · CVE-2026-25547 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27135 · CVE-2026-27904
RHSA-2026:17789: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat build of Cryostat 4.2.0: new RHEL 9 container image security update
CVE-2026-1002 · CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-4926 · CVE-2026-33186 · CVE-2026-33813 · CVE-2026-33815 · CVE-2026-33816 · CVE-2026-33870 · CVE-2026-33871 · CVE-2026-34986 · CVE-2026-39852 · CVE-2026-40895
RHSA-2026:7675: Red Hat Security Advisory: nodejs24 security update
CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1527 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-2581 · CVE-2026-21637 · CVE-2026-21710 · CVE-2026-21711 · CVE-2026-21712 · CVE-2026-21713 · CVE-2026-21714 · CVE-2026-21715 · CVE-2026-21716 · CVE-2026-21717 · CVE-2026-25547 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27135
RHSA-2026:21772: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Dev Spaces 3.28.0 Release.
CVE-2025-14813 · CVE-2025-68121 · CVE-2026-0636 · CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-1605 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-2327 · CVE-2026-5588 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27904 · CVE-2026-29074 · CVE-2026-30827 · CVE-2026-31802 · CVE-2026-32141 · CVE-2026-32280 · CVE-2026-32282 · CVE-2026-32305 · CVE-2026-33252 · CVE-2026-33810 · CVE-2026-34742 · CVE-2026-35051 · CVE-2026-39858 · CVE-2026-40477 · CVE-2026-40478 · CVE-2026-40611 · CVE-2026-40895 · CVE-2026-40912 · CVE-2026-40972 · CVE-2026-40973 · CVE-2026-40975 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-42033 · CVE-2026-42035 · CVE-2026-42039 · CVE-2026-42041 · CVE-2026-42043 · CVE-2026-42044
RHSA-2026:7670: Red Hat Security Advisory: nodejs:24 security update
CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1527 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-2581 · CVE-2026-21637 · CVE-2026-21710 · CVE-2026-21711 · CVE-2026-21712 · CVE-2026-21713 · CVE-2026-21714 · CVE-2026-21715 · CVE-2026-21716 · CVE-2026-21717 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27135
RHSA-2026:7080: Red Hat Security Advisory: nodejs22 security update
CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-21710 · CVE-2026-25547 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27135 · CVE-2026-27904
RHSA-2026:56431: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.18.27 security, enhancement & bug fix update
CVE-2025-61726 · CVE-2025-61729 · CVE-2025-64718 · CVE-2025-68470 · CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1527 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-6321 · CVE-2026-6322 · CVE-2026-6733 · CVE-2026-6734 · CVE-2026-9358 · CVE-2026-9679 · CVE-2026-9697 · CVE-2026-11525 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-12151 · CVE-2026-13149 · CVE-2026-13676 · CVE-2026-22036 · CVE-2026-25645 · CVE-2026-33186 · CVE-2026-33349 · CVE-2026-33671 · CVE-2026-33672 · CVE-2026-33750 · CVE-2026-34043 · CVE-2026-34986 · CVE-2026-35469 · CVE-2026-39821 · CVE-2026-40181 · CVE-2026-41305 · CVE-2026-41650 · CVE-2026-41907 · CVE-2026-42342 · CVE-2026-45409 · CVE-2026-45736 · CVE-2026-48779 · CVE-2026-48801 · CVE-2026-53550 · CVE-2026-59869
RHSA-2026:9742: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.8.6 release.
CVE-2025-62718 · CVE-2025-69534 · CVE-2025-69873 · CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-3118 · CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-4926 · CVE-2026-25679 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27601 · CVE-2026-27904 · CVE-2026-29063 · CVE-2026-29074 · CVE-2026-29186 · CVE-2026-32141 · CVE-2026-33036 · CVE-2026-33228 · CVE-2026-33891 · CVE-2026-33894 · CVE-2026-33895 · CVE-2026-33896 · CVE-2026-39983 · CVE-2026-40175
RHSA-2026:7123: Red Hat Security Advisory: nodejs:22 security update
CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-21710 · CVE-2026-25547 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27135 · CVE-2026-27904
RHSA-2026:13826: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Developer Hub 1.9.4 release.
