Picomatch has a ReDoS vulnerability via extglob quantifiers
Exploitation and risk
Source statusCISA KEV lists vulnerabilities known to be exploited. FIRST EPSS estimates the likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unavailable score does not mean zero risk.
Which CVEs have scores here?
This view includes predictions for CVE identifiers explicitly listed in public NuGet advisories. Microsoft release pages have their own prediction coverage. Check source status for the scope and latest checks.
No exploitation or prediction data is available here for these CVEs. This does not mean they are safe or unlikely to be exploited.
cve-program · CVE-2026-33671
PublishedPicomatch is a glob matcher written JavaScript. Versions prior to 4.0.4, 3.0.2, and 2.3.2 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when processing crafted extglob patterns. Certain patterns using extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, especially when combined with overlapping alternatives or nested extglobs, are compiled into regular expressions that can exhibit catastrophic backtracking on non-matching input. Applications are impacted when they allow untrusted users to supply glob patterns that are passed to `picomatch` for compilation or matching. In those cases, an attacker can cause excessive CPU consumption and block the Node.js event loop, resulting in a denial of service. Applications that only use trusted, developer-controlled glob patterns are much less likely to be exposed in a security-relevant way. This issue is fixed in picomatch 4.0.4, 3.0.2 and 2.3.2. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later, depending on their supported release line. If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted glob patterns to `picomatch`. Possible mitigations include disabling extglob support for untrusted patterns by using `noextglob: true`, rejecting or sanitizing patterns containing nested extglobs or extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, enforcing strict allowlists for accepted pattern syntax, running matching in an isolated worker or separate process with time and resource limits, and applying application-level request throttling and input validation for any endpoint that accepts glob patterns.
- Source published
- 26 Mar 2026 21:20:48 UTC
- Source modified
- 27 Mar 2026 20:00:45 UTC
- Saved here
- 23 Oct 2026 15:48:27 UTC
- Source terms
- CVE Program Terms of Use
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
Source: cve-program · CVE Program Terms of Use. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.
CVSS 3.1 · 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
euvd · EUVD-2026-16436
PublishedPicomatch is a glob matcher written JavaScript. Versions prior to 4.0.4, 3.0.2, and 2.3.2 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when processing crafted extglob patterns. Certain patterns using extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, especially when combined with overlapping alternatives or nested extglobs, are compiled into regular expressions that can exhibit catastrophic backtracking on non-matching input. Applications are impacted when they allow untrusted users to supply glob patterns that are passed to `picomatch` for compilation or matching. In those cases, an attacker can cause excessive CPU consumption and block the Node.js event loop, resulting in a denial of service. Applications that only use trusted, developer-controlled glob patterns are much less likely to be exposed in a security-relevant way. This issue is fixed in picomatch 4.0.4, 3.0.2 and 2.3.2. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later, depending on their supported release line. If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted glob patterns to `picomatch`. Possible mitigations include disabling extglob support for untrusted patterns by using `noextglob: true`, rejecting or sanitizing patterns containing nested extglobs or extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, enforcing strict allowlists for accepted pattern syntax, running matching in an isolated worker or separate process with time and resource limits, and applying application-level request throttling and input validation for any endpoint that accepts glob patterns.
Additional publisher context
EUVD source date text has no stated timezone and is retained without inventing a UTC instant. Related bulletin membership is not an alias, common cause or applicability claim. A missing vector with a zero score is treated as unrated. Complete vendor/product and underlying source evidence remains in the original JSON.
