Public mode

No access to your tenant or devices. Every item links to its source. What this means

Sources need attention Customize Public modeDiscuss ChangeIntel on Discord

Cilium L7 proxy may bypass Kubernetes NetworkPolicy for same-node traffic

cve-program · CVE-2026-33726

Published

Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Prior to versions 1.17.14, 1.18.8, and 1.19.2, Ingress Network Policies are not enforced for traffic from pods to L7 Services (Envoy, GAMMA) with a local backend on the same node, when Per-Endpoint Routing is enabled and BPF Host Routing is disabled. Per-Endpoint Routing is disabled by default, but is automatically enabled in deployments using cloud IPAM, including Cilium ENI on EKS (`eni.enabled`), AlibabaCloud ENI (`alibabacloud.enabled`), Azure IPAM (`azure.enabled`, but not AKS BYOCNI), and some GKE deployments (`gke.enabled`; managed offerings such as GKE Dataplane V2 may use different defaults). It is typically not enabled in tunneled deployments, and chaining deployments are not affected. In practice, Amazon EKS with Cilium ENI mode is likely the most common affected environment. Versions 1.17.14, 1.18.8, and 1.19.2 contain a patch. There is currently no officially verified or comprehensive workaround for this issue. The only option would be to disable per-endpoint routes, but this will likely cause disruptions to ongoing connections, and potential conflicts if running in cloud providers.

Read the publisher's advisory

euvd · EUVD-2026-16503

Published

Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Prior to versions 1.17.14, 1.18.8, and 1.19.2, Ingress Network Policies are not enforced for traffic from pods to L7 Services (Envoy, GAMMA) with a local backend on the same node, when Per-Endpoint Routing is enabled and BPF Host Routing is disabled. Per-Endpoint Routing is disabled by default, but is automatically enabled in deployments using cloud IPAM, including Cilium ENI on EKS (`eni.enabled`), AlibabaCloud ENI (`alibabacloud.enabled`), Azure IPAM (`azure.enabled`, but not AKS BYOCNI), and some GKE deployments (`gke.enabled`; managed offerings such as GKE Dataplane V2 may use different defaults). It is typically not enabled in tunneled deployments, and chaining deployments are not affected. In practice, Amazon EKS with Cilium ENI mode is likely the most common affected environment. Versions 1.17.14, 1.18.8, and 1.19.2 contain a patch. There is currently no officially verified or comprehensive workaround for this issue. The only option would be to disable per-endpoint routes, but this will likely cause disruptions to ongoing connections, and potential conflicts if running in cloud providers.

Read the publisher's advisory

nvd · CVE-2026-33726

Published

Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Prior to versions 1.17.14, 1.18.8, and 1.19.2, Ingress Network Policies are not enforced for traffic from pods to L7 Services (Envoy, GAMMA) with a local backend on the same node, when Per-Endpoint Routing is enabled and BPF Host Routing is disabled. Per-Endpoint Routing is disabled by default, but is automatically enabled in deployments using cloud IPAM, including Cilium ENI on EKS (`eni.enabled`), AlibabaCloud ENI (`alibabacloud.enabled`), Azure IPAM (`azure.enabled`, but not AKS BYOCNI), and some GKE deployments (`gke.enabled`; managed offerings such as GKE Dataplane V2 may use different defaults). It is typically not enabled in tunneled deployments, and chaining deployments are not affected. In practice, Amazon EKS with Cilium ENI mode is likely the most common affected environment. Versions 1.17.14, 1.18.8, and 1.19.2 contain a patch. There is currently no officially verified or comprehensive workaround for this issue. The only option would be to disable per-endpoint routes, but this will likely cause disruptions to ongoing connections, and potential conflicts if running in cloud providers.

Read the publisher's advisory

osv · GHSA-hxv8-4j4r-cqgv

Published

### Impact Ingress [Network Policies](https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/network/kubernetes/policy/#network-policy) are not enforced for traffic from pods to L7 Services ([Envoy](https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/network/servicemesh/l7-traffic-management), GAMMA) with a local backend on the same node, when [Per-Endpoint Routing](https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/network/concepts/routing/#routing) is enabled and [BPF Host Routing](https://docs.cilium.io/en/stable/operations/performance/tuning/#ebpf-host-routing) is disabled. Per-Endpoint Routing is disabled by default, but is automatically enabled in deployments using cloud IPAM, including Cilium ENI on EKS (`eni.enabled`), AlibabaCloud ENI (`alibabacloud.enabled`), Azure IPAM (`azure.enabled`, but not AKS BYOCNI), and some GKE deployments (`gke.enabled`; managed offerings such as GKE Dataplane V2 may use different defaults). It is typically not enabled in tunneled deployments, and chaining deployments are not affected. In practice, Amazon EKS with Cilium ENI mode is likely the most common affected environment. ### Patches This issue was fixed by #44693. This issue affects: * Cilium v1.19 between v1.19.0 and v1.19.1 inclusive * Cilium v1.18 between v1.18.0 and v1.18.7 inclusive * All versions of Cilium prior to v1.17.13 This issue is fixed in: * Cilium v1.19.2 * Cilium v1.18.8 * Cilium v1.17.14 ### Workarounds Disclaimer: There is currently no officially verified or comprehensive workaround for this issue. The only option would be to disable per-endpoint routes, but this will likely cause disruptions to ongoing connections, and potential conflicts if running in cloud providers. ### Acknowledgements The Cilium community has worked together with members of the Northflank and Isovalent teams to prepare these mitigations. Cilium thanks @sudeephb and @Champ-Goblem for reporting the issue and to @smagnani96 and @julianwiedmann for helping with the resolution. ### For more information Anyone who believes a vulnerability affecting Cilium has been found is strongly encouraged to report it to the security mailing list at [email protected]. This is a private mailing list for the Cilium security team, and any such report will be treated as top priority. Please also address any comments or questions on this advisory to the same mailing list.

Read the publisher's advisory

osv · GO-2026-4856

Published

Cilium L7 proxy may bypass Kubernetes NetworkPolicy for same-node traffic in github.com/cilium/cilium

Read the publisher's advisory

Affected versions, risk and source history

Related advisories and sources

Publishers link these advisories through the identifiers shown below. A shared identifier or date alone does not tell you whether your software is affected or whether the advisories describe the same cause.

CVE-2026-33726 · CVE overview and exploitation status

EUVD-2026-16503

GHSA-hxv8-4j4r-cqgv

BIT-cilium-2026-33726

BIT-cilium-operator-2026-33726

BIT-hubble-relay-2026-33726

GO-2026-4856

cve-program · CVE-2026-33726

euvd · EUVD-2026-16503

nvd · CVE-2026-33726

osv · GHSA-hxv8-4j4r-cqgv

osv · GO-2026-4856

Related changes

Linked by CVE identifier

No related changes are available here.

ChangeIntel

An IT change radar: releases, security, known issues, retirements, documentation changes, and service status from public sources. Every item links to supporting evidence; dates and statuses can change after they are read.

Sources read 15 Nov 20:10 UTC · 254 of 275 readable · 250 fully read · documentation 468/469 current