CVE-2026-86078

n8n: Prototype Pollution via Workflow Structure Summary Can Lead to Denial of Service

CVSS 4.0 6.0 MEDIUMEUVD CVSS 4.0 6.0 CVSS 4.0 · [email protected] · Secondary 6.0 MEDIUMCVSS 3.1 · [email protected] · Primary 6.5 MEDIUMCVSS_V4 Publisher rating MODERATEFixed by n8n 2.38.2 Fixed by n8n 2.37.7KEV status unknown

Original advisory

cve-program · CVE-2026-86078

Published

n8n is an open source workflow automation platform. Prior to 2.37.7 and 2.38.2, the Instance AI workflow summary used node names and connection keys from stored workflows as ordinary object keys. A workflow submitted through the REST API could contain __proto__ or constructor, causing nested writes to reach Object.prototype in the main n8n process and disrupt later requests. The affected function is summarizeWorkflowStructure in packages/@n8n/instance-ai/src/tools/workflows/summarize-workflow.ts. This issue is fixed in versions 2.37.7 and 2.38.2.

Read the publisher's advisory

euvd · EUVD-2026-74278

Published

Read the publisher's advisory

nvd · CVE-2026-86078

Published

Read the publisher's advisory

osv · GHSA-679f-58pq-4v2c

Published

## Impact The Instance AI workflow summary built its result with get-or-create-then-nested-write idioms keyed by node names and connection keys taken from the stored workflow. Those are arbitrary strings: the restricted-name guard n8n shows in the editor is client-side and is bypassed by posting the workflow to the REST API directly. So a reserved key such as `__proto__` resolved up the prototype chain instead of creating an own key, and the write landed on `Object.prototype` in the main n8n process, affecting every later request. The patch builds the summary with null-prototype accumulators and validates the keys it accepts, so reserved names cannot reach the prototype chain. ## Patches The issue has been fixed in n8n versions 2.37.7 and 2.38.2. Users should upgrade to one of these versions or later to remediate the vulnerability. ## Workarounds If upgrading is not immediately possible, administrators should consider the following temporary mitigations: - Restrict n8n instance access to fully trusted users only. - Remove or leave unconfigured the `N8N_INSTANCE_AI_MODEL*` environment variables to prevent the Instance AI module from reaching the vulnerable code path. - Restart the n8n process to clear any in-memory prototype pollution if an attack is suspected. These workarounds do not fully remediate the risk and should only be used as short-term mitigation measures.

Read the publisher's advisory

Affected versions, risk and source history

Exploitation and risk

Source status

CISA KEV lists vulnerabilities known to be exploited. FIRST EPSS estimates the likelihood of exploitation in the next 30 days. An unavailable score does not mean zero risk.

Which CVEs have scores here?

This view includes predictions for CVE identifiers explicitly listed in public NuGet advisories. Microsoft release pages have their own prediction coverage. Check source status for the scope and latest checks.

No exploitation or prediction data is available here for these CVEs. This does not mean they are safe or unlikely to be exploited.

Risk history

Compare earlier KEV listings and daily EPSS scores. Advisory wording and affected versions have a separate history.

When does an EPSS score appear as a change?

A prediction change is reported when EPSS rises from below 10% to 10% or higher. Other daily score changes remain in this history.

Advisory history

12 saved versions

See how the publisher's advisory changed over time. Each link opens the version saved at that time. The publisher's update date can differ from the date shown here.

How advisory history works

Each link identifies one complete publisher record. History can include advisories that previously shared an identifier; an identifier removed by a publisher no longer establishes a current relationship. A historical link shows only that record and earlier saved versions. Failed checks and unchanged reads do not create new versions.

13 Nov 2026 18:04:01 UTC