CVE-2025-62718 · CVE-2025-69534 · CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-3118 · CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-4926 · CVE-2026-27601 · CVE-2026-27904 · CVE-2026-29063 · CVE-2026-29074 · CVE-2026-29186 · CVE-2026-32141 · CVE-2026-32280 · CVE-2026-32282 · CVE-2026-33228 · CVE-2026-33891 · CVE-2026-33894 · CVE-2026-33895 · CVE-2026-33896 · CVE-2026-39983 · CVE-2026-40175 · CVE-2026-40895
RHSA-2026:7310: Red Hat Security Advisory: nodejs22 security update
CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-21710 · CVE-2026-25547 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27135 · CVE-2026-27904
WID-SEC-W-2026-0933: IBM App Connect Enterprise (Hono und Undici): Mehrere Schwachstellen
CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-2581 · CVE-2026-29045 · CVE-2026-29085 · CVE-2026-29086 · CVE-2026-1527
RHSA-2026:7302: Red Hat Security Advisory: nodejs:22 security update
CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-21710 · CVE-2026-25547 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27135 · CVE-2026-27904
RHSA-2026:73987: Red Hat Security Advisory: RHOAI 3.3.7 - Red Hat OpenShift AI
CVE-2025-61726 · CVE-2025-66471 · CVE-2025-71408 · CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-5422 · CVE-2026-6321 · CVE-2026-6734 · CVE-2026-9697 · CVE-2026-11816 · CVE-2026-11822 · CVE-2026-11824 · CVE-2026-12151 · CVE-2026-13149 · CVE-2026-15154 · CVE-2026-15378 · CVE-2026-16221 · CVE-2026-16745 · CVE-2026-18951 · CVE-2026-23490 · CVE-2026-25681 · CVE-2026-27136 · CVE-2026-27489 · CVE-2026-27893 · CVE-2026-28356 · CVE-2026-28500 · CVE-2026-28684 · CVE-2026-31230 · CVE-2026-31958 · CVE-2026-32274 · CVE-2026-32286 · CVE-2026-32597 · CVE-2026-33186 · CVE-2026-33231 · CVE-2026-33245 · CVE-2026-33811 · CVE-2026-33814 · CVE-2026-33815 · CVE-2026-33816 · CVE-2026-34445 · CVE-2026-34986 · CVE-2026-34993 · CVE-2026-35397 · CVE-2026-35536 · CVE-2026-39821 · CVE-2026-39828 · CVE-2026-39829 · CVE-2026-39830 · CVE-2026-39831 · CVE-2026-39832 · CVE-2026-39835 · CVE-2026-40110 · CVE-2026-41242 · CVE-2026-42215 · CVE-2026-42294 · CVE-2026-42296 · CVE-2026-42297 · CVE-2026-42338 · CVE-2026-42502 · CVE-2026-42508 · CVE-2026-44240 · CVE-2026-44431 · CVE-2026-44432 · CVE-2026-44727 · CVE-2026-44843 · CVE-2026-45736 · CVE-2026-46595 · CVE-2026-48526 · CVE-2026-48586 · CVE-2026-48710 · CVE-2026-48746 · CVE-2026-48779 · CVE-2026-49855 · CVE-2026-53550 · CVE-2026-54058 · CVE-2026-54283 · CVE-2026-55969 · CVE-2026-56853 · CVE-2026-56858 · CVE-2026-56859 · CVE-2026-56860 · CVE-2026-56862 · CVE-2026-59197 · CVE-2026-59199 · CVE-2026-59200 · CVE-2026-59204 · CVE-2026-59205 · CVE-2026-59869 · CVE-2026-59873 · CVE-2026-59874 · CVE-2026-59884 · CVE-2026-59885 · CVE-2026-59886 · CVE-2026-62384 · CVE-2026-63310 · CVE-2026-64834 · CVE-2026-64835 · CVE-2026-66036 · CVE-2026-66037 · CVE-2026-66038 · CVE-2026-66040 · CVE-2026-67322 · CVE-2026-67323 · CVE-2026-67325 · CVE-2026-68770 · CVE-2026-69152 · CVE-2026-69192 · CVE-2026-69243 · CVE-2026-69244 · CVE-2026-71281 · CVE-2026-73089 · CVE-2026-73415 · CVE-2026-73417 · CVE-2026-73627 · CVE-2026-78682 · CVE-2026-79674 · CVE-2026-79675 · CVE-2026-80205 · CVE-2026-81722 · CVE-2026-81724 · CVE-2026-81727 · CVE-2026-84375 · CVE-2026-84445
- Source published
- Mar 12, 2026, 7:56:55 PM (timezone not stated)
- Source modified
- Mar 12, 2026, 8:46:13 PM (timezone not stated)
- Saved here
- 15 Nov 2026 07:32:48 UTC
- Source terms
- ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
Source: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.