Original publisher date fields
datePublished: Mar 26, 2026, 9:20:48 PM
dateUpdated: Mar 27, 2026, 8:00:45 PM
5 related source bulletins · separate from aliases
RHSA-2026:34342: Red Hat Security Advisory: Cluster Observability Operator 1.5.0
CVE-2020-7753 · CVE-2021-33623 · CVE-2024-4068 · CVE-2024-45338 · CVE-2024-52011 · CVE-2025-22868 · CVE-2025-22870 · CVE-2025-22872 · CVE-2025-47911 · CVE-2025-58190 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1528 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-4800 · CVE-2026-4867 · CVE-2026-6321 · CVE-2026-6322 · CVE-2026-6734 · CVE-2026-9277 · CVE-2026-9697 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-12151 · CVE-2026-25680 · CVE-2026-25681 · CVE-2026-29063 · CVE-2026-32141 · CVE-2026-33228 · CVE-2026-33671 · CVE-2026-33814 · CVE-2026-33891 · CVE-2026-33894 · CVE-2026-33895 · CVE-2026-33896 · CVE-2026-33937 · CVE-2026-33938 · CVE-2026-33939 · CVE-2026-33940 · CVE-2026-33941 · CVE-2026-39821 · CVE-2026-42506 · CVE-2026-48779
RHSA-2026:56431: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.18.27 security, enhancement & bug fix update
CVE-2025-61726 · CVE-2025-61729 · CVE-2025-64718 · CVE-2025-68470 · CVE-2026-1525 · CVE-2026-1526 · CVE-2026-1527 · CVE-2026-2229 · CVE-2026-6321 · CVE-2026-6322 · CVE-2026-6733 · CVE-2026-6734 · CVE-2026-9358 · CVE-2026-9679 · CVE-2026-9697 · CVE-2026-11525 · CVE-2026-12143 · CVE-2026-12151 · CVE-2026-13149 · CVE-2026-13676 · CVE-2026-22036 · CVE-2026-25645 · CVE-2026-33186 · CVE-2026-33349 · CVE-2026-33671 · CVE-2026-33672 · CVE-2026-33750 · CVE-2026-34043 · CVE-2026-34986 · CVE-2026-35469 · CVE-2026-39821 · CVE-2026-40181 · CVE-2026-41305 · CVE-2026-41650 · CVE-2026-41907 · CVE-2026-42342 · CVE-2026-45409 · CVE-2026-45736 · CVE-2026-48779 · CVE-2026-48801 · CVE-2026-53550 · CVE-2026-59869
msrc_CVE-2026-33671: Picomatch has a ReDoS vulnerability via extglob quantifiers
CVE-2026-33671
RHSA-2026:86618: Red Hat Security Advisory: New container image: rhceph-9.2
CVE-2023-46159 · CVE-2024-47866 · CVE-2024-48916 · CVE-2024-55565 · CVE-2025-12816 · CVE-2025-15599 · CVE-2025-26791 · CVE-2025-30156 · CVE-2025-50181 · CVE-2025-50182 · CVE-2025-58754 · CVE-2025-59343 · CVE-2025-62718 · CVE-2025-66030 · CVE-2025-66035 · CVE-2025-66412 · CVE-2025-69873 · CVE-2026-0540 · CVE-2026-21441 · CVE-2026-22610 · CVE-2026-25639 · CVE-2026-26996 · CVE-2026-27903 · CVE-2026-27904 · CVE-2026-27970 · CVE-2026-32141 · CVE-2026-33228 · CVE-2026-33671 · CVE-2026-33672 · CVE-2026-33891 · CVE-2026-33894 · CVE-2026-33895 · CVE-2026-33896 · CVE-2026-39865 · CVE-2026-40175 · CVE-2026-40895 · CVE-2026-41238 · CVE-2026-41239 · CVE-2026-41240 · CVE-2026-41305 · CVE-2026-42033 · CVE-2026-42034 · CVE-2026-42035 · CVE-2026-42036 · CVE-2026-42037 · CVE-2026-42038 · CVE-2026-42039 · CVE-2026-42040 · CVE-2026-42041 · CVE-2026-42042 · CVE-2026-42043 · CVE-2026-42044 · CVE-2026-50152 · CVE-2026-58224
RHSA-2026:56928: Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat OpenShift Data Foundation 4.22.2 security, enhancement & bug fix update
CVE-2026-6321 · CVE-2026-6322 · CVE-2026-9358 · CVE-2026-33671 · CVE-2026-33672 · CVE-2026-33750 · CVE-2026-40181 · CVE-2026-41305 · CVE-2026-41650 · CVE-2026-41907 · CVE-2026-42338 · CVE-2026-44665 · CVE-2026-45149 · CVE-2026-45736
- Source published
- Mar 26, 2026, 9:20:48 PM (timezone not stated)
- Source modified
- Mar 27, 2026, 8:00:45 PM (timezone not stated)
- Saved here
- 13 Nov 2026 09:07:55 UTC
- Source terms
- ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
Source: euvd · ENISA EUVD · source terms and attribution apply. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.
EUVD CVSS 3.1 · 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
nvd · CVE-2026-33671
PublishedPicomatch is a glob matcher written JavaScript. Versions prior to 4.0.4, 3.0.2, and 2.3.2 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when processing crafted extglob patterns. Certain patterns using extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, especially when combined with overlapping alternatives or nested extglobs, are compiled into regular expressions that can exhibit catastrophic backtracking on non-matching input. Applications are impacted when they allow untrusted users to supply glob patterns that are passed to `picomatch` for compilation or matching. In those cases, an attacker can cause excessive CPU consumption and block the Node.js event loop, resulting in a denial of service. Applications that only use trusted, developer-controlled glob patterns are much less likely to be exposed in a security-relevant way. This issue is fixed in picomatch 4.0.4, 3.0.2 and 2.3.2. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later, depending on their supported release line. If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted glob patterns to `picomatch`. Possible mitigations include disabling extglob support for untrusted patterns by using `noextglob: true`, rejecting or sanitizing patterns containing nested extglobs or extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, enforcing strict allowlists for accepted pattern syntax, running matching in an isolated worker or separate process with time and resource limits, and applying application-level request throttling and input validation for any endpoint that accepts glob patterns.
Additional publisher context
NVD analysis and CPE criteria are source context, not proof that a package or your environment is affected. Complete affected data, logical configurations and SSVC are retained in the original JSON.
Source analysis status: Analyzed
Weakness classifications: CWE-1333
Original publisher date fields
published: 2026-03-26T22:16:30.210
lastModified: 2026-06-17T10:37:54.007
1 source CPE criteria · context only
- cpe:2.3:a:jonschlinkert:picomatch:*:*:*:*:*:node.js:*:*
The original JSON retains the logical configuration operators, exclusions and version bounds.
- Source published
- 26 Mar 2026 22:16:30 UTC
- Source modified
- 17 Jun 2026 10:37:54 UTC
- Saved here
- 25 Oct 2026 08:17:24 UTC
- Source terms
- NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
Source: nvd · NIST NVD usage terms; underlying source attribution retained. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.
CVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Secondary · 7.5 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
osv · GHSA-c2c7-rcm5-vvqj
Published### Impact `picomatch` is vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) when processing crafted extglob patterns. Certain patterns using extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()`, especially when combined with overlapping alternatives or nested extglobs, are compiled into regular expressions that can exhibit catastrophic backtracking on non-matching input. Examples of problematic patterns include `+(a|aa)`, `+(*|?)`, `+(+(a))`, `*(+(a))`, and `+(+(+(a)))`. In local reproduction, these patterns caused multi-second event-loop blocking with relatively short inputs. For example, `+(a|aa)` compiled to `^(?:(?=.)(?:a|aa)+)$` and took about 2 seconds to reject a 41-character non-matching input, while nested patterns such as `+(+(a))` and `*(+(a))` took around 29 seconds to reject a 33-character input on a modern M1 MacBook. Applications are impacted when they allow untrusted users to supply glob patterns that are passed to `picomatch` for compilation or matching. In those cases, an attacker can cause excessive CPU consumption and block the Node.js event loop, resulting in a denial of service. Applications that only use trusted, developer-controlled glob patterns are much less likely to be exposed in a security-relevant way. ### Patches This issue is fixed in picomatch 4.0.4, 3.0.2 and 2.3.2. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later, depending on their supported release line. ### Workarounds If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid passing untrusted glob patterns to `picomatch`. Possible mitigations include: - disable extglob support for untrusted patterns by using `noextglob: true` - reject or sanitize patterns containing nested extglobs or extglob quantifiers such as `+()` and `*()` - enforce strict allowlists for accepted pattern syntax - run matching in an isolated worker or separate process with time and resource limits - apply application-level request throttling and input validation for any endpoint that accepts glob patterns ### Resources - Picomatch repository: https://github.com/micromatch/picomatch - `lib/parse.js` and `lib/constants.js` are involved in generating the vulnerable regex forms - Comparable ReDoS precedent: CVE-2024-4067 (`micromatch`) - Comparable generated-regex precedent: CVE-2024-45296 (`path-to-regexp`)
- Source published
- 25 Mar 2026 21:12:07 UTC
- Source modified
- 10 Sep 2026 03:51:00 UTC
- Saved here
- 24 Oct 2026 13:17:17 UTC
- Source terms
- GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0
Original source record · Cite this exact observation · Complete original publisher JSON
Source: osv · GitHub Advisory Database · CC-BY-4.0. The publisher's wording is preserved. ChangeIntel groups the information and labels changes. The JSON record includes additional source fields.
CVSS_V3 · CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Publisher rating · HIGH