EUVD CVSS 3.1 · 6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
nvd · CVE-2026-1525
PublishedUndici allows duplicate HTTP Content-Length headers when they are provided in an array with case-variant names (e.g., Content-Length and content-length). This produces malformed HTTP/1.1 requests with multiple conflicting Content-Length values on the wire. Who is impacted: * Applications using undici.request(), undici.Client, or similar low-level APIs with headers passed as flat arrays * Applications that accept user-controlled header names without case-normalization Potential consequences: * Denial of Service: Strict HTTP parsers (proxies, servers) will reject requests with duplicate Content-Length headers (400 Bad Request) * HTTP Request Smuggling: In deployments where an intermediary and backend interpret duplicate headers inconsistently (e.g., one uses the first value, the other uses the last), this can enable request smuggling attacks leading to ACL bypass, cache poisoning, or credential hijacking
Additional publisher context
NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.
Source analysis status: Analyzed
Weakness classifications: CWE-444
Original publisher date fields
published: 2026-03-12T20:16:02.670
lastModified: 2026-06-17T10:15:59.927
1 source CPE criteria · context only
- cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:undici:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
The original JSON retains the logical configuration operators, exclusions and version bounds.
- Source published
- 12 Mar 2026 20:16:02 UTC
- Source modified
- 17 Jun 2026 10:15:59 UTC
- Saved here
- 25 Oct 2026 05:17:25 UTC
- Source terms
- NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
Source: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.
CVSS 3.1 · ce714d77-add3-4f53-aff5-83d477b104bb · Secondary · 6.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Primary · 9.8 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
osv · GHSA-2mjp-6q6p-2qxm
Published### Impact Undici allows duplicate HTTP `Content-Length` headers when they are provided in an array with case-variant names (e.g., `Content-Length` and `content-length`). This produces malformed HTTP/1.1 requests with multiple conflicting `Content-Length` values on the wire. **Who is impacted:** - Applications using `undici.request()`, `undici.Client`, or similar low-level APIs with headers passed as flat arrays - Applications that accept user-controlled header names without case-normalization **Potential consequences:** - **Denial of Service**: Strict HTTP parsers (proxies, servers) will reject requests with duplicate `Content-Length` headers (400 Bad Request) - **HTTP Request Smuggling**: In deployments where an intermediary and backend interpret duplicate headers inconsistently (e.g., one uses the first value, the other uses the last), this can enable request smuggling attacks leading to ACL bypass, cache poisoning, or credential hijacking ### Patches Patched in the undici version v7.24.0 and v6.24.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. ### Workarounds If upgrading is not immediately possible: 1. **Validate header names**: Ensure no duplicate `Content-Length` headers (case-insensitive) are present before passing headers to undici 2. **Use object format**: Pass headers as a plain object (`{ 'content-length': '123' }`) rather than an array, which naturally deduplicates by key 3. **Sanitize user input**: If headers originate from user input, normalize header names to lowercase and reject duplicates
- Source published
- 13 Mar 2026 20:07:03 UTC
- Source modified
- 10 Sep 2026 03:50:36 UTC
- Saved here
- 24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
- Source terms
- GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
Source: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.
CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
Publisher rating · MODERATE